Supreme Court Reporter

(40 Sup.Ct.)

1920. Motion for leave to file petition for af for complainant. writ of prohibition or mandamus granted, and a rule to show cause awarded returnable Monday, October 4 next.

No. 7, Original. The STATE OF ARKANSAS, complainant, v. The STATE OF MISSISSIPPI. June 7, 1920. See, also, 252 U. S. 344, 40 Sup. Ct. 333, 64 L. Ed. 605. Messrs. Walter P. Armstrong and J. M. Moore, of Little Rock, Ark., and Herbert Pope, of Chicago, Ill., for complainant. Messrs. Garner W. Green, of Jackson, Miss., Gerald Fitz Gerald, of Clarksdale, Miss., and Ross A. Collins, of Jackson, Miss., for respondent. Motion to stay further proceedings in this cause denied.

(253 U. S. 477)

No. 22, Original. The STATE OF GEORGIA, complainant, v. The STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA. June 7, 1920. See, also, 39 Sup. Ct. 258, 64 L. Ed. - Mr. Clifford Walker, of Monroe, Ga., for complainant. Messrs. A. M. Lumpkin, of Columbia, S. C., and Sam M. Wolfe, Atty. Gen., for respondent. Motion for the appointment of a special master to take such testimony as may be necessary and to receive in evidence such exhibits as may be offered by the parties hereto, granted, and, on the suggestion of counsel for both parties, Mr. Charles S. Douglas, of Washington, D. C., appointed as such special master and directed to report the testimony and exhibits to the court without conclusions of law or findings of fact.

(253 U. S. 478)

No. 3. The UNITED STATES of America, appellant, v. READING COMPANY et al.; and No. 4. READING COMPANY et al., appellants, v. The UNITED STATES of America. June 7, 1920. For former opinion, see 253 U. S. 26, 40 Sup. Ct. 425, 64 L. Ed. The Attorney General, for the United States. Messrs. Henry S. Drinker, Jr., Charles Heebner, Abraham M. Beitler and William Jay Turner, all of Philadelphia, Pa., and Jackson E. Reynolds, of New York City, and William Clarke Mason, of Philadelphia, Pa., for respondents. Motions to modify the decree in these cases denied.

No. 27, Original. The STATE OF OKLAHOMA, complainant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS. June 7, 1920. See, also, 40 Sup. Ct. 585, 64 L. Ed. - Messrs. W. A. Ledbetter and H. L. Stuart, both of Oklahoma City, Okl., for complainant. Ordered that this cause be set down for hearing on the 15th day of November, 1920, upon certain questions, and that the parties be permitted to take and present testimony, and Ernest Knaebel, Esq., of the District of Columbia, appointed commissioner to take said evidence and report the same to the court without findings or conclusions.

Leave granted to file intervening petitions on behalf of Judsonia Developing Association, the Burke Divide Oil Company Nos. 2 and 3, and Mellish Consolidated Placer Oil Mining Association; and similar leave is granted to any and all other parties claiming any title to or interest in the lands in the possession of the receiver herein by virtue of the orders of April 1, 1920, and June 7, 1920.

No. 298. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD

COMPANY et al., plaintiffs in error, v. W. H. JENKINS et al. June 7, 1920. See, also, 252 U. S. 589, 40 Sup. Ct. 393, 64 L. Ed. Messrs. Charles H. Sloan, of Geneva, Neb., and William E. Flynn, of No. Platte, Neb., for plaintiffs in error. Motion to vacate the judgment of dismissal and restore this cause to the docket denied.

No. 411. Morris ZUCKER, plaintiff in error, v. The UNITED STATES of America. June

7, 1920. Mr. Louis B. Boudin, of New York City, for plaintiff in error. The Attorney General, for the United States. Motion to vacate the stay order in this cause granted.

No. 489. SILVER KING COALITION MINING COMPANY. June 7, 1920. See, also, MINES COMPANY, petitioner, v. CONKLING 250 U. S. 655, 40 Sup. Ct. 13, 63 L. Ed. 1192. Messrs. Curtis H. Lindley, of San Francisco. Cal., W. H. Dickson, A. C. Ellis, Jr., and Thomas Marioneaux, all of Salt Lake City, Utah, for petitioner. Motion to vacate the order allowing a writ of certiorari in this case denied.

(253 U. S. 492) No. 730. BOSTON WEST AFRICA TRADING COMPANY, petitioner, V. QUAKER CITY MOROCCO COMPANY. June 7, 1920. For opinion below, see 261 Fed. 665. Messrs. all of Boston, Mass., for petitioner. Lee M. Friedman and Friedman & Atherton, William L. Putnam, Joseph B. Jacobs, Putnam, Putnam & Bell, and Jacobs & Jacobs, all of Boston, Mass., for respondent. tion for a writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.

Messrs.

Peti

No. 734. The UNITED STATES, appellant, v. L. P. & J. A. SMITH. June 7, 1920. For remand this cause to the Court of Claims for Motion to opinion below, see 54 Ct. Cl. 119. additional findings granted.

(253 U. S. 477) No. 810. LINCOLN GAS & ELECTRIC LIGHT COMPANY, appellant, v. The CITY OF LINCOLN et al. June 7, 1920, Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the District of Nebraska. Messrs. Charles A. Frueauff, of New York City, Max V. Beghtol, of Lincoln, Neb., and Frueauff, Robinson & Sloan of New York City (Mr. Robert Burns, of New York City, of counsel), for appellant. Mr. C. Petrus Peterson, of Lincoln, Neb., for appellees.

Bate Refrigerating Co. v. Sulzberger, 157 U.
1, 33, 15 Sup. Ct. 508, 33 L. Ed. 601.
Bateman v. Western Union Tel. Co., 174 N. C. 97,
93 S. E. 467, L. R. A. 1318A, 803.
Bates v. Boston, 5 Cush. (Mass.) 93, 99.
Bates v. Dresser (D. C.) 229 Fed. 772..
Battle v. U. S., 209 U. S. 36, 28 Sup. Ct. 422, 52
L. Ed. 670..

150

Bean v. Morris, 159 Fed. 651, 86 C. C. A. 519; U. S. 485, 31 Sup. Ct. 703, 55 L. Ed. 821.. Beavers, In re (D. C.) 125 Fed. 988; (C. C.) Fed. 366....

Ed.

Beavers v. Haubert, 198 U. S. 77, 24 Sup. Ct. 48 L. Ed. 882..

108

538

Beavers v. Henkel, 194 U. S. 73, 83, 24 Sup. 605, 48 L. Ed. 882..

520

Bauman v. Ross, 167 U. S. 548, 587, 598, 17 Sup.
Ct. 966, 42 L. Ed. 270.

.521, 522
1223,

Bayard v. White, 127 U. S. 246, 8 Sup.

Ct.

32 L. Ed, 116..

Beals v. Cone, 27 Colo. 473, 484, 495, 62 Pac.

948,

83 Am. St. Rep. 92..

221

131

605,

Ct.

Beecher v. Wetherby, 95 U. S. 517, 525, 24
Ed. 440..

511 326

242

538

245

539

571

Beer Co. v. Massachusetts, 97 U. S. 25, 32, 33, 24
L. Ed. 989..

