Εικόνες σελίδας
PDF
Ηλεκτρ. έκδοση
[merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors]

TYPOGRAPHY BY J. S. CUSHING & Co., BOSTON, U.S.A.

PRESSWORK BY BERWICK & SMITH, BOSTON, U.S.A.

PREFACE.

THE Lectures herewith presented to the public were delivered in February, 1892, by invitation of the Faculty of the Theological Seminary in Princeton, New Jersey, to the students of that institution; and constitute the "L. P. Stone Course" for that year.

The limitation imposed by the terms of the L. P. Stone endowment, that the lectures of the course. shall not exceed eight in number, made it impossible to attempt an exhaustive discussion of the question of the origin and growth of religion. Hence it seemed best to confine the course to a brief consideration of those theories regarding this subject, which appear at present to have the most extensive influence among those with whom the students in our theological schools are likely to have most to do; and, in the constructive part of the argument, to present chiefly such facts and considerations as appeared likely to be of most practical service to ministers and intelligent laymen, for the defence and

371514

confirmation of the teachings of Holy Scripture regarding the beginning and subsequent development of the religious life of man.

It may properly be remarked that Lectures III. and IV. are based upon articles of the author in review of the theories of Professor Max Müller and Mr. Herbert Spencer, which were published a few years ago in the "Bibliotheca Sacra," Oberlin, Ohio; but have been prepared in the light of and with reference to the most recent published works of the authors reviewed.

The Lectures are now published in the hope that they may be helpful to many more than the students for whom they were originally prepared.

TORONTO, CANADA,

August, 1892.

S. H. KELLOGG.

-

-

origin of religion Fetishism and animism defined-
Tiele's theory; primitive man regarded nature as living
- Would not account for fetish-worship, only for ani-
mism — Tiele's argument criticised — Low intellectual
capacity of primitive man unproved - Facts against this
- Modern savages not primitive types - Proof from
their languages Admissions of Max Müller; of Her-
bert Spencer-Belief in a personal God coexists with
animism and fetishism - Sir John Lubbock's mistake-
Degree of religious development not conditioned by de-
gree of civilization - Fetishism and animism not most
common among most ancient peoples; e.g., China, India,
Egypt - Ideas of God, responsibility, sin, not derivable
from animism or fetishism

[ocr errors]

PAGES

28-63

LECTURE III.

HERBERT SPENCER'S GHOST THEORY.

-

-

Ancestor-worship the earliest form of religion - Belief in
spirit and its survival after death to be accounted for
Mr. Spencer's explanation. Primitive man observed
that some things had a visible and invisible state; might
change their substance, and form; hence inferred a double
of himself and all things - This confirmed by dreams,
especially of the dead; whence survival of soul inferred;
and post mortem reward and retribution — Idea of God
evolved from idea of a ghost - The theory applied to
fetish-worship; to nature-worship- Mr. Spencer's ad-
mission; modern savages not primitive, but degraded
men - A dilemma; facts versus theory - Mr. Spencer's
priori primitive man; a petitio principii- His theory
denies innate ideas; inadequate to account for phenomena
of sin; for whole content of idea of God; as Cause;

-

« ΠροηγούμενηΣυνέχεια »