Εικόνες σελίδας
PDF
Ηλεκτρ. έκδοση

MEMORANDUM DECISIONS

DISPOSED OF AT OCTOBER TERM, 1918

(248 U. S. 534)

(248 U. S. 532)

No. 352. DESCHUTES RAILROAD COM-| of Atlanta, Ga., and Leon Weil, of Montgomery, PANY, appellant, v. EASTERN OREGON Ala., for appellee. Petition for a writ of certiLAND COMPANY. Nov. 4, 1918. Appeal orari herein denied. from the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. For opinion below, see 246 Fed. 400, 158 C. C. A. 464. See, also, 245 U. S. 672, 38 Sup. Ct. 192, 62 L. Ed. 540. Messrs. Arthur C. Spencer and James G. Wilson, both of Portland, Or., for appellant. Messrs. Alex. Britton and Evans Browne, both of Washington, D. C., for appellee.

PER CURIAM. Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) a. Section 128 of the Judicial Code (Act March 3, 1911, c. 231, 36 Stat. 1133 [Comp. St. 1916, § 1120]); Louisville & Nashville R. R. Co. v. Western Union Telegraph Co., 237 U. S. 300, 35 Sup. Ct. 598, 59 L. Ed. 965; b. Equitable Assurance Soc. v. Brown, 187 U. S. 308, 314, 23 Sup. Ct. 123, 47 L. Ed. 190; Deming v. Carlisle Packing Co., 226 U. S. 102, 33 Sup. Ct. 80, 57 L. Ed. 140; Consolidated Turnpike v. Norfolk, etc., Ry. Co., 228 U. S. 596, 600, 33 Sup. Ct. 605, 57 L. Ed. 982; (2) a. Bankers' Mutual Casualty Co. v. Minneapolis, St. P. & S. Ste. M. R. Co., 192 U. S. 371, | 383, 385, 24 Sup. Ct. 325, 48 L. Ed. 484; Hull v. Burr, 234 U. S. 712, 34 Sup. Ct. 892, 58 L. Ed. 1557; b. Taylor v. Anderson, 234 U. S. 74, 34 Sup. Ct. 724, 58 L. Ed. 1218; Joy v. City of St. Louis, 201 U. S. 332, 26 Sup. Ct. 478, 50 L. Ed. 776. See writ of certiorari denied, Deschutes R. R. Co. v. Oregon Land Co., 245 U. S. 672, 38 Sup. Ct. 192, 62 L. Ed. 540.

(248 U. S. 533)

No. 380. LOUISVILLE & NASHVILLE RAILROAD COMPANY, plaintiff in error, v. The STATE OF ALABAMA. Nov. 4, 1918. In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Alabama. For opinion below, see 78 South. 93. Messrs. H. L. Stone, of Corsicana, Tex., and E. Perry Thomas, of Montgomery, Ala., for plaintiff in error.

PER CURIAM. Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of St. Louis S. W. Ry. Co. v. Arkansas, 235 U. S. 350, 35 Sup. Ct. 99, 59 L. Ed. 265; Kansas City, Memphis & Birmingham Ry. Co. v. Stiles, 242 U. S. 111, 37 Sup. Ct. 58, 61 L. Ed. 176.

(248 U. S. 533, 575)

No. 457. The ZANESVILLE & WESTERN RAILWAY COMPANY, plaintiff in error, v. Charles F. WILLIAMS, administrator, etc. Nov. 4, 1918. In error to the Court of Appeals of Muskingum County, State of Ohio. Mr. John H. Doyle, of Toledo, Ohio, for plaintiff in error. PER CURIAM. Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of section 237, Judicial Code (Act March 3, 1911, c. 231, 36 Stat. 1156), as amended by the act of Congress of September 6, 1916, chap. 448, § 2, 39 Stat. 726 (Comp. St. 1916, § 1214); and petition for certiorari denied.

