Εικόνες σελίδας
PDF
Ηλεκτρ. έκδοση

5

§ 4. This change in the form of ecclesiastical government was followed by a corrupt state of the clergy. For although examples of primitive piety and virtue were not wanting, yet many were addicted to dissipation, arrogance, voluptuousness, contention, and other vices. This appears from numerous complaints, of the most credible persons in those times. Many bishops now affected the privileges of princes, especially those who had charge of the more numerous and wealthy congregations; for they dazzled the eyes and minds of the populace, by a throne, attendants, and other ensigns of religious majesty, perhaps also with splendid robes. The presbyters imitated the example of their superiors, and, neglecting their duties, followed a luxurious way of life. This emboldened the deacons to make encroachments upon the rights and offices of presbyters.

§ 5. And from this cause chiefly, in my opinion, the minor orders of clergy were every where, in this century, added to the bishops, presbyters, and deacons. The words subdeacons, acolytes, door-keepers, exorcists, and copiatæ, designate officers,

of the power of bishops than the arrogant Cyprian-that very Cyprian who, when not fired by any passion, is so condescending towards presbyters, deacons, and the common people. He inculcates, on all occasions, that bishops derive their office, not so much from their election by the clergy and people, as from the attestation and decree of God. See Ep. lii. p. 68, 69. ep. xlv. p. 59. ep. lv. p. 82. ep. lxv. p. 113. ep. lxix. p. 121. He regards bishops as the successors of the apostles. Ep. xlii. p. 57. So that bishops are amenable to none, but to God only; while presbyters are amenable to the religious society. Ep. xi. p. 19.-Deacons were created by the bishop; and, therefore, can be punished by him alone, without the voice of the society. Ep. lxv. p. 114.- Bishops have the same rights with apostles, whose successors they are. And hence, none but God can take cognizance of their actions. Ep. lxix. p. 121.-The whole church is founded on the bishop; and no one is a true member of the church who is not submissive to his bishop. Ep. lxix. p. 123.- Bishops represent Christ himself, and govern and judge in his name. Ep. lv. ad Cornel. p. 81, 82.Hence all bishops, in the following ages, styled themselves vicars of Christ. See J. Bingham's Orig. Eccles. vol. i. p. 81,

[ocr errors]

&c. In the ninth century, a bishop of Paris is so styled in a letter of Servatus Lupus. Ep. xcix. p. 149, ed. Baluze. After the ninth century, the bishops of Rome assumed the exclusive right to this as well as other honorary episcopal titles. Schl. From Mosheim, de Rebus Christianor. p. 588, &c. Tr.]

5 Origen, Comment. in Matthæum, pt. i. Opp. p. 420. 441, 442. Eusebius, Historia Eccles. lib. viii. cap. 1, p. 291. Cyprian, in many of his Epistles.

6 [Subdeacons are said by Bona, to have been either instituted by Christ, as the later schoolmen think, or by the apostles. But he admits that Scripture makes no express mention of this order, and cites no earlier authority for it than an epistle attributed to Ignatius, but generally considered spurious, though the cardinal himself will not give it up. Subdeacons are to wait upon the deacons. The orders inferior to the subdiaconate, Bona tells us, are said by the schoolmen to be of apostolical institution, or at least have originated from those who immediately succeeded the apostles, but he admits that nothing of the sort is proved. Acolytes, or colets, as they were anciently called in England, had the care of the lights, and of the wine and water for the Eucharist; readers are mentioned by Tertullian, and

which I think the church would have never had if the rulers of it had possessed more piety or true religion. But when the honours and privileges of the bishops and presbyters were augmented, the deacons also became more inflated, and refused to perform those meaner offices to which they once cheerfully submitted. The offices designated by these new titles, are in great measure explained by the words themselves. The exorcists owed their origin to the doctrine of the New Platonists adopted by the Christians, that evil spirits have a strong desire after the human body, and that vicious men are not so much impelled to sin by their natural depravity, and the influence of bad examples, as by the suggestions of some evil spirit lodging ¦ within them. The copiata were employed in the burial of the dead.

