26TH CONG.... 1ST SESS. his bank, with others, took advantage of the prople, to put exchange to five, ten, and twenty-five per cent. premium, and keep it there, after importing and keeping, in the midst of our difficulties," more specie than the country ever had before? 66 In this sum of $5,000,000, to lie idle" under the bill, he says you "start with a minimum." I think just the reverse, and have given the reasons. By his system, however, it is clearly proved we started with a minimum," and ended with a maximum. Here is history against prophecy. He says by the bank the transfer of public funds costs you nothing. Igrant, by the account stated on the bank books, there may be no charge. That does not prove it costs nothing; if so, this bill would not be expensive. His plan only costs the people a charter-a barter of their Constitution, and a bonus of $1,000,000 over and above all the expense he charges against the sub-Treasury. The banks," he says, "are suffering with the community." A glorious state of suffering, indeed; one in which they gain everything, and need lose nothing; in which, having all power, they command everything, and are, therefore, interested to prolong the suffering. I save and except here, sir, such banks as have held the deposits sacred, and have done a legitimate business. "I will turn you to facts curious to behold." "Our expenditures, it is amazing to see how they have increased within a few years." This is one curious fact, to which I have been curious enough to call your attention already, with a view to show wherein lies the curiosity. I should have been amazed if one so conversant with the bank policy as that gentleman, should have failed to point to this "curious fact." It is the legitimate offspring of the system which he, with exultation, ascribes to Alexander Hamilton, in these words: "Hamilton arranged the plan that has never been altered, except once in 1829." He is right, sir; and what was that plan? It was to use the banks as depositaries. There the money was kept to the credit of the Treasurer of the United States. Yet he says "The Treasurer has never any money in his keeping." By warrants, drafts, and checks, it was drawn, transferred, or paid out, in bank paper, good or bad. By that plan the Treasurer's office, and these banks or vaults, were called the Treasury of the United States; for Mr. Gallatin said expressly, "These depositaries are the Treasury of the United States." (See State Papers, volume two, title Finance, pages 461 and 463.) Now, in what does this bill differ? "The offices in the Treasury building, in Boston, New York, Philadelphia, Charleston, New Orleans, and St. Louis, are called the "Treasury of the United States;" here is no difference. But these places are not corporations to issue paper money; there is one difference. The money is placed to the credit of the Treasurer; here is no difference. To be paid on his own warrant, draft, or check, as heretofore; here is no difference. In gold and silver; here is the sound and material difference. This is not all, sir. "Hamilton arranged the first, Federalists adopted it, have always advocated it, and still do. The State-rights men proposed the second, have always advocated it, and still ought. But, after stating this "curious fact" about the expenditures which caused him to be "amazed," his amazement ceases, and he says, " Expenses have increased, do increase, and ought to inThus he comes at last to the creed of crease. a true believer. He says, "The placing the money there to the credit of the Treasurer, subject to his draft as though in the Treasury, is an unconstitutional feature." If this be true, then he and Mr. Gallatin have furnished additional authority for saying the plan of Hamilton was unconstitutional. For the money was placed in the "depositories to the credit of the Treasurer," and "these depositories were called the Treasury of the United States. "Take care how you extract from the people and give to a cold, heartless Treasury." That Operation has proved a cooling business to the bank, and has left them "heartless," too, however much of soul they may have had. But of what use is this caution? Take his own plan, and Mr. Gallatin says, "Those depositories are Independent Treasury-Mr. Cooper. the Treasury," and in the words of the gentleman I reiterate his warning, "You give no aid to the banks; you jostle trade." Sir, you have helped them to the means by which they have deranged the currency and jostled trade; you have given them millions annually to be used under the privileges of a charter; you have helped them to the power of producing excitement, expansion, and contraction; of speculating on your people; of raising or lowering prices; of corrupting the purity of your public tribunals; and of almost perpetuating their own existence, and yet their friends cry "Give, give!" The time has come when we should say no to any proposition that looks to the increase of their power. "This is a war on banks." Not so. It is a child's bargain. The people instruct us to say to the banks, "Let us alone and we will let you alone." Congress has no power to do or say more by any operation on the currency. But he says, "Will you give no help to exchanges?" Sir, the only effect you can produce, the only aid you can give, is that of a very large dealer in exchange, whose purpose