108

140

71 418 248

Beers v. Glynn, 211 U. S. 477, 485, 29 Sup. Ct. 186, 53 L. Ed. 290.

.7, 562

Belk v. Meagher, 104 U. S. 279, 287, 26 L. Ed. 735..

.325, 330 Bell's Gap R. Co. v. Pennsylvania, 134 U. S. 232, 237, 239, 10 Sup. Ct. 533, 535, 33 L. Ed. 892. .115, 230, 562, 563 Benson v. Henkel, 198 U. S. 1, 10, 11, 12, 25 Sup. Ct. 569, 49 L. Ed. 919...

539

Berry v. Davis, 242 U. S. 468, 37 Sup. Ct. 208, 61
L. Ed. 441.

449
223

Berryhill v. Carter (Okl.) 185 P. 93..

Berryman v. U. S. (C. C. A.) 259 Fed. 208....... 364
Bessette v. W. B. Conkey Co., 194 U. S. 324, 328-
337, 24 Sup. Ct. 665, 48 L. Ed. 997.
Beuttell v. Magone, 157 U. S. 154, 157, 15 Sup.
Ct. 566, 39 L. Ed. 654..

178

161

Bigby v. U. S., 188 U. S. 400, 23 Sup. Ct. 468, 47 L. Ed. 519.. 456, 520 Bigelow v. Old Dominion Copper Co., 225 U. S. 111, 132, 32 Sup. Ct. 641, 56 L. Ed. 1009, Ann. Cas. 1913E, 875; 74 N. J. Eq. 457, 500, 71 Atl. 153

Bilby v. Stewart, 246 U. S. 255, 257, 38 Sup. Ct. 264, 62 L. Ed. 701.. .178, 343, 346 Billings v. Sitner, 228 Fed. 315, 142 C. C. A. 607.. 349 Billings v. U. S., 232 U. S. 261, 282, 34 Sup. Ct. 421, 58 L. Ed. 596..

554

Birge Forbes Co. v. Heye, 234 U. S. 759, 34 Sup.
Ct. 676. 58 L. Ed. 1580; 248 Fed. 636, 160 C.
C. A. 536..
160

Bishop v. State, 149 Ind. 223, 230, 48 N. E. 1038,
1040, 39 L. R. A. 278, 63 Am. St. Rep. 270.... 204
Blair v. Chicago, 201 U. S. 400, 471, 26 Sup. Ct.
427, 50 L. Ed. 801...

454 Blair v. U. S., 250 U. S. 273, 39 Sup. Ct. 468, 63 L. Ed. 979..

292

lack v. McClelland, 3 Fed. Cas. 504, 505, No. 1, 462.

136 Black Heath, The, 195 U. S. 361, 365, 366, 367, 25 Sup. Ct. 46, 47, 49 L. Ed. 236.. .66, 440 Mlackstone v. Miller, 188 U. S. 189, 205, 206, 207, 23 Sup. Ct. 277, 47 L. Ed. 439.. .6, 7, 418 Alake v. McClung, 172 U. S. 239, 247, 248, 19 Sup.

161

Ct. 165, 43 L. Ed. 432; 176 U. S. 59, 67, 20 Sup. Ct. 307, 44 L. Ed. 371. .231, 403, 404 Blake v. U. S., 103 U. S. 227, 26 L. Ed. 462..... 376 Blood v. Morrin (C. C.) 140 Fed. 918. Blumenstock Bros. Advertising Agency v. Curtis Pub. Co., 252 U. S. 436, 40 Sup. Ct. 385, 64 L. Ed. 395 Blythe v. Hinckley, 180 U. S. 333, 340, 21 Sup. Ct. 330, 45 L. Ed. 557. 384 Board of Com'rs of Love County v. Ward, 173 Pac. 1050; 248 U. S. 556, 39 Sup. Ct. 12, 63 L. Ed. 419. 420 Board of Education v. Illinois, 203 U. S. 553, 27 sup. Ct. 171, 51 L. Ed. 314, 8 Ann. Cas. 157.... 7

Borough of Ben Avon v. Ohio Valley Water Co., 260 Pa. 289, 103 Atl. 744.. Boston & Fairhaven Iron Works, In re (C. C.) 23 Fed. 880..

Brander v. Brander, 4 Ves. Jr. 800.
Branson v. Bush, 251 U. S. 182, 40 Sup. Ct. 113,
64 L. Ed.
Branson v. Gee, 25 Or. 462, 36 Pac. 527, 24 L. R.
A. 355..

374

Boston & Montana Min. Co. v. Montana Ore Pur-
chasing Co., 188 U. S. 632, 23 Sup. Ct. 434, 47
L. Ed. 626.
Bostwick v. Brinkerhoff, 106 U. S. 3, 4, 1 Sup.
Ct. 15, 27 L. Ed. 73.
Bowe v. Scott, 233 U. S. 658, 664, 665, 34 Sup.
Ct. 769, 58 L. Ed. 1141...
12, 55
Bowersock v. Smith, 243 U. S. 29, 34, 37 Sup.
Ct. 371, 61 L. Ed. 572.

349

69 Bowes v. Haywood, 35 Mich. 241, 246. ..311, 312 Bowman v. Wathen, 2 McLean, 376, Fed. Cas. No. 1,740

559

529

421

Boyd v. Thayer, 143 U. S. 135, 180, 12 Sup. Ct. 375, 36 L. Ed. 103. Bradshaw v. State, 76 Ark. 562, 89 S. W. 1051.. 144 Bragg v. Weaver, 251 U. S. 57, 40 Sup. Ct. 62, 64 L. Ed.

136

Brazee v. Michigan, 241 U. S. 340, 36 Sup. Ct.
561, 60 L. Ed. 1034, Ann. Cas. 1017C, 522.
Brennan v. Titusville, 153 U. S. 289, 14 Sup.
829, 38 L. Ed. 719..

Ct.

