· BRITTON V. BAKER et al. (No. 9,678.) :: . (Supreme Court of Ohio. Jan. 23, 1906.) Error to Circuit Court, Franklin County. Cyrus Huling and Taylor, Seymour, Weber & King, for plaintiff in error. C. T. Clark, Rogers & Rogers, C. Kinney, Frank Rathmell, E. E. Corwin, M. E. Thrailkill, and H. J. Ossing, for defendants in error. PER CURIAM. Judgment affirmed. DAVIS, C. J., and SHAUCK, PRICE, CREW, and SUMMERS, JJ., concur. BRUNS v. HORN et al. (No. 9,501.) (Supreme Court of Ohio. Feb. 27, 1906.)' Error to Circuit Court, Henry County. H. R. Dittmer, for plaintiff in error. Donovan & Warden, for defendants in error. PER CURIAM. Judgment affirmed. SHAUCK, C. J., and CREW and SPEAR, JJ., concur. BRITTON v. JONES, Auditor, et al. (No. 9,679.) (Supreme Court of Ohio. Jan. 23, 1906.) Error to Circuit Court, Franklin County. Cyrus Huling and Taylor, Seymour, Webber & King, for plaintiff in error. C. T. Clark, Rogers & Rogers, C. Kinney, Frank Rathmell, E. E. Corwin, M. E. Thrailkill, and H. J. Ossing, for defendants in error. PER CURIAM. Judgment affirmed. DAVIS, C. J., and SHAUCK, PRICE, CREW, and SUMMERS, JJ., concur. BRUNSWICK-BALKE-COLLENDER CO. V. SMITH et al. (No. 9,364.) (Supreme Court of Ohio. Dec. 22, 1905.) Error to Circuit Court, Richland County. Kerr & La Dow, for plaintiff in error. Seward & Bricker, for defendants in error. PER CURIAM. Judgment affirmed, on authority of Lindemann v. Ingham, 36 Ohio St. 1, and Ingham v. Lindemann, 37 Ohio St. 218. DAVIS, C. J., and SHAUCK, PRICE, CREW, SUMMERS, and SPEAR, JJ., concur. BROOKS et al, V. SPENCER, Treasurer. (No. 9,451.) (Supreme Court of Ohio. Feb. 20, 1906.). Error to Circuit Court, Cuyahoga County. Smith, Taft & Arter, for plaintiffs in error. Stage, Armstrong & Cannon, for defendant in error. PER CURIAM. Judgment affirmed. PRICE, SUMMERS, and DAVIS, JJ., concur. BURGESS STEEL & IRON WORKS v. CHAMPION IRON CO. (No. 9,559.) (Supreme Court of Ohio. May 15, 1900.) Error to Circuit Court, Hardin County. A. T. Holcomb and Johnson & Johnson, for plaintiff in error. George E. Crane, for defendant in error. PER CURIAM. Judgment affirmed. PRICE, SUMMERS, and SPEAR, JJ., concur. BROOKS CO. V. TOLMAN. (No. 9,432.) (Supreme Court of Ohio. Feb. 20, 1906.) Error to Circuit Court, Cuyahoga County. Árnold Green, for plaintiff in error. Wm. E. Patterson, for defendant in error. BURNS v. BURNS. (No. 9,238.) (Supreme Court of Ohio. Dec. 12. 1905.) Error to Circuit Court, Hamilton County. C. W. Baker, for plaintiff in error. R. B. Smith, for defendant in error. PER CURIAM. Judgment affirmed. , PER CURIAM. Judgment affirmed. cur. BURT V. JONES, Auditor, et al. (No. 9,562.) (Supreme Court of Ohio. Jan. 23, 1906.) Error to Circuit Court, Franklin County. Cyrus Huling and Taylor, Seymour, Webber & King, for plaintiff in error. C. T. Clark, Rogers & Rogers, C. Kinney, Frank Rathmell, E. E. Corwin, M. E. Thraiskill, and H. J. Ossing, for defendants in error. PER CURIAM. Judgment affirmed. DAVIS, C. J., and SHAUCK, PRICE, CREW, and SUMMERS, JJ., concur. CENTRAL TRUST & SAFE DEPOSIT CO. SHAUCK, C. J., and PRICE, CREW, and