Supreme Court Reporter

Caldwell v. Donaghey, 108 Ark. 60, 64, 156 S. (N. S.) 721, Ann. Cas.

127

W. 839, 45 L. R. A. 1915 B, 133... Caldwell v. North Carolina, 187 U. S. 622, 23 Sup. Ct. 229, 47 L. Ed. 336.. Calhoun v. Massie, 253 U. S. 170, 40 Sup. Ct. 474, 64 L. Ed. --, 123 Va. 673, 97 S. E. 576, 249 U. S. 596, 39 Sup. Ct. 289, 63 L. Ed. 794.... ..475, 479, 480 California v. Pacific R. Co., 127 U. S. 1, 39, 8 Sup. Ct. 1073, 32 L. Ed. 150.. 150 California v. San Pablo & T. R. Co., 149 U. S. 308, 314, 13 Sup. Ct. 876, 878, 37 L. Ed. 747....53, 449 California v. Southern Pac. Co., 157 U. S. 229, 15 Sup. Ct. 591, 39 L. Ed. 683... 154 California Powder Works v. Davis, 151 U. S. 389, 393, 14 Sup. Ct. 350, 38 L. Ed. 206.. .55, 218 Cameron v. Bass, 19 Ariz. 246, 168 Pac. 645.... 413 Cameron v. U. S., 250 Fed. 943, 163 C. C. A. 193 410 Caminetti v. U. S., 242 U. S. 470, 485, 490, 37 Sup. Ct. 192, 61 L. Ed. 442, L. R. A. 1917F, 502, Ann. Cas. 1917B, 1168...

Chesapeake & O. R. Co. v. Kentucky, 179 U. S. 388, 21 Sup. Ct. 101, 45 L. Ed. 244. Chesapeake & O. R. Co. v. Proffitt, 241 U. S. 462, 468, 36 Sup. Ct. 620, 60 L. Ed. 1102... Chesbrough v. Woodworth, 195 Fed. 875, 116 C. C. A. 465; 221 Fed. 912, 137 C. C. A. 482; 251 Fed. 881, 164 C. C. A. 97; 244 U. S. 72, 37 Sup. Ct. 579, 61 L. Ed. 1000..

380

276

237

.140, 402

416

Capital City Dairy Co. v. Ohio, 183 U. S. 238, 248, 22 Sup. Ct. 120, 46 L. Ed. 171... Capital Traction Co. v. Hof, 174 U. S. 1, 18-30, 45, 19 Sup. Ct. 580, 43 L. Ed. 873.. Capital Trust Co. v. Calhoun, 250 U. S. 208, 216, 218, 219, 39 Sup. Ct. 486, 63 L. Ed. 942..477, 478, 480 Carbon Steel Co. v. Lewellyn (C. C. A.) 258 Fed. 533; 251 U. S. 501, 40 Sup. Ct. 283, 64 L. Ed. Carey v. Houston & T. Cent. R. Co., 150 U. S. 171, 14 Sup. Ct. 63, 37 L. Ed. 1041.

331

Chicago, B. & Q. R. Co. v. Harrington, 241 U.
S. 177, 36 Sup. Ct. 517, 60 L. Ed. 941..
Chicago, B. & Q. R. Co. v. Iowa, 94 U. S. 155,
162, 24 L. Ed. 94..

452

133

.63, 546

286

178

Carey v. South Dakota, 250 U. S. 118, 39 Sup. Ct. 403, 63 L. Ed. 886.. Carlile, In re (D. C.) 199 Fed. 612, 615, 616.... 537 Carolina Glass Co. v. South Carolina, 240 U. S. 305, 318, 36 Sup. Ct. 293, 60 L. Ed. 658.. Carolina-Tennessee Power Co. v. Hiawassee River Power Co., 171 N. C. 248, 88 S. E. 349; 175 N. C. 670, 96 S. E. 99.. Carr v. Edwards, 84 N. J. Law, 667, 87 Atl. 132.. Carroll v. Greenwich Ins. Co., 129 U. S. 401, 410, 26 Sup. Ct. 66, 50 L. Ed. 246.. 108 Carroll v. Safford, 3 How. 441, 11 L. Ed. 671.. 412 Carter v. Texas, 177 U. S. 442, 447, 20 Sup. Ct. 687, 44 L. Ed. 839..

384

Chicago, B. & Q. R. Co. v. McGuire, 219 U. S. 549, 569, 31 Sup. Ct. 259, 55 L. Ed. 328... Chicago, etc., R. R. v. Jones, 149 Ill. 361, 382, 37 N. E. 247, 24 L. R. A. 141, 41 Am. St. Rep. 278 547 Chicago, etc., R. Co. v. Minnesota, 134 U. S. 418, 456-458, 10 Sup. Ct. 462, 33 L. Ed. 970.. 340 Chicago, I., etc., Ry. v. McGuire, 196 U. S. 128, 132, 25 Sup. Ct. 200, 49 L. Ed. 413. Chicago Junction R. Co. v. King, 222 U. S. 222, 32 Sup. Ct. 79, 56 L. Ed. 173..

502

331

409

Central Vermont R. Co. v. White, 238 U. S. 507, 35 Sup. Ct. 865, 59 L. Ed. 1433, Ann. Cas. 1916B, 252 Chambers v. Baltimore & O. R. Co., 207 U. S. 142, 148, 155, 28 Sup. Ct. 34, 52 L. Ed. 143..372, 403 Champion Lumber Co. v. Fisher. 227 U. S. 445, 450, 451, 33 Sup. Ct. 329, 57 L. Ed. 591... Chapin v. Fye, 179 U. S. 127, 130, 21 Sup. Ct. 71, 45 L. Ed. 119..