(248 U. S. 575)

No. 523. WESTERN UNION TELEGRAPH COMPANY, appellant, v. The ATLANTA & WEST POINT RAILROAD COMPANY. Nov. 4, 1918. For opinion below, see 250 Fed. 208. Mr. William L. Clay, of Atlanta, Ga., for appellant. Messrs. Sanders McDaniel,

No. 524. WESTERN UNION TELEGRAPH COMPANY, appellant, v. LOUISVILLE & NASHVILLE RAILROAD COMPANY. Nov. 4, 1918. Appeal from the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. For opinion below, see 250 Fed. 199, which affirmed 243 Fed. 687. Mr. William L. Clay, of Atlanta, Ga., for appellant. Messrs. Henry L. Stone, of Louisville, Ky., and Henry C. Peeples, of Atlanta, Ga., for appellee.

PER CURIAM. Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) a. Section 128 of the Judicial Code (Act March 3, 1911, c. 231, 36 Stat. 1133 [Comp. St. 1916, § 1120]); Louisville & Nashville R. R. Co. v. Western Union Telegraph Co., 237 U. S. 300, 35 Sup. Ct. 598, 59 L. Ed. 965; b. Equitable Assurance Soc. v. Brown, 187 U. S. 308, 314, 23 Sup. Ct. 123, 47 L. Ed. 190; Deming v. Carlisle Packing Co., 226 U. S. 102, 33 Sup. Ct. 80, 57 L. Ed. 140; Consolidated Turnpike v. Norfolk, etc., Ry. Co., 228 U. S. 596, 600, 33 Sup. Ct. 605, 57 L. Ed. 982; (2) Pensacola Telegraph Co. v. Western Union Telegraph Co., 96 Ü. S. 1, 24 L. Ed. 708; Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Ann Arbor R. R. Co., 178 U. S. 239, 20 Sup. Ct. 867, 44 L. Ed. 1052; Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Pennsylvania R. R. Co., 195 U. S. 540, 25 Sup. Ct. 133, 49 L. Ed. 312, 1 Ann. Cas. 517; Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Richmond, 224 U. S. 160, 32 Sup. Ct. 449, 56 L. Ed. 710; Louisville & Nashville R. R. Co. v. Western Union Telegraph Co., 237 U. S. 300, 35 Sup. Ct. 598, 59 L. Ed. 965. See Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Louisville & Nashville R. R. Co., 244 U. S. 649, 37 Sup. Ct. 743, 61 L. Ed. 1371.

(248 U. S. 576)

No. 524. WESTERN UNION TELEGRAPH COMPANY, appellant, v. The LOUISVILLE & NASHVILLE RAILROAD COMPANY. Nov. 4, 1918. For opinion below, see 250 Fed. 199. Mr. William L. Clay, of Atlanta. Ga., for appellant. Messrs. Henry L. Stone, of Corsicana, Tex., and Henry C. Peeples, of Atlanta, Ga., for appellee. Petition for a writ of certiorari herein denied.

(248 U. S. 576)

No. 525. WESTERN UNION TELEGRAPH COMPANY, appellant, v. The NASHVILLE, CHATTANOOGA & ST. LOUIS RAILWAY. Nov. 4, 1918. For opinion below, see 250 Fed. 207, which affirms 243 Fed. 694. Mr. William L. Clay, of Atlanta, Ga., for appellant. Messrs. Henry C. Peeples, of Atlanta, Ga., and Claude Waller, of Nashville, Tenn., for appellee. Petition for a writ of certiorari herein denied.

(248 U. S. 576)

No. 558. WESTERN UNION TELEGRAPH COMPANY, petitioner, v. LOUISVILLE & NASHVILLE RAILROAD COMPANY. Nov. 4, 1918. For opinion below, see 249 Fed. 385. Mr. Adolphus Edward Richards, of

Louisville, Ky., for petitioner. Petition for a 'the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit the Sixth Circuit denied. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

(248 U. 8. 556)

No. 584. The ESTATE OF P. D. BECKWITH, Inc., petitioner, v. The COMMISSIONER OF PATENTS. Nov. 4, 1918. Mr. Harry C. Howard, of Kalamazoo, Mich., for petitioner. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia granted.

(248 U. S. 577)

No. 624. The CUDAHY PACKING COMPANY, petitioner, v. William K. BIXBY et al., receivers, etc. Nov. 4, 1918. For opinion below, see 205 S. W. 865. Mr. George T. Buckingham, of Chicago, Ill., for petitioner. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the Kansas City Court of Appeals of the State of Missouri denied.