BURTON et al. v. STAPELY. (No. 9,132.) (Supreme Court of Ohio. March 27, 1906.) Error to Circuit Court, Hamilton County. Louis J. Dolle, John S. Conner, and Constant Southworth, for plaintiffs in error. Shay & Cogan, for defendant in error. PER CURIAM. Judgment reversed, and judgment for plaintiffs in error on facts found by the circuit court. SHAUCK, C. J., and PRICE, CREW, and SPEAR, JJ., concur. CHENEY V. FIRST NAT. BANK OF TOLEDO. (No. 9,257.) (Supreme Court of Ohio. Oct. 17, 1905.) Error to Circuit Court, Lucas County. Seney & Johnson, for plaintiff in error. Smith & Beckwith, for defendant in error. PER CURIAM. Judgment affirmed. DAVIS, C. J., and SHAUCK, CREW, SUMMERS, and SPEAR, JJ., concur. BYERS et al. v. RAINEY et al. (No. 9,075.) CILLEY et al. v. YATES et al. (No. 9,097.) (Supreme Court of Ohio. Jan. 30, 1906.) Er (Supreme Court of Ohio. March 13, 1906.) Error to Circuit Court, Hamilton County. S. ror to Circuit Court, Mahoning County. Hine T. Crawford, for plaintiffs in error. Bromwell & Kennedy, for plaintiff in error. Scott & Bruce and Harper & Allen, for defendants Stewart and T. W. Sanderson, for defendants in error. in error. PER CURIAM. Judgment affirmed. PER CURIAM. Judgment reversed, and that of the common pleas modified. PRICE, SUMMERS, and DAVIS, JJ., con cur. DAVIS, C. J., and PRICE, CREW, and SUMMERS, JJ., concur. CINCINNATI, C. & W. TURNPIKE CO. v. OLIVER et al. (No. 9,357). (Supreme Court CALHOUN et al. V. DARLING. (No. 9, of Ohio. Dec. 22, 1905.) Error to Superior 344.) (Supreme Court of Ohio. May 1, 1906.) Court of Cincinnati. Chas. W. Baker, for plainError to Circuit Court, Richland County. H. T. Manner and Donnell, Marriott & Bissman, tiff in error. Burch & Johnson and B. H. Štites, for defendants in error. for plaintiffs in error. Bowers & lack, for de fendant in error. PER CURIAM. Judgment affirmed. PER CURIAM. Judgment affirmed. DAVIS, C. J., and SHAUCK, PRICE, SUM MERS, and SPEAR, JJ., concur. CINCINNATI, H. & D. RY. CO. V. DE BOLT. (No. 9,312.) (Supreme Court of Ohio. CALLAN et al. V. STANG et al. (No. Nov. 21. 1905.) Error to Circuit Court, Mont9,296.) (Supreme Court of Ohio. April 17, gomery County. Marshall & Marshall, for plain1906.) Error to Circuit Court, Erie County. tiff in error. John Roehm, for defendant in Charles H. Kibler and John F. McCrystal, for error. plaintiffs in error. Thomas M. Sloane, C. P. PER CURIAM. Judgment reversed, and Wickham, King & Guerin, and W. B. Starbird, judgment for plaintiff in error. for defendants in error. DAVIS, C. J., and SHAUCK, PRICE, and PER CURIAM. Judgment affirmed. SPEAR, JJ., concur. CREW, SUMMERS, and DAVIS, JJ., concur. CINCINNATI, H. & D. RY. CO. v. KLUTE. (No. 9,500.) (Supreme Court of Ohio. Dec. 12, CARLIN V. CITY OF FINDLAY. (No. 1905.) Error to Circuit Court, Lucas County. 