Abuses.-System unsafe.-Success overrated.

arena with native talent, and become disheartened as to any future attempt.

Now where is the justice in all this proceeding? Yet this is not fiction; it is history! If such abuses— abuses that might well make an angel weep, revealing, as they do, that woman's heart can be thus sold to deception are the accompaniments of a prize system, may we not well doubt the utility of that system?

Yet who can know either the different facilities enjoyed by the competitors, or the want of principle in some of them? Who can enter the secret chambers of the mind or the heart, and estimate with any accuracy the just amount of merit in any action? This is God's prerogative; while "man looketh only on the outward appearance." My inference then is: A system can hardly be safe which is so uncertain.

V. The prize rewards success, not EFFORT; TALENT, not WORTH. Every one knows that in estimating the value and virtue of an action, the motive which prompted it, and the effort it necessarily cost, should be taken into the account. Every one knows, too, that success in study is by no means a criterion by which to judge of the merits of the scholar. Some learn their lessons with great facility and with but little effort; others study long and patiently without any brilliant results. One competitor for a prize may bring results which have cost him midnight toil and the most unremitting perseverance; another with brighter parts, and with but little labor, is able to surpass him, and takes the medal. Now the former deserves in a far higher

But God rewards.-How?-Studying for a prize only.

degree the encouragement of the reward; yet it is g to him who has the talent but who lacks the indu The rule of Scripture which announces that "to w much is given, of him shall much be required, violated, and he is rewarded for producing but 1 more than the one to whom little is given.

It is often urged by those who advocate a system prizes and rewards, that God rewards; and theref it is at least justifiable that we should imitate his ample. I admit that God, in his government, de reward; but he rewards effort rather than success; "looketh upon the heart" as man cannot do, and wards worth, not talent. We might, indeed, imita his example, if we had less frailty, and were not liable to be imposed upon by the outward appearanc God indeed rewards men; but he estimates the secr intention, seeing the inward springs of thought befor they find expression in words or actions. He regard the motive, and holds out for the encouragement of th humblest child of earth, who does the best he can, a rich a crown of glory, as he does for those whose out ward circumstances, in the eyes of mortals, are mor auspicious. When man can as wisely and as righte ously bestow his prizes and rewards, there will be far less objection to their use.

VI. The pupil who studies for a prize as his chief motive, will seldom continue to study when the prize is withdrawn. This is so obvious as scarcely to need illustration. If it be necessary to add any thing to the mere statement of the fact, an appeal to almost univer

Argument perverted.-" He is studying for the prize."

sal experience would confirm it. A teacher who has depended upon prizes in a school, finds it very difficult to awaken an interest there when he withdraws the prize. Hence many have, on trying the experiment of abandoning the prize system, become discouraged, and have returned again to the use of prizes, believing them essential to their success. Thus the very argument which shows most clearly their pernicious tendency, is made a reason for continuing them. As before hinted, the prize scholars in our academies, and even our colleges, are seldom distinguished men in after-life,—a fact that speaks conclusively on this point. But it can scarcely be necessary to spend words to prove a truth almost self-evident.

It

VII. By the prize system, the influence of the good example of some of the best pupils, is lost upon the school. All who have taught, know how important this influence is to the success of the school. tells with resistless power upon the other scholars, wherever it exists, unless some unworthy motive can be assigned for it. But under the prize system, let a teacher appeal to the example of his best scholars, and the reply is, "Oh, yes, he behaves well, or he studies diligently, but he is trying to get the prize." With this understanding, his example becomes powerless, unless, indeed, there may be a disposition to be unlike him in every thing. It is believed this is a consideration of considerable importance.

I have thus assigned, at some length, the reasons why I should discountenance, among the incentives

System of rewards.-Not necessary.-Why not?

of the school, the use of Prizes. As to the use of "Rewards," when they are made so numerous that every one who is really deserving may receive one,— and when the basis of their distribution is not talent, not success merely, but good intention and praiseworthy effort, I have much less to say. As expressions of the teacher's interest in the children, and of his approval of their well-doing, they may serve a good end. Perhaps there is no very strong objection to them in principle; though if the teacher subjects himself to the necessary outlay in the purchase of them, it may become burdensome to him. I may add, however, that I do not think rewards are necessary to the teacher's success. I should prefer to do without them. It is possible to produce such a feeling in the schoolroom, that the approving conscience of the child, and the commendatory smile of the teacher, shall be the richest of all rewards. These come without money and without price, and may always be freely and safely bestowed, wherever there is a good intention exhibited by the child. That is the most healthy state of things where these are most prized. As children whose parents begin early to hire them to do their duty, are seldom ready afterwards to render their cheerful service as an act of filial obligation, whenever the pay is withheld,-so children at school, who have been accustomed to expect a reward, seldom pursue their studies as cheerfully when that expectation is cut off.

Safe incentives.-Approbation of friends.

SECTION III.-PROPER INCENTIVES.

In what has already been said, it has been more than hinted that there are higher attributes than emulation, which the teacher should address, and which, if he is successful in calling them into exercise, will be quite sufficient to ensure the proper application of his pupils to their studies. They have the merit, moreover, of being safe. They do not unduly stimulate the intellectual, at the expense of the moral faculties. Their very exercise constitutes a healthy growth of the moral nature. Some of these I may briefly allude to.

I. A DESIRE TO GAIN THE APPROBATION OF THEIR PARENTS AND TEACHER. The love of approbation is as universal in the human mind as emulation. Not one in a thousand can be found who does not possess it. Within proper limits, it is a desirable trait in human character. It is, to be sure, one of the selfish propensities; but among them all, it is the most innocent. Carried to an extreme, it would lead its possessor to crave the good opinion of the bad as well as of the good, and to become an obsequious seeker after popularity. This, of course, is to be deprecated. But there can be no danger of this extreme, as long as the approbation of parents and teachers is the object aimed at. It implies in the child a respect for the opinions, and a confidence in the justice of his parents and teachers; and hence it implies in him a