Chapman v. Douglas County, 107 U. S. 348, 355, 2 Sup. Ct. 62, 27 L. Ed. 378.. Charleston Western Carolina R. Co. v. Thompson, 234 U. S. 576, 34 Sup. Ct. 964, 58 L. Ed. 1476.. 288 Charleston & W. C. R. Co. v. Varnville Furniture Co., 237 U. S. 597, 604. 35 Sup. Ct. 715, 59 L. Ed. 1137, Ann. Cas. 1916D, 233. Charlton v. Kelly, 229 U. S. 447, 33 Sup. Ct. 945, 57 L. Ed. 1274, 46 L. R. A. (N. S.) 397.... 347, 349, 350

Chattanooga Nat. Bldg. & Loan Ass'n v. Denson, 189 U. S. 408, 23 Sup. Ct. 630, 47 L. Ed. 870 366 Cheatham v. U. S., 92 U. S. 85, 23 L. Ed. 561.... 159 Chelentis v. Luckenbach S. S. Co., 247 U. S. 372, 38 Sup. Ct. 501, 62 L. Ed. 1171..

40 SUP.CT.-38

439

.144

City of Amarillo v. Southwestern Telegraph & Telephone Co., 253 Fed. 638, 165 C. C. A. 264.. 465 City of Bowling Green v. McMullen, 134 Ky. 742, 122 S. W. 823, 26 L. R. A. (N. S.) 895.. City of Bowling Green v. McMullen, 134 Ky. 742, 122 S. W. 823, 26 L. R. A. (N. S.) 895. 148 City of Chicago v. Dempey, 250 U. S. 651, 40 Sup. Ct. 53, 63 L. Ed. 1189. .219, 342 City of Denver v. Londoner, 33 Colo. 104, 117, 80 Pac. 117, 121.....

City of Louisiana v. Wood, 102 U. S. 294, 298, 299, 26 L. Ed. 153..

272

422

City of Mitchell v. Dakota Central Tel. Co., 246 T'.
S. 396, 412, 38 Sup. Ct. 362, 62 L. Ed. 793...... 454

Catholic Bishop of Nesqually v. Gibbon, 158 U. S. 155, 166, 167, 15 Sup. Ct. 779, 784, 39 L. Ed. 931 .413, 414 Cattle Raisers' Ass'n of Texas V. Missouri, K. & T. R. Co., 11 Interst. Com. R. 296, 352; 13 Interst. Com. R. 418, 435... Cedar Rapids Gaslight Co. v. Cedar Rapids, 223 U. S. 655, 658, 32 Sup. Ct. 389, 56 L. Ed. 594.. 531 Central Land Co. v. Laidley, 159 U. S. 103, 111, 16 Sup. Ct. 80, 40 L. Ed. 91. Central of Georgia R. Co. v. Wright, 248 U. S. 525, 39 Sup. Ct. 181, 63 L. Ed. 401.. Central Penn. Lumber Co. v. Director General, 53 Interst. Com. R. 523..

Chin Fong v. White, 258 Fed. 849, 169 C. C. A. 569 449 Chin K. Shue, In re (D. C.) 199 Fed. 282, 284.... 349 Chin Yow v. U. S., 208 U. S. 8, 12, 13, 28 Sup. Ct. 201, 52 L. Ed. 369. .349, 568, 570 Chirac v. Chirac, 2 Wheat, 259, 275, 4 L. Ed. 234.. 384 Choate v. Trapp, 224 U. S. 665, 32 Sup. Ct. 565,

Chicago & N. W. R. Co. v. Ochs, 249 U. S. 416, 419-420, 39 Sup. Ct. 343, 63 L. Ed. 679.. Chicago & N. W. R. Co. v. Ohle, 117 U. S. 123, 129, 6 Sup. Ct. 632, 29 L. Ed. 837..

132

.18, 87

Chin Fong v. Backus, 241 U. S. 1-5, 36 Sup. Ct. 490, 60 L. Ed. 859..

450

Cornell v. Coyne, 192 U. S. 418, 530, 24 Sup. Ct. 383, 48 L. Ed. 504..

352

Corry v. Baltimore, 196 U. S. 466, 25 Sup. Ct. 297, 49 L. Ed. 556.

539

Cosmos Exploration Co. v. Gray Eagle Oil Co., 190 U. S. 301, 308, 23 Sup. Ct. 692, 696, 47 L. Ed. 1064..

413

102

City of Newport v. French Bros. Bauer Co., 169 Ky. 174, 185, 183 S. W. 532.. City of Newport v. Wagner, 168 Ky. 646, 182 S. W. 834, Ann. Cas. 1917A, 962.. City of Pawhuska v. Pawhuska Oil & Gas Co., 250 U. S. 394, 39 Sup. Ct. 526, 63 L. Ed. 1054 ...54, 219, 342 Claassen v. U. S., 142 U. S. 140, 12 Sup. Ct. 169, 35 L. Ed. 966.. ..18, 210 Clark Distilling Co. v. Western Maryland R. Co., 242 U. S. 311, 332, 37 Sup. Ct. 180, 61 L. Ed. 326, L. R. A. 1917B, 1218, Ann. Cas. 1917B, 845.. 109. 441, 443 Clarke v. McDade, 165 U. S. 168, 172, 17 Sup. Ct. 284, 41 L. Ed. 673.. 331 Clarke v. Rogers, 183 Fed. 518, 521, 522, 106 C. C. A. 64; 228 U. S. 534, 542, 543, 548, 33 Sup. Ct. 587, 57 L. Ed. 953. ...137, 138 Clay County Produce Co. v. Western Union Tel. Co., 44 Interst. Com. R. 670... Cleveland, etc., R. Co. v. Backus, 154 U. S. 439, 445, 14 Sup. Ct. 1122, 1124, 38 L. Ed. 1041... Cleveland & P. R. Co. v. Cleveland, 225 U. S. 50, 53, 35 Sup. Ct. 21, 59 L. Ed. 127.. Clifford v. Atlantic Cotton Mills, 146 Mass. 47, 48, 49, 15 N. E. 84, 4 Am. St. Rep. 279. Clinton Sugar Refining Co. v. Chicago & N. W. R. Co., 28 Interst. Com. R. 364, 367.. Clipper Mining Co. v. Eli Mining Co., 194 U. S. 220, 229, 232, 234, 24 Sup. Ct. 632, 48 L. Ed. 944 .325, 326, 413 Cochran v. U. S., 157 U. S. 286, 295, 296, 15 Sup. Ct. 628, 39 L. Ed. 704..