8,976.) (Supreme Court of Ohio. March 13, Swayne, Hayes, Fuller & Tyler, for plaintiff 1906.) Error to Circuit Court, Hancock Coun in error. C. A. Seiders and Ralph Emery, for ty. J. A. & E. V. Bope, for plaintiff in error. defendant in error. Thomas W. Long, Sol., and A. Blackford, for PER CURIAM. Judgment a ffirmed. defendant in error. DAVIS, C. J., and SHAUCK, PRICE, PER CURIAM. Judgment affirmed. CREW, SUMMERS, and SPEAR, JJ., concur. SHAUCK, C. J., and PRICE, CREW, SUMMERS, and DAVIS, JJ., concur. CINCINNATI, H. & D. RY. CO. V. PHJL LIPS. (No. 9,356.) (Supreme Court of Ohio. CARLISLE et al., County Com’rs, v. STATE Oct. 10, 1905.) Error to Circuit Court, Jackson ex rel. SHERMAN. (No. 9,467.) (Supreme ( County. A. E. Jacobs and Marshall & Marshall, Court of Ohio. Feb. 20, 1906.) Error to Cir for plaintiff in error. Hogan & McFarland, for cuit Court, Franklin County. Seymour, Web defendant in error. ber & King, Pros. Attys., for plaintiffs in er- PER CURIAM. Judgment affirmed. ror. William J. Ford and S. G. Osborn, for DAVIS, C. J., and SHAUCK, CREW SUMdefendant in error. Butler & Keating, amici | MERS, and SPEAR, JJ., concur. PRICE, J., curiæ. not participating. CINCINNATI, L. & A. ELECTRIC ST. R. CO. v. LOHE. (No. 9,339.) (Supreme Court of Ohio. Oct. 10, 1905.) Error to Circuit Court, Hamilton County. Peck, Shaffer & Peck and Shepherd & Shaffer, for plaintiff in error. Alfred Benedict, for defendant in error. PER CURIAM. Judgment affirmed. DAVIS, C. J., and SHAUCK, PRICE, CREW, SUMMERS, and SPEAR, JJ., concur. , ., . CITY OF MANSFIELD V. MANSFIELD RY., LIGHT & POWER CO. (No. 9,517.) (Supreme Court of Ohio. March 13, 1906.) Error to Circuit Court, Richland County. L. H. Beam, for plaintiff in error. Cummings, Mc-. Bride & Wolfe, for defendant in error. PER CURIAM. Judgment reversed, and judgment for plaintiff in error. SHAUCK, C. J., and PRICE, CREW, SUMMERS, SPEAR, and DAVIS, JJ., concur. CITY OF MT. VERNON v. HARPER. (No. 9,091.) (Supreme Court of Ohio. April 10, 1906.) Error to Circuit Court, Knox County. J. M. Butler and J. B. Graham, for plaintiff in error. Frank 0. Levering and F. V. Owen, for defendant in error. PER CURIAM. Judgment of the circuit court reversed, and that of the common pleas affirmed, on authority of the City of Wellston v. Morgan, 65 Ohio St. 219, 62 N. E. 127. SHAUCK, C. J., and PRICE, CREW, SUMMERS, and SPEÁR, JJ., concur. . CINCINNATI & E. ELECTRIC RY. CO. V. MIGHTS. (No. 9,414.) (Supreme Court of Ohio. May 8, 1906.) Errorto Circuit Court, Hamilton County. Frank F. Dinsmore, for plaintiff in error. Edw. A. Hafner and Prescott Smith, for defendant in error. PER CURIAM. Judgment reversed. Grounds stated in journal entry. It is ordered and adjudged by this court that the judgment of said circuit court be, and the same hereby is, reversed for error in affirming the judgment of the court of common pleas; and this court proceeding to render the judgment that said circuit court should have rendered, it is ordered and adjudged that the judgment of said court of common pleas is reversed for error in overruling the motion for a new trial, on the ground that the court erred in its charge to the jury in submitting to the jury the question of punitive damages, for the reason that the evidence did not warrant the submission of that question to the jury, and that the motion for a new trial