and habit it is to give it to you at par, everywhere. That much aid, and no more, we propose to give by this bill, and that only to the extent of our transactions in raising and disbursing a revenue limited to the actual wants of the Government. But why call on us? Your favorite system operated for twenty years, and what did it effect? What it failed to make on domestic it made up in foreign exchanges; and it found it more profit in commanding all the exchange, at a given rate, than to speculate for a season. In this, too, it founded its only hope of reputation, its only claim | to regeneration. But when you refused its demands how did it requite you for years of kind treatment? As if to manifest its want of gratitude it threw your currency overboard, and destroyed more at its death than it created during its life. The operations on foreign exchange afforded a wider field; and while it prided itself in the uniformity of domestic exchanges the foreign were left to take their course. This may be illustrated by the exchange table here before me, in Senate Document, second session Twenty-Fifth Congress, pages 457, 137, and 138. It shows that from 1788 to 1814, exchange on England was at an average discount of three per cent. For the time great uniformity in the rate prevailed. The widest range was to 4 premium. From 1815 to 1838, exchange on England was at an average premium of 82. No uniformity prevailed while it ranged from 1 to 18, and from 7 to 21 premium. In the coincidence between the fluctuations of this commodity at different times, and the rise or fall in the deposits and circulation of the United States Bank, some" curious facts" appear which it will be amazing to behold. The document first referred to, and the Document No. 142, Senate, third session Twenty-Fifth Congress, will exhibit them. Sir, too much has been claimed for this institution as a regulator. It assumed that office at times, but always looked to you to give it the means. There is no regulator but specie. Now, sir, let me answer the two questions of the other gentleman [Mr. BIDDLE] from Pennsylvania. 1. "When specie gets to the point of attraction, how is it to get back?" I answer, by the power this bill gives to individuals to demand that article in payment. 2. "Bank paper being refused by the Government is disparaged; how will you restore its value?" It is not in our power. Nevertheless, it will speedily be done, because every sound bank which has pride of character, or interest in its good credit, will of itself very soon put its notes on the footing of specie, which will naturally produce an influx of specie in their vaults, to be supplied by their notes. Those which cannot hope to reach this point, will forfeit all claims to confidence, and die by their own act. The gentleman from Maine, [Mr. EVANS,] and also the gentleman from Tennessee, [Mr. BELL,] assert that " this bill will discredit the States." I can perceive but one way in which it can have Ho. OF REPS. that effect; and for that we are not accountable. It is this: the States are now discredited by their own imprudence; their stocks are under par. This has brought about some of those "other liabilities" of the bank. If another bank charter could be obtained, the stocks, on the plan of Hamilton, will be a fund to pay for that stock. Hence a new demand for them would be created. This is the forlorn hope. Pass this bill, and the bank is suspended, and stocks are regulated by the existing demand, and therefore will continue to fall. But is this your fault; or must you violate your duty to consult the interest of those who hold State stocks? Let the speculators in stocks take care of themselves; the people will take care of the public money. If, sir, you are bound to divest your policy, with a view to prop or reinstate these stocks, it is only on the principle that you can indorse for them or substitute your credit for theirs. This is a favorite idea with the friends of the Hamiltonian system, but receives no favor with me. When it shall be yielded to by the country the Government will have become a machine for the promotion of a privileged order. I will resist it as long as it can be resisted, and be one of the last to yield; but being forced to give up I shall then, with what means I can command, try to place myself on a footing with the favored few. But I confess I should only do it on the principle that when I must be a slave or a master I prefer the latter. The gentleman from Tennessee " calls on gentlemen from the South to avail themselves of this opportunity to cut off this continual increase of expenditure." Sir, I echo the call, send it back to that gentleman, and send it in the ears of my colleagues, and assure them that I mistake greatly if the passage of this bill is not the plan. He calls this an ultra Federal policy." Where did he get that idea, and how does it appear? He obtained it not from history, not from men who have died, not from Washington, nor Jefferson, nor Madison, nor Alexander Hamilton. It must be the creature of a lively imagination. He asks, "Where is your $5,000,000 of specie to come from? It is not in the country, and what little is in the country is in the vaults of the banks." Is this true; and are the banks to furnish an argument of necessity against this bill by locking up the specie, that their friends may