Εικόνες σελίδας
PDF
Ηλεκτρ. έκδοση

FOLLOWING ARE MEMORANDA

OF

CASES DISPOSED OF AT OCTOBER TERM, 1906,

WITHOUT OPINIONS AND NOT ELSEWHERE OR OTHERWISE REPORTED IN THIS EDITION.

ROBERT A. MILLER, as Special Master, et | COVINGTON & CINCINNATI BRIDGE COMPANY, al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. NORTHERN ASSURANCE COMPANY. [No. 61.]

In Error to the District Court of the United States for the District of Porto Rico. See same case below, 1 Porto Rico Fed. Rep. 420.

Mr. Fritz V. Briesen for plaintiffs in

error.

Messrs. F. H. Dexter and F. D. McKenney for defendant in error.

October 9, 1906. Dismissed, per stipulation, on motion of Mr. Frederic D. McKenney for the defendant in error.

AMERICAN RAILROAD COMPANY OF PORTO RICO, Plaintiff in Error, v. JUAN MATIAS FERNANDEZ. [No. 95.]

In Error to the District Court of the United States for the District of Porto Rico.

Messrs. F. H. Dexter, F. D. McKenney, and J. S. Flannery for plaintiff in error. No appearance for defendant in error. October 9, 1906. Dismissed with costs, on motion of Mr. Frederic D. McKenney for the plaintiff in error.

NEWPORT NEWS & OLD POINT RAILWAY & ELECTRIC COMPANY, Plaintiff in Error, v. HAMPTON ROADS RAILWAY & ELECTRIC COMPANY et al. [No. 5.]

In Error to the Supreme Court of Appeals of the State of Virginia. See same case below, 102 Va. 795, 47 S. E. 839.

Messrs. Fred Harper and S. Gordon Cumming for plaintiff in error.

Mr. R. G. Bickford for defendant in error. October 9, 1906. Dismissed with costs, on motion of counsel for the plaintiff in

error.

ALLIANCE GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY, Appellant, v. THE CITY OF ALLIANCE. [Nos. 161 and 162.]

Appeals from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of Ohio.

Mr. Wm. B. Sanders for appellant.
No appearance for appellee.

October 9, 1906. Dismissed with costs, on motion of counsel for the appellant.

Plaintiff in Error, v. THE CITY OF COVINGTON. [No. 183.]

In Error to the Court of Appeals of the State of Kentucky.

Mr. 8. D. Rouse for plaintiff in error. No appearance for defendant in error. October 9, 1906. Dismissed with costs, on motion of counsel for plaintiff in error.

OKLAHOMA GAS & ELECTRIC & ELECTRIC COMPANY, Plaintiff in Error, v. MYRTLE LUKERT. [No. 203.]

In Error to the Supreme Court of the Territory of Oklahoma.

Messrs. D. T. Flynn and C. B. Ames for plaintiff in error.

Mr. Chester Howe for defendant in error. October 9, 1906. Dismissed, per stipula

tion.

UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, Appellant, v. ROBERT O. FINK, Treasurer, etc., et al. [No. 22.]

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Nebraska. Messrs. Maxwell Evarts and John N. Baldwin for the appellant.

Mr. Norris Brown for appellee.

October 9, 1906. Dismissed with costs, on motion of Mr. Maxwell Evarts for the appellant.

CHICAGO, BURLINGTON, & QUINCY RAILWAY COMPANY, Appellant, v. A. F. CARLSON et al. [No. 23.]

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Nebraska. Messrs. Charles J. Greene and Ralph W. Breckenridge for the appellant.

Mr. Norris Brown for appellee. October 9, 1906. Dismissed with costs, on motion of Mr. Maxwell Evarts in behalf of counsel for the appellant.

775

GEORGE D. COLLINS, Plaintiff in Error, v. | DELAWARE, LACKAWANNA & WESTERN RAIL

THOMAS F. O'NEIL, Sheriff of the City and County of San Francisco, Cal. [No. 452.]

In Error to the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, State of California.

Mr. William Hoff Cook for the defendant in error.

October 9, 1906. Docketed and dismissed with costs, on motion of Mr. William Hoff Cook for the defendant in error.

[ocr errors]

ROAD COMPANY, Petitioner v. WILLIAM W. RUTTER et al., Executors, etc. [No. 330.] Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. See same case below, 77 C. C. A. 315, 147 Fed. 51.

