Εικόνες σελίδας
PDF
Ηλεκτρ. έκδοση

WILLIAM BEATTIE & Son, Petitioner, v.JOOK B. HENDERSON, Petitioner, o. JAMES

UNITED SHIRT & COLLAB COMPANY et al. M. HENBIE et al. (No. 711.] [No. 679.]

Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. See same case below, the Second Circuit. See same case below, i 76 C. C. A. 196, 145 Fed. 316. 79 C. C. A. 442, 149 Fed. 736.

Mr. V. B. Archer for petitioner. Messrs. Frank 8. Black and George A.

Messrs. John G. McCluer and James S. Mosher for petitioner.

McCluer for respondents. Mr. H. O. Messimer and Mr. Livingston May 13, 1907. Denied. Gifford for respondents.

April 29, 1907. Denied. NEW YORK CENTRAL & HUDSON RIVER RAIL JAMES L. BRADFORD et al., Petitioners, v.

UNITED STATES. [Nos. 717, 718.] ROAD COMPANY, Petitioner, v. CATHERINE

Petitions for Writs of Certiorari to the MOGRATH. [No. 708.] Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the the Fifth Circuit. See same case below, 152

United States Circuit Court of Appeals for United States Circuit Court of Appeals for

Fed. 616, 617. the First Circuit. See same case below,

Mr. Edgar H. Farrar and Mr. F. L. Rich151 Fed. 436.

ardson for petitioners. Mr. J. H. McGowan for petitioner.

The Attorney General, Solicitor General Mr. Holmes Conrad for respondent.

Hoyt, and Mr. W. W. Howe for respondent. April 29, 1907. Denied.

May 13, 1907. Denied.

THOMAS B. CLEMENT, Petitioner, v. UNIT

ED STATES. [No. 655.]

Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the Emma L. Kaipu in behalf of Mikala Kaipu, United States Circuit Court of Appeals for

Appellant, v. L. E. PINKHAM, President

of the Board of Health, etc. [No. 172.] the Eighth Circuit. See same case below,

Appeal from the District Court of the 79 C. C. A. 243, 149 Fed. 305.

United States for the Territory of Hawaii. Mr. George N. Baxter for petitioner.

Mr. A. G. M. Robertson for appellant. The Attorney General and Solicitor Gen

Mr. Lorrin Andrews for appellee. eral Hoyt for respondent,

May 13, 1907. Death of Mikala Kaipu May 13, 1907. Denied.

having been suggested, and the case abated,

appeal dismissed. FREDERICK HERBERT RAMSDEN, Petitioner,

V. HENRY M. KNOWLES. [No. 685.]

Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for EX PARTE: IN THE MATTER OF GEORGE H. the First Circuit. See same case below,

CRAWFORD, Petitioner. [No. --, Origi151 Fed. T21.

nal.]

Motion for Leave to File Petition for & Mr. Wm. Reed Bigelow for petitioner. Mr. Felix Rackemann for respondent.

Writ of Habeas Corpus.
May 13, 1907. Denied.

Mr. Henry M. Hoyt for petitioner.
May 13, 1907. Denied.

ARMOUR & COMPANY, Petitioners, v. AGNES

SKENE. [No. 695.]

Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the IN THE MATTER OF CHARLES UGHBANKS, United States Circuit Court of Appeals for Petitioner. [No. - Original.] the First Circuit.

Motion for Leave to File Petition for a Messrs. Roland Gray and John C. Gray Writ of Habeas Corpus. for petitioners.

Mr. John B. Chaddock for petitioner. Messrs. Charles H. Fiske, Andrew Fiske, May 13, 1907. Denied. and Charles A. Fiske, Jr., for respondent,

May 13, 1907. Denicd.

ALASKA TREADWELL GOLD MINING COM. EXPANDED METAL COMPANY et al., Petition

PANY, Petitioner, v. Z. R. CHENEY, Ad- ers, v. EUGENE S. BRADFORD et al. [No. ministrator, etc. (No. 697.)

713.] Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the

Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. See same case below, 78 the Third Circuit. C. C. A. 498, 148 Fed. 808.

Mr. Ernest Howard Hunter for petitionMr. Charles J. Faulkner for petitioner.

ers. Messrs. J. J. Darlington and R. W. Jen

Mr. E. Hayward Fairbanks for respondnings for respondent.

ents. May 13, 1907. Denied.

May 13, 1907. Granted.

SAMUEL B. HARTMAN, Petitioner, v. JOHN | TOWN OF CENTERVILLE STATION, ST CLAIB D. PARK & SONS Co. (No. 719.]

