Εικόνες σελίδας
PDF
Ηλεκτρ. έκδοση

which neither Euclid, Archimedes, Appolonius, nor any geometer before Theon's time, ever made use of, and of which there is not to be found the least appearance in any of their writings; and, as this definition did much embarrass beginners, and is quite useless, it is now thrown out of the Elements, and another, which, without doubt, Euclid had given, is put in its proper place among the definitions of the 5th book, by which the doctrine of compound ratios is rendered plain and easy. Besides, among the definitions of the 11th book, there is this, which is the 10th, viz.“ Equal and similar solid “ figures are those which are contained by similar planes of " the same number and magnitude." Now this proposition is a theorem, not a definition; because the equality of figures of any kind must be demonstrated, and not assumed; and, therefore, though this were a true proposition, it ought to have been demonstrated. But, indeed, this proposition, which makes the 10th definition of the 11th book, is not true universally, except in the case in which each of the solid angles of the figures is contained by no more than three plane angles; for, in other cases, two solid figures may be contained by similar planes of the same number and magnitude, and yet be unequal to one another; as shall be made evident in the notes subjoined to these Elements. In like manner, in the demonstration of the 26th prop. of the 11th book, it is taken for granted, that those solid angles are equal to one another which are contained by plane angles of the same number and magnitude, placed in the same order; but neither is this universally true, except in the case in which the solid angles are contained by no more than three plane angles; nor of this case is there

any

demonstration in the Elements we now have, though it is quite necessary there should be one. Now, upon the 10th definition of this book depend the 25th and 28th propositions of it; and, upon the 25th and 26th depend other eight, viz. the 27th, 31st, 32d, 33d, 34th, 36th, 37th, and 40th of the same

book; and the 12th of the 12th book depends upon the 8th of the same, and this 8th, and the corollary of proposition 17, and prop. 18th of the 12th book, depend upon the 9th definition of the 11th book, which is not a right definition, because there may be solids contained by the same number of similar plane figures, which are not similar to one another, in the true sense of similarity received by all geometers; and all these propositions have, for these reasons, been insufficiently demonstrated since Theon's time hitherto. Besides, there are several other things which have nothing of Euclid's accuracy, and which plainly show, that his Elements have been much corrupted by unskilful geometers; and, though these are not so gross as the others now mentioned, they ought by no means to remain uncorrected.

Upon these accounts it appeared necessary, and I hope will prove acceptable to all lovers of accurate reasoning, and of mathematical learning, to remove such blemishes, and restore the principal books of the Elements to their original accuracy, as far as I was able; especially since these Elements are the foundation of a science by which the investigation and discovery of useful truths, at least in mathematical learning, is promoted as far as the limited powers of the mind allow; and which likewise is of the greatest use in the arts both of peace and war, to many of which geometry is absolutely necessary. This I have endeavoured to do, by taking away the

. inaccurate and false reasonings which unskilful editors have put into the place of some of the genuine demonstrations of Euclid, who has ever been justly celebrated as the most accurate of geometers, and by restoring to him those things which Theon or others have suppressed, and which have these many ages been buried in oblivion.

In this edition, Ptolemy's proposition concerning a property of quadrilateral figures in a circle is added at the end of

the sixth book. Also the note on the 29th prop. book 1st, is altered, and made more explicit, and a more general demonstration is given, instead of that which was in the note on the 10th definition of book 11th; besides, the translation is much amended by the friendly assistance of a learned gentleman.

To which are also added, the Elements of Plane and Spherical Trigonometry, which are commonly taught after the Elements of Euclid.

a

THE

ELEMENTS OF EUCLID.

BOOK I.

DEFINITIONS.

I.

a

A POINT is that which hath no parts, or which hath no mag-See Notes. nitude.

II. A line is length without breadth.

III. The extremities of a line are points.

IV.
A straight line is that which lies evenly between its extreme
points.

V.
A superficies is that which hath only length and breadth.

VI.
The extremities of a superficies are lines.

VII. A plane superficies is that in which any two points being taken, See N: the straight line between them lies wholly in that superficies.

VIII. “A plane angle is the inclination of two lines to one another See N.

“ in a plane, which meet together, but are not in the same
“ direction.”

IX.
A plane rectilineal angle is the inclination of two straight lines

to one another, which meet together, but are not in the same
straight line.

В.

a

[ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors]
« ΠροηγούμενηΣυνέχεια »