Messrs. William D. Guthrie and Henry D. Hotchkiss for the petitioner.

Mr. Augustus Van Wyck for the respondent.

October 15, 1906. Denied.

EAGLE ORE SAMPLING COMPANY, Petitioner, v. DUNCAN CHISHOLM, Trustee. [No. 142.]

Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. See same case below, 75 C. C. A. 472, 144 Fed. 670.

Mr. Henry M. Teller for the petitioner. Messrs. C. A. Brandenburg, E. C. Brandenburg and Joel F Vaile for respondent. October 15, 1906. Denied.

DAVID MACKENZIE, Petitioner, v. JAMES
PEASE, Sheriff, etc. [No. 337.]

Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the

United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit.

Mr. Robert G. Dyrenforth for the petitioner.

Mr. Harris F Williams for the respondent.

October 15, 1906. Denied.

M. P. REEVE, Petitioner, v. NORTH CARO-
LINA LAND AND TIMBER COMPANY et al.
[No. 298.]

Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the
United States Circuit Court of Appeals for
the Sixth Circuit. See same case below, 72
C. C. A. 287, 141 Fed. 821.

Mr. Henry H. Ingersoll for the petitioner. Mr. R. E. L Mountcastle for the respondents.

October 15, 1906. Denied.

SAGINAW MATCH COMPANY, Petitioner, v.
DIAMOND MATCH COMPANY. [No. 397.]
Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the
United States Circuit Court of Appeals for
the Sixth Circuit. See same case below, 74
C. C. A. 59, 142 Fed. 727.

Messrs. R. A. Parker and Charles F. Burton for the petitioner.

Mr. John R. Nolan for the respondent.
October 15, 1906. Denied.

CUMBERLAND TELEPHONE & TELEGRAPH COM-
PANY, Petitioner, v. MAYOR AND CITY
COUNCIL OF NASHVILLE, TENN. [No. 436.]
Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the

ARTHUR WEINREB et al., Petitioners, v. United States Circuit Court of Appeals for JOSEPH H. FINK. [No. 305.]

Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. See same case below, 76 C. C. A. 609, 146 Fed. 243.

Mr. F. M. Czaki for the petitioners.
Mr. Adolph Bloch for the respondent.
October 15, 1906. Denied.

the Sixth Circuit. See same case below, 76 C. C. A. 297, 145 Fed. 607.

Mr. William L. Granbery for the peti tioner.

No appearance for respondent.
October 15, 1906. Denied.

NEW YORK EVENING JOURNAL PUBLISHING 'COMPANY, Petitioner, v. JOSEPH SIMON.

CARMELO GRECO, Petitioner, v. THE STEAM- [No. 441.]
SHIP SARNIA, etc. [No. 322.]

Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. See same case below, 77 C. C. A. 332, 147 Fed. 106.

Mr. Wilford H. Smith for the petitioner.
Mr. Percy S. Dudley for the respondent.
October 15, 1906. Denied.

Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. See same case below, 77 C. C. A. 366, 147 Fed. 224.

Messrs. Edward T. Fenwick and Clarence
J. Shearn for the petitioner.

Mr. Edward K. Jones for the respondent.
October 15, 1906. Denied.

ATLANTIC TRANSPORT COMPANY, Claimant, | FRANK D. ZELL, Plaintiff in Error, v. etc., Petitioner, v. FRANCES M. BARNES. [No. 442.]

Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the
United States Circuit Court of Appeals for
the Second Circuit. See same case below, 77
C. C. A. 217, 146 Fed. 509.

Mr. J. Parker Kirlin for the petitioner.
Mr. Louis H. Porter for the respondent.
October 15, 1906. Denied.

JAMES P. STEWART et al., Petitioners, v. H.
S. WRIGHT. [No. 443.]
Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the
United State Circuit Court of Appeals for
the Eighth Circuit. See same case below,
77 C. C. A. 499, 147 Fed. 321.

Mr. W. R. Robertson for the petitioners.
Mr. John W Halliburton for the respond-

ent.

October 15, 1906. Denied.

EX PARTE: IN THE MATTER OF THE SEN-
ECA NATION et al., Petitioners. [No. -,
Original.]

JUDGES OF THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE
UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DIS-
TRICT OF VIRGINIA. [No. 297.]

In Error to the United States Circuit
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
See same case below, 75 C. C. A. 665, 144
Fed. 837.

Messrs. C. L. Frailey, R. D. Brown, Malcolm Lloyd, Jr., Charles H. Burr, and A. S. Worthington for plaintiff in error.