raise this objection? Certain it is that there is now, by the account of the gentleman from Philadelphia, [Mr. SERGEANT,] a superabundance of specie. And in reply to the gentleman from Tennessee, I answer, take a part of that "enormous amount of useless specie," spoken of by the former gentleman, and put it to the uses of the people in the redemption of bank paper, and your sub-Treasury will have no difficulty. The gentleman from Massachusetts [Mr. CusnING] said, "Hamilton tried this scheme and it failed." I have been unable to find the authority for this declaration. I doubt whether it exists; the more so, since on this point this gentleman and the distinguished gentleman from Pennsyl vania [Mr. SERGEANT] are at issue. But if he tried it and let it go, it was because it failed to strengthen and consolidate the Federal Government as he desired; and this cuts down the grandest of all pretended objections to the bill. The gentleman from Massachusetts says, "We are to have one currency for the Government and another for the people." This has become too stale and shallow a pretext for an argument to deserve consideration. Still, I will illustrate it. Put a case. You reside in the interior of the "Empire State;" you have an agent or agents in New York who manage all your moneyed affairs. Where you live the ordinary medium is paper money. It has become of little value, because it is irredeemable. It issued from banks in and about New York. You draw on your agent; he fails to pay, assigning as a reason that your money was deposited for safe-keeping in banks who re fuse to pay it. After an examination of their affairs you find they have governed their circulation by the sum of your deposits, which being withdrawn in part cannot be redeemed. The bank therefore stops. You order your agents to deal in gold and silver, and remove your deposits, that the money which circulates in your immediate vicin 26TH CONG....1ST SESS. ity may be better; that your agent at New York, where your great interests are, may meet these engagements unembarrassed. Now, when he receives and pays out for you, is it your affair or his? Is it one money for him and another for you, or is it not yours in either case? This is the affair of the people; the Government is their agent. I would gladly, Mr. Chairman, call my colleagues' attention to the important influence a United States Bank has had, and must always have, on our southern staple and our facilities to elect between alternative markets; also the vastness of the political results that might inure to the South by throwing such preponderating machinery at the North. These are topics grand and overwhelming. But my time is spent, and I desist. I have endeavored to present fairly the merits of this bill. That I have succeeded, it would be vanity in me to suppose; but I desire it to be remembered that the great good to be effected by it, in my estimation, is to limit the revenue to the wants of the Government, making it as simple and economical as a republic ought to be; to close up the innumerable avenues to indirect executive patronage, and thereby limit his power to that which is given and lawful to be exercised; thirdly, to check the alarming tendency of Federal legislation to adopt a rule of construing the supreme law, by which its decisions, concerning its powers, ride over the supremacy of that law. If I have contributed to this, I have sustained the interest of my constituents, my own, and the interests of the country; I shall have cause to be satisfied with what I have done, and will rest on a "conscience void of offense. دو INDEPENDENT TREASURY. SPEECH OF HON. C. SHEPARD, IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, In Committee of the Whole on the state of the Union, on who support this bill. If its effect on the currency would be wholesome, its passage is still more desirable; but I view it principally as an engine to manage the national revenue, and I am the more anxious for its success, because it obviates the necessity of a measure odious to the people and destructive to the harmony of the country. Sir, I do not belong to that school of politicians, who, under the cloak of doing one thing, are aiming at another not sanctioned by the Constitution. "An honest man will not cheat his neighbor, neither will he commit a fraud in the Legislature of the Union for the triumph of party, or the still more despicable purpose of taxing one portion of the people for the advantage of another. robbers; that the President will have the power ests. The bill proposes that the public revenue shall be kept by the public officers, by men appointed for that purpose according to the laws of the land; and it forbids the receipt at the Treasury of anything but gold and silver, the legal currency of the country. These simple principles are the essence of the measure, and on them will depend its usefulness and efficiency, either as a fiscal agent of the Government or in its incidental bearing on the industry of the Union. Gentlemen have said that they are contrary to the genius of our institutions, that they are more congenial to the despotisms of the Old World, and more in unison with the habits and feelings of an enslaved people. To test the truth of these assertions, let us go to the fountain of our legislation, whose pure and living waters are yet refreshing