114

218

516

576

315

.178, 180

Coulter v. Louisville & N. R. Co., 196 U. S. 599, 25 Sup. Ct. 342, 49 L. Ed. 615.. Courtney v. Pradt, 196 U. S. 89, 91, 25 Sup. Ct. 208, 49 L. Ed. 398. Covington v. Covington First Nat. Bank, 185 U. S. 270, 277, 22 Sup. Ct. 645, 46 L. Ed. 906.... 349 Crabtree v. Neff, 1 Bond, 554, Fed. Cas. No. 3,549 Craig v. Missouri, 4 Pet. 410, 433, 7 L. Ed. 903 199 Cramp v. International Curtis Marine Turbine Co., 246 U. S. 28, 38 Sup. Ct. 271, 62 L. Ed. 560 457 Crawford v. Burke, 195 U. S. 176, 187, 193, 25 Sup. Ct. 9, 49 L. Ed. 147. .136, 137 Cream of Wheat Co. v. Grand Forks County, 253 U. S. 325, 40 Sup. Ct. 558, 64 L. Ed. Credits Commutation Co. v. U. S., 177 U. S. 311, 315, 20 Sup. Ct. 636, 44 L. Ed. 782. Creede & Cripple Creek Mining Co. v. Uinta Tunnel Mining Co., 196 U. S. 337, 348-351, 352, 356, 25 Sup. Ct. 266, 49 L. Ed. 501. .326, 328, 413 Creekmore v. U. S., 237 Fed. 743, 150 C. C. A. 497, L. R. A. 1917C, 845...

563

512

292

Cole v. Ralph, 252 U. S. 286, 40 Sup. Ct. 321, 64 L. Ed. 411 Coleman v. Tennessee, 97 U. S. 508, 509, 514, 515, 24 L. Ed. 1118.. .390, 391 Collard v. Pittsburgh, C., C. & St. L. R. Co., 246 U. S. 653, 38 Sup. Ct. 336, 62 L. Ed. 922.. 55 Collector v. Day, 11 Wall. 113, 20 L. Ed. 122.... 553 Collector, The, v. Hubbard, 12 Wall. 1, 18, 20 L. Ed. 272

Crossman v. Pendery (C. C.) 8 Fed. 693..
Crow v. Van Sickle, 6 Nev. 146...
Cruickshank v. Bidwell, 176 U. S. 73, 81, 20 Sup.
Ct. 280, 44 L. Ed. 877.

102 Crozier v. Krupp, 224 U. S. 290, 306, 32 Sup. Ct. 488, 56 L. Ed. 771.... ...64, 457, 521 Cuba R. Co. v. Crosby, 222 U. S. 473, 32 Sup. Ct. 132, 56 L. Ed. 274, 38 L. R. A. (N. S.) 40 320 Cudney v. Flannery, 1 L. D. 165.. 35

Creswill v. Knights of Pythias, 225 U. S. 246, 261, 32 Sup. Ct. 822, 56 L. Ed. 1074.. Crew Levick Co. v. Pennsylvania, 245 U. S. 292, 294, 38 Sup. Ct. 126, 62 L. Ed. 295... .226, 227 Crews v. Burcham, 1 Black, 352, 17 L. Ed. 91.. 32 Cross Lake Shooting & Fishing Club v. Louisiana, 224 U. S. 632, 639, 32 Sup. Ct. 577, 56 L. Ed. 924....

421

..106, 366

328

325

Com. v. McGrath, 185 Mass. 1, 69 N. E. 340..144, 147 Com. v. Mann, 5 Watts & S. (Pa.) 403, 415... 554 Com. v. Peachie, 177 Mass. 267, 272, 59 N. E. 55. 304 Com. v. Phelps, 209 Mass. 396, 404, 95 N. E. 868, Ann. Cas. 1912B, 566..

349

Dainese v. Kendall, 119 U. S. 53, 7 Sup. Ct. 65, 30 L. Ed. 305.. Dakota Central Telephone Co. v. South Dakota, 250 U. S. 163, 184, 39 Sup. Ct. 507, 63 L. Ed. 910 110 Dalay v. Savage, 145 Mass. 38, 41, 12 N. E. 841, 1 Am. St. Rep. 429.. 516 Damon v. Carrol, 163 Mass. 404, 408, 40 N. E. 185 472 Dana v. Dana, 250 U. S. 651, 40 Sup. Ct. 9, 63 L. Ed. 1203..

Com. v. Stoner, 70 Pa. Super. Ct. 365..
Com. v. Strauss, 188 Mass. 229, 74 N. E. 308; 191
Mass. 545, 78 N. E. 136, 11 L. R. A. (N. S.)
968, 6 Ann. Cas. 842..

292

Com. v. Whitaker, 25 Pa. Co. Ct. 42.. Connecticut General Life Ins. Co. v. Eaton (D. C.) 218 Fed. 188, 192..

292

Darnell v. Edwards, 244 U. S. 564, 569, 37 Sup. Ct. 701, 61 L. Ed. 1317...

.397, 398, 399

Connecticut Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. Eaton (D. C.) 218 Fed. 206.. ..397, 399 Consolidated Gas Co. of New York v. Newton (D. C.) 256 Fed. 238; (C. C. A.) 260 Fed. 1022 512 Consolidated Turnpike Co. v. Norfolk, etc., R. Co., 228 U. S. 326, 334, 596, 600, 33 Sup. Ct. 510, 605, 57 L. Ed. 857, 982.. ..178, 346, 484, 485 Converse v. Hamilton, 224 U. S. 243, 32 Sup. Ct. 415, 56 L. Ed. 749, Ann. Cas. 1913D, 1292. .372 Cooke v. U. S., 91 U. S. 389, 396, 23 L. Ed. 237.. 363 Cooley v. Board of Wardens, 12 How. 299, 317, 318, 13 L. Ed. 996...

478 Davis v. Hildebrant, 241 U. S. 565, 36 S. Ct. 708, 60 L. Ed. 1172.. .498, 500

.40, 531 David Kauffman Sons Co. v. Smith, 216 U. S. 610, 30 Sup. Ct. 419, 54 L. Ed. 636..

454

Davidson v. New Orleans, 96 U. S. 97, 106, 24 L. Ed. 616....

305

Davis v. Com., 164 Mass. 241, 41 N. E. 292, 30 L. R. A. 743..

