6, 1897. son, page 556 622 and The the the 566 'yne 782 777 any, 326, 828 [The Law Times, Oct. 16, 1897.] IN THE FOLLOWING APPEALS THE DECISIONS OF THE COURTS 2 The Law Times, Oct. 16, 897 TABLE OF CASES CITED IN THIS VOLUME. Anstee v. Nelmes (1 H. & N. 225, 230). A Raft of Spars (1 Abbott Adm. 485, in 1848) page 84, 701 .192, 673 664 ...... 664 194 ... 347 416 Ash v. Ash (68 L. T. Rep. 500; (1893) P. 222) Ashbury v. Watson (54 L. T. Rep. 27; 30 Ch. Div. 376, 386)..... 235 133 Adamson v. The Clyde Trustees (4 Macq. 931) 141 Ashbury Railway Carriage Company v. Rich (33 134 579 Ashby v. Pocock (3 Atk. 208) 285 Agriculturalist Cattle Insurance Company Limited, Ashby, re; ex parte Wreford (66 L. T. Rep. 353; (1892) 1 Q. B. 872).. 743 487, 740 Alcock v. Sloper (2 My. & K. 699) Asher v. Whitlock (13 L. T. Rep. 254; L. Rep. 1 701 452 Ashly v. Freckleton (3 Lev. 73) 92 26 Alexander v. Mills (24 L. T. Rep. 206; L. Rep. 6 Ch. App. 124) 477 Alina, The (42 L. T. Rep. 517; 4 Asp. Mar. Law Astbury, ex parte (20 L. T. Rep. 997; L. Rep. 4 Ashworth v. Lord (58 L. T. Rep. 18; 36 Ch. Div. 545) 40 417 628 Atkins v. Tredgold (2 B. & C. 23) 714 Allen . Smith (6 L. T. Rep. 459; 12 C. B. N. S. 638) 141 Atkinson, re; Atkinson v. Bruce (54 L. T. Rep. 403; 775 Allen v. Taylor (16 Ch. Div. 355) 245 Allhusen v. Labouchere (39 L. T. Rep. 207; Attorney-General v. Abdy (6 L. T. Rep. 756; 1 H. 126 3 Q. B. Div. 654) 677 Allingham, re (54 L. T. Rep. 905; 32 Ch. Div. 36) Attorney-General v. Chapman (65 L. T. Rep. 119; Attorney-General v. The Cockermouth Local Board .558, 570 740 487 .587, 747 796 44 Anderson's case (37 L. T. Rep. 560; 7 Ch. Div. 75) 400 Attorney-General v. Higgins (2 H. & N. 339) 722 726 457 754 Andrews v. Gas Meter Company (76 L. T. Rep. 132; (1897) 1 Ch. 361).. Attorney-General v. Robertson (68 L. T. Rep. 371; 655 324, 516 Angell v. The Vestry of Paddington (L. Rep. 3 Q. B. 714) Attorney-General v. Sillem (10 L. T. Rep. 434; 352 431 Anglo-African Steamship Company, re (54 L. T. 830 Anglo-Italian Bank v. Davies (39 L. T. Rep. 244; 9 Ch. Div. 285) 554 Angus v. Dalton (44 L T. Rep. 844; L. Rep. 6 App. Cas. 740) 760 Attorney-General v. Tomline (38 L. T. Rep. 57; 126 62 Beddoe, re: Downes v. Cottam (68 L. T. Rep. 595 Bennett v. Bury (42 L. T. Rep. 480; 5 C. P. Div 339) Benyon v. Benyon (1 P. Div. 447) Besant. Wood (12 Ch. Div. 605) Betts, re (1897) 1 Q. B. 50) Betts v. Armstead (58 L. T. Rep. 811; 20 Q. F Div. 771)..... Bibby v. Thompson (32 Beav. 646). Biederman v. Stone (16 L. T. Rep. 415; L. Rep. C. P. 504) . Brogden (59 L. T. Rep. 650: Div. 546)... Birkley v. Presgrave (1 East, 220, at p. 228). Birmingham, Dudley, and District Banking Con pany v. Ross (59 L. T. Rep. 609; 38 Ch. Di 295) Bishop v. Bishop (76 L. T. Rep. 28) Bishop, ex parte; re Tönnies (28 L. T. Rep. 86: Bissell v. Fox (51 L. T. Rep. 663) Blackwood v. London Chartered Bank of Austral (30 L. T. Rep. 45; L. Rep. 5 P. C. 111). Blair v. Cordner (19 Q. B. Div. 516) Blakely Ordnance Company, Limited, re; Lum den's case (19 L. T. Rep. 437; L. Rep. 4 C App. 31) Blithman, re (14 L. T. Rep. 61; L. Rep. 2. Eq. 2 Blyth v. Fladgate (63 L. T. Rep. 546; (1891) 1 C 337) Bodenham v. Hoskyns (19 L. T. Rep. 0. S. 29 2 De. G. M. & G. 903) Bos v. Helsham (15 L. T. Rep. 481; L. Rep. 2. H Bourne, re; Martin v. Martin (67 L. T. Rep. 58 (1893) 1 Ch. 188) Bovril case (74 L. T. Rep. 805; (1896) 2 Ch. 600 Bows v. Fenwick (30 L. T. Rep. 524; L. Rep C. P. 339) Boycott, re (52 L. T. Rep. 482; 29 Ch. Div. 571) Bradford v. Belfield (2 Sim. 264) Brall, re; ex parte Norton (69 L. T. Rep. 32 Atlee (56 L. T. Rep. 514; 35 Ch. 47, 246 |