to the patriot and statesman-to the Constitution itself. That instrument authorizes the President and the Senate to appoint subordinate officers to assist in managing the affairs of this Government. It says nothing of corporations; and the inference that its authors intended to impose all the duties arising under the Constitution on persons selected according to law, and liable to its penalties, is not unreasonable. Congress has power to "coin money," and the States are forbidden to "emit bills of credit," or to "make anything but gold and silver coin a tender in payment of debts;" but no mention is made of bank paper, no author Mr. CHAIRMAN: The few remarks which I intend to make will be strictly applicable to the bill under consideration. Honorable gentlemen have wandered to other topics which have but little connection with this subject; they have traveled over the old ground, so well known to the members of this House; they have rehearsed the story of the war upon the banks, and indulged in the usuality is given to make use of the promissory notes tirades against the persons engaged in that famous controversy. A member from Kentucky has affirmed that this question was to be decided by authority, and, charging certain eminent gentlemen with having changed their opinions on the subject of the currency, he supposed this fact to be a powerful argument against the bill. Sir, I differ entirely from that honorable gentleman. Politicians may change with the moon, but their conduct should not arrest the progress of great and valuable principles. The human mind is so much influenced by prejudice, so often governed by circumstances, and is so circumscribed in its vision, that the best and wisest are liable to error. Must we, therefore, ever continue in the wrong, and must we never yield to the lessons of experience? Mr. Van Buren was in favor of the "safety-fund" system of New York, and Mr. Calhoun once advocated the establishment of a national bank; but do these things justify the assertion that they are dishonest in recommending this measure; or are they sufficient to draw you, or me, or any honorable member, from its zealous support? Sir, I think and act independently on all occasions. The people whom I represent are too proud and too generous to expect a base subserviency to any man or any party; all that they wish is an honest devotion to their welfare, and a conscientious discharge of the solemn duties required by the Constitution. Sir, if this bill contain in its womb but a small portion of the evils which its enemies have foretold, it is the worst measure ever introduced into a deliberative assembly. We have heard that the public treasure will be surrendered to thieves and of private associations, and it is not illogical to An honorable member from New York [Mr. But gentlemen are distrustful of individuals; they think that corporations alone are safe depositaries of the public funds. A single person is fit for the Presidency, though the destiny of fifteen million people is placed in his hands; a judge on the bench must decide questions involving the lives and fortunes of his fellow-citizens; and each one of us is trusted with the performance of great and solemn duties to the President and the Senate would be unable to find men sufficiently honest to take charge of a few dollars and cents? If there be so little integrity in the country, why do these moneyed institutions themselves put confidence in their officers and directors? How was the public money kept during the war of the Revolution, when there were no banks in existence? Other nations use individual depositaries, yet there is no complaint of loss, no absolute necessity of changing their system. Greece and Rome carried on their mighty conquests, and filled their exchequers with the spoils of the world, and their treasure was confided to the care of individuals. Gentlemen are willing that the revenue should be collected by the officers of the Government, though the keeping of it must be committed to private associations. It is not easy to see the distinction; if men are too worthless to be trusted with the latter duty, it is unwise to allow their interference for any purpose, and banks should measure boxes, gauge molasses, sell land, and saunter about the country as regular tax-gatherers. The case of Swartwout illustrates this view of the subject; his defalcation occurred during the connection of the Government with the banks, and while the public officers were ordered to collect and deposit in these institutions. Yet this did not prevent the embezzlement, for if a man be disposed to cheat he has ample opportunity dur ing the process of collection. The truth is, that whether banks or individuals be the depositaries, the Government is equally exposed to loss; the only safe rule is to select trustworthy men, to keep a vigilant eye over their conduct, and to infict the heaviest penalties on negligence and dishonesty. This bill goes far to place guards around the public treasure; should, however, fine, imprisonment, and future disqualification for office be unavailing, let the whipping-post and the gibbet drive men into the paths of rectitude. of But, sir, I will proceed to a topic of still greater importance. It is pretended that the power the President will be increased by the provisions of this bill, and the patriotic