Messrs. D. Lawrence Grover, Tazewell Taylor and Hampton L. Carson for defendant in error.

October 15, 1906. Order affirmed with

costs.

GRAHAM & MORTON TRANSPORTATION COM-
PANY, Appellant, v. CRAIG SHIPBUILDING
COMPANY. [No. 339.]

United States for the Northern District of
Appeal from the District Court of the
Illinois.

Mr. Charles E. Kremer for the appellant. Messrs. Harvey D. Goulder, S. H. Holding, and Frank S. Masten for the appellee.

October 15, 1906. Decree affirmed with costs, on the authority of People's Ferry Co. v. Beers, 20 How. 393, 15 L. ed. 961; Roach v. Chapman, 22 How. 129, 16 L. ed. 294; Edwards v. Elliott, 21 Wall. 532, 22 L. ed.

Motion for Leave to File Petition for a 487; The Robert W. Parsons (Perry v. Writ of Mandamus.

Mr. Chester Howe for petitioners.
Messrs. W. H. Robeson, J. J. Hemphill, A.
B. Browne, and Alexander Britton for re-
spondents.

Assistant Attorney General Van Orsdel for the United States.

October 15, 1906. Denied.

ATLANTIC TRUST COMPANY, Petitioner, v. EDGAR C. CHAPMAN, Receiver, etc., et al. [No. 413.]

Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.

Haines) 191 U. S. 17, 48 L. ed. 73, 24 Sup.
Ct. Rep. 8, and cases cited.

C. W. BUSTER et al., Appellants v. J.
GEORGE WRIGHT, United States Indian In-
spector, et al. [No. 39.]

Appeal from the United States Circuit
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit.
Mr. Wm. F. Hutchings for appellants.
No appearance for appellees.
October 17, 1906. Dismissed with costs,
pursuant to the Tenth Rule.

ELBERT R. ROBINSON, Petitioner, v. AMERICAN CAR & FOUNDRY COMPANY. [No. 165.]

Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for

Messrs. Edward B. Whitney and Stanley the Seventh Circuit. See same case below,

W. Dexter for petitioner.

Mr. Edgar C. Chapman for respondents.
October 15, 1906. Granted.

HENRY ARNOLD RICHARDSON, as Truseee, etc., Petitioner, v. JOHN M. SHAW et al. [No. 433.]

Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.

Mr. John Brooks Leavitt for petitioner.
Mr. E. S. Theall for respondents.
October 15, 1906. Granted.

68 C. C. A. 331, 135 Fed. 693.

Mr. J. Gray Lucas for the petitioner. Messrs .Thomas A. Banning and Ephraim Banning for the respondent.

October 22, 1906. Denied.

SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, Petitioner, v. MATTIE J. STUTTS, Administratrix, etc. [No. 318.]

Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. See same case below, 75 C. C. A. 588, 144 Fed. 948.

Mr. Milton Humes for the petitioner. Mr. Richard W Walker for the respond ent.

October 22, 1906. Denied.

OLD DOMINION STEAMSHIP COMPANY, Own- | DANIEL SULLIVAN, Plaintiff in Error, v. er, etc., Petitioner, v. PRIMUS GILMORE, Administrator, etc. [No. 350.]

Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.

Mr. Harrington Putnam for petitioner. Messrs. J. Parker Kirlin and George Whitfield Betts, Jr., for respondent. October 22, 1906. Granted.

ABRAM ROSENBERGER, Petitioner, v. JOSEPH
H. HARRIS. [No. 366.]
Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the
United States Circuit Court of Appeals for
the Eighth Circuit. See same case below.
76 C. C. A. 225, 145 Fed. 449.

Messrs. J. J. Darlington and James C.
Jones for the petitioner.

Messrs. Solicitor General Hoyt and Assistant Attorney General Robb for the respondent.

October 22, 1906. Denied.

ST. LOUIS, BROWNSVILLE, & MEXICO RAIL-
WAY COMPANY. [No. 29.]

In Error to the Circuit Court of the-
United States for the Southern District of
Texas.

Messrs. L. G. Denman and Floyd McGown for the plaintiff in error.

Messrs. A. W. Houston and Reagan Houston for the defendant in error.