133,

225

526

127

Brickill v. New York (C. C.) 55 Fed. 565. Bridges v. Sheldon (C. C.) 7 Fed. 17, 42... Briggs v. Spaulding, 141 U. S. 132, 11 Sup. Ct. 924, 35 L. Ed. 662.. Bristol v. Washington County, 177 U. S. 145, 20 Sup. Ct. 585, 44 L. Ed. 701.. Brolan v. U. S., 236 U. S. 216, 218, 35 Sup. Ct. 285, 59 L. Ed. 544....55, 56, 207, 346, 394, 395, 484, 583 Brooks-Scanlon Co. v. Railroad Commission of Louisiana, 251 U. S. 396, 40 Sup. Ct. 183, 64 L. Ed. Brown v. Alton Water Co., 222 U. S. 325, 332-334, 32 Sup. Ct. 156, 56 L. Ed. 221.. .343, 485 Brown Chemical Co. v. Meyer, 139 U. S. 540, 11 Sup. Ct. 625, 35 L. Ed. 247. 416 Brown v. Colorado, 106 U. S. 95, 98, 1 Sup. Ct. 175, 27 L. Ed. 132.. Brown v. Elliott, 225 U. S. 392, 32 Sup. Ct. 812, 56 L. Ed. 1136.. .245, 247 Brown v. Gurney, 201 U. S. 184, 190, 26 Sup. Ct. 509, 50 L. Ed. 717.. 326 Brown v. Houston, 114 U. S. 622, 5 Sup. Ct. 1091, 29 L. Ed. 257... Brown v. Maryland, 12 Wheat. 419, 446, 6 L. Ed. 678 199, 202 Brown v. State, 17 Ariz. 314, 152 Pac. 578.. 144 Brown v. United Button Co., 149 Fed. 48, 52, 53, 79 C. C. A. 70, 8 L. R. A. (N. S.) 961, 9 Ann. Cas. 455... Browning v. Waycross, 233 U. S. 16, 34 Sup. Ct. 578, 58 L. Ed. 828.. Bruce v. Tobin, 245 U. S. 18, 19, 38 Sup. Ct. 7, 62 L. Ed. 123. ..55, 218, 343, 484 Brushaber v. Union Pac. R. Co., 240 U. S. 1, 17-19, 25, 26, 36 Sup. Ct. 236, 60 L. Ed. 493, Ann. Cas. 1917B, 713, L. R. A. 1917D, 414..110, 193, 554, 556 Buell v. Chicago, M. & St. P. R. Co., 1 Wis. R. Com. 324.... Burfenning v. Chicago, St. P., etc., R. Co., 163 U. S. 321, 323, 16 Sup. Ct. 1018, 41 L. Ed. 175.. 414 Burke v. Southern Pac. R. Co., 234 U. S. 669, 676-679, 34 Sup. Ct. 907, 58 L. Ed. 1527.. Burt v. Merchants' Ins. Co., 115 Mass. 1, 14.... 521 Burton v. New York Cent. R. R., 245 U. S. 315, 318, 38 Sup. Ct. 108, 62 L. Ed. 314.. Butler v. Goreley, 146 U. S. 308, 309, 310, 13 Sup. Ct. 84, 36 L. Ed. 981; 147 Mass. 8, 12, 16 N. E. 734 511 Butte City Water Co. v. Baker, 196 U. S. 119, 126, 25 Sup. Ct. 211, 49 L. Ed. 409.. Buttfield v. Stranahan, 192 U. S. 470, 496, 24 Sup. Ct. 349, 48 L. Ed. 525..

127 203

274

306

95 548

548

Calaf v. Calaf, 232 U. S. 371, 34 Sup. Ct. 411, 58 L. Ed. 642 176

441

(40 Sup.Ct.) Page

593

Page

Chemung Canal Bank v. Lowery, 93 U. S. 72, 23 L. Ed. 806..

404

Cheney Bros. Co. v. Massachusetts, 246 U. S. 147,
153, 38 Sup. Ct. 295, 62 L. Ed. 632..
Cheong Ah Moy v. U. S., 113 U. S. 216, 5 Sup.
Ct. 431, 28 L. Ed. 983..

571 40

.272, 276

380

276

237

468

Cherokee Nation v. Southern Kansas R. Co., 135 U. S. 641, 653, 10 Sup. Ct. 965, 34 L. Ed. 295. Chesapeake & O. R. Co. v. Conley, 230 U. S. 513, 33 Sup. Ct. 985, 57 L. Ed. 1597. Chesapeake & O. R. Co. v. De Atley, 241 U. S. 310, 313, 315, 36 Sup. Ct. 564, 566, 60 L. Ed. 1016 Chesapeake & O. R. Co. v. Kentucky, 179 U. S. 388, 21 Sup. Ct. 101, 45 L. Ed. 244.. Chesapeake & O. R. Co. v. Proffitt, 241 U. S. 462, 468, 36 Sup. Ct. 620, 60 L. Ed. 1102. Chesbrough v. Woodworth, 195 Fed. 875, 116 C. C. A. 465; 221 Fed. 912, 137 C. C. A. 482; 251 Fed. 881, 164 C. C. A. 97; 244 U. S. 72, 37 Sup. Ct. 579, 61 L. Ed. 1000.... Chetwood, In re, 165 U. S. 443, 462, 17 Sup. Ct. 385, 41 L. Ed. 782..... Chicago, B. & Q. R. Co. v. Drainage Com'rs, 200 U. S. 561, 593, 26 Sup. Ct. 341, 50 L. Ed. 596, 4 Ann. Cas. 1175.. Chicago, B. & Q. R. Co. v. Harrington, 241 U. S. 177, 36 Sup. Ct. 517, 60 L. Ed. 941.. Chicago, B. & Q. R. Co. v. Iowa, 94 U. S. 155, 162, 24 L. Ed. 94.. Chicago, B. & Q. R. Co. v. McGuire, 219 U. S. Chicago, etc., R. R. v. Jones, 149 Ill. 361, 382, 37 549, 569, 31 Sup. Ct. 259, 55 L. Ed. 328.. N. E. 247, 24 L. R. A. 141, 41 Am. St. Rep. 278 547 Chicago, etc., R. Co. v. Minnesota, 134 U. S. 418, 456-458, 10 Sup. Ct. 462, 33 L. Ed. 970.... Chicago, I., etc., Ry. v. McGuire, 196 U. S. 128, 132, 25 Sup. Ct. 200, 49 L. Ed. 413.. Chicago Junction R. Co. v. King, 222 U. S. 222, 32 Sup. Ct. 79, 56 L. Ed. 173.. Chicago, M. & St. P. R. Co. v. Minneapolis Civic & Commerce Ass'n, 247 U. S. 490, 501, 38 Sup. Ct. 553, 62 L. Ed. 1229.

452

133

502

340

331

409

434 547

Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. v. Tompkins, 176 U. S. 167, 180, 20 Sup. Ct. 336, 44 L. Ed. 417.. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. v. Arkansas, 219 U. S. 453, 31 Sup. Ct. 275, 55 L. Ed. 290. Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co. v. Davis, 114 Ark. ..37, 309 519, 525, 170 S. W. 245, 246... Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co. v. Maucher, 248 U. S. 359, 363, 39 Sup. Ct. 108, 63 L. Ed. 294.. Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co. v. Ward (Okl.) 173 Pac. 212... Chicago, S. P., etc., Ry. v. U. S., 217 U. S. 180, 30 Sup. Ct. 470, 54 L. Ed. 721.. Chicago & N. W. R. Co. v. Ochs, 249 U. S. 416, 312, 313 419-420, 39 Sup. Ct. 343, 63 L. Ed. 679. Chicago & N. W. R. Co. v. Ohle, 117 U. S. 123, 129, 6 Sup. Ct. 632, 29 L. Ed. 837.. Chin Fong v. Backus, 241 U. S. 1-5, 36 Sup. Ct. 18, 87 490, 60 L. Ed. 859..