(248 U. S. 557)

No. 625. SEABOARD AIR LINE RAILWAY COMPANY, petitioner, v. J. J. GRAY. Nov. 4, 1918. Mr. Jo-Berry S. Lyles, of Columbia, S. C., for petitioner. Petition for a writ of certiorari' to the Supreme Court of the State of South Carolina granted.

(248 U. S. 577)

No. 648. LOUISIANA NAVIGATION COMPANY, petitioner, v. OYSTER COMMISSION OF LOUISIANA et al. Nov. 4, 1918. For opin ion below, see 79 South. 213. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of the State of Louisiana denied.

(248 U. S. 556)

No. 649. Alvah CROCKER et al., trustees, petitioners, v. John F. MALLEY, Collector of Internal Revenue. Nov. 4, 1918. For opinion below, see 250 Fed. 817. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the First Circuit granted.

(248 U. S. 577)

No. 678. S. T. HILLS, as trustee, etc., petitioner, v. C. D. STIMSON COMPANY. Nov. 4, 1918. For opinion below, see 172 Pac. 1181. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of the State of Washington denied.

(248 U. S. 556)

No. 682. Bessie TYRRELL, etc., petitioner, v. Charles B. SHAFFER et al. Nov. 4, 1918. For opinion below, see 174 Pac. 1074. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of the State of Oklahoma granted.

(248 U. S. 577)

No. 683. The STATE OF LOUISIANA, petitioner, v. NEW ORLEANS LAND COMPANY. Nov. 4, 1918. For opinion below, see 79 South. 515. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of the State of Louisiana denied.

(248 U. S. 578)

No. 686. Maurice SUGAR, petitioner, v. The UNITED STATES. Nov. 4, 1918. For opinion below, see 252 Fed. 74. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

(248 U. S. 578)

No. 687. Maurice SUGAR, petitioner, v. The UNITED STATES. Nov. 4, 1918. For opinion below, see 252 Fed. 79, which affirms 243 Fed. 423. Petition for a writ of certiorari to

[blocks in formation]

No. 12. Stephen W. ALLEN et al., plaintiffs in error, v. J. F. TRIMMER, as treasurer, etc. Nov. 7, 1918. In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Oklahoma. For opinion below, see 45 Okl. 83, 144 Pac. 795. Mr. Albert Rennie, of Pauls Valley, Okl., for plaintiff in error. Mr. S. P. Freeling, of Oklahoma City, Okl., for defendant in error. Dismissed with costs, pursuant to the Sixteenth Rule (32 Sup. Ct. ix) on motion of Mr. S. P. Freeling for the defendant in error.

(248 U. S. 534)

No. 1. The STATE OF LOUISIANA ex rel. Wilhelmine G. SCHMIDT, widow, etc., ernor, et al. Nov. 11, 1918. plaintiff in error, v. Jared Y. SANDERS, GovSupreme Court of the State of Louisiana. Mr. In error to the Willis J. Roussel, for plaintiff in error. opinion below, see State ex rel. Roussel v. For Sanders, 128 La. 635, 54 South. 1036.

PER CURIAM. Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) Bilby et al. 62 L. Ed. 701; Cuyahoga River Power Co. v. V. Stewart, 246 U. S. 255, 257, 38 Sup. Ct. 264, Northern Realty Co., 244 U. S. 300, 37 Sup. Ct. 643, 61 L. Ed. 1153; Stewart v. City of Kansas City, 239 U. S. 14, 36 Sup. Ct. 15, 60 L. Ed. 120; (2) Stearns v. Minnesota ex rel. Marr, 179 U. S. 223, 21 Sup. Ct. 73, 45 L. Ed. 162; Board of Liquidation v. Louisiana ex 45 L. Ed. 347; (3) Empire State-Idaho Mining rel. Wilder, 179 U. S. 622, 21 Sup. Ct. 263, Co. v. Hanley, 205 U. S. 225, 27 Sup. Ct. 476, 51 L. Ed. 779; Goodrich v. Ferris, 214 U. S. 71, 29 Sup. Ct. 580, 53 L. Ed. 914; Brolan v. United States, 236 U. S. 216, 35 Sup. Ct. 285, 59 L. Ed. 544.