§ 6. Marriage was allowed to all the clergy, from the highest rank to the lowest. Yet those were accounted more holy and excellent who lived in celibacy. For it was the general persuasion, that those who lived in wedlock were much more

were not only to read Scripture in church, but also to bless bread and first-fruits; exorcists are mentioned by Tertullian, but it seems not as a particular order of ministers; when made one, they were to order non-communicants out of the church, and to pour out the water for ministration; copiate, otherwise called fossarii, or grave-diggers, were employed in various duties connected with funerals: the Greek form of their name seems to come from коTiãodai, to labour, though some have derived it from KOTETOS, wailing. Bona says, that servile offices are no longer performed in the Roman church by ordained persons, but by boys and men engaged in the ordinary way. The reader who wishes for more information on these matters, cannot do better than consult Bingham, B. iii. Ed.]

7 See J. Godofredus, ad Codicem Theodosianum, tom. vi. p. 48. [Several of the Catholic writers, as, e. g. Baronius, Bellarmine, and Schelstrate, believed these minor orders of the clergy were instituted by the apostles. But the most learned writers of the Romish communion, and all the Protestants, maintain that they were first instituted in the third century. See Cardinal Bona, Rerum Liturgicar. 1. i. c. 25, § 16.

17. Morin, de Ordinatione, p. iii. Exerc. 14, c. 1, and Bingham's Orig. Eccles. vol. i. Not one of these orders is even named by any writer who lived before Tertullian; nor are all of them named by him. Cyprian, in the middle of the third century, mentions hypodiaconi, acolythi, and lectores. See his Epp. 14. 24. 36. 42. 49. 79, ed. Baluz. And Cornelius, bp. of Rome, contemporary with Cyprian, in an epistle which is preserved by Eusebius, H. E. vi. c. 43, represents his church as embracing 46 (πреσбυτέρους) presbyters; 7 (διακόνους) deacons; 7 (vodiaкóvovs) subdeacons ; 42 (akoλoulous) acolythi; exorcists (opKIOTàs), and readers (avayvuotas), with door-keepers (qua Tuλwpoîs), together 52. The particular functions of these inferior orders are but imperfectly defined by the writers of the third century. From the Epistles of Cyprian above cited, it appears that subdeacons and acolythi, singly or together, were frequently the bearers of public letters to and from bishops; and that readers were employed to read the scriptural lessons in time of public worship. The writers and councils of the fourth century describe more fully the duties of all these petty offices. Tr.]

exposed to the assaults of evil spirits than others: and it was of immense importance, that no impure or malignant spirit should assail the mind or the body of one who was to instruct and govern others. Such persons therefore wished, if possible, to have nothing to do with conjugal life. And this many of the clergy, especially in Africa, endeavoured to accomplish with the least violence to their inclinations; for they received into their house, and even to their beds, some of those females who had vowed perpetual chastity, affirming, however, most religiously, that they had no disgraceful intercourse with them." These concubines were by the Greeks called ovvεloaктoι, and by the Latins mulieres subintroductæ. Many of the bishops, indeed, sternly opposed this most shameful practice; but it was a long time before it could be wholly abolished.

§ 7. Of the writers of this century the most distinguished for the celebrity of his name and for the extent of his writings was Origen, a presbyter and catechist of Alexandria, a man truly great, and the common teacher of the Christian world. Had his discernment and soundness of judgment been equal to his genius, piety, industry, erudition, and other accomplishments, he would deserve almost unbounded commendation. As he is, all should revere his virtues and his merits.1 The second was

[ocr errors]

417.

Porphyrius, eрl añоxns, lib. iv. p.

9 See H. Dodwell, Diss. tertia Cyprianica; and Lud. Ant. Muratorius, Diss. de Synisactis et Agapetis, in his Anecdota Græca, p. 218. Steph. Baluze, ad Cypriani Epistol. p. 5. 12, and others.-[This shameful practice commenced before this century. Slight allusions to it are found in the Shepherd of Hermas and in Tertullian; but the first distinct mention of it is in Cyprian, who inveighs severely against it in some of his Epistles. -It is to be remembered, that none but virgin sisters in the church, and they under a vow of perpetual chastity, became σVVELσaкTOL. With these some of the single clergy attempted to live, in the manner in which certain married people then lived,-dwelling and even sleeping together, but with a mutual agreement to have no conjugal intercourse. Such connexions they considered as a marriage of souls, without the marriage of bodies. See Mosheim, de Rebus Christianor. &c. p. 599, &c. Tr.]