289 275

132

Chin Fong v. White, 258 Fed. 849, 169 C. C. A. 450 569

420

Chin K. Shue, In re (D. C.) 199 Fed. 282, 284.... 349 449 Chin Yow v. U. S., 208 U. S. 8, 12, 13, 28 Sup. Ct. 201, 52 L. Ed. 369.. Chirac v. Chirac, 2 Wheat, 259, 275, 4 L. Ed. 234.. 384 .349, 568, 570 Choate v. Trapp, 224 U. S. 665, 32 Sup. Ct. 565, 56 L. Ed. 941; 28 Okl. 517, 114 Pac. 709.. Chrisman v. Miller, 197 U. S. 313, 322, 25 Sup. Ct. 468, 470, 49 L. Ed. 770.. Christie v. U. S., 237 U. S. 234, 35 Sup. Ct. 565, .327, 412 59 L. Ed. 933.. Christmas v. Russell 5 Wall. 290, 18 L. Ed. 475 372 425 Cincinnati, H. & D. R. Co. v. Interstate Commerce Commission, 206 U. S. 142, 149, 27 Sup. Ct. 648, 51 L. Ed. 995. Citizens' Nat. Bank v. Donnell, 195 U. S. 369, 373, 374, 25 Sup. Ct. 49, 50, 49 L. Ed. 238. Citizens' Saving & Loan Ass'n v. Topeka, 20 62 Wall. 665, 22 L. Ed. 455.. Citizens' Tel. Co. v. Fuller, 229 U. S. 322, 329, 502 33 Sup. Ct. 833, 57 L. Ed. 1206. City of Akron v. Bone, 221 Fed. 944, 137 C. C. A. 514 City of Amarillo v. Southwestern Telegraph & Telephone Co., 253 Fed. 638, 165 C. C. A. 264.. 465

576

Chambers v. Baltimore & O. R. Co., 207 U. S.
254
142, 148, 155, 28 Sup. Ct. 34, 52 L. Ed. 143..372, 403
Champion Lumber Co. v. Fisher, 227 U. S. 445,
450, 451, 33 Sup. Ct. 329, 57 L. Ed. 591..
Chapin v. Fye, 179 U. S. 127, 130, 21 Sup. Ct. 71,
256
45 L. Ed. 119..

562

Chapman v. Douglas County, 107 U. S. 348, 355,
2 Sup. Ct. 62, 27 L. Ed. 378..
Charleston Western Carolina R. Co. v. Thompson,
234 U. S. 576, 34 Sup. Ct. 964, 58 L. Ed. 1476.. 288 City of Bowling Green v. McMullen, 134 Ky.

422

.144

Charleston & W. C. R. Co. v. Varnville Furniture
Co., 237 U. S. 597, 604, 35 Sup. Ct. 715, 59 L.
Ed. 1137, Ann. Cas. 1916D, 233.
Charlton v. Kelly, 229 U. S. 447, 33 Sup. Ct.
945, 57 L. Ed. 1274, 46 L. R. A. (N. S.) 397.... 347,
Chattanooga Nat. Bldg. & Loan Ass'n v. Den-
349, 350
son, 189 U. S. 408, 23 Sup. Ct. 630, 47 L. Ed. 870 366
Cheatham v. U. S., 92 U. S. 85, 23 L. Ed. 561....
Chelentis v. Luckenbach S. S. Co., 247 U. S.
159
372, 38 Sup. Ct. 501, 62 L. Ed. 1171..
439

742, 122 S. W. 823, 26 L. R. A. (N. S.) 895..
City of Bowling Green v. McMullen, 134 Ky. 742,
122 S. W. 823, 26 L. R. A. (N. S.) 895..
City of Chicago v. Dempcy, 250 U. S. 651, 40
148
Sup. Ct. 53, 63 L. Ed. 1139.
City of Denver v. Londoner, 33 Colo. 104, 117,
.219, 342
80 Pac. 117, 121..

272

City of Louisiana v. Wood, 102 U. S. 294, 298,
299, 26 L. Ed. 153...

422

City of Mitchell v. Dakota Central Tel. Co., 246 C.
S. 396, 412, 38 Sup. Ct. 362, 62 L. Ed. 793...... 454

40 SUP.CT.-38

Caldwell v. Donaghey, 108 Ark. 60, 64, 156 S.
W. 839, 45 L. R. A. (N. S.) 721, Ann. Cas.
1915 B, 133..
Caldwell v. North Carolina, 187 U. S. 622, 23
Sup. Ct. 229, 47 L. Ed. 336..

127

150

154

Calhoun v. Massie, 253 U. S. 170, 40 Sup. Ct. 474, 64 L. Ed., 123 Va. 673, 97 S. E. 576, 249 U. S. 596, 39 Sup. Ct. 289, 63 L. Ed. 794..... California v. Pacific R. Co., 127 U. S. 1, 39, 8 .475, 479, 480 Sup. Ct. 1073, 32 L. Ed. 150.. California v. San Pablo & T. R. Co., 149 U. S. 308, 314, 13 Sup. Ct. 876, 878, 37 L. Ed. 747....53, 449 California v. Southern Pac. Co., 157 U. S. 229, 15 Sup. Ct. 591, 39 L. Ed. 683. California Powder Works v. Davis, 151 U. S. 389, 393, 14 Sup. Ct. 350, 38 L. Ed. 206. Cameron v. Bass, 19 Ariz. 246, 168 Pac. 645... .55, 218 Cameron v. U. S., 250 Fed. 943, 163 C. C. A. 193 410 413 Caminetti v. U. S., 242 U. S. 470, 485, 490, 37 Sup. Ct. 192, 61 L. Ed. 442, L. R. A. 1917F, 502, Ann. Cas. 1917B, 1168. Camp v. Boyd, 229 U. S. 530, 551, 552, 33 Sup. ...140, 402 Ct. 785, 57 L. Ed. 1317.. Campbell v. California, 200 U. S. 87, 95, 26

Sup.

224 7

Ct. 182, 185, 50 L. Ed. 382. Canal Co. v. Clark, 13 Wall. 311, 322, 323, 324, 20 L. Ed. 581..

416

331 .63, 546

Capital City Dairy Co. v. Ohio, 183 U. S. 238, 248, 22 Sup. Ct. 120, 46 L. Ed. 171... Capital Traction Co. v. Hof, 174 U. S. 1, 18-30, 45, 19 Sup. Ct. 580, 43 L. Ed. 873. Capital Trust Co. v. Calhoun, 250 U. S. 208, 216, 218, 219, 39 Sup. Ct. 486, 63 L. Ed. 942..477, 478, 480 Carbon Steel Co. v. Lewellyn (C. C. A.) 258 Fed. 533; 251 U. S. 501, 40 Sup. Ct. 283, 64 L. Ed. Carey v. Houston & T. Cent. R. Co., 150 U. S. 171, 14 Sup. Ct. 63, 37 L. Ed. 1041.. Carey v. South Dakota, 250 U. S. 118, 39 Sup. Ct. 403, 63 L. Ed. 886.

286

178

Carlile, In re (D. C.) 199 Fed. 612, 615, 616.... 537
384
Carolina Glass Co. v. South Carolina, 240 U. S.
305, 318, 36 Sup. Ct. 293, 60 L. Ed. 658..
Carolina-Tennessee Power Co.
River Power Co., 171 N. C. 248, 88 S. E. 349; 175
V. Hiawassee
N. C. 670, 96 S. E. 99....

