554 U. S. v. Sauer (D. C.) 73 Fed. 671.. U. S. v. Shapleigh, 54 Fed. 126, 4 C. C. A. 237 U. S. v. Stanley, 6 McLean, 409, Fed. Cas. U. S. v. Stevens (D. C.) 44 Fed. 132.... 83 213 .24, 478 U. S. v. Telephone Co. (C. C.) 29 Fed. 17.. 671 U. S. v. Tingey, 5 Pet. 115, 8 L. Ed. 66, 72 553, 554 99 Ward v. Todd, 103 U. S. 327, 329, 26 L. Ed. 339.. .. 284 Warren v. Comings, 6 Cush. (Mass.) 103.. 576 Warren v. Lyons, 152 Mass. 310, 25 N. E. 721, 9 L. R. A. 353..... 21 Waters v. Howard, 1 Md. Ch. 112, 116.... 461 Watson v. Merrill, 136 Fed. 359, 362, 69 C. C. A. 185, 188, 69 L. R. A. 719.. Watts v. Kellar, 56 Fed. 1, 5 C. C. A. 394 ..... 21 181 31 119 787 729 .... U. S. v. Van Fossen, 1 Dill. 408, Fed. Cas. 843 Way v. McClarin (C. C.) 91 Fed. 663.... 375 W. B. Belknap & Co. v. Bank (no opinion) 329 Webber v. Virginia, 103 U. S. 344, 26 L. Ed. 565.. 750 420 U. S. Fidelity & G. Co. v. Com'rs, 76 C. C. Weeks v. Scharer, 64 C. C. A. 11, 14, 129 Fed. 333, 336.. 178 116 Weil v. Silverstone, 6 Bush (Ky.)_698.... 269 Welcome v. Hess, 90 Cal. 507, 27 Pac. 369, 25 Am. St. Rep. 145.. 31 U. S. Trust Company v. Contract Co., 81 Fed. 454, 26 C. C. A. 472.. Werder, In re (C. C.) 15 Fed. 789. 736 471 Werra, The, 12 P. D. 52, 54. 837 Utah Const. Co. v. Railroad Co. (C. C.) 145 Fed. 981... 39 Utt, In re, 105 Fed. 758, 45 C. C. A. 32... 825 West v. U. S. (C. C.) 119 Fed. 495.....66, 70 Western German Bank v. Norvell, 134 Fed. 724, 69 C. C. A. 330.. 268 207 203 Vaill v. Council, 18 R. I. 405, 28 Atl. 344 228 Vanderbilt, Matter of, 172 N. Y. 69, 73, 64 N. E. 782 .. Vanderbilt v. Eidman, 196 U. S. 480, 493, 25 Sup. Ct. 330, 334, 49 L. Ed. 563. Van Horn v. Van Horn (N. J.) 28 Atl. 669 522 Vegelahn v. Guntner, 167 Mass. 92, 44 N. E. 1077, 35 L. R. A. 722, 57 Am. St. Rep. 443 .175, 177, Vernam v. Smith, 15 N. Y. 327. Vicksburg v. Water Co., 26 Sup. Ct. 660.. Vicksburg, etc, Tel. Co. v. Telephone Co., 79 Miss. 341, 30 South. 725, 89 Am. St. Rep. 656 Victory and Plymouthian, The, 168 U. S. 410, 18 Sup. Ct. 149, 42 L. Ed. 519..... 199 Village of Port Jarvis v. Bank, 96 N. Y. 550, 556.. Westervelt v. Mohrenstecher, 22 C. C. A. 93, 95, 76 Fed. 118, 121. Westinghouse Electric & Mfg. Co. v. Light Co. (C. C.) 108 Fed. 221. Wetmore, In re, 99 Fed. 703, 704.. Wheeler v. Eldred, 121 Cal. 28, 53 Pac. 431, 66 Am. St. Rep. 20; 137 Cal. 38, 69 Pac. 619... 760, 761, 763 Wheeler v. Winn, 53 Pa. 122, 126, 91 Am. Dec. 186... Western Union Tel. Co. v. Brown (C. C.) 32 Fed. 337.... 811 28 137 713 43 228, 793 107 642 Page Willis v. Trust Co., 169 U. S. 295, 307, 308, 18 Sup. Ct. 347, 42 L. Ed. 752.... 203 Wills v. Blain, 4 N. M. 378, 20 Pac. 798.. 565, 566 Wills v. Ross, 77 Ind. 1, 40 Am. Rep. 279 25 Wilson, Ex parte, 114 U. S. 417, 5 Sup. Ct. 935, 29 L. Ed. 89.... 216 Wilson v. Railroad Co., 18 R. I. 598, 29 Atl. 300; 64 S. C. 162, 36 S. E. 701, 41 S. E. 971.. Winslow v. Wallace, 116 Ind. 317, 17 N. E. 923, 1 L. R. A. 179.. Winter v. Railway, 160 Mo. 159, 61 S. W. 606.. Wisdom v. State (Tex.) 86 S. W. 756.... Witt v. Railroad Co., 38 Minn. 122, 127, 35 N. W. 862.... 101 28 CASES ARGUED AND DETERMINED IN THE UNITED STATES CIRCUIT COURTS OF APPEALS AND THE CIRCUIT AND DISTRICT COURTS. FLICKINGER v. UNITED STATES. (Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. December 5, 1906.) No. 1,556 1. BANKS AND BANKING-OFFENSES BY OFFICERS OF NATIONAL BANKS-INDICTMENT FOR MISAPPLICATION OF FUNDS. In an indictment under Rev. St. § 5209 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3497], charging an officer of a national bank with a willful misapplication of its funds with intent to injure and defraud the association, it is not necessary to aver that the acts set out were done without authority from the directors. [Ed. Note.-For cases in point, see Cent. Dig. vol. 6, Banks and Banking, § 973.] 2. SAME-ACTS CONSTITUTING OFFENSE. The discounting by the president of a national bank with the funds of the bank of commercial paper known by him to be worthless or fictitious, for the benefit of an insolvent corporation of which he is an officer, and with intent to injure and defraud the bank, is a willful misapplication of its funds, constituting a criminal offense under Rev. St. § 5209 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3497.] [Ed. Note.-For cases in point, see Cent. Dig. vol. 6, Banks and Banking, § 964.] 3. CRIMINAL LAW-VERDICT-REPUGNANCY-SEVERAL COUNTS. Where an indictment under Rev. St. § 5209 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3497], charging an officer of a national bank with willful misapplication of its funds, contains counts each based on the discounting of a separate instrument, and another count based on the discounting of all of such instruments, a verdict is not repugnant and inconsistent because it finds the defendant guilty on the latter count and not guilty on the former. [Ed. Note.-For cases in point, see Cent. Dig. vol. 14, Criminal Law, §§ 2100, 2101.] In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Eastern Division of the Northern District of Ohio. T. E. Powell, for plaintiff in error. Before LURTON, SEVERENS, and RICHARDS, Circuit Judges. 150 F.-1 |