See P. D. Huet, Origeniana, a learn

ed and valuable work; Lud. Doucin, Histoire d'Origène et des Mouvemens arrivées dans l'église au sujet de sa Doctrine. Paris, 1700, 8vo.; and Bayle, Dictionnaire, tom. iii. art. Origène; and many others.-[Origen, surnamed Adamantius, (and Xaλкévтepos, from his prodigious powers and habit of sustaining labour, Ed.) was an Alexandrian Greek, born of Christian parents A. D. 185. His father Leonidas was a man of letters, a devout Christian, and took great pains with the education of his son, especially in the Holy Scriptures, some portion of which he required him daily to commit to memory. His education, begun under his father, was completed under Clemens Alexandrinus, and the philosopher Ammonius Saccas. Origen was distinguished for precocity of genius, early piety, and indefatigable industry. When his father suffered martyrdom, A. D. 202, Origen, then 17 years old, was eager to suffer with him, but was prevented by his mother. He wrote to his father in prison, exhorting him to stedfastness in the faith, and to be unsolicitous about

Julius Africanus, a very learned man, most of whose labours and

his family. The whole property of the family was confiscated, and Origen with his widowed mother and six younger sons were left in poverty. But the persecution having exterminated or driven away all the Christian schoolmasters, Origen found no difficulty in procuring a school; for which his talents so well qualified him. The next year, A. D. 203, Demetrius, bp. of Alexandria, advanced him to the mastership of the catechetic school, though he was then but 18 years old. His talents as an instructor, his eminent piety, and his assiduous attention to those who suffered in the persecution, procured him high reputation and numerous friends among the Christians; but his great success in making converts to Christianity, and forming his pupils to be intelligent and devoted Christians, rendered him odious to the pagans, who watched about his house, and hunted him through the city, in order to assassinate him. The austerity of his life was great. He fed on the coarsest fare, went barefoot, and slept on the ground. He spent the whole day in teaching, and in active duties, and devoted most of the night to his private studies and to devotion. About this time he sold his large and valuable collection of pagan authors, for a perpetual income of four oboli (about seven cents) per diem, which he regarded as a competent support. Construing the passage in Matth. xix. 12, literally, he emasculated himself, in order to avoid temptation in his intercourse with his female pupils. About the year 212, he made a short visit to Rome. On his return he took his former pupil Heraclas to be his assistant in the school, so that he might devote more time to theology and the exposition of the Scriptures. Many learned persons, pagans and heretics, were converted by him; and among them, Ambrose, a Valentinian and a man of wealth, who became a liberal patron of Origen, and at last died a martyr. In the year 215, the persecution under Caracalla obliged Origen to flee from Alexandria. He retired to Cæsarea in Palestine, where he was received with high respect; and though not even a deacon at that time, the bishops of Cæsarea and Jerusalem allowed him to expound the publicly in their presence. year, Demetrius called him

Scriptures

The next back to

Alexandria and to his mastership of the catechetic school. About this time an Arabian prince invited him to his court, to impart to him Christian instruction. Afterwards, Mammæa, the mother of the emperor Alexander Severus, sent for him to Antioch, in order to hear him preach. In the year 228, he was publicly called to Achaia, to withstand the heretics who disturbed the churches there. On his return through Palestine, Theoctistus, bp. of Cæsarea, and Alexander, bp. of Jerusalem, who had before treated him with marked attention, ordained him a presbyter, to the great offence of Demetrius, who was envious of the growing reputation of his catechist. Demetrius had little to object against Origen, except that he was a eunuch, and that foreign bishops had, no right to ordain his laymen. Controversy ensued, and in the year 230, Demetrius assembled two councils against him, the first of which banished Origen from Alexandria, and the second deprived him of his clerical office. Demetrius also wrote letters to Rome and elsewhere, to excite odium against this unoffending man. Heracles now succeeded him in the school at Alexandria, and Origen retired, A.D. 231, to Cæsarea \ in Palestine. Here he resumed his office of instructor, and continued to write expositions of the Bible. But in the year 235, a persecution in Palestine obliged him to flee to Cæsarea in Cappadocia, where he lived concealed for two years. After his return to Palestine, he visited Athens; and about the year 244, was called to attend a council at Bostra in Arabia, against Beryllus, bp. of that place, who was heretical in respect to the personal existence of Christ previous to his incarnation. Origen

converted him to the orthodox faith. Demetrius, his persecutor, died A. D. 232, and was succeeded by Heraclas, a disciple of Origen, after whom Dionysius the Great filled the see of Alexandria from A. D. 248 to 265. The persecution of Origen died with his personal enemy Demetrius, and he was greatly beloved and honoured by all around him till the day of his death. His residence was now fixed at Cæsarea in Palestine; but he occasionally visited other places. His time was occupied in an extensive correspondence, in preaching, and in composing books explanatory of the