Page

Defiance Water Co. v. Defiance, 191 U. S. 184, 194, 24 Sup. Ct. 63, 48 L. Ed. 140.. De Ganay v. Lederer, 250 U. S. 376, 39 Sup. Ct. 524, 63 L. Ed. 1042..

348

.225, 418

384

250

De Geofroy v. Riggs, 133 U. S. 258, 10 Sup. Ct. 295, 33 L. Ed. 642. Delamater v. South Dakota, 205 U. S. 93, 97, 27 Sup. Ct. 447, 51 L. Ed. 724, 10 Ann. Cas. 733.. 442 De La Rama v. De La Rama, 241 U. S. 154, 159, 36 Sup. Ct. 518, 60 L. Ed. 932, Ann. Cas. 1917C, 411, Delaware, L. & W. R. Co. v. Pennsylvania, 198 U. S. 341, 25 Sup. Ct. 669, 49 L. Ed. 1077.. Delaware, L. & W. R. Co. v. U. S., 249 U. S. 560 385, 388, 39 Sup. Ct. 348, 63 L. Ed. 659.. Delaware, L. & W. R. Co. v. Yurkonis, 238 U. S. 439, 444, 35 Sup. Ct. 902, 59 L. Ed. 1397..345, 452, 485

.68, 166

Denver v. Denver Union Water Co., 246 U. S.
178, 38 Sup. Ct. 278, 62 L. Ed. 649..
Denver v. Dumars, 33 Colo. 94, 97, 80 Pac. 114 272
Denver v. Kennedy, 33 Colo. 80, 80 Pac. 122, 467 272
Denver v. New York Trust Co., 229 U. S. 123,
136, 33 Sup. Ct. 657, 57 L. Ed. 1101..
Deposit Bank v. Fayette Bank, 90 Ky. 10, 13 S.
W. 339, 7 L. R. A. 819..

465

Egan v. Hart, 165 U. S. 188, 17 Sup. Ct. 300, 41 L. Ed. 680.

546

531

.54, 586

Eichel v. U. S. Fidelity & Guaranty Co., 239 U.
S. 629, 36 Sup. Ct. 165, 50 L. Ed. 475..
Eisner v. Macomber, 252 U. S. 189, 40 Sup. Ct.
189, 64 L. Ed. 521...

Elgin National Watch Co. v. Illinois Watch Case
*. 556
Co., 179 U. S. 665, 21 Sup. Ct. 270, 45 L. Ed. 365 416
El Paso Sash & Door Co. v. Carraway, 245 U. S.
Embree v. Kansas City, etc., Road District, 240 U.
643, 38 Sup. Ct. 222, 62 L. Ed. 528..
E. Luckenbach, The (D. C.) 19 Fed. 847..
..12, 55
548
S. 242, 250, 36 Sup. Ct. 317, 60 L. Ed. 624....116, 274
Emert v. Missouri, 156 U. S. 296, 15 Sup. Ct. 367,
39 L. Ed.

430.. Empire State Cattle Co. v. Atchison, T. & S. F. R. Co., 210 U. S. 1, 8, 28 Sup. Ct. 607, 52 L. Ed. 931, 15 Ann. Cas. 70.. Empire State-Idaho Mining Co. v. Hanley, 205 U. 161 S. 225, 232, 27 Sup. Ct. 476, 51 L. Ed. 779..395, 484, 583 Engelhard, In re, 231 U. S. 646, 34 Sup. Ct. 258, 58 L. Ed. 416..

576

Dickerson v. Western Union Tel. Co., 114 Miss. 115, 74 South. 779.

English v. Richardson, 224 U. S. 630, 32 Sup. Ct.
571, 56 L. Ed. 949; 28 Okl. 408, 114 Pac. 710...
Enterprise Irr. Dist. v. Farmers' Mutual Canal
Co., 243 U. S. 157, 164, 37 Sup. Ct. 318. 61 L.
Ed. 644..
Equitable Life Assur. Soc. v. Brown, 187 U. S.
308, 311, 314, 23 Sup. Ct. 123, 47 L. Ed. 190
Erickson v. Preuss, 223 N. Y. 365, 368, 119 N. E.
332, 484, 485
555
46

Dobbins v. Commissioners of Erie County, 16 Pet. 435, 450, 10 L. Ed. 1022.

Dr. Miles Medical Co. v. Park & Sons Co., 220
U. S. 373, 31 Sup. Ct. 376, 55 L. Ed. 502...
Doe v. Wilson, 23 How. 457, 16 L. Ed. 584.
Dodge v. Woolsey, 18 How. 331, 348, 15 L. Ed.
401

Dobbins v. Los Angeles, 195 U. S. 223, 235, 25 Sup. Ct. 18, 20, 49 L. Ed. 169..

103

Erie Lighter 108, The (D. C.) 250 Fed. 490, 497, 498 67
Erie R. R. v. Pennsylvania, 153 U. S. 628, 14
Sup. Ct. 952, 38 L. Ed. 846..

230

252

Erie R. Co. v. Purucker, 244 U. S. 320, 37 Sup.
Ct. 629, 91 L. Ed. 1166..

276

Erwin v. U. S., 97 U. S. 392, 395, 396, 397, 24 L.
Ed. 1065.

.370, 473

497

Dodge's Case, 6 Mart. O. S. (La.) 569.

Esselborn, In re (C. C.) 8 Fed. 904..

539

Doggett v. Emerson, 1 Woodb. & M. 195, 7 Fed. Cas. 821, 826, No. 3,962.

136

Dollar Co. v. Canadian C. & F. Co., 220 N. Y. 270, 277, 115 N. E. 711..

173

Dowdell v. U. S., 221 U. S. 325, 332, 31 Sup. Ct. 590, 55 L. Ed. 753..

Dorr v. U. S., 195 U. S. 138, 24 Sup. Ct. 808, 49 L. Ed. 128, 1 Ann. Cas. 697...

279

Gore (D. C.) 262 Fed. 550.
Evans v. U. S., 153 U. S. 584, 587, 595,
Sup. Ct. 934, 939, 38 L. Ed. 830, 839...
Extract & Tonic Co. v. Lynch, 100 Miss.
South. 316

Estes v. State, 13 Okl. Cr. 604, 166 Pac. 77.....
Eugene F. Moran, The, 212 U. S. 466, 474, 475, 29
Sup. Ct. 339, 53 L. Ed. 600..
Evans v.

