Εικόνες σελίδας
PDF
Ηλεκτρ. έκδοση
[blocks in formation]

Cook ads. Hough....

581

Corbus et al. v. Teed.......

Cookson v. Richardson et al.... 137 Goodspeed et al. ads. Burton

Goodrich ads. Howell...............

556

[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]
[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]
[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]

332 632

Y

318

Vallette v. Bennett..

Van Namee v. Bradley et al.... 299 Young et al. ads. Amick...... 542

[blocks in formation]

RULES OF PRACTICE

IN THE

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF IILINOIS.

On the second day of October, of the September term, 1875, it was "Ordered, that Rule forty two of this court be and the same is hereby rescinded."

That rule was as follows:

RULE 42. "Upon the affirmance of judgments, executions may issue at the option of the party, from this court, or if such party so elect, a writ of procedendo shall be issued to the court below, upon the payment by the successful party of the costs made by him in this court.”

On the first day of November, also of the September term, 1875, it was "Ordered, that Rule forty-three be amended by striking out of the last sentence the words and Friday.'"

Thereby providing that candidates for admission to the Bar shall be examined on Thursday of the first week of each term, instead of Thursday and Friday, as heretofore.

At the same time, it was "Ordered, that Rule fifty-two be rescinded." That rule was as follows:

RULE 52. "The clerks in the Central and Southern Grand Divisions shall be allowed a fee upon abstracts filed in this court in said divisions, respectively, for the full amount thereof, at the present mode of taxation less twenty cents for each one hundred words of one copy of said abstracts, to be allowed the party for printing the same, but in no case shall the clerks' fees for such abstracts, as provided in this rule, exceed the sum of twenty-five dollars."

It was also Ordered, "that the last clause of Rule fifty-three, commencing with the words and in addition thereto,' be and the same is hereby stricken out, so as to conform to the statute now in force." That rule was as follows, the portion in italics indicating that which is stricken out by the foregoing amendment:

RULE 53. "Upon printed abstracts being furnished, in any of the sev eral grand divisions, in conformity to the rules of this court, it shall be the duty of the clerk to tax a printer's fee, at the rate of twenty cents for each one hundred words of one copy of such abstract, against the unsuccessful party not furnishing such abstracts, as costs, to be recovered by the successful party furnishing the same; and in addition thereto, there shall be taxed as costs, in cases in the Central and Southern Grand Divisions, against the unsuccessful party, such fees for abstracts as are allowed to the clerks of the two last named divisions, under the preceding rule."

« ΠροηγούμενηΣυνέχεια »