October 22, 1906. Judgment affirmed with costs. Rosenbaum v. Bauer, 120 U. S. 450, 30 L. ed. 743, 7 Sup. Ct. Rep. 633; Knapp v. Lake Shore & M. S. R. Co. (UnitStates ex rel. Knapp v. Lake Shore & M. S. R. Co.) 197 U. S. 541, 49 L. ed. 871, 25 Sup. Ct. Rep. 538.

NORTH AMERICAN TRANSPORTATION & TRAD-
ING COMPANY, Plaintiff in Error, v. W.
B. GILL, [No. 35.]

In Error to the Supreme Court of the

MORITZ EISNER et al., Petitioners, v. EMILIE State of Washington. See same case below,

SAXLEHNER. [No. 414.]

Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the

37 Wash. 694, 79 Pac. 778.

Mr. Frederick Bausman for the plaintiff

No counsel appeared for the defendant in

United States Circuit Court of Appeals for in error.
the Second Circuit. See same case below,
77 C. C. A. 417, 147 Fed. 189.

Messrs. Charles K. Allen, Leopold Wallach, and Charles G. Coe for the petitioners. Mr. Antonio Knauth for the respondent.

October 22, 1906. Denied.

JOSEPH J. WATERS, Administrator of Robert
Jackson, Deceased, Plaintiff in Error, v.
GEORGE E. EMMONS and J. PAUL SMITH.
[No. 19.]

In Error to the Court of Appeals of the
District of Columbia. See same case below,
25 App. D. C. 146; on former appeal 19
App. D. C. 250.

Mr. J. J. Waters for the plaintiff in error. Mr. William F. Mattingly for the defendants in error.

October 22, 1906. Judgment affirmed with costs. See Jackson v. Emmons, 19 App. D. C. 250, 25 App. D. C. 146.

error.

October 22, 1906. with costs.

Judgment affirmed

Leon v. Galceran, 11 Wall. 185, 20 L. ed. 74; American S. B. Co. v.

Chase, 16 Wall. 522, 21 L. ed. 369; The
Robert W. Parsons (Perry v. Haines) 191
U. S. 17, 36, 48 L. ed. 73, 81, 24 Sup. Ct.
Rep. 8.

W. J. LAFFOON, Plaintiff in Error, v. J. F..
KERNER et al. [No. 38.]

In Error to the Supreme Court of the State of North Carolina. See same case below, 138 N. C. 281, 50 S. E. 654.

Mr. Louis M. Swink for the plaintiff in

error.

No counsel appeared for the defendant in error.

October 22, 1906. Dismissed for want of jurisdiction. California Consol. Min. Co. v.

J. A. AXTELL, et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. Manley, 203 U. S. 579, 51 L. ed.
CYRUS WEBBER. [No. 26.]

In Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Minnesota. See same case below, 94 Minn. 375, 102 N. W. 915, 6 L. R. A. (N. S.) 194.

Messrs. Albert R. Allen, George E. Clarke, and C. M. O'Neill for the plaintiffs in error. Messrs. F. J. Knox and Andrew C. Dunn for the defendant in error.

October 22, 1906. Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Beaupre v. Noyes, 138 U. S. 397, 34 L. ed. 991, 11 Sup. Ct. Rep. 296; National F. Ins. Co. v. Scheffer, 131 U. S. C. C. 111. Appx. and 26 L. ed. 1110.

Sup. Ct. Rep. 779, and cases cited.

-

27

JAMES VAN BUREN, Appellant, v. P. F. HENNESSEY, Testamentary Executor, etc., et al. [No. 65.]

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the
United States for the Eastern District of
Louisiana.

Branch K. Miller for appellant.
Mr. Wm. J. Hennessey for appellee.
October 24, 1906. Dismissed with costs,
pursuant to the Tenth Rule.

CALIFORNIA CONSOLIDATED MINING COм- | ROSA M. COLE, Executrix, etc., Petitioner, v.
PANY, Plaintiff in Error, v. CHARLES MAN-
LEY, Sheriff of Shoshone County, State of
Idaho, et al. [No. 148.]

CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS et al. [No. 465.]
Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the
United States Circuit Court of Appeals for
the Seventh Circuit. See same case below,

In Error to the Supreme Court of the
State of Idaho. See same case below, 10 | 75 C. C. A. 442, 144 Fed. 640.
Idaho, 786, 81 Pac. 50; on rehearing 10 Ida-
ho, 801, 81 Pac. 54.

Mr. J. H. Forney in support of the motion to dismiss.

