RIKEL, Appellant, v. FERGUSON, Respondent. | SEYMOUR et al., Appellants, v. RINDSKOPF (Court of Appeals of New York. Dec. 20, 1889.)

el al., Respondents. Albert G. McDonald, for respondent. Hu- (Court of Appeals of New York, Second Divis

ion. Nov. 26, 1889.) go Hirsch, for appellant.

No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with Chas. E. Hughes, for appellants. Nathancosts. All concur. See 5 N. Y. Supp. 774. iel Myers, for respondents.

No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs,

upon opinion of BROWN, J., in Bernheinier v. BLODGETT et al., Appellants, v. SCOFIELD Rindskopf, ante, 1074, (November 26, 1889.)

All concur. See 41 Hun, 646. et al., Respondents. (Court of Appeals of New York. Dec. 20, 1889.)

W. A. Sutherland, for appellants. Geo. P. CITY OF COHOES, Appellant, v. MORRISON, Decker, for respondents.

Respondent.
No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs.
All concur. See 48 Hun, 615.

(Court of Appeals of New York, Second Divis

ion. Nov. 26, 1889.) Matthew Hale, for appellant. Edgar L.

Fursman, for respondent. FLEET, Appellant, v. KALBFLEISCH et al.,

No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs. Respondents.

All concur, except HAIGIIT, J., not voting. (Court of Appeals of New York. Dec. 20, 1889.) See 42 Hun, 216.

Edward V. B. Kissam, for appellant. Wm. N. Dykman, for respondents.

No opinion. Appeal dismissed, with costs. FARMER et al., Appellants, o. SHANNON, All concur. See 43 Hun, 443.

Respondent. (Court of Appeals of New York, Second Divis

ion. Nov. 26, 1889.) AVERY, Respondent, v. NEW YORK CENT. Chas. M. Earle, for appellants. E. F. & H. R. R. Co., Appellant.

Bullard, for respondent. (Court of Appeals of New York. Dec. 20, 1889.) No opinion. Order affirmed, with costs.

All concur. See 22 Jones & S. 346.
James F. Gluck, for appellant. Truman
C. White, for respondent.

No opinion. Order affirmed, with costs.
All concur. See 6 N. Y. Supp. 547.

O'DONNELL, Respondent, o. MCINTYRE, Ap

pellant. (Court of Appeals of New York, Second Divis

ion. Nov. 26, 1889.) NEWHALL, Respondent, c. APPLETON et al., Appellants.

J. A. Stull, for appellant. Fanning & &

Williams, for respondent. (Court of Appeals of New York. Dec. 20, 1889.)

No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs. E. Winslow Paige, for appellants. Wm. All concur, except BRADLEY, J., not sitting.

, W. Badger, for respondent.

See 41 Hun, 100.
No opinion. Appeal dismissed, with costs.
All concur. See 6 N. Y. Supp. 4.

TEN BROECK, Respondent, v. TRAVELERS"

INS. Co., Appellant. KOEHLER, Respondent, V. FARMERS' & (Court of Appeals of New York, Second Divis

v DROVERS' NAT. BANK OF SOMERS, (CLOSE,

ion. Nov. 26, 1899.) Appellant.)

John W. Lyon, for appellant. W.F.O'Neill, (Court of Appeals of New York. Dec. 20, 1889.) for respondent.

Wm. A. Abbott, for appellant. Emanuel No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs, J. Myers, for respondent.

All concur, except BROWN, J., not sitting. No opinion. Order affirmed, with costs. See 42 Huri, 656. All concur. See 6 N. Y. Supp. 470.

ELECTRICAL SUPPLY CO., Respondent, 0.

JERSEY CITY ELECTRIC LIGHT Co., ApIn re Application of PEOPLE'S RAILROAD OF

pellant. SYRACUSE to Appoint Commissioners, etc.

(Court of Appeals of New York, Second Divis(Court of Appeals of New York. Dec. 20, 1859.)

ion. Nov. 26, 1889.) Chas. H. Peck, for appellant. Martin A. J. K. Hayward, for appellant. Eugene Knapp, for respondents.

Smith, for respondent. No opinion. Order affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Judgmentalfirmed, with costs. All concur. See 5 N. Y. Supp. 954.

All concur. See 42 Hun, 659.