146

550

608, 14 650, 56 .18, 141, 210

..144, 145

279

Dower v. Richards, 151 U. S. 658, 14 Sup. Ct. 38 L. Ed. 305.

452,

Downes v. Bidwell, 182 U. S. 244, 21 Sup. Ct. 770, 45 L. Ed. 1088..

531

Fair v. Manhattan Ins. Co., 112 Mass. 329.
Fairbanks v. U. S., 181 U. S. 283, 293, 21 Sup.
Ct. 648, 652, 45 L. Ed. 862...

545

557

Dozier v. Alabama, 218 U. S. 124, 30 Sup. Ct. 619, 54 L. Ed. 965, 28 L. R. A. (N. S.) 264... Doyle v. Doyle, 56 N. H. 567.

279

Fair Haven & W. R. Co. v. New Haven, 203 U.

S. 379, 27 Sup. Ct. 74, 51 L. Ed. 237..
Fallbrook Irr. Dist. v. Bradley, 164 U. S. 155,
158, 17 Sup. Ct. 56, 63, 41 L. Ed. 369.
Fargo v. Hart, 193 U. S. 490, 24 Sup. Ct. 498, 48
L. Ed. 761.

308

501

Doyle v. Mitchell Bros. Co., 247 U. S. 179, 183,
185, 38 Sup. Ct. 467, 469, 62 L. Ed. 1054..
Dresser v. Bates, 250 Fed. 525, 162 C. C. A. 541 248
193
Drumm-Flato Commission Co. v. Edmisson, 208
U. S. 534, 539, 28 Sup. Ct. 367, 52 L. Ed. 606.. 250
Drury v. Lewis, 200 U. S. 1, 26 Sup. Ct. 229, 50
L. Ed.

Farnham v. U. S., 240 U. S. 537, 540, 36 Sup.
Farmers' & Mechanics' Bank v. Dearing, 91 U.
437
S. 29, 32, 23 L. Ed. 196..
..58, 59, 60
Ct. 427, 60 L. Ed. 786.
Farrell v. O'Brien, 199 U. S. 89, 100, 25 Sup. Ct.
456
727, 50 L. Ed. 101..
Farrugia v. Philadelphia & R. R. Co., 233 U. S.
..394, 395, 484, 583
352, 353, 34 Sup. Ct. 591, 58 L. Ed. 996..
Fauntleroy v. Lum, 210 U. S. 230, 235, 236, 28
Sup. Ct. 641, 52 L. Ed. 1039.

180

372

199

Dunbar v. Dunbar, 190 U. S. 340, 350, 23

Sup.

Ct. 757, 761, 47 L. Ed. 1084..

Federal Trade Commission v. Gratz, 258 Fed. 314, 169 C. C. A. 330.

574

136

Duncan v. Missouri, 152 U. S. 377, 382, 14

Sup.

Ct. 570, 38 L. Ed. 485..

Dundy v. Chambers, 22 Ill. 369..

Fenn v. Kinsey, 45 Mich. 446, 8 N. W. 64....311, 313
Fetter, In re, 23 N. J. Law, 311, 321, 57 Am. Dec.
382

539

559

Durre v. Western Union Tel. Co., 165 Wis. 190, 161 N. W. 755....

Dusar v. Murgatroyd, 1 Wash. C. C. 13, 8 Fed.

Cas 140, No. 4,199.

Ficklen v. Taxing Dist. of Shelby County, 145
U. S. 1, 12 Sup. Ct. 810, 36 L. Ed. 601..
Fidelity Title & Trust Co. v. Dubois Electric Co.,
249 U. S. 597, 606, 39 Sup. Ct. 290, 388, 63 L. Ed.
795
Fidelity & Columbia Trust Co. v. Louisville, 245
U. S. 54, 59, 38 Sup. Ct. 40, 62 L. Ed. 145, L. R.
A. 1918C, 124...
Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. U. S., 187 U. S. 315,
.418, 560
23 Sup. Ct. 120, 47 L. Ed. 194.

387

515

546

169

Eastern R. Co. v. U. S., 129 U. S. 391, 394, 396, 9 Sup. Ct. 320, 32 L. Ed. 730.. ..68, 166

Field v. Clark, 143 U. S. 619, 692, 12 Sup. Ct. 495,
36 L. Ed. 294..
Field v. Holland, 6 Cranch, 8, 21, 3 L. Ed. 136.. 547
Fink v. Pittsburgh, C., C. & St. L. R. Co., 19
Ohio Cir. Ct. R. (N. S.) 103.....

441

Fitts v. McGhee, 172 U. S. 516, 524, 19 Sup. Ct.
269, 42 L. Ed. 535..
Fitzpatrick v. U. S., 178 U. S. 304, 307, 20 Sup.
Ct. 944, 44 L. Ed. 1078..

363

First Nat. Bank v. State Bank, 107 Iowa, 327, 77 N. W. 1045, 44 L. R. A. 131.. First Nat. Bank v. Title & Trust Co., 198 U. S. 280, 288, 291, 25 Sup. Ct. 693, 49 L. Ed. 1051.. 535 Fishbeck Soap Co. v. Kleeno Mfg. Co., 44 App. D. C. 6.....

Fisher v. Heirs of Rule, 43 L. D. 217..

415 35

Godley v. Hagerty, 20 Pa. 387, 59 Am. Dec. 731 516 Goldman v. U. S., 245 U. S. 474, 477, 38 Sup. Ct. 166, 62 L. Ed. 410..

.208, 446 Goodman v. Niblack, 102 U. S. 556, 560, 26 L. Ed. 229... 370 Goodrich v. Ferris, 214 U. S. 71, 79, 29 Sup. Ct. 580, 53 L. Ed. 914. ..55, 394, 395, 484, 583 Goodyear India Rubber Glove Mfg. Co. V. Goodyear Rubber Co., 128 U. S. 598, 9 Sup. Ct. 166, 32 L. Ed. 535.

