Εικόνες σελίδας
PDF
Ηλεκτρ. έκδοση

Let it be required to reduce to the least common denominator the fractions, 6, and 14.

If we take the least common multiple of the denominators 12, 16, and 24, which is 48, and divide it in turn by these denominators, we shall obtain the respective quotients 4, 3, and 2. Hence, if we multiply the numerator and denominator of each fraction by 4, 3 and 2 respectively, they will become 29, and . These fractions are equivalent to the original ones, and have their least common denominator. Hence fractions may be reduced to their least common denominator by the following

RULE.

Reduce the fractions to their simplest form; then find the least common multiple of their denominators, (by Rule under ART. 41,) which will be their least common denominator. Divide this denominator by the respective denominators of the given fractions; multiply the quotients thus obtained by the respective numerators, and the several products will be the new numerators.

Repeat the Rule for reducing fractions to their least common denominator.

EXAMPLES.

1. Reduce,,, to equivalent fractions having the least common denominator.

The least common multiple of the denominators 12, 15, 24, is 120 common denominator.

[ocr errors]

New numerator of first fraction 12x 5=50.
New numerator of second fraction 120-x 7=56.

New numerator of third fraction 120x11-55.

Hence, the fractions, when reduced to their least common denominator, become

[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][subsumed]

3. Reduce 3, 43, §, to equivalent fractions having the

least common denominator.

Ans. 105, 130o, 38.

309

4. Reduce,, 13, to equivalent fractions having the Ans. 180, 10, 117.

least common denominator.

[ocr errors]

5. Reduce, f, 6, to equivalent fractions having the least common denominator. Ans. 150, 2025. 6. Reduce, 34, and 1, to equivalent fractions having the least common denominator. Ans. 30, 40, 195, 13. 7. Reduce to,,,, to equivalent fractions having the least common denominator. Ans.,, 30%, 4%. 8. Reduce,,,,, to equivalent fractions having the least common denominator. Ans. 40, 45, 48, 50, 27. 9. Reduce, 1, 3, 5, 10, T70, to equivalent fractions having the least common denominator.

Ans. 80%, 30%, 7722%, 120, 128, T70. 10. Reduce, 1, 1, 1, 1, 7, 1, 1, to equivalent fractions having the least common denominator.

[merged small][merged small][merged small][subsumed][ocr errors][merged small]

43. Suppose we wish to add and . We know that so long as these fractions have different denominators, they

cannot be added any more than pounds and yards can be added together. We will therefore reduce them to a common denominator. We thus obtain

[ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]

Reduce the fractions to a common denominator, and take the sum of their numerators, under which place the common denominator, and it will give the sum required.

NOTE. The labor will be the least when we reduce the fractions to their least common denominator.

EXAMPLES.

1. What is the sum of,,, and ?

These fractions, when reduced to their least common denominator, are 1, 2, 2, and, the sum of whose numerators is 6+4+3+2=15. Hence we have

[ocr errors]

Ans.
Ans.

Ans. 24-14.

2. What is the sum of and ? 3. What is the sum of, o, 20. 4. What is the sum of 1,,? 5. What is the sum of †, f, ? 6. What is the sum of 3, 4, 7, &? ́Ans. §6=17.

Ans. 58.

NOTE. If any of the fractions are compound, they must first be reduced to simple fractions, (by Rule under ART. 39.)

7. What is the sum of † of 4 of 4, † of †, and †?

T'hese fractions, when reduced to their simplest forms, are 1, 2, and 3; which, when reduced to their least common denominator, become

[blocks in formation]

8. What is the sum of

of of 3?

of of 1o, § of 2 of 6, and Ans. 41.

9. What is the sum of of 4 of 8, of of 1⁄4o, and

of 16?

Ans. 8.

10. What is the sum of of 4 of 3, 1 of 3 of 2, and 3

of ?

11. What is the sum of 3, 4, 5, and 2?

12. What is the sum of 1, 1, 2, §, and 11⁄2?

Ans..

[ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small]

Ans. 44-34.

13. What is the sum of 1, 2, 4; Tō,

9

and ?

Ans. 18-3.

14. What is the sum of 3, of, of 3 of 4, and ?

i's?

Ans. 24-4.

15. What is the sum of of, 4 of 4, 5 of 4, and of

[ocr errors][merged small][merged small]

16. What is the sum of,,, 1, 1, 7, 1, 1 ?

[blocks in formation]

18. What is the sum of 3, 4, 4, ? Ans. 317517. 19. What is the sum of,,t, t, t, b, To, TT, 12, 13?

[blocks in formation]

10

360 360

20. What is the sum of 4, 8, 7, 4, 1, 4o, 11, 12, 13, 14?

[blocks in formation]

SUBTRACTION OF FRACTIONS.

44. SUPPOSE we wish to subtract from . We know that so long as these fractions have different denominators, the one cannot be subtracted from the other any more than pounds can be subtracted from yards. We therefore reduce them to a common denominator, and obtain =; =. Now, taking their difference, we obtain ---. Hence, to subtract one fraction from another we have this

RULE.

Reduce the fractions to a common denominator; subtract the less numerator from the greater, and place the common denominator under the difference.

[merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]

NOTE.-As in Addition, if either of the fractions is compound, it

must first be reduced to its simplest form.

9. From of of subtract to.

subtract of 18.

of subtract ✈ of 3.

10. From

11. From

[blocks in formation]

Ans. .

Ans.

.

Ans.

Ans. 14.

« ΠροηγούμενηΣυνέχεια »