512

Carr v. Edwards, 84 N. J. Law, 667, 87 Atl. 132..
Carroll v. Greenwich Ins. Co., 129 U. S. 401,
410, 26 Sup. Ct. 66, 50 L. Ed. 246..
Carroll v. Safford, 3 How. 441, 11 L. Ed. 671...
Carter v. Texas, 177 U. S. 442, 447, 20 Sup. Ct.
687, 44 L. Ed. 839.

331

108

412

421

Cass Farm Co. v. Detroit, 181 U. S. 396, 398, 21
Sup. Ct. 644, 45 L. Ed. 914..

115

103

118

Castle v. Mason, 91 Ohio St. 296, 303, 110 N. E. 463, Ann. Cas. 1917A, 164.. Castillo v. McConnico, 168 U. S. 674, 18 Sup. Ct. 229, 42 L. Ed. 622. Catholic Bishop of Nesqually v. Gibbon, 158 U. S. 155, 166, 167, 15 Sup. Ct. 779, 784, 39 L. Ed. 931 Cattle Raisers' Ass'n .413, 414 of Texas K. & T. R. Co., 11 Interst. Com. R. 296, 352; Missouri, 13 Interst. Com. R. 418, 435... Cedar Rapids Gaslight Co. v. Cedar Rapids, 223 .469, 470 U. S. 655, 658, 32 Sup. Ct. 389, 56 L. Ed. 594.. Central Land Co. v. Laidley, 159 U. S. 103, 111, 531 16 Sup. Ct. 80, 40 L. Ed. 91. Central of Georgia R. Co. v. Wright, 248 U. S. ..309, 583 525, 39 Sup. Ct. 181, 63 L. Ed. 401.. Central Penn. Lumber Co. v. Director General, 53 Interst. Com. R. 523..

534

Central Trust Co. v. Chicago Auditorium, 240 U.
S. 581, 592, 36 Sup. Ct. 412, 60 L. Ed. 811, L. R.
A. 1917B, 580..
Central Vermont R. Co. v. White, 238 U. S. 507,
35 Sup. Ct. 865, 59 L. Ed. 1433, Ann. Cas. 1916B,
252

136

539

132

594

Page

City of Newport v. French Bros. Bauer Co., 169
Ky. 174, 185, 183 S. W. 532..

City of Newport v.

S. W. 834, Ann. Cas. 1917A, 962.
Wagner, 168 Ky. 646, 182
City of Pawhuska v. Pawhuska Oil & Gas Co.,
250 U. S. 394, 39 Sup. Ct. 526, 63 L. Ed.
1054
Claassen v. U. S., 142 U. S. 140, 12 Sup. Ct. 169,
....54, 219, 342
35 L. Ed. 966..

..18, 210

Clark Distilling Co. v. Western Maryland R. Co.,
242 U. S. 311, 332, 37 Sup. Ct. 180, 61 L. Ed. 326,
L. R. A. 1917B, 1218, Ann. Cas. 1917B, 845.. 109.
441, 443
331

Clarke v. McDade, 165 U. S. 168, 172, 17 Sup.
Ct. 284, 41 L. Ed. 673...

.137, 138
70

114

Clarke v. Rogers, 183 Fed. 518, 521, 522, 106 C. C. A. 64; 228 U. S. 534, 542, 543, 548, 33 Sup. Ct. 587, 57 L. Ed. 953.. Clay County Produce Co. v. Western Union Tel. Co., 44 Interst. Com. R. 670.. Cleveland, etc., R. Co. v. Backus, 154 U. S. 439, 445, 14 Sup. Ct. 1122, 1124, 38 L. Ed. 1041.. Cleveland & P. R. Co. v. Cleveland, 225 U. S. 50, 53, 35 Sup. Ct. 21, 59 L. Ed. 127.. Clifford v. Atlantic Cotton Mills, 146 Mass. 47, 48, 49, 15 N. E. 84, 4 Am. St. Rep. 279.. Clinton Sugar Refining Co. v. Chicago & N. W. R. Co., 28 Interst. Com. R. 364, 367. Clipper Mining Co. v. Eli Mining Co., 194 U. S. 220, 229, 232, 234, 24 Sup. Ct. 632, 48 L. Ed. 944 Cochran v. U. S., 157 U. S. 286, 295, 296, 15 Sup. ..325, 326, 413 Ct. 628, 39 L. Ed. 704..

218

516

576

Coe v. Armour Fertilizer Works, 237 U. S. 413, 418, 35 Sup. Ct. 625, 59 L. Ed. 1027.

Coe v. Errol, 116 U. S. 517, 524, 6 Sup. Ct. 475,
29 L. Ed. 715..
Coffey v. Harlan County, 204 U. S. 659, 662, 27
..288, 513, 560
Sup. Ct. 305, 51 L. Ed. 666.

Cole v. Ralph, 252 U. S. 286, 40 Sup. Ct. 321, 64
L. Ed.

Coleman v. Tennessee, 97 U. S. 508, 509, 514, 515,
411
24 L. Ed. 1118..
Collard v. Pittsburgh, C., C. & St. L. R. Co.,
.390, 391
246 U. S. 653, 38 Sup. Ct. 336, 62 L. Ed. 922....
Collector v. Day, 11 Wall. 113, 20 L. Ed. 122....
Collector, The, v. Hubbard, 12 Wall. 1, 18, 20 L.
Ed. 272
Collins' Case, 259 Fed. 172, 170 C. C. A. 240..
.197, 201
Collins v. Johnston, 237 U. S. 502, 510, 35 Sup.
454
Ct. 649, 59 L. Ed. 1071..

Collins v. Miller, 252 U. S. 364, 40 Sup. Ct. 347,
64 L. Ed. 616..

Comegys v. Vasse, 1 Pet. 193, 213, 7 L. Ed. 108.. 473
358
Com. v. Allen, 14 Pa. Co. Ct. 546.
Com. v. Blos, 116 Mass. 56...

292
147

Com. v. Hall, 9 Gray (Mass.) 262, 69 Am. Dec.

285

538

Com. v. Hamilton Mfg.

Co., 12 Allen (Mass.)

559

298 Com. v. McGrath, 185 Mass. 1, 69 N. E. 340..144, 147 Com. v. Mann, 5 Watts & S. (Pa.) 403, 415... Com. v. Peachie, 177 Mass. 267, 272, 59 N. E. 55.. 304 554 Com. v. Phelps, 209 Mass. 396, 404, 95 N. E. 868, Ann. Cas. 1912B, 566.

538

516 292 292

Com. v. Pierce, 138 Mass. 165, 178, 52 Am. Rep. 264

....

55 553

Com. v. Priestly, 24 Pa. Co. Ct. 543..
Com. v. Stoner, 70 Pa. Super. Ct. 365.
Com. v. Strauss, 188 Mass. 229, 74 N. E. 308; 191
Mass. 545, 78 N. E. 136, 11 L. R. A. (N. S.)
968, 6 Ann. Cas. 842...