416

154

Grafton v. U. S., 206 U. S. 333, 27 Sup. Ct. 749, 51 L. Ed. 1048, 11 Ann. Cas. 640..

391

.59, 61

136

349

Flagg v. U. S., 233 Fed. 481, 483, 147 C. C. A. 367 183 Fleckner v. Bank, 8 Wheat. 338, 349, 354, 5 L. Ed. 631

F. L. Grant Shoe Co. v. Laird, 212 U. S. 445, 447, 448, 29 Sup. Ct. 332, 53 L. Ed. 591. Flint v. Stone Tracy Co., 220 U. S. 107, 146, 158, 162, 31 Sup. Ct. 342, 55 L. Ed. 389, Ann. Cas. 1912B, 1312 .554, 560 Fong Yue Ting v. U. S., 149 U. S. 698, 714, 13 Sup. Ct. 1016, 37 L. Ed. 905.. Ford v. Munroe (Tex. Civ. App.) 144 S. W. 349 306 Forgay v. Conrad, 6 How. 201, 204, 21 L. Ed. 404 349 Four Hundred & Forty-Three Cans of Egg Prod

uct_v. U. S., 226 U. S. 172, 184, 33 Sup. Ct. 50, 57 L. Ed. 174..

512 329

Fox v. Myers, 29 Nev. 169, 186, 86 Pac. 793.
Fraina v. U. S., 255 Fed. 28, 33, 166 C. C. A. 356 446
Francis v. Baker, 11 R. I. 103, 23 Am. Rep. 424 547
Frank v. Mangum, 237 U. S. 309, 340, 35 Sup. Ct.
582, 59 L. Ed. 969.

Grant v. Laird, 212 U. S. 445, 29 Sup. Ct. 332, 53 L. Ed. 591.

Grant v. Phoenix Ins. Co., 106 U. S. 429, 431, 1 Sup. Ct. 414, 27 L. Ed. 237..

348 Grant v. Raymond, 6 Pet. 218, 247, 8 L. Ed. 376 566 Gratiot State Bank v. Johnson, 249 U. S. 246, 39 Sup. Ct. 263, 63 L. Ed. 587.. Gray, Ex parte (Tex. Cr. App.) 83 S. W. 828... 148 Gray v. Boston Gas Light Co., 114 Mass. 149, 19 Am. Rep. 324....

387

516

Franklin v. Lynch, 233 U. S. 269, 34 Sup. Ct. 505, 58 L. Ed. 954.. Franklin v. U. S., 216 U. S. 559, 30 Sup. Ct. 434, 54 L. Ed. 615..

32 ...391, 443

French v. Barber Asphalt Paving Co., 181 U.
S. 324, 21 Sup. Ct. 625, 45 L. Ed. 879..
Friend v. Talcott, 228 U. S. 27, 39, 33 Sup.
505, 57 L. Ed. 718..

115

Ct.

137

Fritts v. Palmer, 132 U. S. 282, 288, 10 Sup. 93, 33 L. Ed. 317..

Gray's Harbor Co. v. Coats-Fordney Co., 243 U. S. 251, 255, 37 Sup. Ct. 295, 61 L. Ed. 702..218, 343, 484 Great Northern R. Co. v. Hower, 236 U. S. 702, 710, 35 Sup. Ct. 465, 59 L. Ed. 798.. Great Northern R. Co. v. Minnesota, 238 340, 35 Sup. Ct. 753, 59 L. Ed. 1337. Great Western R. Co. v. Railway Co., L. App. Cas. 787, 808..

Ct.

366

145

Funk v. State, 208 S. W. 509.. Fuss, In re, 5 L. D. 167...

Gear, Scott & Co. v. Shannon, 223 U. S. 468, 471, 472, 473, 32 Sup. Ct. 236, 56 L. Ed. 510..

421, 422, 436, 484 Galliher v. Cadwell, 145 U. S. 368, 371-373, 12 Sup. Ct. 873, 36 L. Ed. 738.. Gandia v. Pettingill, 222 U. S. 452, 32 Sup. Ct. 127, 56 L. Ed. 267.

127

216

102, 126, 223, 256 Grenada Lumber Co. v. Mississippi, 217 U. S. 433, 443, 30 Sup. Ct. 535, 54 L. Ed. 826.. Grin, In re (C. C.) 112 Fed. 790, 794. Grin v. Shine, 187 U. S. 181, 187, 23 Sup. Ct. 98, 47 L. Ed. 130..

341

349

Gardner v. Michigan, 199 U. S. 325, 26 Sup. Ct. 106. 50 L. Ed. 212.

Gardiner v. Western Union Tel. Co., 231 Fed. 405, 145 C. C. A. 399..

Gast Realty & I. Co. v. Schneider Granite Co., 240 U. S. 55, 36 Sup. Ct. 254, 60 L. Ed. 523.... 116 Gayler v. Wilder, 10 How. 477, 13 L. Ed. 504.. 457 Geer v. Connecticut, 161 U. S. 519, 16 Sup. Ct. 600, 40 L. Ed. 793 383 Gelpcke v. Dubuque, 1 Wall. 175, 17 L. Ed. 520 309 General Oil Co. v. Crain, 209 U. S. 211, 216, 220, 228, 28 Sup. Ct. 475, 52 L. Ed. 754.. 372 Georgia v. Brailsford, 3 Dall. 1, 4, 1 L. Ed. 483 69 Georgia v. Tennessee Copper Co., 206 U. S. 230, 237, 27 Sup. Ct. 618, 51 L. Ed. 1038, 11 Ann. Cas. 488 382 German Alliance Ins. Co. v. Kansas, 233 U. S. 389, 34 Sup. Ct. 612, 58 L. Ed. 1011, L. R. A. 1915C, 1189 German National Bank v. Speckert, 181 U. S. 405, 21 Sup. Ct. 688, 45 L. Ed. 926..

535 Gibbons v. Mahon, 136 U. S. 549, 559, 560, 10 Sup. Ct. 1057, 34 L. Ed. 525. .191, 202, 203 Gibbons v. Ogden, 9 Wheat. 1, 189, 193, 197, 207, 209, 6 L. Ed. 23.. ...110, 365, 387, 443, 493, 588 Gleason v. Wood, 224 U. S. 679, 32 Sup. Ct. 571, 56 L. Ed. 947; 28 Okl. 502, 114 Pac. 708... 420 Globe Newspaper Co. v. Walker, 210 U. S. 356, 28 Sup. Ct. 726, 52 L. Ed. 1096..