sensibilities of gentlemen are aroused by the idea that the Commander of the Army and Navy, and the leader of forty thousand office-holders, should also have control of the Federal purse. The zeal of these animated orators would encourage the belief that public liberty was in danger, and that the Presi dent was grasping at all the powers of the Constitution in order to change the nature of our Republic. A plain statement will dissipate these clouds and relieve the anxieties of honorable gentlemen, if they are sincerely in search of truth and not playing the game of petty politicians for selfish purposes. If the Government and the banks be connected, the public money will be deposited in these institutions, subject to the drafts of certain officers, in pursuance of old and established laws. Whether it be a bank chartered by Congress or a State Legislature, the keeper of the money is compelled to obey the command of these officers; it cannot be said that the fund is to be used for an improper or illegal object; the depositary cannot inquire into the motives and designs of the public The most prominent measure of the late Administration proves the truth of this argument; the Secretary of the Treasury refused to obey the President and remove the deposits from the Bank of the United States; he was displaced, and his successor readily executed the mandate of his superior. Shame, then, on this hypocritical clamor against the great measure of reform! Where is the proposition to increase the power of the Executive? Where is the clause by which he can exercise more influence than at present? This attempt to deceive the people is worthy of scribbling partisans and traveling orators; it ought not to appear in this House, where we should assemble and deliberate like dignified statesmen. If gentlemen are fearful that the President may exercise an improper influence on the Department of the Treasury, the only way to remedy this evil is to affect an amendment of the Constitution; and to make that Department directly responsible to the Representatives of the people. A proposal of this nature would involve grave considerations; it might be feared that the Chief Magistrate would be rendered weak and inefficient, or the Secretary of the Treasury himself become too powerful, or the Legislature would engross too much authority and trample under foot the coordinate branches of the Government. But the passage of this bill cannot be an obstacle to any change which may be desired by the wisdom and patriotism of the country; the question now at issue concerns the keeping of the public money, and whether it be placed in banks or in the hands of our own offcers for safety and disbursement, the ultimate control of it may be given at any time to whomBoever the voice of the nation shall direct. The management of the "independent treasures" will require the appointment of a few more officers and clerks, and to this extent the patronage of the President must be increased, but it will be shown, in the progress of my remarks, that this is trifling in comparison with that which will be lopped off by separating the banks from the Government. But, Mr. Chairman, the strongest feature of this bill is that denominated the "specie clause," which orders the revenue to be collected in gold and silver. This provision will go into operation gradually to avoid the injurious consequences of a change too sudden, and to enable all classes to accommodate their affairs to the future condition of the currency. The enemies of this measure have denounced it as a scheme to prostrate the HO. OF REPS. probable that the sum above mentioned must be supplied by the banks, and they should be prepared for this additional demand for the precious metals. By the last report these institutions had $33,000,000 in coin, and upward of four hundred millions in debts, while they owed much more than one hundred millions to the community. Can it be possible that corporations so rich, and having such entire control of the business of the country, are unable to redeem $5,000,000 of their own notes? Or is it reasonable to suppose that their usefulness would be destroyed by the refusal of the Government to use their paper? Sir, these professed friends of the banks are their worst enemies; they have done more injury to paper currency by prating about its weakness, and dragging the subject into politics, than the most frantic bullionist could effect by argument. I think better of these institutions than their political allies. I believe they are perfectly able to answer the call made by this bill, and if they are not, they would soon fall without the help of external violence. banks and the credit system; the demand of coin tutions. If the coin paid to the Government be hoarded will soon learn to foresee the amount of specie When the public funds consisted of promissory notes, and were deposited in banks, they formed the basis of new loans, and in some cases were used as capital, though in reality they were the simple obligations of these institutions themselves. If, instead of having this deposit, they be called on to redeem $5,000,000 of previous promises, it is not astonishing that all interested in large issues should be violently opposed to this bill. According to safe practice a banker can lend in paper three times more than he has in coin; and if