[ocr errors]

works are lost. The name of Hippolytus ranks very high among both the writers and the martyrs; but his history is

Bible, and in defence of Christianity. Against the more learned pagans and the heretics of those times he was a champion that had no equal; he was also considered as a devout and exemplary Christian, and was, beyond question, the first biblical scholar of the age. He was master of the literature and the science of that age, which he valued only as subservient to the cause of Christ; but he was more skilful in employing them against pagans and heretics, than in the explanation and confirmation of the truths of revelation. In the latter part of his life, during the Decian persecution, A. D. 250, he was imprisoned for a considerable time, and came near to martyrdom, which he showed himself willing to meet. He was, however, released; but his sufferings in prison, added to his intense literary labours, had broken down his constitution, and he died, A. D. 254, at Tyre, in the 69th year of his age.-His winning eloquence, his great learning, his amiable temper, and his reputation for sincere and ardent piety, gave him immense influence, especially among the well informed and the higher classes in society. No man, since the apostles, had been more indefatigable, and no one had done more to diffuse knowledge and make the Christian community intelligent, united, and respectable, in the view of mankind. He was in general orthodox, according to the standard of that age; but, unfettered in his speculations, and unguarded in his communications, he threw out some crude opinions, which the next age gathered up and blazoned abroad, and for which he was accounted by some a heretic. The principle errors ascribed to him, are derived from his four books Teрì àрxwv (de principiis, on the first principles of human knowledge,) and are: 1. the pre-existence of human souls, and their incarceration in material bodies, for offences committed in a former state of being. 2. The pre-existence of Christ's human soul, and its union with the divine nature anterior to the incarnation of Christ. 3. The transformation of our material bodies into ethereal ones, at the resurrection. 4. The final recovery of all men, and even devils, through the mediation of Christ.-Origen could number among his pupils many eminent

But

martyrs and divines, among whom Firmilianus of Cappadocia, Gregory Thaumaturgus, and Dionysius the Great, bp. of Alexandria, are best known at the present day. His life and history are best related by Eusebius, Hist. Eccl. lib. vi. passim; and by Jerome, de Viris Illustr. cap. 55, and Ep. 41 or 65. The united work of Pamphilus and Eusebius, in defence of Origen, in six books, is unfortunately lost, except the first book, of which we have a translation by Rufinus. Epiphanius, Hares. 64, gives a philippic upon Origen and his followers. Photius, Biblioth. cxviii. affords us some knowledge of his lost works.-Origen was a most voluminous writer. Eusebius says he collected 100 Epistles of Origen, and that when 60 years old, Origen permitted stenographers to write down his extempore discourses.-Besides these, he composed eight Books against Celsus, in defence of Christianity, which are still extant; four Books Tepl apxŵr, extant in a Latin translation by Rufinus; ten books entitled Stromata, which are lost; his Hexapla and Tetrapla, of which little remains; and tracts on prayer, martyrdom, and the resurrection. his principal works are expositions of the Scriptures. It is said, he wrote on every book in the Bible, except the Apocalypse. His allegorical mode of interpreting Scripture is described by Mosheim in the next chapter. Origen's expositions are of three kinds :—1. Homilies, or popular lectures. 2. Commentaries, divided into books, which are full, elaborate, and learned expositions. Scholia, or short notes, intended especially for the learned. A collection of Origen's Scholia, and scattered remarks on Scripture, compiled by Basil the Great and Gregory Nazianzen, is extant, bearing the title of Φιλοκαλία. A large part of his Homilies and Commentaries is wholly lost, and some of the others have come to us only in the Latin translation of Rufinus.-The earlier editions of Origen's works are chiefly in Latin, and of little value. P. D. Huet, a Benedictine monk, first published, A. D. 1668, in 2 vols. fol. the expository works of Origen, Greek and Latin, with notes, and a valuable introduction entitled Origeniana. Bern. de Montfaucon, another Benedictine, collected and published what remains of his Hexapla and Te

3.

« ΠροηγούμενηΣυνέχεια »