Hamilton v. Kentucky Distillery & Warehouse Co., 251 U. S. 146, 40 Sup. Ct. 106, 64 L. Ed. 141, 143, 149, 151, 152, 476 Hamilton Co. v. Massachusetts, 6 Wall. 632, 18 L. Ed. 904..

559

Harding v. Illinois, 196 U. S. 78, 80, 86, 25 Sup. Ct.

Hollingsworth v. Virginia, 3 Dall. 378, 1 L. Ed.

(40 Sup.Ct.)

Page

..55, 218

644

127

347

176, 49 L. Ed. 394...
Hardt v. Heidweyer, 152 U. S. 547, 559, 14 Sup. Ct.
671, 38 L. Ed. 548..

Harkrader v. Wadley, 172 U. S. 148, 162, 10
Sup. Ct. 119, 43 L. Ed. 399.

456

Harley v. U. S., 198 U. S. 229, 304, 25 Sup. Ct.
634, 49 L. Ed. 1029.
Harper Bros. v. Klaw (D. C.) 232 Fed. 609, 612, 613 336
Harriman v. Northen Securities Co., 197 U. S.

536
516

244, 287, 291, 25 Sup. Ct. 493, 49 L. Ed. 739..302, 465 Harris v. Equator Min. Co. (C. C.) 8 Fed. 863, 866 330 Harris v. First Nat. Bank, 216 U. S. 382, 385, 30 Sup. Ct. 296, 54 L. Ed. 528. Harris v. James, 45 L. J., Q. B., 545. Harriss-Irby Cotton Co. v. State, 31 Okl. 603, 122 Pac. 163.. Harry Lode Mining Claim, 41 Land Dec. 403.... 325 ..339, 340 Hart Steel Co. v. Railroad Supply Co., 244 U. S. 294, 299, 37 Sup. Ct. 506, 61 L. Ed. 1148.. Harvey v. U. S., 113 U. S. 243, 249, 5 Sup. Ct. 465, 28 L. Ed. 987..

597

Page

498

Holmes v. Hunt, 122 Mass. 505, 512, 23 Am. Rep.
381.
Holmes v. Jennison, 14 Pet. 540, 570, 10 L. Ed. 579 589
.545, 547
Holt v. U. S., 218 U. S. 245, 248, 31 Sup. Ct. 2,
54 L. Ed. 1021, 20 Ann. Cas. 1138..
Home Ins. Co. v. New York, 134 U. S. 594, 601, 10
Sup. Ct. 593, 33 L. Ed. 1035..

Hooe v. Alexandria, 1 Cranch (C. C.) 98, Fed.
Cas. No. 6667.

Hopkins v. U. S., 171 U. S. 579, 19 Sup. Ct. 40, 43 L. Ed. 290..

176

387

Hopkirk v. Bell, 3 Cranch, 454, 2 L. Ed. 497..
Hopt v. Utah, 120 U. S. 430, 7 Sup. Ct. 614, 30
L. Ed. 708..

374

384

362

114, 115

Haseltine v. Bank, 183 U. S. 130, 22 Sup. Ct. 49,
46 L. Ed. 117..
Haseltine v. Central Bank of Springfield, 183 U.
S. 132, 134, 22 Sup. Ct. 50, 46 L. Ed. 118..58, 59, 60
Haskell, Ex parte, 112 Cal. 412, 44 Pac. 725, 32
L. R. A. 527..

Hortsman v. Henshaw, 11 How, 177, 183, 13 L.
Ed. 653...

Houck v. Little River Drainage Dist., 239
S. 254, 36 Sup. Ct. 58, 60 L. Ed. 266..
Houlihan v. Corporation of St. Anthony (C. C.)
173 Fed. 496; 184 Fed. 252, 106 C. C. A. 394;
U. S. 613, 31 Sup. Ct. 717, 55 L. Ed. 609..
220
Howard v. Acme Brewing Co., 143 Ga. 1, 83 S.
E. 1096, Ann. Cas. 1917A, 91...

Haskell v. Kansas Natural Gas Co., 224 U. S.
217, 32 Sup. Ct. 442, 56 L. Ed. 738..
Haskell Implement Co. v. Postal Tel. Cable Co.,
114 Me. 277, 96 Atl. 219...

280

Hatch v. Reardon, 204 U. S. 152, 159, 27 Sup. Ct. 188, 51 L. Ed. 415, 9 Ann. Cas. 736..

144

Hathaway v. Roach, 2 Woodb. & M. 63, 67, Fed.
Cas. No. 6,213..

363

Hauenstein v. Lynham, 100 U. S. 483, 25 L. Ed. 628

548

384

Howard v. Gipsy Oil Co., 247 U. S. 503, 38 Sup.
Ct. 426, 62 L. Ed. 1239.

224

Hawaii v. Mankichi, 190 U. S. 197, 220, 23 Sup.
Ct. 787, 47 L. Ed. 1016..

Howard v. Kimball, 65 Me. 308..

547

279

Howe Mach. Co. v. Edwards, 15 Blatchf. 402,
Fed. Cas. No. 6784..

546

Howell, The (D. C.) 257 Fed. 578.

440

.125

Hulbert v. Chicago, 202 U. S. 275, 279, 280, 26
Hubert v. New Orleans, 215 U. S. 170,
Sup. Ct. 40, 54 L. Ed. 144..
Sup. Ct. 617, 50 L. Ed. 1026.
Hull v. Burr, 234 U. S. 712, 720, 34 Sup. Ct. 892,
.331, 332
58 L. Ed. 1557.
.12, 345, 485

175, 30

583

359

Hawke v. Smith, 253 U. S. 221, 40 Sup. Ct. 495,
64 L. Ed. --; (Ohio) 126 N. E. 400..
Hawley v. Malden, 232 U. S. 1, 11, 12, 34 Sup. Ct.
.488, 498, 499
201, 58 L. Ed. 477, Ann. Cas. 1916C, 842....559, 560
Hayes v. Missouri, 120 U. S. 68, 71, 7 Sup. Ct. 350,
30 L. Ed. 578..