he lose the advantage of the Federal revenue, his circulation will be curtailed probably to the amount of $20,000,000. This result may be unpalatable to the receivers of dividends, and to those whose prospect of wealth is dependent on heavy loans and endless credit; but in placing a moderate and wholesome check on the manufacture of paper, this bill confers a great benefit on the people, who are deeply concerned in the maintenance of a sound and steady currency. The history of banking shows a constant proneness to overaction; the anxiety of the stockholder to make large profits, and the greediness of the borrower, who too often is a mere speculator, seduce all parties beyond the limits of prudence. The former thinks that the demand for his notes 26TH CONG....1ST SESS. is caused by the business of the country, and the latter imagines the supply to proceed from real, active capital. This may be true to a certain extent; but as the paper increases the price of property rises, and, reacting on the banks, induces greater expansion. These alternate influences continue to operate until the condition of things is entirely artificial, the trading men being deeply indebted to the banks, and these utterly unable to redeem their obligations. While the flood is going on it is easy and agreeable to glide in the current. High wages, high prices, and plenty of money make us rejoice in the prosperity of the country; but when there is a reflux of the tide, and debtors are called on to pay, unrewarded labor, the sacrifice of property, and "hard times," mark the period of contraction. Self-interest is the guide and counselor of these trading companies. The object of the capitalist is not to furnish a good currency to the people, but to make a profitable investment of his money. If it be advantageous to extend the business, it is done without caring for the soundness of the circulating medium; and if it be necessary to "stop accommodations," the decree goes forth amid the groans and sorrows of a ruined community. In many cases, cunning and unscrupulous men creep into the command of these institutions; they act for the benefit of themselves, their friends, and confederates, regarding neither the interests of stockholders nor the welfare of the country. Such persons are worthy of the gallows. But if the managers of the system be honest, and disposed to do their duty, how can they avoid the periodical crises under which we suffer? Where is the index to point out the limit of issues, beyond which it were unsafe to go? Who can tell when the demand for paper ceases to be natural, and the cravings of a morbid appetite begin to operate? port all the merchandise that was to be carried, at Charleston took the paper of a local bank, it Honorable members are addicted to being elo- A learned member from Massachusetts [Mr. CUSHING] Seems to think that the prosperity of a country is commensurate with the quantity of its circulating medium. If the currency be something valuable, its increase is undoubtedly an evidence of industry and enterprise, but considered as a mere instrument of commerce, as a means to effectuate a particular purpose, as a measure of value and exchange, its excellence depends on its efficiency for the desired object. A railway between two large cities may be useful and profitable; but if another be constructed, though the former could convey all the passengers, and trans may advance too rapidly, that our strength will Some gentlemen have been seized with a won- Let us compare the effect of such an institution with that of the Independent Treasury. According to the act of 1816, the officers of the revenue received the notes of any bank which paid specie at the place of reception, or the notes of the national bank payable anywhere. If the collector Mr. Chairman, one of the strongest arguments in favor of this measure is its tendency to introduce stricter habits of economy, and to make the people understand any malversation which may occur in the conduct of their affairs. In 1824 and 1828, under the pretense of collecting revenue, laws were passed imposing heavy taxes on the people of this country, for the purpose of protecting domestic manufactures. I shall not descant on the subject, but will merely remark that these enactments were considered unjust and oppressive by those who did not participate in the bounties granted; they were contrary to those modern principles of philosophy which teach that commerce should be free and industry unrestricted; they were in violation of the spirit of the Constitution, which forbids that the Government should be prostituted to the interests of a particular class or section of this wide-spread Confederacy. Under their operation large sums of money were collected from the people which were not necessary for the public service; in a short time the national debt was liquidated, as if the present generation alone should pay the price of our liberties, and the most ridiculous, expensive, and unconstitutional schemes were projected to absorb the revenue, and yet there was a surplus in the Treasury of $40,000,000. Sir, does the history of England or France, or even Turkey, exhibit a policy so unjust and foolish? Monarchs have taken the property of their subjects to carry on war, by which their ambition might be gratified, their territories increased, and their