1905.) Error to Circuit Court, Preble County. Gilmore & Gilmore, for plaintiff in error. Ri. singer & Risinger for defendant in error.

PER CURIAM. Judgment affirmed. PRICE, CREW, SUMMERS and SPEAR, JJ., concur.

DUNNICK v. DUNNICK. (No. 9,565.) (Supreme Court of Ohio. June 19, 1906.) Error to Circuit Court, Franklin County. M. E. Thrailkill, for plaintiff in error. J. M. Pugh and W. B. Page, for defendant in error.

PER CURIAM. Judgment affirmed.

SHAUCK, C. J., and PRICE, SUMMERS, SPEAR, and DAVIS, JJ., concur.

DENNIS V. LANDRETH et al. (No. 9,556.) (Supreme Court of Ohio. March 13, 1906.) Error to Circuit Court, Cuyahoga County. Charles F. Morgan, for plaintiff in error. Bacon & Clay and Ward Sager, for defendants in error. PER CURIAM. Judgment affirmed.

SHAUCK, C. J., and CREW and SPEAR, JJ., concur.

DUNNING et al. v. WHITE. (No. 8,813.) (Supreme Court of Ohio. Oct. 17, 1905.) Error to Circuit Court, Cuyahoga County. Hart, Canfield & Croke, for plaintiff in error. Carpenter, Young & Stocker, for defendant in error.

PER CURIAM. Judgment affirmed. SHAUCK, CREW, and SPEAR, JJ., concur.

DESNOYERS V. AMES et al. (No. 9,360.) (Supreme Court of Ohio. May 1, 1906.) Error to Circuit Court, Cuyahoga County. Willis Vickery and C. M. Lemmon, for plaintiff in error. Herrick & Hopkins, for defendants in error.

PER CURIAM. Judgment affirmed. SHAUCK, C. J., and CREW and SPEAR, JJ., concur.

DUPLER V. SIMONS. (No. 9,566.) (Supreme Court of Ohio. June 19, 1906.) Error to Circuit Court, Perry County. Crossan & Binckley, for plaintiff in error. Donahue & Spencer, for defendant in error.

PER CURIAM. Judgment reversed, and judgment for plaintiff in error as to injunction. Cause remanded to circuit court to ascertain value of coal taken, and to render judgment in favor of plaintiff in error therefor.

SHAUCK, C. J., and PRICE, CREW, and SPEAR, JJ., concur.

DIECKMANN V. HUNT et al. (No. 9,523.) (Supreme Court of Ohio. June 12, 1906.) Error to Circuit Court, Hamilton County. RenDer & Renner and Eugene Heim, for plaintiff in error. Fulton & Woost, C. A. Groom, and F. E. Neiderhelman, for defendants in error.

PER CURIAM. Judgment affirmed.

SHAUCK, O. J., and PRICE, CREW, and DAVIS, JJ., concur.

EASTERN OHIO COAL CO. v. BUGHER. (No. 9,394.) (Supreme Court of Ohio. Oct. 3, 1905.) Error to Circuit Court, Noble County. Okey & Frazier and C. H. Judkins, for plaintiff in error. R. T. Scott and C. 0. Dye, for defendant in error. PER CURIAM. Judgment affirmed.

SHAUCK, PRICE SUMMERS, and SPEAR, JJ., concur.

DOE V. DO. (No. 9,378.) '(Supreme Court

) of Ohio. Jan. 16, 1906.) Error to Circuit Court, Seneca County. Jesse Stephens and M. L. Shackelford, for plaintiff in error. Kinney, O'Farrel & Rimelspach, H. E. Garn, and Dore & Dore, for defendant in error.

PER CURIAM. Judgment affirmed.

DAVIS, C. J., and SHAUCK, PRICE, CREW, and SUMMERS, JJ., concur.

EDDY et al. v. LEITH et al. (No. 9,148.) (Supreme Court of Ohio. March 27, 1906.) Errorto Circuit Court, Lucas County. King & Tracy, for plaintiffs in error. Potter & Potter, for defendants in error.

PER CURIAM. Judgment affirmed.

PRICE, SUMMERS, and DAVIS, JJ., concur.

DORGER v. WOODWARD et al. . (No. 9,521.) (Supreme Court of Ohio. May 15, 1906.) Error to Circuit Court, Hamilton County. John C. Healy, for plaintiff in error. Scott & Morrill and Horstman & Horstman, for defendants in error.

