WILLIAM BEATTIE & Son, Petitioner, v. | JOOK B. HENDERSON, Petitioner, o. JAMES UNITED SHIRT & COLLAR COMPANY et al. M. HENRIE et al. (No. 711.) [No. 679.] Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. See same caśe below, the Second Circuit. See same case below, i 76 C. C. A. 196, 145 Fed. 316. 79 C. C. A. 442, 149 Fed. 736. Mr. V. B. Archer for petitioner. Messrs. Frank 8. Black and George A. Messrs. John G. McCluer and James S. Mosher for petitioner. McCluer for respondents. JAMES L. BRADFORD et al., Petitioners, v. NEW YORK CENTRAL & HUDSON RIVER RAIL UNITED STATES. [Nos. 717, 718.] ROAD COMPANY, Petitioner, v. CATHERINE Petitions for Writs of Certiorari to the MCGRATH. [No. 708.] Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the the Fifth Circuit. See same case below, 152 United States Circuit Court of Appeals for United States Circuit Court of Appeals for Fed. 616, 617. the First Circuit. See same case below, Mr. Edgar H. Farrar and Mr. F. L. Rich151 Fed. 436. ardson for petitioners. Mr. J. H. McGowan for petitioner. The Attorney General, Solicitor General Mr. Holmes Conrad for respondent. Hoyt, and Mr. W. W. Howe for respondent. April 29, 1907. Denied. May 13, 1907. Denied. THOMAS B. CLEMENT, Petitioner, v. UNIT ED STATES. (No. 655.] Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the Emma L. Kaipu in behalf of Mikala Kaipu, United States Circuit Court of Appeals for Appellant, v. L. E. PINKHAM, President of the Board of Health, etc. [No. 172.] the Eighth Circuit. See same case below, Appeal from the District Court of the 79 C. C. A. 243, 149 Fed. 305. United States for the Territory of Hawaii. Mr. George N. Baxter for petitioner. Mr. A. G. M. Robertson for appellant. The Attorney General and Solicitor Gen Mr. Lorrin Andrews for appellee. eral Hoyt for respondent. May 13, 1907. Death of Mikala Kaipu May 13, 1907. Denied. having been suggested, and the case abated, appeal dismissed. FREDERICK HERBERT RAMSDEN, Petitioner, v. HENRY M. KNOWLES. [No. 685.) Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for EX PARTE: IN THE MATTER OF GEORGE H. the First Circuit. See same case below, CRAWFORD, Petitioner. (No. - Origi151 Fed. T21. nal.] Motion for Leave to File Petition for & Mr. Wm. Reed Bigelow for petitioner. Mr. Felix Rackemann for respondent. Writ of Habeas Corpus. Mr. Henry M. Hoyt for petitioner. ARMOUR & COMPANY, Petitioners, v. AGNES SKENE. [No. 695.] Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the IN THE MATTER OF CHARLES UGHBANKS, United States Circuit Court of Appeals for Petitioner. [No. - Original.] the First Circuit. Motion for Leave to File Petition for a Messrs. Roland Gray and John C. Gray Writ of Habeas Corpus. for petitioners. Mr. John B. Chaddock for petitioner. Messrs. Charles H. Fiske, Andrew Fiske, May 13, 1907. Denied. and Charles H. Fiske, Jr., for respondentes May 13, 1907. Denicd. ALASKA TREADWELL GOLD MINING COM. EXPANDED METAL COMPANY et al., Petition PANY, Petitioner, v. Z. R. CHENEY, Ad- ers, v. EUGENE S. BRADFORD et al. [No. ministrator, etc. (No. 697.) 713.) Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. See same case below, 78 the Third Circuit. C. C. A. 498, 148 Fed. 808. Mr. Ernest Howard Hunter for petitionMr. Charles J. Faulkner for petitioner. ers. Messrs. J. J. Darlington and R. W. Jen Mr. E. Hayward Fairbanks for respond. nings for respondent. ents. May 13, 1907. Denied. May 13, 1907. Granted. SAMUEL B. HARTMAN, Petitioner, v. JOHN TOWN OF CENTERVILLE STATION, ST CLAIB D. PARK & SONS Co. (No. 719.] COUNTY, ILL., Petitioner, v. NORTHWESTPetition for a Writ of Certiorari to the ERN SAVINGS BANK. [No. 731.) United States Circuit Court of Appeals for Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the the Sixth Circuit. United States Circuit Court of Appeals for Mr. Frank F. Reed for petitioner. the Seventh Circuit. May 13, 1907. Granted. Mr. Edward C. Kramer for petitioner. May 27, 1907. Denied. Error, v. GRAND CENTRAL MINING Com- THUR C. PLATT. (No. 734.] tiorari granted, on motion of Mr. R. N. Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the Baskin for plaintiff in error. United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. See same case below, 153 Fed. 126. LEEDS & CATLIN COMPANY, Petitioner, v. Mr. Louis Lowenstein for petitioner. VICTOR TALKING MACHINE COMPANY et al. Mr. John M. Coit for respondent. [Nos. 742, 743.) May 27, 1907. Denied. CHARLES M. WARD et al., Admrs, etc., Pe. Mr. Louis Hicks for petitioner. titioners, V. MARIA E. G. McK. WARD et Mr. Horace Pettit for respondent. al. Nos. 735, 736.] May 27, 1907. Granted. Petitions for Writs of Certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. See same case below, EX PARTE: IN THE MATTER OF THE ST. 74 C. C. A. 146, 145 Fed. 1023. LOUIS MINING & MILLING COMPANY OF MONTANA, Petitioner. [No. 17, Original.] Fox for petitioners. Messrs. Henry M. Ward and Austen G. . Mr. Jackson H. Ralston for petitioner. Messrs. Chas. J. Hughes, Jr., W.E. Cullen, Mr. Wm. G. Wilson for respondents. A. B. Browne, and Alex. Britton for respond May 27, 1907. Denied. ents. May 27, 1907. Per Curiam: Rule discharged and petition for writ of mandamus dismissed. Re Rice, 155 U. S. 396, 39 L. ed. (NORTH CHICAGO STREET RAILROAD COMPANY 198, 15 Sup. Ct. Rep. 149; Re Pollitz (May et al., Petitioners, v. CHICAGO CONSOLI27, 1907), 206 U. S. 323, 51 L. ed. 1081, 27 DATED TRACTION COMPANY et al. [No. Sup. Ct. Rep. 729. 737]; WEST CHICAGO STREET RAILROAD COMPANY et al., Petitioners, v. CHICAGO CONSOLIDATED TRACTION COMPANY et al. TROY WAGON WORKS COMPANY, Petitioner, [No. 738.) V. HOWARD L. HANCOCK, Trustee. (No. Petitions for Writs of Certiorari to the 641.) United States Circuit Court of Appeals for Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the the Seventh Circuit. United States Circuit Court of Appeals for Mr. Henry 8. Robbins for petitioners. the Seventh Circuit. See same case below, Messrs. James F. Meagher, Nathaniel C. 152 Fed. 605. Sears, Clarence A. Knight, and A. J. Hop- May 27, 1907. Denied. NATIONAL EXCHANGE BANK OF PROVIDENCE, AMERICAN NEWS COMPANY, Petitioner, 0. R.' I., Petitioner, v. CITY OF SUPERIOR, UNITED STATES. [No. 740.] [No. 716.] Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. See same case below, the Seventh Circuit. See same case below, 148 Fed. 1017. 78 0. C. A. 179, 148 Fed. 11. Mr. Albert H. Washburn for petitioner. Mr. J. H. Caldwell for petitioner. The Attorney General and Solicitor GenNo brief for respondent. eral Hoyt for respondent. May 27, 1907. Denied. May 27, 1907. Denied. OXFORD & Coast LINE RAILROAD COMPANY, CANDIDO Acosta et al., Appellants, v. PEO Petitioner, v. UNION BANK OF RICHMOND, PLE OF PORTO Rico. [No. 781.] Appeal from the Supreme Court of Porto May 27, 1907. Docketed and dismissed Mr. Thomas B. Womack for petitioner. with costs, on motion of Mr. Solicitor GenMr. Wm. L. Royall for respondent. eral Hoyt on behalf of counsel for appellees. May 27, 1907. Denied. STANLEY FRANCIS, Petitioner, D. UNITED SUSAN E. POITERFIELD, Petitioner, v. GESTATES. [No. 745.] RARD D. MOORE, Trustee, etc., et al. [No. Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the 728.] United States Circuit Court of Appeals for Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the the Third Circuit. See same case below, United States Circuit Court of Appeals for 152 Fed. 155. the Fourth Circuit. Mr. Charles L. Frailey for petitioner. Mr. Forrest W. Brown for petitioner. The Attorney General and Solicitor Gen- No appearance for respondent. eral Hoyt for respondent. May 27, 1907. Dismissed, on motion of May 27, 1907. Denied. counsel for petitioner. INDEX. ABANDONMENT. Particular causes or grounds of action. See "Collision," § 1; "Judgment," $ 8. Of mining rights, see "Mines and Minerals," § 1. Death of servant, see "Master and Servant,” Of property belonging to bankrupt estate, see $ 2. “Bankruptcy,”. § 2. Enforcement of liability of officers of national Of rights in public lands, see "Public Lands," bank, see "Banks and Banking," $ 1. 8 1. Foreign judgment, see "Judgment," $ 8. of writ of error, see "Appeal and Error," $ 5. Infringement of patent, see "Patents," $ 3. Personal injuries, see' "Master and Servant," ABATEMENT AND REVIVAL. $ 2. Particular forms of special relief. Election of remedy, see "Election of Reme- See “Injunction.” dies.” Judgment as bar to another action, see "Judg-Enforcement or foreclosure of lien, see "Mari of 1 ment," $ 5. time Liens," $ 1. Foreclosure of mortgage, see "Mortgages," $ 1. ABUTTING OWNERS. Particular proceedings in actions. Assessments for expenses of public improve- See “Appearance";.. "Damages”; “Evidence” ments, see "Municipal Corporations," $ 2. "Judgment"; "Judicial Sales" ; "Limitation of State laws as rules of decision in federal courts Actions"; "Pleading”; “Removal of Causes”; relative to rights of, see "Courts," $ 8. "Trial." Particular remedies in or incident to actions. ACCIDENT INSURANCE. See "Injunction": "Receivers." Notice of pendency of action, see "Lis PenSee "Insurance," 8 2. dens.” Proceedings in exercise of special or limited ACCORD AND SATISFACTION. jurisdictions. Criminal prosecutions, see "Crimical Law." See “Release." Suits in admiralty, see "Admiralty"; "Col lision," $ 1; "Maritime Liens," $ 1. ACCRUAL. Suits in equity, see “Equity.” Review of proceedings. Of right of action, see "Limitation of Actions," $ 1. See “Appeal and Error”; “Certiorari”; “Ex ceptivus, Bill of"; "Judgment,” $ 2. ACTION. ADEQUATE REMEDY AT LAW. Accrual, see "Limitation of Actions," $ 1. Bar by former adjudication, see "Judgment," Effect on jurisdiction of equity, see "Injunc tiou," s 1. Election of remedy, see "Election of Remedies." Jurisdiction of courts, see “Courts." ADJUDICATION. Limitation by statute, see "Limitation of Actions." Of courts in general, see "Courts," $ 1. Pendency of action, see "Lis Pendens." Operation and effect of former adjudication, Restraining action at law, see “Injunction,” see "Judgment,” 88 5, 6. $ 1. ADMIRALTY. See “Collision": "Maritime Liens”; “Shippersons. See “Carriers," $ 2; "Receivers,” 1; “States," | 8 2: Jurisdiction. "§ § 1. $ 2; "United States," $ 3. Admiralty has jurisdiction of a libel by one of Stockholders, see "Corporations," $ 1. two vessels, both adjudged to be in fault, to Trustees in bankruptcy, see "Bankruptcy," $ 4. Co. v. Erie & W. Transp. Co., 246. enforce contribution from the other.-Erie R. Actions relating to particular species of property or estates. ADOPTION. Community property, see "Husband and Wife,' $ 1. Into Indian tribe, see "Indians.” •Point annotated. See syllabus. 27 s.c. (799) ping." |