be sustained, the verdict set aside, and the cause be remanded to said court of common pleas for a new trial. SHAUCK, C. J., and PRICE, SUMMERS, ånd DAVIS, JJ., concur. CITY OF TOLEDO v. RODD. (No. 9,595.) (Supreme Court of Ohio. April 17, 1906.) Error to Circuit Court, Lucas County. U. G. Den. man and Chas. K. Friedman, for plaintiff in error. Southard & Southard, for defendant in error. PER CURIAM. Judgment affirmed. PRICE, SUMMERS, and DAVIS, JJ., concur. CITY OF CANTON v. STUDER. (No. 9,482.) _(Supreme Court of Ohio. Feb. 20, 1906.) Error to Circuit Court, Stark County. Denver C. Hughes, City Sol., for plaintiff in error. W. 0. Werntz, for defendant in error. PER CURIAM. Judgment affirmed. SHAUCK, C. J., and CREW and SPEAR, JJ., concur. CITY OF TOLEDO V. SEEL. (No. 9,198.) (Supreme Court of Ohio. May 8, 1906.) Error to Circuit Court, Lucas County. U. G. Denman, City Sol., and Chas. M. Milroy, for plaintiff in error. Bierly & Dickey, for defendant in error. PER CURIAM. Judgment of circuit court reversed, and that of the common pleas affirmed, on authority of Norwalk v. Tuttle, 73 Ohio St. 242, 76 N. E. 617. SHAUCK, C. J., and CREW, SUMMERS, SPEAR, and DAVÍS, JJ., concur. CITY OF CLEVELAND V. GRIFFIN et al. (No. 9,359.) (Supreme Court of Ohio. Dec. 22, 1905.) Error to Circuit Court, Cuya hoga County. N. W. Baker and G. S. Addams, for plaintiff in error. Albert Lawrence and Brady & Cashman, for defendants in error. PER CURIAM. Judgment affirmed. DAVIS, C. J., and SHAUCK, PRICE, SUMMERS, and SPEAR, JJ., concur. CITY OF WELLSVILLE V. RINEHART et al. (No. 9,298.) (Supreme Court of Ohio. Dec. 5, 1905.) Error to Circuit Court, Columbiana County. Billingsley, Clark, & De Ford and Chas. Boyd, for plaintiff in error. Smith & Lones, for defendants in error. PER CURIAM. Judgment affirmed. DAVIS, C. J., and SHAUCK PRICE, CREW, SUMMERS, and SPEAR, JJ., concur. CITY OF CONNEAUT V. SHIPMAN. (No. 9,242.) (Supreme Court of Ohio. Oct. 24, 1905.) Error to Circuit Court, Ashtabula County. C. W. Appleby and M. G. Spaulding, for plaintiff in error. F. J. Bishop and Perry & Roberts, for defendant in error. PER CURIAM. Judgment affirmed. DAVIS, C. J., and SHAUCK, PRICE, CREW, SUMMERS, and SPEAR, JJ., concur. CITY OF WOOSTER v. CENTRAL UNION TELEPHONE CO. (No. 9,221.) (Supreme Court of Ohio. June 5, 1906.) Error to Circuit ) Court, Wayne County. Benton G. Hay, City Sol., and A. D. Metz, for plaintiff in error. H. Richardson and John McSweeney, for defendant in error. PER CURIAM. Judgment reversed, on authority of Queen City Telephone Co. v. Cincinnati, 73 Ohio St, 64, 76 N. E. 392. SHAUCK, C. J., and PRICE, CREW, SUMMERS, SPEAR, and DAVIS, JJ., concur. CITY OF GALLIPOLIS V. PLYMALE, Treasurer. (No. 9,375.) (Supreme Court of Ohio. Jan. 9, 1906.) Error to Circuit Court, Gallia County. C. W. White, J. P. Bradbury, and W. R. White, Jr., for plaintiff in error. F. S. Monnett and F. M. Cromley, for defendant in error. PER CURIAM. Judgment affirmed. DAVIS, C. J., and SHAUCK, PRICE, and SPEAR, JJ., concur. 78 N.E.