326

387

Hays v. Seattle (D. C.) 226 Fed. 287.
Healey v. Rupp, 37 Colo. 25, 28, 86 Pac. 1015..
Healy v. Sea Gull Specialty Co., 237 U. S. 479,
35 Sup. Ct. 658, 59 L. Ed. 1056.
Heckers v. Fowler, 2 Wall. 123, 17 L. Ed. 759.. 548
Heike v. U. S., 217 U. S. 423, 429, 30 Sup. Ct. 539,
54 L. Ed. 821..
Heirs of P. F. Dubourg de St. Colombe v. U. S.,
.347, 349, 468, 586
7 Pet. 625, 8 L. Ed. 807....
Henderson Light & Power Co. v. Blue Ridge
Ry., 243 U. S. 563, 37 Sup. Ct. 440, 61 L. Ed. 900 332
Hennen, Ex parte, 13 Pet, 230, 259, 260, 10 L. Ed.
138

547

Hull v. Philadelphia & R. R. Co., 132 Md. 540, 104
Atl. 274...

421

Huntington v. Attrill, 146 U. S. 657, 683, 684, 13
Hunnicutt v. Peyton, 102 U. S. 333, 26 L. Ed. 113.. 445
Huntress v. Town of Epsom (C. C.) 15 Fed. 732.. 549
Sup. Ct. 224, 36 L. Ed. 1123.
Hurley v. Jones, 97 U. S. 318, 24 L. Ed. 1008..
Hyde v. Shine, 199 U. S. 62, 81, 25 Sup. Ct. 760,
50 L. Ed. 90..

Hijo v. U. S., 194 U. S. 315, 323, 24 Sup. Ct. 727, 48
161
L. Ed. 994..
.110, 111, 520

Henry v. Henkel, 235 U. S. 219, 35 Sup. Ct. 54, 59
376
L. Ed. 203..
Henry v. U. S., 251 U. S. 393, 40 Sup. Ct. 185, 64
.245 349
L. Ed.
Hepburn v. Dubois, 12 Pet. 345, 376, 9 L. Ed. 1111 87
..368,369
Herold v. Mutual Ben, Life Ins. Co., 201 Fed. 918,
120 C. C. A. 256; 231 U. S. 755, 34 Sup. Ct. 323,
58 L. Ed. 468..
Hewit v. Berlin Mach. Works, 194 U. S. 296, 300,
24 Sup. Ct. 690, 691, 48 L. Ed. 986.
Heye v. Birge-Forbes Co., 212 Fed. 112, 128 C.
.535, 536
C. A. 628; 234 U. S. 759, 34 Sup. Ct. 676, 58 L.
Ed. 1580..

399

480

Hill v. Bugbee, 91 N. J. Law, 454, 103 Atl. 861; 92
N. J. Law, 514, 105 Atl. 893.
Hilton v. Dickerson, 108 U. S. 165, 168, 2 Sup.
Ct. 424, 27 L. Ed. 688.
Himely v. Rose, 5 Cranch. 313, 319, 3 L. Ed. 111.. 525
Himphreys v. Idaho Gold Mines Co., 21 Idaho,
126, 140, 120 Pac. 823, 40 L. R. A. (N. S.) 817.... 330
Hipolite Egg Co. v. U. S., 220 U. S. 45, 58, 31 Sup.
Ct. 364, 55 L. Ed. 364..
Hirschman, In re (D. C.) 104 Fed. 69, 70, 71.... 137
..108, 476
Hirsh v. Twyford, 40 Okl. 220, 230, 139 Pac. 313.. 340
Hobart v. Drogan, 10 Pet. 108, 119, 9 L. Ed. 363.. 443
Hoffman v. Bank of Milwaukee, 12 Wall. 181, 192,
20 L. Ed. 366...

363

Illinois Seed Co., Ex parte, 219 O. G. 931.
Indiana Transportation Co., Ex parte. 244 U. S.
456, 457, 37 Sup. Ct. 717, 61 L. Ed. 1253..
Insurance Co. v. Norton, 96 U. S. 234..
Inter-Island Steam Nav. Co. v. Ward, 242 U. S.
1, 37 Sup. Ct. 1, 61 L. Ed. 113..
International Harvester Co. v. State of Missouri,
234 U. S. 199, 209, 34 Sup. Ct. 859, 862, 58 L. Ed.
1276, 52 L. R. A. (N. S.) 525..
International Paper Co. v. Massachusetts, 246 U.
S. 135, 38 Sup. Ct. 292, 62 L. Ed. 624, Ann. Cas.
1918C, 617..

539

415

224

463

518

433

Hohorst v. Hamburg-American Packet Co., 148
U. S. 262, 13 Sup. Ct. 590 (C. C.) 76 Fed. 472, 37
L. Ed. 443....
Hoke v. U. S., 227 U. S. 308, 323, 33 Sup. Ct. 281,
..358, 548
57 L. Ed. 523, 43 L. R. A. (N. S.) 906, Ann. Cas.
1913E, 905.

Interstate Commerce Commission v. Diffenbaugh
222 U. S. 42, 32 Sup. Ct. 22, 56 L. Ed. 83.....
Interstate Commerce Commission
Transit Co., 224 U. S. 191, 214, 32 Sup. Ct. 436,
Goodrich
56 L. Ed. 729..

578

Holcombe v. McKusick, 20 How. 552, 554, 15 L.
.108, 476
Ed. 1020

Interstate Commerce Commission v. Louisville &
441
N. R. Co., 227 U. S. 88, 93, 33 Sup. Ct. 185, 187,
57 L. Ed. 431...

472

349

Hollerbach v. U. S., 233 U. S. 165, 34 Sup. Ct. 553, 58 L. Ed. 898.

425

Interstate Commerce Commission v. Union Pac.
R. Co., 222 U. S. 541, 547, 548, 32 Sup. Ct. 108,
111, 56 L. Ed. 308..
..40, 531

« Προηγούμενη Συνέχεια »

Βιβλία

Supreme Court Reporter, Τόμοι 39-40