(248 U. S. 591)

plaintiff in_error, v. The PEOPLE OF THE
No. 30. METROPOLITAN STATE BANK,
STATE OF ILLINOIS. Nov. 11, 1918. In
error to the Supreme Court of the State of Ill-
inois. For opinion below, see 272 Ill. 311, 111
N. E. 992. Messrs. Philip J. McKenna and
Howard F. Bishop, both of Chicago, Ill., for
dage, Atty. Gen., and James H. Wilkerson, both
plaintiff in error. Messrs. Edward J. Brun-
of Chicago, Ill., for defendant in error.
missed with costs, pursuant to the 19th Rule
Dis-
(32 Sup. Ct. ix).

(248 U. S. 591)

No. 32. Francis A. CHURCHILL and Stewart Tait, copartners, doing business under the firm name and style of the Mercantile Advertising Agency, appellants and plaintiffs in error, v. James F. RAFFERTY, as Collector of Internal Revenue of the Philippine Islands. Nov. 11, 1918. Appeal from and in error to the Supreme Court of the Philippine Islands. Mr. E. Allen Frost, of Chicago, Ill., for plaintiffs in error. Mr. Samuel T. Ansell, of Washington, D. C., for defendant in error. Dismissed with costs, pursuant to the 19th Rule (32 Sup. Ct. ix).

(248 U. S. 535)

No. 290. OREGON-WASHINGTON RAILROAD & NAVIGATION COMPANY, plaintiff in error, v. STODDARD LUMBER COMPANY. Nov. 11, 1918. In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Oregon. For opinion be low, see 84 Or. 399, 165 Pac. 363. Messrs. Waldemar Van Cott, Edward M. Allison, Jr., and William D. Riter, all of Salt Lake City, Utah, for plaintiff in error. Mr. W. Lair Thompson, of Portland, Or., for defendant in

error.

PER CURIAM. Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of section 237 of the Judicial Code (Act March 3, 1911, c. 231, 36 Stat. 1156), as amended by the act of September 6, 1916, c. 448, § 2, 39 Stats. at L 726 (Comp. St. 1916, § 1214).

(248 U. S. 535)

No. 369. John C. MADDEN, plaintiff in error, v. W. M. FORBES. Nov. 11, 1918. In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Kansas. For opinion below, see 102 Kan. 46, 169 Pac. 211. Mr. Joseph M. Stark, of Topeka, Kan., for plaintiff in error.

PER CURIAM. Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) Bilby et al. v. Stewart, 246 U. S. 255, 257, 38 Sup. Čt. 264, 62 L. Ed. 701; Cuyahoga River Power Co. v. Northern Realty Co., 244 U. S. 300, 37 Sup. Ct. 643, 61 L. Ed. 1153; Stewart v. City of Kansas City, 239 U. S. 14, 36 Sup. Ct. 15, 60 L. Ed. 120; (2) Empire State-Idaho Mining Co. v. Hanley, 205 U. S. 225, 27 Sup. Ct. 476, 51 L. Ed. 779; Goodrich v. Ferris, 214 U. S. 71, 29 Sup. Ct. 580, 53 L. Ed. 914; Brolan v. The United States, 236 U. S. 216, 35 Sup. Ct. 285, 59 L. Ed. 544.

(248 U. S. 535)

No. 523. WESTERN UNION TELEGRAPH COMPANY, appellant, v. The ATLANTA & WEST POINT RAILROAD COMPANY. Nov. 11, 1918. Appeal from the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. For opinion below, see 250 Fed. 208. Mr. William L. Clay, of Atlanta, Ga., for appellant. Messrs. Sanders McDaniel, of Atlanta, Ga., and Leon Weil, of Montgomery, Ala., for appellee.

PER CURIAM. Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Louisville & Nashville R. R. Co., 248 U. S. 576, 39 Sup. Ct. 18, 63 L. Ed. dismissed per curiam November 4, 1918.

