...Elliott, he was liable on his covenant for his failure so to do. The court properly instructed the jury that the measure of damages was the difference between the contract price and the fair and reasonable market value of the land on the day it was to have been conveyed under the...

...the contract after the day on which it was to be paid did not preclude the recovery of damages, and that the measure of damages was the difference between the contract price of the seed and the price it subsequently sold for; provided the last sale was made bonajide and to...

...its arrival was offered to the defendant ; but he refused to take it. On the trial it was contended that the measure of damages was the difference between the contract price and the price on the 26th of January, when notice was given. But, on argument, the Exchequer held that...

...the trial judge, applied an improper rule in measuring his damages. The trial judge charged the jury that the measure of damages was the difference between the contract price of the glass and its market value on the 21st of April, 1902. ( This was the day defendant notified...

...transport merchandise, and to deliver the same at the terminus, on or before a specified day, — Heidi that the measure of damages was the difference between the contract price, had it arrived at the place of delivery on the day specified, and the price for which it was actually...

...deposit and the expenses of investigating the title, but also damages for the loss of his bargain ; and that the measure of damages was the difference between the contract price and the value at the time of the breach of contract ; and that the profit which it was shewn the plaintiff...

...deposit and expenses of investigating the title, but also damages for the loss of his bargain. (2). That the measure of damages was the difference between the contract price and the market value at the time of the breach of the contract. (3). That, in the absence of evidence to...

...CUBED. — In an action for failure to deliver hay contracted for, where the Court erroneously charged that the measure of damages was the difference between the contract price and the highest market price of the same article at the time the suit was brought, the error was harmless,...

...gallon. The defense alleged that the fair market price was less than 18 cents per gallon. But the court ruled that the measure of damages was the difference between the contract price and the price as claimed by plaintiffs. Plaintiffs had a verdict for the amount claimed. The defendant...

...taken under the circumstances. In an action for breach of contract in not delivering the goods,—Held, that the measure of damages was the difference between the contract price and the cost to pit of the goods purchased by him in substitution.—Hinde v. Liddell, 44 L J. Rep., QB...