Mr. M. A. Folsom in opposition thereto. October 22, 1906. Dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Green v. Van Buskerk, 3 Wall. 448, 18 L. ed. 245; Union Mut. L. Ins. Co. v. Kirchoff, 160 U. S. 374, 40 L. ed. 461, 16 Sup. Ct. Rep. 318; Haseltine v. Central Nat. Bank, 183 U. S. 130, 46 L. ed. 117, 22 Sup. Ct. Rep. 49; Schlosser v. Hemphill, 198 Ū. S. 173, 49 L. ed. 1000, 25 Sup. Ct. Rep. 654; Clark v. Roller, 199 U. S. 541-544, 5C L. ed. 300-302, 26 Sup. Ct. Rep.

141.

W. W. ROSE, Plaintiff in Error, v. STATE

OF KANSAS ON THE RELATION OF C. C.
COLEMAN, Attorney General. [No. 360.]
In Error to the Supreme Court of the
State of Kansas. See same
case below
(Kan.) 86 Pac. 296, 6 L. R. A. (N. S.) 843.
Mr. C. C. Coleman in support of motions.
Mr. Frederic D. McKenney in opposition

thereto.

October 22, 1906. Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Smiley v. Kansas, 196 U. S. 447, 49 L. ed. 546, 25 Sup. Ct. Rep. 289; Nonconnah Turnp. Co. v. Tennessee, 131 U. S. clviii Appx. and 24 L. ed. 368; Newport Light Co. v. Newport, 151 U. S. 527, 38 L. ed. 259, 14 Sup. Ct. Rep. 429; Harrison v. Morton, 171 U. S. 38, 43 L. ed. 53, 18 Sup. Ct. Rep. 742.

WILLIAM J. GALLAGHER, Plaintiff in Error, v. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS. [No. 20.]

In Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Illinois. See same case below, 211 Ill. 158, 71 N. E. 842.

Mr. Charles H. Soelke for plaintiff in

error.

Mr. E. C. Lindley for defendant in error. October 22, 1906. Dismissed with costs, pursuant to the Tenth Rule.

Messrs. Ferdinand Winter and Alexander C. Ayres for the petitioner.

Messrs. Frederick E. Matson, Henry Warrum, and Merrill Moores for the respondents.

October 29, 1906. Denied.

FERDINAND EIDMAN, Collector, etc., Petitioner, v. FREDERICK B. TILGHMAN et al., Executors, etc. [No. 208.]

On Writ of Certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. See same case below, 69 C. C. A. 139, 136 Fed. 141.

Messrs. Assistant Attorney General McReynolds, Assistant Attorney General Robb and Solicitor General Hoyt for the peti

tioner.

Mr. E. B. Whitney for the respondents. October 29, 1906. Judgment affirmed with costs by a divided court, and cause remanded to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.

THOMAS F. WILSON (on Behalf of the Territory of Arizona), Appellant, v. N. O. MURPHY et al. [No. 6.]

Appeal from the Supreme Court of the
Territory of Arizona.

Mr. Eugene S. Ives for appellant.
Mr. C. F. Ainsworth for appellees.
October 29, 1906. Decree affirmed with
costs.

THOMAS F. WILSON (on Behalf of the
Territory of Arizona), Appellant, v.
GEORGE W. VICKERS et al. [No. 7.]
Appeal from the Supreme Court of the
Territory of Arizona.

Mr. Eugene S. Ives for appellant.
Mr. C. F. Ainsworth for appellees.
October 29, 1906. Decree affirmed with

costs.

FREDERICK H. VOGT, Appellant, v. MATILDA S. VOGT by her Guardian ad Litem, Pauline Vogt. [No. 62.]

Appeal from the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia. See same case below,

ALEXANDER D. SHAW et al., Petitioners, v. 26 App. D. C. 46.
UNITED STATES. [No. 460.]

Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. See same case below, 75 C. C. A. 291, 144 Fed. 329.

Mr. John C. Gittings for the appellant. Messrs. J. J. Darlington and Leon Tobriner for appellee.

October 29, 1906. Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Schlosser v. Hemphill, 198 Mr. Edward S. Hatch for the petitioners. | U. S. 173, 49 L. ed. 1000, 25 Sup. Ct. Rep. Mr. Solicitor General Hoyt for the re- 654; California Consol. Min. Co. v. Manley, spondent. 203 U. S. 579, 51 L. ed., 27 Sup. Ct.

October 29, 1906. Denied.

Rep. 779, and cases cited.

« ΠροηγούμενηΣυνέχεια »