COUNTY, ILL., Petitioner, v. NORTHWESTPetition for a Writ of Certiorari to the ERN SAVINGS BANK. [No. 731.] United States Circuit Court of Appeals for Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the the Sixth Circuit.

United States Circuit Court of Appeals for Mr. Frank F. Reed for petitioner.

the Seventh Circuit. May 13, 1907. Granted.

Mr. Edward C. Kramer for petitioner.
Mr. B. H. Canby for respondent.

May 27, 1907. Denied.
MAMMOTH MINING COMPANY, Plaintiff in

Error, v. GRAND CENTRAL MINING COM-
PANY et al. [No. 774.)
Mr. R. N. Baskin for plaintiff in error. SEYMOUR W. BONSALL, Petitioner, 0. AB-

May 27, 1907. Writs of error and cer- THUB C. PLATT. (No. 734.] tiorari granted, on motion of Mr. R. N.

Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the Baskin for plaintiff in error.

United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. See same case below,

153 Fed. 126. LEEDS & CATLIN COMPANY, Petitioner, v. Mr. Louis Lowenstein for petitioner. VICTOR TALKING MACHINE COMPANY et al.

Mr. John M. Coit for respondent. [Nos. 742, 743.]

May 27, 1907. Denied.
Petitions for Writs of Certiorari to the
United States Circuit Court of Appeals for
the Second Circuit.

CHARLES M. WARD et al., Admrs. etc., PeMr. Louis Hicks for petitioner.

titioners, v. MARIA E. G. McK. WARD et Mr. Horace Pettit for respondent.

al. [Nos. 735, 736.] May 27, 1907. Granted.

Petitions for Writs of Certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for

the Second Circuit. See same case below, EX PARTE: IN THE MATTER OF THE ST.

74 C. C. A. 146, 145 Fed. 1023. LOUIS MINING & MILLING COMPANY OF

Messrs. Henry M. Ward and Austen G. MONTANA, Petitioner. [No. 17, Original.] Mr. Jackson H. Ralston for petitioner.

Fow for petitioners. Messrs. Chas. J. Hughes, Jr., W.E. Cullen,

Mr. Wm. G. Wilson for respondents. A. B. Browne, and Alex. Britton for respond

May 27, 1907. Denied. ents.

May 27, 1907. Per Curiam : Rule discharged and petition for writ of mandamus dismissed. Re Rice, 155 U. S. 396, 39 L. ed. | NORTH CHICAGO STREET RAILROAD COMPANY 198, 15 Sup. Ct. Rep. 149; Re Pollitz (May et al., Petitioners, v. CHICAGO CONSOLI27, 1907), 206 U. S. 323, 51 L. ed. 1081, 27 DATED TRACTION COMPANY et al. [No. Sup. Ct. Rep. 729.

737]; WEST CHICAGO STREET RAILROAD COMPANY et al., Petitioners, v. CHICAGO

CONSOLIDATED TRACTION COMPANY et al. TROY WAGON WORKS COMPANY, Petitioner,

[No. 738.] V. HOWARD L. HANCOCK, Trustee. (No.

Petitions for Writs of Certiorari to the 641.]

United States Circuit Court of Appeals for Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the the Seventh Circuit. United States Circuit Court of Appeals for

Mr. Henry 8. Robbins for petitioners. the Seventh Circuit. See same case below,

Messrs. James F. Meagher, Nathaniel 0. 152 Fed. 605.

Sears, Clarence A. Knight, and A. J. Hop-
Messrs. Almon W. Bulkley and Charles kins for respondents.
Martindale for petitioner.

May 27, 1907. Denied.
Mr. James W. Noel for respondent.
May 27, 1907. Denied.

NATIONAL EXCHANGE BANK OF PROVIDENCE, AMERICAN NEWS COMPANY, Petitioner, o.

R.' I., Petitioner, v. CITY OF SUPERIOR, UNITED STATES. [No. 740.] [No. 716.]

Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. See same case below, the Seventh Circuit. See same case below, 148 Fed. 1017. 78 0. C. A. 179, 148 Fed. 11.

Mr. Albert H. Washburn for petitioner. Mr. J. H. Caldwell for petitioner.

The Attorney General and Solicitor GenNo brief for respondent.

eral Hoyt for respondent. May 27, 1907. Denied.

May 27, 1907. Denied.

OXFORD & Coast LINE RAILROAD COMPANY, CANDIDO Acosta et al., Appellants, v. PEO

Petitioner, v. UNION BANK OF RICHMOND, PLE OF PORTO Rico. [No. 781.]
VA. [No. 744.]

Appeal from the Supreme Court of Porto
Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the Rico.
United States Circuit Court of Appeals for Solicitor General Hoyt for appellee.
the Fourth Circuit.