Com. v. Whitaker, 25 Pa. Co. Ct. 42..
Connecticut General Life Ins. Co. v. Eaton (D.
C.) 218 Fed. 188, 192..
Connecticut Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. Eaton (D. C.)
..397, 398, 399
218 Fed. 206..
Consolidated Gas Co. of New York v. Newton
..397, 399
(D. C.) 256 Fed. 238; (C. C. A.) 260 Fed. 1022 512
Consolidated Turnpike Co. v. Norfolk, etc., R.
Co., 228 U. S. 326, 334, 596, 600, 33 Sup. Ct. 510,
605, 57 L. Ed. 857, 982...
Converse v. Hamilton, 224 U. S. 243, 32 Sup. Ct.
..178, 346, 484, 485
415, 56 L. Ed. 749, Ann. Cas. 1913D, 1292..
Cooke v. U. S., 91 U. S. 389, 396, 23 L. Ed. 237.. 363
...372
Cooley v. Board of Wardens, 12 How. 299, 317,
318, 13 L. Ed. 996...

Page

Cornelius v. Kessel, 128 U. S. 456, 9 Sup. Ct. 122, 32 L. Ed. 482 Cornell v. Coyne, 192 U. S. 418, 530, 24 Sup. Ct. 383, 48 L. Ed. 504.. Corry v. Baltimore, 196 U. S. 466, 25 Sup. Ct. 297, 49 L. Ed. 556. Cosmos Exploration Co. v. Gray Eagle Oil Co., 190 U. S. 301, 308, 23 Sup. Ct. 692, 696, 47 L. Ed. 1064... Coulter v. Louisville & N. R. Co., 196 U. S. 599, 25 Sup. Ct. 342, 49 L. Ed. 615.. Courtney v. Pradt, 196 U. S. 89, 91, 25 Sup. Ct. 208, 49 L. Ed. 398.. Covington v. Covington First Nat. Bank, 185 U. ..178, 180 S. 270, 277, 22 Sup. Ct. 645, 46 L. Ed. 906.. Crabtree v. Neff, 1 Bond, 554, Fed. Cas. No. 3,315

413

102

349

549

512

Craig v. Missouri, 4 Pet. 410, 433, 7 L. Ed. 903 199 Cramp v. International Curtis Marine Turbine Co., 246 U. S. 28, 38 Sup. Ct. 271, 62 L. Ed. 560 457 Crawford v. Burke, 195 U. S. 176, 187, 193, 25 Sup. Ct. 9, 49 L. Ed. 147... Cream of Wheat Co. v. Grand Forks County, 253 .136, 137 U. S. 325, 40 Sup. Ct. 558, 64 L. Ed. Credits Commutation Co. v. U. S., 177 U. S. 311, 563 315, 20 Sup. Ct. 636, 44 L. Ed. 782. Creede & Cripple Creek Mining Co. v. Uinta Tunnel Mining Co., 196 U. S. 337, 348-351, 352, 356, 25 Sup. Ct. 266, 49 L. Ed. 501.. Creekmore v. U. S., 237 Fed. 743, 150 C. C. A. ..326, 328, 413 497, L. R. A. 1917C, 845.. Crenshaw v. Arkansas, 227 U. S. 389, 399, 400, 33 Sup. Ct. 294, 57 L. Ed. 565... Crescent Lumber Co., In re (D. C.) 154 Fed. 95 724, 727..... Creswill v. Knights of Pythias, 225 U. S. 246, 261, 32 Sup. Ct. 822, 56 L. Ed. 1074. Crew Levick Co. v. Pennsylvania, 245 U. S. 292, 294, 38 Sup. Ct. 126, 62 L. Ed. 295.. Crews v. Burcham, 1 Black, 352, 17 L. Ed. 91.. 32 ..226, 227 Cross Lake Shooting & Fishing Club v. Louisiana, 224 U. S. 632, 639, 32 Sup. Ct. 577, 56 L. Ed. 924...

292

137

421

443
161

Coolidge v. Inglee, 13 Mass. 26, 37.
Coon v. Kennedy, 248 U. S. 457, 39 Sup. Ct. 146,
63 L. Ed. 358..

134

210

Cooper v. Schlesinger, 111 U. S. 148, 155, 4 Sup.
Ct. 360, 28 L. Ed. 382.
Coppage v. Kansas, 236 U. S. 1, 35 Sup. Ct. 240,
59 L. Ed. 441, L. R. A. 1915C, 960..
Coppell v. Hall, 7 Wall. 542, 558, 19 L. Ed. 244.. 480
478
Corfield v. Coryell, 4 Wash. C. C. 371, 380, Fed.
Cas. No. 3,230.

403

349

Dainese v. Kendall, 119 U. S. 53, 7 Sup. Ct. 65,
30 L. Ed. 305..
Dakota Central Telephone Co. v. South Dakota,
250 U. S. 163, 184, 39 Sup. Ct. 507, 63 L. Ed. 910 110
Dalay v. Savage, 145 Mass. 38, 41, 12 N. E. 841,
1 Am. St. Rep. 429..
Damon v. Carrol, 163 Mass. 404, 408, 40 N. E. 185 472
516
Dana v. Dana, 250 U. S. 651, 40 Sup. Ct. 9, 63 L.
Ed. 1203..

579

Darnell v. Edwards, 244 U. S. 564, 569, 37 Sup. 292

Danciger v. Cooley, 248 U. S. 319, 323, 39 Sup. Ct. 119, 63 L. Ed. 266.. Darling & Co. v. Pittsburgh, etc., R. Co., 37 364 Interst. Com. R. 401.. 533 Ct. 701, 61 L. Ed. 1317.. David Kauffman Sons Co. v. Smith, 216 U. S. 610, .40, 531 30 Sup. Ct. 419, 54 L. Ed. 636.. Davidson v. New Orleans, 96 U. S. 97, 106, 24 454 L. Ed. 616.. Davis v. Com., 164 Mass. 241, 41 N. E. 292, 30 305 L. R. A. 743.. Davis v. Hildebrant, 241 U. S. 565, 36 S. Ct. 708, 478 60 L. Ed. 1172. Davis v. Patrick, 122 U. S. 138, 7 Sup. Ct. 1102, .498, 500 30 L. Ed. 1090.. Davis v. St. Louis & S. F. R. Co. (C. C.) 25 Fed. 786 Dawson v. Columbia Trust Co., 197 U. S. 178, 181, 25 Sup. Ct. 429, 49 L. Ed. 713.. Dean v. Davis, 242 U. S. 438, 444, 37 Sup. Ct. 130, 61 L. Ed. 419.. Debs, In re, 158 U. S. 564, 15 Sup. Ct. 900, 39 L. 138 Ed. 1092. 150

445

546

127

Debs v. U. S., 249 U. S. 211, 215, 216, 39 Sup.
Ct. 252, 63 L. Ed. 566..
Decatur Bank v. St. Louis Bank, 21 Wall. 294,
.18. 21, 29, 207, 210, 263
22 L. Ed. 560..
Dedham Bank v. Everett Bank, 177 Mass. $92.
395, 59 N. E. 62, 83 Am. St. Rep. 286....