(248 U. S. 557)

No. 599. MINERALS SEPARATION, Limited, et al., petitioners, v. BUTTE & SUPERIOR MINING COMPANY. Nov. 11, 1918. For opinion below, see 250 Fed. 241. Messrs. Henry D. Williams, William Houston Kenyon, and Lindley M. Garrison, all of New York City, Frederic D. McKenney, of Washington, D. C., Garret W. McEnerney, of San Francisco, Cal., and Odell W. McConnell, of Helena, Mont., for petitioners. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit granted.

(248 U. 8. 557)

No. 691. The BARBER ASPHALT PAVING COMPANY, petitioner, v. William H. WOERHEIDE et al. Nov. 11, 1918. For opinion below, see 251 Fed. 196. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit granted.

(248 U. S. 578)

No. 692. ALTHEIMER & RAWLINGS INVESTMENT COMPANY, petitioner, v. E. B. ALLEN, U. S. Collector of Internal Revenue. Nov. 11, 1918. For opinion below, see 248 Fed. 688. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

(248 U. S. 578)

No. 709. James F. BISHOP, Administrator, etc., petitioner, v. GREAT LAKES TOWING COMPANY. Nov. 11, 1918. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

For opinion below, see Great Lakes Towing Co. v. St. Joseph-Chicago S. S. Co., 253 Fed. 635, 165 C. C. A. 261.

(248 U. S. 579)

No. 710. PITTSBURGH COAL COMPANY OF ILLINOIS, petitioner, v. GREAT LAKES TOWING COMPANY. Nov. 11, 1918: Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

(248 U. S. 579)

No. 726. NORTHWESTERN ELECTRIC EQUIPMENT COMPANY, petitioner, V. BENJAMIN ELECTRIC MANUFACTURING COMPANY. Nov. 11, 1918. For opinion below, see 251 Fed, 288. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

(248 U. S. 591)

No. 48. ATLANTIC COAST LINE RAILROAD COMPANY, plaintiff in error, v. A. M. KEELS. Nov. 15, 1918. In error to the Supreme Court of the State of South Carolina. For opinion below, see 104 S. C. 497, 89 S. E. 388. Mr. P. A. Willcox, of Florence, S. C., for plaintiff in error. Dismissed with costs, and mandate granted, on motion of Mr. Frederic D. McKenney, of counsel for the plaintiff in error.

[blocks in formation]

No. 41. G. L. HENDERSON et al., plaintiffs in error, v. Helen R. RESSOR, or Helen R. Henderson, et al. Nov. 18, 1918. In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Missouri. For opinion below, see 265 Mo. 718, 178 S. W. 175. Mr. Daniel V. Howell, of Kansas City, Mo., for plaintiffs in error. Mr. H. M. Langworthy, of Kansas City, Mo., for defendants in error.

PER CURIAM. Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) Farrell v. O'Brien, 199 U. S. 89, 25 Sup. Ct. 727, 50 L Ed. 101; Empire State-Idaho Mining Co. v. Hanley. 205 U. S. 225, 27 Sup. Ct. 476, 51 L Ed. 779; Goodrich v. Ferris, 214 U. S. 71, 29 Sup. Ct. 580, 53 L. Ed. 914; Brolan v. United States, 236 U. S. 216, 35 Sup. Ct. 285, 59 L. Ed. 544; (2) Louisville & Nashville R. R. Co. v. Melton, 218 U. S. 36, 51, 52, 30 Sup. Ct. 676, 54 L. Ed. 921, 47 L. R. A. (N. S.) 84; Eastern Building & Loan Association v. Ebaugh, 185 U. S. 114, 22 Sup. Ct. 566, 46 L. Ed. 830; Pennsylvania Fire Insurance Co. v. Gold Issue Mining Co., 243 U. S. 93, 96, 37 Sup. Ct. 344, 61 L. Ed. 610; Texas & New Orleans R. R.

Co. v. Miller, 221 U. S. 408, 416, 31 Sup. Ct.

534, 55 L. Ed. 789.

