Εικόνες σελίδας
PDF
Ηλεκτρ. έκδοση
[graphic]

plaintiffs in error. Butler & Keating, for de ZAREMBSKI V. CINCINNATI, H. & D. fendants in error. RY. CO. (No. 9,397.) (Supreme Court of Ohio. PER CURIAM. Judgment affirmed. Oct. 3, 1905.) Error to Circuit Court, Lucas

DAVIS, C. J.and SHAUCK, PRICE, County. Harvey Scriber and Corneli Schrei

CREW, and SUMMERS, JJ., concur. ber, for plaintiff in error. Swayne, Hayes, Fuller & Tyler and W. P. Tyler, for defendant in error. PER CURIAM. Judgment affirmed.

ZIMMERMAN v. GAFF et al. (No. 9,436.) DAVIS, C. J., and SHAUCK, PRICE, SUM

(Supreme Court of Ohio. May 15, 1906.) ErMERS, and SPEAR, JJ., concur.

ror to Circuit Court, Hamilton County. Frederick E. Niederhelman, for plaintiff in error.

Johnson & Levy and Ireton, Collins, Schoenle ZELSMAN et al. v. CITY OF COLUMBUS

& Poor, for defendants in error. et al. (No. 9,373.) (Supreme Court of Ohio. PER CURIAM. Judgment affirmed. Oct. 24, 1905.) Error to Circuit Court, Frank- SHAUCK, C. J., and CREW and SPEAR, lin County. Huggins, Huggins & Huggins, for 'JJ., concur.

END OF CASES IN VOL. 78.

[graphic]
« ΠροηγούμενηΣυνέχεια »