Reports of Cases at Law and in Equity Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court of Arkansas, Τόμος 23B.J. Borden, 1867 |
Αναζήτηση στο βιβλίο
Αποτελέσματα 1 - 5 από τα 100.
Σελίδα 1
... January Term , 1861 . [ CONTINUED FROM Vol . XXII . ] BARKMAN ET AL . VS. SIMMONS . Where a deed of assignment , for the benefit of creditors , purports to convey all of the debtor's property , and refers to a schedule as thereto ...
... January Term , 1861 . [ CONTINUED FROM Vol . XXII . ] BARKMAN ET AL . VS. SIMMONS . Where a deed of assignment , for the benefit of creditors , purports to convey all of the debtor's property , and refers to a schedule as thereto ...
Σελίδα 4
Arkansas. Supreme Court. Barkman et al . vs. Simmons . [ JANUARY the personal property of Lockwood and Phillips would have passed , had no mention been inade of a schedule " annexed . " Such a general description has been held to be ...
Arkansas. Supreme Court. Barkman et al . vs. Simmons . [ JANUARY the personal property of Lockwood and Phillips would have passed , had no mention been inade of a schedule " annexed . " Such a general description has been held to be ...
Σελίδα 5
... attached at the time the deed was exe- cuted , nor until after the property assigned had been levied on at the suit of a creditor , and the commencement of a suit 66 Barkman et al . vs. Simmons . [ JANUARY OF THE STATE OF ARKANSAS . 5.
... attached at the time the deed was exe- cuted , nor until after the property assigned had been levied on at the suit of a creditor , and the commencement of a suit 66 Barkman et al . vs. Simmons . [ JANUARY OF THE STATE OF ARKANSAS . 5.
Σελίδα 11
... ; for , though no rule is better established , than that parol evidence is not admissible to add to , alter or contradict a written contract , it is equally Vaughan et al . vs. Matlock . JANUARY well settled OF THE STATE OF ARKANSAS . 11.
... ; for , though no rule is better established , than that parol evidence is not admissible to add to , alter or contradict a written contract , it is equally Vaughan et al . vs. Matlock . JANUARY well settled OF THE STATE OF ARKANSAS . 11.
Σελίδα 14
Arkansas. Supreme Court. Sullivan vs. Deadman . [ JANUARY SULLIVAN AD . VS. DEADMAN . On the trial of a case de novo , in the circuit court , on appeal from the pro- bate court , it is in accordance with the spirit of the statute ( sec ...
Arkansas. Supreme Court. Sullivan vs. Deadman . [ JANUARY SULLIVAN AD . VS. DEADMAN . On the trial of a case de novo , in the circuit court , on appeal from the pro- bate court , it is in accordance with the spirit of the statute ( sec ...
Άλλες εκδόσεις - Προβολή όλων
Συχνά εμφανιζόμενοι όροι και φράσεις
action administrator affirmed alleged appellant appellee application assumpsit bill bond cause certificate chancery charge Chicot county Chief Justice ENGLISH Circuit Court Circuit Judge claim commissioners contract county court court of chancery court of equity creditors debt DECEMBER declaration decree deed defendant delivered the opinion demurrer dollars entitled equity error evidence execution facts filed Ford Fowler fraud fraudulent GARLAND & RANDOLPH Gould's heirs Hempstead Hempstead county Hicks Hundley Independence Circuit instruction issue JANUARY John judgment jurisdiction jury Justice ENGLISH delivered Justice FAIRCHILD delivered levee levy lien ment Miles mortgage negroes Norris paid parties payment person plaintiff plaintiff in error plea pleaded possession Probate Court Pulaski county purchase money refused scire facias scrip sheriff slaves sold statute suit sustained swamp land taxes TERM testator testimony tion trial trust verdict vested Walworth wife William William G witness writ