SPRING et al., Appellants, v. BROOKS et al., WILTSIE, Respondent, v. VILLAGE OF Repondents.

GREENBUSH, Appellant. (Court of Appeals of New York, Second Divis- (Court of Appeals of New York, Second Division. Nov. 26, 1889.)

ion. Dec. 10, 1889.) Geo. W. Van Slyck, for appellants. F.A. Levi 8. Longley, for appellant. Esek CowPaddock, for respondents.

en, for respondent. No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs, No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs. on opinion of FOLLETT, C. J., in Haynes v. All concur. See 42 Hun, 654. Brooks, ante, 1083, (November 26, 1889.) All concur.

BARRETT, Appellant, v. STATE, Respondent. LAKE SHORE & M. S. R. Co., Respondent, v. (Court of Appeals of New York, Second DivisBOARD SUPERVISORS ERIE COUNTY, Ap

ion. Dec. 10, 1889.) pellant.

John A. Barhite, for appellant. John W. (Court of Appeals of New York, Second Divis- Hogan, Dep. Atty. Gen., for the State. ion. Nov. 26, 1889.)

No opinion. Order affirmed, without costs. James M. Humphrey, for appellant. James All concur. Fraser Gluck, for respondent.

No opinion. Judgment aifirmed, with costs. All concur, except BRADLEY and HAIGHT,

HUGGINS et al., Appellants, 0. STATE, Re. JJ., not sitting. See 41 Hun, 637.

spondent. (Court of Appeals of New York, Second Divis

ion. Dec. 10, 1889.) MAURER, Respondent, v. Bliss et al., Ap- John A. Barhite, for appellants. John pellants.

W. Hogan, Dep. Atty. Gen., for the State.

No opinion. Order affirmed, without costs. (Court of Appeals of New York, Second Division. Nov. 26, 1889.)

All concur.
Geo. L. Rives, for appellants. John E.
Eustis, for respondent.

FREDERICKS, Respondent, 0. DAVIDSON, No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Sheriff, Appellant. All concur.

(Court of Appeals of New York, Second Divis

ion. Dec. 17, 1889.) GIBBS, Appellant, v. COYKENDALL, Respond- Wales F. Severance, for appellant. Franent.

cis B. Chedsey, for respondent. (Court of Appeals of New York, Second Divis

No opinion. Order affirmed, with costs, ion. Nov. 26, 1889.)

and judgment absolute ordered upon the James Wood, for Appellant. Fredk. W. stipulation against the appellant. All conNoyes, for respondent.

cur.
No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs.
All concur, except BRADLEY and HAIGHT,
JJ., not sitting. See 39 Hun, 140.

ROSE, Appellant, v. HAWLEY et al., Re

spondents. (Court of Appeals of New York, Second Divis

ion. Dec. 17, 1889.) STRAUSS, Respondent, v. HEYENGA, Appellant.

Gratz Nathan, for appellant. Jas. M.

Hunt, for respondents. (Court of Appeals of New York, Second Division. Nov. 26, 1889.)

No opinion. The motion is denied, with Saml. Greenbaum, for appellant. Dona- William 'Radford acquired any title to the

$10 costs, but without determining whether hoe, Newcombe & Cardozo, for respondent. No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs. premises by the deed given to him by the

sheriff, and with leave to said Radford to file All concur, except HAIGHT, J., not sitting.

a brief on the argument of this appeal, proSee 41 Hun, 646.

vided he serves a printed copy thereof on the plaintiff's attorney five days before the argu

See 45 Hun, 592. FLYNN et al., Commissioners, etc., Respond- ment. All concur.

ents, v. WHIPPLE, Commissioner, etc., Ap

pellant. (Court of Appeals of New York, Second Divis- ALBERT, Respondent, v. SWEET et al., Apion. Dec. 10, 1889.)

pellants. N. C. Moak, for appellant. R. A. Par- (Court of Appeals of New York, Second Divis

( menter, for respondents.

ion. Dec. 17, 1889.) No opinion. Judgment reversed, new trial Amasa J. Parker, Jr., for appellants. E. granted, costs to abide event, on opinion of Winslow Paige, for respondent. PARKER, J., in Flynn v. Hurd, ante, 1109, No opinion. Motion for reargument de(December 10, 1889.) All concur, except nied, with $10 costs. All concur. See 42 POTTER, J., not sitting.

Hun, 654.