(248 U. S. 536)

No. 42. CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE & ST. PAUL RAILWAY COMPANY, plaintiff in error, v. Mary O'CONNOR, as administratrix, etc. Nov. 18, 1918. In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Wisconsin. For opinion below, see 163 Wis. 653, 158 N. W. 343. Messrs. C. H. Van Alstine and H. J. Killilea, both of Milwaukee, Wis., for plaintiff in error. Messrs. Victor I. Minahan and Eben R. Minahan, both of Green Bay, Wis., for defendant in error. PER CURIAM. Affirmed with costs upon the authority of Seaboard Air Line v. Padgett, 236 U. S. 668. 673, 35 Sup. Ct. 481. 59 L. Ed. 777: Great Northern Ry. Co. v. Knapp, 240 U. S. 464, 466, 36 Sup. Ct. 399, 60 L. Ed. 745; Southern Ry. Co. v. Puckett, 244 U. S. 571, 574, 37 Sup. Ct. 703, 61 L. Ed. 1321, Ann. Cas. 1918B, 69.

(248 U. S. 537)

No. 46. Edmund PENFOLD et al., executors. etc.. et al., plaintiffs in error, v. Eugene M. TRAVIS, as Comptroller of the State of New York. Nov. 18, 1918. In error to the Surrogate's Court, New York County, State of New York. For opinion below, see 216 N. Y. 171, 110 N. E. 499. Mr. William Mitchell, of New York City, for plaintiffs in error. Mr. John B. Gleason, of New York City, for defendant in error.

PER CURIAM. Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) Consolidated Turnpike Co. v. Norfolk, etc., Ry. Co., 228 U. S. 596, 33 Sup. Ct. 605, 57 L. Ed. 982; Bilby et al. v. Stewart, 246 U. S. 255, 257, 38 Sup. Ct. 264, 62 L. Ed. 701; Municipal Securities Corporation v. Kansas City, 246 U. S. 63, 69, 38 Sup. Ct. 224, 62 L. Ed. 579; Cuyahoga River Power Co. v. Northern Realty Co., 244 U. S. 300, 37 Sup. Ct. 643, 61 L. Ed. 1153; (2) Farrell v. O'Brien, 199 U. S. 89, 25 Sup. Ct. 727, 50 L. Ed. 101; Empire State Idaho Mining Co. v. Hanley, 205 U. S. 225, 27 Sup. Ct. 476, 51 L. Ed. 779; Goodrich v. Ferris, 214 U. S. 71, 29 Sup. Ct. 580, 53 L. Ed. 914; Brolan v. United States, 236 U. S. 216, 35 Sup. Ct. 285, 59 L. Ed. 544.

(248 U. S. 591)

No. 55. Paul APPENZELLAR, plaintiff in error, v. Henry C. CONRAD, associate judge, etc., et al. Nov. 18, 1918. For opinion below, see 6 Boyce (Del.) 225, 99 Atl. 31. Messrs. Josiah Marvel and David T. Marvel, both of Wilmington, Del., for plaintiff in error. Mr. Robert H. Richards, of Wilmington, Del., for defendant in error. In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Delaware. Dismissed with costs, per stipulation.

[blocks in formation]

No. 246. The CINCINNATI TRACTION COMPANY et al., plaintiffs in error, v. the CITY OF CINCINNATI. Nov. 18, 1918. In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Ohio. For opinion below, see 96 Ohio St. 602, 118 N. E. 1082. Messrs. Ellis G. Kinkead and Joseph Wilby, both of Cincinnati, Ohio, for Mr. Charles A. Groom, of Cincinnati, Ohio, for defendant in error. plaintiffs in error. PER CURIAM. Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Consolidated Turnpike Co. v. Norfolk, etc., Railway Co., 228 Ú. S. 596, 33 Sup. Ct. 605, 57 L. Ed. 982; Bilby et al. v. Stewart, 246 U. S. 255, 257, 38 Sup. Ct. 264, 62 L. Ed. 701; Municipal Securities Corporation v. Kansas City, 246 U. S. 63, 69, 38 Sup. Ct. 224, 62 L. Ed. 579; Cuyahoga River Power Co. v. Northern_Realty Co., 244 U. S. 300, 37 Sup. Ct. 643, 61 L. Ed. 1153.