243

363

..106, 366

328 325

102

Crossman v. Pendery (C. C.) 8 Fed. 693. Crow v. Van Sickle, 6 Nev. 146... Cruickshank v. Bidwell, 176 U. S. 73, 81, 20 Sup. Ct. 280, 44 L. Ed. 877... Crozier v. Krupp, 224 U. S. 290, 306, 32 Sup. Ct. 488, 56 L. Ed. 771..... Cuba R. Co. v. Crosby, 222 U. S. 473, 32 Sup. ...64, 457, 521 Ct. 132, 56 L. Ed. 274, 38 L. R. A. (N. S.) 40 320 Cudney v. Flannery, 1 L. D. 165. Cummings v. National Bank, 101 U. S. 153, 158, 35 162, 163, 25 L. Ed. 903... Curtin v. Somerset, 140 Pa. 70, 21 Atl. 244, 12 ..62, 102 L. R. A. 322, 23 Am. St. Rep. 220.. Cutting, Ex parte, 94 U. S. 14, 22, 24 L. Ed. 49.. 512 516

413

352

559

Defiance Water Co. v. Defiance, 191 U. S. 184,
194, 24 Sup. Ct. 63, 48 L. Ed. 140...
De Ganay v. Lederer, 250 U. S. 376, 39 Sup. Ct.
524, 63 L. Ed. 1042..

348

.225, 418

384

250

Delamater v. South Dakota, 205 U. S. 93, 97, 27 Sup. Ct. 447, 51 L. Ed. 724, 10 Ann. Cas. 733.. 442 De La Rama v. De La Rama, 241 U. S. 154, 159, 36 Sup. Ct. 518, 60 L. Ed. 932, Ann. Cas. 1917C, 411 Delaware, L. & W. R. Co. v. Pennsylvania, 198 U. S. 341, 25 Sup. Ct. 669, 49 L. Ed. 1077. Delaware, L. & W. R. Co. v. U. S., 249 U. S. 385, 388, 39 Sup. Ct. 348, 63 L. Ed. 659......68, 166 Delaware, L. & W. R. Co. v. Yurkonis, 238 U. S. 439, 444, 35 Sup. Ct. 902, 59 L. Ed. 1397..345, 452, 485

560

De Geofroy v. Riggs, 133 U. S. 258, 10 Sup. Ct.
295, 33 L. Ed. 642..

Denver v. Denver Union Water Co., 246 U. S.
178, 38 Sup. Ct. 278, 62 L. Ed. 649..
Denver v. Dumars, 33 Colo. 94, 97, 80 Pac. 114 272
40
Denver v. Kennedy, 33 Colo. 80, 80 Pac. 122, 467 272
Denver v. New York Trust Co., 229 U. S. 123,

465

126, 33 Sup. Ct. 657, 57 L. Ed. 1101. Deposit Bank v. Fayette Bank, 90 Ky. 10, 13 S. W. 339, 7 L. R. A. 819..

363

Detroit v. Parker, 181 U. S. 399, 21 Sup. Ct. 624, 45 L. Ed. 917..

115

Detroit United Ry. v. Detroit, 242 U. S. 238, 249,
37 Sup. Ct. 87, 61 L. Ed. 268..
Devine v. Los Angeles, 202 U. S. 313, 333, 26 Sup.
Ct. 652, 50 L. Ed. 1046.

308

Fed. ..345, 374

Dexter Horton Nat. Bank v. Hawkins, 190

924, 111 C. C. A. 514.

Diamond Coal Co. v. U. S., 233 U. S.

236,

243,
241
250,
.50, 129
C.) 187

34 Sup. Ct. 507, 58 L. Ed. 936..
Diaz v. U. S., 223 U. S. 442, 450, 32 Sup.
56 L. Ed. 500, Ann. Cas. 1913C, 1138.
Dickerson v. Louisville & N. R. Co. (C.
Fed. 874, 878..
Dickerson v. Western Union Tel. Co., 114 Miss.
115, 74 South. 779..

Ct.

472 576

553

103

Dobbins v. Commissioners of Erie County, 16
Pet. 435, 450, 10 L. Ed. 1022.
Dobbins v. Los Angeles, 195 U. S. 223, 235, 25
Sup. Ct. 18, 20, 49 L. Ed. 169..
Dr. Miles Medical Co. v. Park & Sons Co., 220
U. S. 373, 31 Sup. Ct. 376, 55 L. Ed. 502..
Doe v. Wilson, 23 How. 457, 16 L. Ed. 584..
252
Dodge v. Woolsey, 18 How. 331, 348, 15 L. Ed.
32
401
497
539

Dodge's Case, 6 Mart. O. S. (La.) 569..
Doggett v. Emerson, 1 Woodb. & M. 195, 7 Fed.
Cas. 821, 826, No. 3,962.

136

Dollar Co. v. Canadian C. & F. Co., 220 N. Y. 270, 277, 115 N. E. 711..

173

Dorr v. U. S., 195 U. S. 138, 24 Sup. Ct. 808, 49
L. Ed. 128, 1 Ann. Cas. 697...

279

Dowdell v. U. S., 221 U. S. 325, 332, 31 Sup. Ct. 590, 55 L. Ed. 753..

279

Dower v. Richards, 151 U. S. 658, 14 Sup. Ct. 452, 38 L. Ed. 305...

531

Downes v. Bidwell, 182 U. S. 244, 21 Sup. Ct. 770, 45 L. Ed. 1088..

279

Dozier v. Alabama, 218 U. S. 124, 30 Sup. Ct. 619,
54 L. Ed. 965, 28 L. R. A. (N. S.) 264..
Doyle v. Doyle, 56 N. H. 567.

Doyle v. Mitchell Bros. Co., 247 U. S. 179, 183,
185, 38 Sup. Ct. 467, 469, 62 L. Ed. 1054..
Dresser v. Bates, 250 Fed. 525, 162 C. C. A. 541 248
193
Drumm-Flato Commission Co. v. Edmisson, 208

Dusar v. Murgatroyd, 1 Wash. C. C. 13, 8 Fed.
Cas 140, No. 4,199...

....

Eagle Glass & Mfg. Co. v. Rowe, 245 U. S. 275,
281, 38 Sup. Ct. 80, 62 L. Ed. 286..
Earp's Appeal, 28 Pa. 368..
Eastern Extension, Australasia & China Tel. Co

(40 Sup.Ct.)

Page

U. S. 534, 539, 28 Sup. Ct. 367, 52 L. Ed. 606.. 250
Drury v. Lewis, 200 U. S. 1, 26 Sup. Ct. 229, 50
L. Ed. 343...
Du Bois Electric Co. v. Fidelity Title & Trust
Co., 238 Fed. 129, 132, 151 C. C. A. 205, L. R. A.
1917C, 907..

391

515

Du Bois Electric Co. v. Pancoast's Adm'r, 253 Fed. 987, 165 C. C. A. 668.

515
199

Duffill's Estate (Cal.) 183 P. 337.
Dunbar v. Dunbar, 190 U. S. 340, 350, 23 Sup.
Ct. 757, 761, 47 L. Ed. 1084...

Duncan v. Missouri, 152 U. S. 377, 382, 14 Sup.
Ct. 570, 38 L. Ed. 485..

Dundy v. Chambers, 22 Ill. 369.

Durre v. Western Union Tel. Co., 165 Wis. 190, 161 N. W. 755.....