families enriched; but in this Republic, established for the benefit of the whole people, whose ancestors refused to pay King George a small tribute, we have an instance of levying more taxes than are wanted, or could be wisely spent! This fund was deposited in the banks, which loaned it out to the real owners at an interest of six per cent., and kept them from feeling the burden that had been imposed; but finally the authors of this miserable system of duplicity and plunder, to conceal the enormity of their conduct, proposed that these millions of dollars should be distributed among the States. Thus trading politicians, combined with the representatives of selfish and grasping interests, passed laws for the benefit of the few at the expense of the many, and, when the result of the policy began to be manifest, a cunning scheme is devised to blind the eyes of the country, by returning the money which had been improperly seized, and by endeavoring to have it believed that this Government was a paternal benefactor. Sir, do you think that the juggling conspirators could have consummated the plan of deception if the revenue had been paid in gold and silver and been kept by the public officers? If $40,000,000 in coin had been accumulated in the Treasury, every branch of industry would have suffered so intensely that the people would have seen the real nature of these hypocritical enactments, and with one voice, from Maine to Louisiana, demanded a repeal. Such is the beautiful operation of this measure, that the Government and banks are made to exert on each other an indirect but wholesome influence; the 26TH CONG....1ST SESS. demand for specie will tend to keep the issues of paper within proper limits, and unjust or improvident legislation will receive a sure check from its bearing on the moneyed interests of the people. Independent Treasury-Mr. Shepard. who will always have private interests in view, But, sir, we are told that a corporation of large sues of State banks, and prevent those expansions Mr. Chairman, I have been amused at the various and contradictory objections which have been made to the passage of this bill. One member tells us that most of the coin will be collected at New York, and it must be transferred to different places where it may be wanted by the Government, and thence it will return by the course of trade to the city from which it came. He concludes, therefore, that specie will be travelingdium equivalent to specie; would control the isabout the country and keeping commercial affairs in constant agitation, as if drafts payable at the depository in New York and sent to St. Louis, for instance, would not be readily cashed by merchants or bankers of that city who stand in need of eastern funds, and thus prevent the movement of a single dollar. Another member opines that a great bank is to be erected, where all the specie of the country will be hoarded and paper will be issued to take the place of our present currency, as if this bill countenances or approves of any such project, or does not contain provisions which a fair and honorable statesman would consider utterly hostile to the life of a monster so obnox-trigue and favoritism? Will not all be equally ious. A third gentleman is stuffed by his leaders with both these ideas; and not perceiving their inconsistency he pours them forth with all the gravity of conviction, and congratulates himself with having dealt a heavy blow on the Independent Treasury and its supporters when his simplicity has only excited their pity and laughter. Sir, honorable members are compelled to resort to their old tactics. Overthrown in argument, they create men of straw of vast dimensions and bad propensities, against whom they war most lustily, or charges of corruption and imbecility are made against the Administration, which finally sinks into the awful crimes of buying a few flowers, or eating with a silver spoon, or using a cambric handkerchief. The object of this virulent slander and petty persecution is to divert the public mind from the real issue, to keep the people from considering the great questions which they are called decide, and slyly elevate a party whose heart's desire is to establish a national bank. The beauties of such an institution have been often portrayed to this House, and to the country. A circulating medium at par throughout the Union, domestic exchanges regular, and at a small charge, the State banks compelled to redeem their issues these are the boasted blessings to be conferred by a national bank! It is certainly convenient for travelers to have a paper currency, that will be received in all the States; but they constitute an exceedingly small part of the community, and the trouble of taking a few gold pieces would save them from the loss and annoyance of using the notes of local corporations. This advantage is also counterbalanced by another consideration: it is not the ability of a national bank, or the skill with which it might be managed, that gives a general currency to its bills, but the Federal Government receives them in payment of dues, and thus gives them credit in sections far distant from the place of redemption. Were the note of any bank or an individual stamped with such an authority, it also would go everywhere and be eagerly sought after. The granting of this favor to a special