No. 571. SEABOARD AIR LINE RAIL WAY COMPANY, petitioner, v. Mrs. Lessie HORTON, administratrix, etc. Nov. 18, 1918. See, also, 248 U. S. 553, 39 Sup. Ct. 8, 63 L. Ed. Messrs. Thaddeus A. Adams, of Charlotte, N. C., and E. Marvin Underwood, of Norfolk, Va., for petitioner. Motion for supersedeas submitted by Mr. E. Marvin Underwood for the petitioner and motion granted, a bond for $25,000 to be given within ten days, to be approved by clerk of this court.

[blocks in formation]

No. 57. Joseph FENSTERWALD, plaintiff in error, v. Selma R. BURK. Nov. 19, 1918. In error to the Court of Appeals of the State of Maryland. For opinion below, see 129 Md. 131, 98 Atl. 358. Mr. Samuel Want, of Baltimore, Md., for plaintiff in error. Messrs. J. Kent Rawley, of Richmond, Va., and Edward M. Hammond, of Baltimore, Md., for defendant in error. Dismissed with costs, pursuant to the 16th rule (32 Sup. Ct. ix) on motion of Mr. J. Kent Rawley for the defendant in error.

(248 U. S. 593)

No. 16. The UNITED STATES, appellant, | v. Northern Realty Co., 244 U. S. 300, 37 Sup. ▼. E. W. BLISS COMPANY. Nov. 20, 1918. Ct. 643, 61 L. Ed. 1153; Bilby et al. v. StewAppeal from the United States Circuit Court art, 246 U. S. 255, 257, 38, Sup. Ct. 264, 62 of Appeals for the Second Circuit. For opin- L. Ed. 701; (2) Empire State-Idaho Mining ions below, see 224 Fed. 325, 139 C. C. A. 633, Co. v. Hanley, 205 U. S. 225, 27 Sup. Ct. 476, and 229 Fed. 376, 143 C. C. A. 496. The At- 51 L. Ed. 779; Goodrich v. Ferris, 214 U. S. torney General, for the United States. Dis- 71, 29 Sup. Ct. 580, 53 L. Ed. 914; Brolan v. missed on motion of Mr. Assistant to the At- United States, 236 U. S. 216, 35 Sup. Ct. 285, torney General Todd for the appellant. 59 L. Ed. 544.

(248 U. S. 592)

No. 71. NEW ORLEANS, MOBILE & CHICAGO RAILROAD COMPANY, plaintiff in error, v. T. E. McCARDLE et al. Nov. 20,

(248 U. S. 538)

of Nathan W. Going, deceased, plaintiff in erNo. 77. Willie M. GOING, administratrix ror, v. NORFOLK & WESTERN RAILWAY Nov. 25, 1918. COMPANY. In error to the Supreme Court of the Supreme Court of Appeals of the State of Vir1918. In error to the State of Mississippi. For opinion below, see 71 South. 880. Mr. James N. Flowers, of Jack-ginia. For opinion below, see 119 Va. 543, 89 son, Miss., for plaintiff in error. S. E. 914. Mr. W. L. Welborn, of Roanoke, Va., Dismissed with costs, on authority of counsel for the plain-of Roanoke, Va., Theodore W. Reath, of Philafor plaintiff in error. Messrs. Waller R. Staples,

tiff in error.

[blocks in formation]

delphia, Pa., and Roy B. Smith, of Norfolk, Va., for defendant in error.

PER CURIAM. Affirmed upon the authority of Seaboard Air Line v. Padgett, 236 U. S. 668, 673, 35 Sup. Ct. 481, 59 L. Ed. 777; Great Northern Ry. Co. v. Knapp, 240 U. S. 464, 466, 36 Sup. Ct. 399, 60 L. Ed. 745; Southern Ry. Co. v. Puckett, 244 U. S. 571, 574, 37 Sup. Ct. 703, 61 L. Ed. 1321, Ann. Cas. 1918B. 69. See, also, Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Ry. Co. v. O'Connor, administratrix, etc., 248 Ü. S. 536, 39 Sup. Ct. 21, 63 L. Ed. - decided November 18, 1918.

(248 U. S. 580)

No. 723. WILLIAM WRIGLEY, JR., COMPANY, petitioner, v. L. P. LARSON, JR., COMPANY. Nov. 25, 1918. For opinion below, see 253 Fed. 914. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

« ΠροηγούμενηΣυνέχεια »