May 27, 1907. Docketed and dismissed Mr. Thomas B. Womack for petitioner. with costs, on motion of Mr. Solicitor GenMr. Wm. L. Royall for respondent. eral Hoyt on behalf of counsel for appellees. May 27, 1907. Denied.

STANLEY FRANCIS, Petitioner, 0. UNITED SUSAN E. POITERFIELD, Petitioner, v. GESTATES. [No. 745.]

RARD D. MOORE, Trustee, etc., et al. [No. Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the 728.] United States Circuit Court of Appeals for Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the the Third Circuit. See same case below, United States Circuit Court of Appeals for 152 Fed. 155.

the Fourth Circuit. Mr. Charles L. Frailey for petitioner. Mr. Forrest W. Brown for petitioner.

The Attorney General and Solicitor Gen- No appearance for respondent. eral Hoyt for respondent.

May 27, 1907. Dismissed, on motion of May 27, 1907. Denied.

counsel for petitioner.

INDEX.

ABANDONMENT.

Particular causes or grounds of action.

See "Collision,” § 1; “Judgment,” § 8. Of mining rights, see "Mines and Minerals," § 1. Death of servant, see "Master and Servant," Of property belonging to bankrupt estate, see $ 2. “Bankruptcy," $2.

Enforcement of liability of officers of national Of rights in public lands, see “Public Lands," bank, see "Banks and Banking," $ 1.

$ 1. of writ of error, see "Appeal and Error,” g 5. Infringement of patent, see "Patents,” $ 3.

Foreign judgment, see “Judgment,” Š 8.

Personal injuries, see "Master and Servant,” ABATEMENT AND REVIVAL.

§ 2.

Particular forms of special relief. Election of remedy, see "Election of Reme- See “Injunction.”

dies." Judgment as bar to another action, see "Judg-Enforcement or foreclosure of lien, see “Mari

Construction of will, see "Wills," 8 1. ment," $ 5.

time Liens," $ 1.

Foreclosure of mortgage, see "Mortgages," $ 1. ABUTTING OWNERS.

Particular proceedings in actions. Assessments for expenses of public improve- See “Appearance” ;,. "Damages”; “Evidence"; ments, see “Municipal Corporations," $ 2.

"Judgment"; "Judicial Sales" ; "Limitation of State laws as rules of decision in federal courts

Actions"; "Pleading"; "Removal of Causes”; relative to rights of, see "Courts," $ 8.

"Trial."

Particular remedies in or incident to actions. ACCIDENT INSURANCE. See "Injunction": "Receivers."

Notice of pendency of action, see "Lis PenSee "Insurance," 8 2.

dens."

Proceedings in exercise of special or limited ACCORD AND SATISFACTION.

jurisdictions.

Criminal prosecutions, see "Crimical Law.”' See “Release.”

Suits in admiralty, see "Admiralty"; "Col

lision," $ 1; "Maritime Liens," $ 1. ACCRUAL.

Suits in equity, see “Equity.” Of right of action, see "Limitation of Ac

Review of proceedings. tions," $ 1.

See "Appeal and Error"; "Certiorari"; "Ex

ceptivus, Bill of"; "Judgment,” $ 2. ACTION.

ADEQUATE REMEDY AT LAW. . Accrual, see "Limitation of Actions," $ 1. Bar by former adjudication, see "Judgment," Effect on jurisdiction of equity, see "Injunc$ 5.

tiou,' s 1. Election of remedy, see "Election of Remedies." Jurisdiction of courts, see "Courts."

ADJUDICATION. Limitation by statute, see "Limitation of Actions.”

Of courts in general, see "Courts," $ 1. Pendency of action, see "Lis Pendens."

Operation and effect of former adjudication, Restraining action at law, see “Injunction,” see "Judgment,” 88 5, 6.

$ 1.
Actions between parties in particular relations.

ADMIRALTY.
See "Master and Servant," $ 2.
Actions by or against particular classes of

See "Collision”: “Maritime Liens”; “Ship

ping." persons. See “Carriers,”; $.2; “Receivers," {1; "States," s 3: Jurisdiction. $ 2; "United States," $ 3.

Admiralty has jurisdiction of a libel by one of Stockholders, see "Corporations," $ 1.

two vessels, both adjudged to be in fault, to Trustees in bankruptcy, see "Bankruptcy,” $ 4. Co. v. Erie & W. Transp. Co., 246.

enforce_contribution from the other.-Erie R. Actions relating to particular species of property or estates.

ADOPTION. Community property, see "Husband and Wife,” $ 1.

Into Indian tribe, see "Indians."

•Point annotated. See syllabus. 27 S.C.

(799)

« ΠροηγούμενηΣυνέχεια »