association is a great monopoly, and can only be justified by the overruling law of necessity. Exchange between two points depends on the business of commerce, on the productions sold and the merchandise purchased, and on the relations subsisting between them as debtor and creditor. Natural causes, therefore, govern exchange, and if there be no tampering, no interference by the Legislature, it will always be on a proper footing. Nobody complains of exchange between New York and Liverpool, and merchants would think it ridiculous to speak of regulating it by a bank; for it is rarely much above or below the par standard. If a trader in New Orleans had $1,000 to pay a debt in Philadelphia, and a draft could not be bought on fair terms, he could transport the money by water at the small expense of one or two per cent. This is done in all parts of the world, and where is the need of an artificial ruler, HO. OF REPS. peal from those with whom they have no sympathies of feeling reach their hearts and influence their conduct? Cold and calculating, they might sweep from existence the State banks, established to foster the dawning commerce of our ancient sovereignties, and create a dependence on themselves throughout this extensive empire. They might concentrate the trade of the country at particular points when the wishes and welfare of those whose industry has brought it into existence would give it another direction. Sir, can I vote to place the happiness and the prosperity of my constituents at the command of strangers, who know them not? Can I give to a few bankers the control of their commerce and the regulation of their industry? Should I become the servile instrument of cunning politicians, who, having national words on their lips, are entirely governed by local feelings, and assist in sacrificing my own home and my own friends to pamper the pride and increase the wealth of the people of other sections? No, sir; let this Government be separated from all banks; let it raise aloft the standard of the Constitution as the guide of the country and the protector of the people; let it warn men of business from the shoals and quicksands hid under the smooth current of unsound credit; let it be the signal of safety in the hour of distress, the solid bulwark of national honor amid the rage of disastrous speculation and the petty tricks of temporary expediency! The enemies of this great doctrine have endeavored to degrade it into a mercenary scheme for the benefit of the public officers. This view is more consistent with the narrowness of their own minds and the bitterness of politica! feeling than the important consequences that will flow from its adoption, either to the advantage or the injury of our descendants. My own opinion is, that the connection which has existed between the Government and the moneyed class of our citizens was corruptive of both. It did not advance the permanent interests of society, and if prolonged might so change the character of our institutions as to render profitless the blood and treasure that were expended in their establishment. This subject has caused all the strife and turmoil that have made the last eight years so memorable in our history. The party in power refused to recharter the late national bank, whose stockholders immediately threw themselves into the arms of the Opposition, and the question became the prominent topic of political controversy. General Jackson was charged with designing to tamper with that institution; and he retorted with ac desirous of large dividends? Will not all be Whatever force may be in the statements of the next consideration. Would they care for the on the public mind. Members of Congress and men of influence received loans or high compensations for service, which were stigmatized as bribes, and the varying state of the bank's discounts was said to be without reference to the business of the country, and intended to produce panic and upeasiness throughout the land. The removal of the deposits was proclaimed an act of tyranny, and defended as necessary to curb a bold and intriguing corporation. The substitution of the State banks to keep the public money was hailed as a deliverance, while the Opposition considered them mere political machines, brought up to aid the policy of a corrupt Administration. I know nothing of the truth of these charges and criminations, though to this day they are believed by thousands of honest and intelligent citizens. The secret doings of factions, and the private arrangements of public men, can never be fully understood; but in matters of this kind, a well-grounded suspicion is sufficient for an argument, and patriotism bids us to be ever watchful in guarding the purity of our noble institutions. An association of capitalists prays for the grant of extraordinary privileges, even the power of controlling the commerce, regulating the industry, and valuing the property of fifteen million people. This is refused; and is it unreasonable to suppose that these men would use uncommon efforts to attain their objects? Would they scruple to form an alliance with needy politicians, that were in search of new weapons to attack their adversaries? Would they hesitate to work zealously in the cause of a party whose elevation will redound to their own personal advantage? Or, let us suppose that an ambitious |