547

136

559

136

465

203

V. U. S., 231 U. S. 326, 34 Sup. Ct. 57, 58 L.
Ed. 250..

169

Eastern R. Co. v. U. S., 129 U. S. 391, 394, 396,

9 Sup. Ct. 320, 32 L. Ed. 730..

.68, 166

Page

Eastern States Lumber Ass'n v. U. S., 234 U. S.
600, 34 Sup. Ct. 951, 58 L. Ed. 1490, L. R. A.
1915A, 788.
Eberle v. Michigan, 232 U. S. 700, 706, 34 Sup.
Ct. 464, 58 L. Ed. 803..

303

109

E. Clemens Horst Co. v. Railroad Commission, 175 Cal. 660, 166 Pac. 804..

176

Edwards v. Darby, 12 Wheat. 206, 6 L. Ed. 603 239
Edwardson v. Garnhart, 56 Mo. 81.

546

531

Egan v. Hart, 165 U. S. 188, 17 Sup. Ct. 300, 41
L. Ed. 680.
Eichel v. U. S. Fidelity & Guaranty Co., 239 U.
S. 629, 36 Sup. Ct. 165, 50 L. Ed. 475.
Eisner v. Macomber, 252 U. S. 189, 40 Sup. Ct.
189, 64 L. Ed. 521...

.54. 586
... 556

Elgin National Watch Co. v. Illinois Watch Case Co., 179 U. S. 665, 21 Sup. Ct. 270, 45 L. Ed. 365 416 El Paso Sash & Door Co. v. Carraway, 245 U. S. Embree v. Kansas City, etc., Road District, 240 U. 643, 38 Sup. Ct. 222, 62 L. Ed. 528. E. Luckenbach, The (D. C.) 19 Fed. 847.. .12, 55 548 S. 242, 250, 36 Sup. Ct. 317, 60 L. Ed. 624....116, 274 Emert v. Missouri, 156 U. S. 296, 15 Sup. Ct. 367, 39 L. Ed. 430.. Empire State Cattle Co. v. Atchison, T. & S. F. R. Co., 210 U. S. 1, 8, 28 Sup. Ct. 607, 52 L. Ed. 931, 15 Ann. Cas. 70...

161

420

Empire State-Idaho Mining Co. v. Hanley, 205 U. S. 225, 232, 27 Sup. Ct. 476, 51 L. Ed. 779..395, 484, 583 Engelhard, In re, 231 U. S. 646, 34 Sup. Ct. 258, 58 L. Ed. 416.. English v. Richardson, 224 U. S. 630, 32 Sup. Ct. 571, 56 L. Ed. 949; 28 Okl. 408, 114 Pac. 710... Enterprise Irr. Dist. v. Farmers' Mutual Canal Co., 243 U. S. 157, 164, 37 Sup. Ct. 318. 61 L. Ed. 644.. Equitable Life Assur. Soc. v. Brown, 187 U. S. 308, 311, 314, 23 Sup. Ct. 123, 47 L. Ed. 190 Erickson v. Preuss, 223 N. Y. 365, 368, 119 N. E. 332, 484, 485 555 Erie County Com'rs v. Dobbins, 7 Watts (Pa.) 46 513

421

Erie Lighter 108, The (D. C.) 250 Fed. 490, 497, 498 67
553
Erie R. R. v. Pennsylvania, 153 U. S. 628, 14
Sup. Ct. 952, 38 L. Ed. 846..

230

Erie R. Co. v. Purucker, 244 U. S. 320, 37 Sup.
Ct. 629, 91 L. Ed. 1166..

276

Erwin v. U. S., 97 U. S. 392, 395, 396, 397, 24 L.
Ed. 1065.

.370, 473
539
146

Esselborn, In re (C. C.) 8 Fed. 904..
Estes v. State, 13 Okl. Cr. 604, 166 Pac. 77.
Eugene F. Moran, The, 212 U. S. 466, 474, 475, 29
Sup. Ct. 339, 53 L. Ed. 600..
Evans v.
66
Evans v. U. S., 153 U. S. 584, 587, 595, 608, 14
550
Sup. Ct. 934, 939, 38 L. Ed. 830, 839.
Extract & Tonic Co. v. Lynch, 100 Miss. 650, 56
...18, 141, 210
South. 316
.144, 145

Gore (D. C.) 262 Fed. 550.

Fair v. Manhattan Ins. Co., 112 Mass. 329.
Fairbanks v. U. S., 181 U. S. 283, 293, 21 Sup.
Ct. 648, 652, 45 L. Ed. 862..

308

545 Fair Haven & W. R. Co. v. New Haven, 203 U. 557 S. 379, 27 Sup. Ct. 74, 51 L. Ed. 237. Fallbrook Irr. Dist. v. Bradley, 164 U. S. 155, 158, 17 Sup. Ct. 56, 63, 41 L. Ed. 369.. Farmers' & Mechanics' Bank v. Dearing, 91 U. Fargo v. Hart, 193 U. S. 490, 24 Sup. Ct. 498, 48 501 L. Ed. 761.. Farnham v. U. S., 240 U. S. 537, 437 S. 29, 32, 23 L. Ed. 196... .58, 59, 60 Ct. 427, 60 L. Ed. 786.. 540, 36 Sup. Farrell v. O'Brien, 199 U. S. 89, 100, 25 Sup. Ct. 727, 50 L. Ed. 101... Farrugia v. Philadelphia & R. R. Co., 233 U. S. ..394, 395, 484, 583 352, 353, 34 Sup. Ct. 591, 58 L. Ed. 996. Fauntleroy v. Lum, 210 U. S. 230, 235, 236, 28 180 Sup. Ct. 641, 52 L. Ed. 1039. Federal Trade Commission v. Gratz, 258 Fed. 314, 169 C. C. A. 330.

456

372

574

539

Fenn v. Kinsey, 45 Mich. 446, 8 N. W. 64....311, 313
Fetter, In re, 23 N. J. Law, 311, 321, 57 Am. Dec.
382
Ficklen v. Taxing Dist. of Shelby County, 145
U. S. 1, 12 Sup. Ct. 810, 36 L. Ed. 601...
Fidelity Title & Trust Co. v. Dubois Electric Co.,
387
249 U. S. 597, 606, 39 Sup. Ct. 290, 388, 63 L. Ed.
795
Fidelity & Columbia Trust Co. v. Louisville, 245
U. S. 54, 59, 38 Sup. Ct. 40, 62 L. Ed. 145, L. R.
A. 1918C, 124...
Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. U. S., 187 U. S. 315,
.418, 560
23 Sup. Ct. 120, 47 L. Ed. 194.
Field v. Clark, 143 U. S. 649, 692, 12 Sup. Ct. 495,
546
36 L. Ed. 294.

441

Field v. Holland, 6 Cranch, 8, 21, 3 L. Ed. 136.. 547
Fink v. Pittsburgh, C., C. & St. L. R. Co., 19
Ohio Cir. Ct. R. (N. S.) 103...
27

595

515

« Προηγούμενη Συνέχεια »

Βιβλία

Supreme Court Reporter, Τόμοι 39-40