PER CURIAM. Judgment affirmed.

PRICE, SUMMERS, and DAVIS, JJ., concur.

EICHERT et al. v. EICHERT et al. (No. 9,586.) (Supreme Court of Ohio. June 12, 1906.) Error to Circuit Court, Hamilton County. J. G. Hudson, F. S. Starkey, and B. H. Stites, for plaintiffs in error. Chris. Von Seggern, Gustav Tafel, Colon Schott, Frederick Hertenstein, J. D. Hudson, and F. S. Starkey, for defendants in error. PER CURIAM. Judgment affirmed.

PRICE, SUMMERS, and DAVIS, JJ., concur.

DRAKE & STRATTON CO. V. ALLEN, Treasurer. (No. 9,228.) (Supreme Court of Ohio. Oct. 10, 1905.) Error to Circuit Court, Portage County. E. W. Maxson, for plaintiff in error.

W. J. Beckley, for defendant in error. PER CURIAM. Judgment affirmed.

SHAUCK, PRICE, CREW, SUMMERS, and SPEAR, JJ., concur.

ELLIS v. BEHYMER. (No. 9,430.) (Supreme Court of Ohio. Feb. 13, 1906.) Error to Circuit Court, Hamilton County. H. E. Englehardt, for plaintiff in error. Wilson & De Witt and Wm. M. Tugman, for defendant in error. PER CURIAM. Judgment affirmed.

SHAUCK, C. J., and PRICE, CREW, SUMMERS, SPEAR, and DAVIS, JJ., concur.

DRAPER v. JONES et al. (No. 8,857.) (Supreme Court of Ohio. Nov. 28, 1905.) Error to Circuit Court, Wood County. Beverstock & Donahey, J. O. Troup, J. A. Bope, and E. B. King, for plaintiff in error. Phelps & David, for defendants in error. PER CURIAM. Judgment affirmed.

CREW, SUMMERS, and SPEAR, JJ., concur.

ENDERES et al. v. MARSHALL. (No. 9,498.) (Supreme Court of Ohio.

Feb. 27, 1906.) Error to Superior Court of Cincinnati. Aaron E. Moore and Frank M. Cottle, for

PER CURIAM. Judgment affirmed. SHAUCK, O. J., and CREW and SPEAR, JJ., concur.

HAWKINS v. LAKE SHORE & M. S. RY. CO. (No. 9,532.) (Supreme Court of Ohio. Feb. 13, 1906.) Error to Circuit Court, Cuya

, hoga County. Charles W. Dille, E. Jay Pinney, and Conway W. Noble, for plaintiff in error. Brewer, Cook & McGowan, for defendant in error.

PER CURIAM. Judgment affirmed.

DAVIS, SHAUCK, and SUMMERS, JJ., concur.

HAZEN et al. v. KECK et al. (No. 8,985.) (Supreme Court of Ohio. Feb. 20, 1906.) Error to Circuit Court, Hamilton County O'Hara & Jordan, for plaintiffs in error. Jones & James and G. B. Groesbeck, for defendants in error.

PER CURIAM. Judgment reversed, and judgment for plaintiff in error.

SHAUCK, C. J., and PRICE, SUMMERS, SPEAR, and DAVIS, JJ., concur.

HOLDREN et al. v. HOLDREN et ai. (No. 9.366.) (Supreme Court of Ohio. June 29, 1906.) Error to Circuit Court, Fayette County. Post & Reid, for plaintiffs in error. Mills Gardner, for defendants in error:

PER CURIAM. Judgment reversed; ground stated in journal entry. It is ordered and adjudged by this court that the judgment of the said circuit court be, and the same hereby is, reversed for error in computing and determining the specific amounts to be paid by the administrator, and in ascertaining and determining the basis for distribution of the proceeds arising from the sale of the real estate herein: and, this court proceeding to render the judgment the circuit court should have rendered, it is considered and adjudged that the judgment of the court of common pleas be, and the same hereby is, reversed for error in adjudging that the interest of Stanley Holdren in the real estate devised to him by the will of his father, John W. Holdren, is not subject to be charged with the value of the life estate therein of Emma Holdren, by way of compensation to the other devises under said will, because of the election of said Emma Holdren not to take under said will. And this cause is remanded to the court of common pleas of Fayette county, with instructions to ascertain and determine the value of the life estate of the said Emma Holdren in the real estate devised to Stanley Holdren, the value of the dower estate of said Emma Holdren in the whole of the real estate devised by the will of her husband, John W. Holdren, the amount and value of the personal property of said estate, and the amount of the debts of said estate, including the specific legacies charged upon the real estate and the costs of administration; and when these several amounts shall have been ascertained, to order and direct that distribution be made of the proceeds arising from the sale of the real estate as follows: (1) The debts, costs of administration, and specific legacies charged on said real estate. (2) To Emma Holdren the estimated value of her dower in the whole of the premises. (3) To the devisees other than Stanley Iloldren the amount found to be the value of the life estate of Emma Holdren, together with the value of the personal property. (4) The residue one. sixth to William Holdren, one-sixth to Reuben Holdren, one-sixth to Lafayette Holdren, onesixth to Ira Holdren, one-sixth to Stanley Hołdren, and one-sixth to the children of Mattie IIarper, as devisees under the will of John W. Holdren.

SHAUCK, C. J., and PRICE, CREW, SUMIMERS, and SPEAR, JJ., concur.

HEINZE et al. V. POWER. (No. 9,486.) (Supreme Court of Ohio. May 15, 1906.) Error to Circuit Court, Cuyahoga County. Beavis & Johnson, for plaintiffs in error. Smith, Taft & Arter, for defendant in error.

PER CURIAM. Judgment affirmed.

SHAUCK, C. J., and PRICE, SUMMERS, SPEAR, and DAVIS, JJ., concur.

In re HIGGINS' ESTATE. HOLMES v. HIGGINS et al. (No. 8,855.) (Supreme Court of Ohio. March 20, 1906.) Error to Circuit Court, Franklin County. James T. Holmes, Jr., for plaintiff in error. Thomas E. Powell, for defendants in error.

PER CURIAM. Judgment of circuit court reversed, and that of common pleas affirmed: ground stated in journal entry. It is ordered and adjudged by this court that the judgment of the said circuit court be, and the same hereby is, reversed, for the reason that the record before the circuit court did not show that the probate court had not denied administration to the defendants in error for cause; and, this court proceeding to render the judgment which said circuit court should have rendered, it is considered and adjudged that the judgment of the court of common pleas be, and it hereby is, affirmed.

SHAUCK, C. J., and PRICE, SPEAR, and DAVIS, JJ., concur.

HILL V. STATE. (No. 9,447.) (Supreme Court of Ohio. Dec. 5, 1905.) Error to Circuit Court, Richland County. Douglass & Mengert, for plaintiff in error. C. H. Huston, for the State,

PER CURIAM. Judgment affirmed.

DAVIS, C. J. and SHAUCK, PRICE, CREW, and SUMMERS, JJ., concur.

HOLLMEYER et al. v. McKinney et al. (No. 9.211.) (Supreme Court of Ohio. April 3, 1906.) Error_to Circuit Court, Hamilton County. Ernst Rehm, for plaintiffs in error. Closs & Luebbert and Stanley Struble, for defendants in error.

PER CURIAM. Judgment affirmed. SHAUCK, C. J., and CREW and SPEAR, JJ., concur.

HILLIARD V. TOLEDO & 0. C. RY. CO. (No. 9,742.) (Supreme Court of Ohio. June 19, 1906.) Error to Circuit Court, Fairfield County. S. W. Bennett, W. K. Martin, and J. M. Sheets, for plaintiff in error. Doyle & Lewis and Pickering & Pickering, for defendant in error. PER CURIAM. Judgment affirmed.

. SHAUCK, C. J., and SUMMERS, SPEAR, and DAVIS, JJ., concur.

HOUSER V. CINCINNATI & EASTERN ELECTRIC R. CO. (No. 9,550.) (Supreine Court of Ohio. March 27, 1906.) Error to

) Circuit Court, Clermont County. Frazier & Hicks, for plaintiff in error. F. F. Dinsmore and Nichols & Nichols, for defendant in error. PER CURIAM. Judgment affirmed.

PRICE, SUMMERS, and DAVIS, JJ., concur.

HUBER v. CAREW et al. (No. 9.177.)

. (Supreme Court of Ohio. April 3, 1906.) Error to Circuit Court, Hamilton County. John W.