—71 CITY OF ZANESVILLE V. KINCADE. (No. 9,255.) (Supreme Court of Ohio. Oct. 17, 1905.) Error to Circuit Court, Muskingum County. H. C. Pugh, for plaintiff in error. W. J. Massey, for defendant in error. PER CURIAM. Judgment affirmed. DAVIS, C. J. and SHAUCK, PRICE, CREW, SUMMERS, and SPEAR, JJ., concur. CLEVELAND, C., C. & ST. L. RY. CO. v. HAUN. (No. 9,408.) (Supreme Court of Ohio. Jan. 23, 1906.) Error to Circuit Court, Richland County. Cummings, McBride & Wolfe, for plaintiff in error. Mansfield & Long, for defendant in error. PER CURIAM. Judgment affirmed. PRICE, CREW, SUMMERS, and SPEAR, JJ., concur. CLEVELAND, A. & C. RY. CO. V. MURRAY. (No. 9,574.) (Supreme Court of Ohio. June 29, 1906.) Error to Circuit Court, Holmes County. G. W. Sharp and Carey & Mullins, for plaintiff in error. W. Stilwell and J. & G. E. Huston, for defendant in error. PER CURIAM. Judgment reversed; ground stated in journal entry. It is ordered and adjudged by this court that the judgment of the said circuit court be, and the same hereby is, reversed for error in affirming the judgment herein of the court of common pleas of said Holmes county; and this court proceding to render the judgment said circuit court should have rendered, it is considered and adjudged that the judgment of the said court of common pleas be, and the same hereby is, reversed for error in refusing to give to the jury the following instruction requested by the railway company, to wit: “(8) I instruct you that you shall not consider evidence of custom prior to May 1, 1901, if you find from the evidence that a new book of rules was adopted, as claimed by the defendant, on that date, providing you find from the evidence that Murray had in his possession a copy of such book of rules prior to his injury;" and for admitting evidence contrary to the law as stated in said request. And this cause is remanded to the court of common pleas of Holmes county for further proceedings according to law. SHAUCK, C. J., and CREW, SUMMERS, and DAVIS, JJ., concur. CLEVELAND, C., C. & ST. L. RY. CO. V. CHAMBERLAIN. (No. 9,112.) (Supreme Court of Ohio. Feb. 2, 1906.) Error to Circuit Court, Clark County. Bowman & Bowman, for plaintiff in error. J. L. Zimmerman, for defendant in error. PER CURIAM. Judgment reversed ground of refusal to charge the jury as requested on page 220 of printed record, and that it was erroneous to rule out the question asked of the witness Drake. DAVIS, C. J., and SHAUCK, CREW, SUMMERS, and SPEAR, JJ., concur. CLEVELAND & S. W. TRACTION CO. v. WARD. (No. 9,560.) (Supreme Court of Ohio. Jan. 16, 1906.) Error to Circuit Court, Lorain County. Collister & Halle and E. G. & H. C. Johnson, for plaintiff in error. Skiles, Greene & Skiles and Lee Stroup, for defendant in error. PER CURIAM. Judgment affirmed. DAVIS, C. J., and SHAUCK, PRICE, . , CREW, SUMMERS, and SPEAR, JJ., concur. , , , ., on COBB V. SCOFIELD et al. (No. 9,433.) (Supreme Court of Ohio. June 19, 1906.) Er. ror to Circuit Court, Cuyahoga County. Gould |
0 Κριτικές Οι αξιολογήσεις δεν επαληθεύονται, αλλά η Google ελέγχει και καταργεί ψευδές περιεχόμενο όταν το εντοπίζει Σύνταξη κριτικής |