Εικόνες σελίδας
PDF
Ηλεκτρ. έκδοση
[blocks in formation]

No. 698. The UNITED STATES of America ex rel. Pauline FINK, petitioner, v. Robert E. TOD, Commissioner of Immigration, Ellis Island, Port of New York. Jan. 13, 1925. On writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. For opinion below, see 1 F. (2d) 246. Mr. Max J. Kohler, of New York City, for petitioner. Mr. James E. Beck, Sol. Gen., of Washington, D. C., for respondent. Judgment reversed with costs; and cause remanded to the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York with directions to discharge the petitioner, upon confession of error by Mr. Solicitor General Beck.

[blocks in formation]

227

George C. Bedell, of Jacksonville, Fla., for appellant. Dismissed, per stipulation.

[blocks in formation]

No. 165. O. H. CHRISP, plaintiff in error, v. James C. DAVIS, Director General, as Agent. Jan. 19, 1925. In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Arkansas. For opinion below, see 159 Ark. 335, 252 S. W. 606. Messrs. J. Merrick Moore, of Little Rock, Ark., and Leslie C. Garnett, of Washington, D. C., for plaintiff in error. Messrs. Thomas B. Pryor, of Fort Smith, Ark., and A. A. McLaughlin, of Washington, D. C., for defendant in error.

PER CURIAM. Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction upon the authority of section 237 of the Judicial Code, as amended by the act of September 6, 1916, c. 448, § 2, 39 Stat. 726 (Comp. St. § 1214); Jett Bros. Distilling Co. Carrollton, 252 U. S. 1, 5, 6, 40 S. Ct. 255,

64 L. Ed. 421.

[blocks in formation]

No. 172. COWOKOCHEE, plaintiff in error, v. James A. CHAPMAN et al. Jan. 19, 1925. In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Oklahoma. For opinion below, see 90 Okl. 121, 215 P. 759. Mr. Lewis C. Lawson, of Holdenville, Okl., for plaintiff in error.

PER CURIAM. Dismissed for want of juof the Judicial Code, as amended by the act risdiction upon the authority of section 237 of September 6, 1916, c. 448, § 2, 39 Stat. 726 (Comp. St. § 1214); Jett Bros. Distilling Co. v. Carrollton, 252 U. S. 1, 5, 6, 40 S. Ct. 255, 64 L. Ed. 421. (Judgment entered January

No. original. Ex parte In the matter of 15, 1925.) Frank C. MEBANE, petitioner. Jan. 19, 1925. Motion for leave to file a petition for a writ of mandamus herein. denied.

[blocks in formation]

(267 U. S. 572)

No. 186. Nicodemus B. HURR et al., plaintiffs in error, v. Everett W. DAVIS et al. Jan. 19, 1925. In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Minnesota. For opinion below, see 155 Minn. 456, 193 N. W. 943, 194 N. W. 379. Mr. Robert C. Bell, of Detroit, Minn., for plaintiffs in error.

PER CURIAM. Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction upon the authority of section 237 of the Judicial Code, as amended by the act of September 6, 1916, c. 448, § 2, 39 Stat. 726 (Comp. St. § 1214); Jett Bros. Distilling Co. v. Carrollton, 252 U. S. 1, 5, 6, 40 S. Ct. 255, 64 L. Ed. 421.

12

No. 131. The ST. JOHNS ELECTRIC COMPANY, appellant, v. The CITY OF ST. AU- No. 242. Forrest P. TAYLOE, appellant, v. GUSTINE, etc., et al. Jan. 19, 1925. Appeal The UNITED STATES. Jan. 19, 1925. For from the District Court of the United States opinion below, see 58 Ct. Cl. 470. Mr. Harry for the Southern District of Florida. Mr. Peyton, of Washington, D. C., for appellant.

Motion to remand to the Court of Claims for teenth rule, on motion of Mr. H. L. Johnson further findings denied. for the appellees.

(267 U. S. 571)

No. 534. Ellis N. BLACK, plaintiff in error, v. Lura W. BLACK. Jan. 19, 1925. In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Ohio. For opinion below, see 144 N. E. 268. Mr. John S. Black, of Columbus, Ohio, for plaintiff in error. Mr. Frank Davis, Jr., of Washington, D. C., for defendant in error.

PER CURIAM. Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction upon the authority of section 237 of the Judicial Code, as amended by the act of September 6, 1916, c. 448, § 2, 39 Stat. 726 (Comp. St. § 1214); Jett Bros. Distilling Co. v. Carrollton, 252 U. S. 1, 5, 6, 40 S. Ct. 255,

64 L. Ed. 421.

[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]

No. 190. PROPRIETORS OF THE LOCKS & CANALS ON MERRIMACK RIVER, plaintiff in error, v. BOSTON & MAINE RAILROAD. Jan. 26, 1925. In error to the Land Court of the State of Massachusetts. For opinion below, see 245 Mass. 52, 139 N. E. 839. Messrs. Felix Rackemann and Harrison M. Davis, both of Boston, Mass., for plaintiffs in error. Mr. Archibald R. Tisdale, of Boston, Mass., for defendants in error.

PER CURIAM. Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Hulbert v. Chicago, 202 U. S. 275, 280, 26 S. Ct. 617, 50 L. Ed. 1026; Cleveland & Pittsburgh R. R. Co. v. Cleveland, 235 U. S. 50, 53, 35 S. Ct. 21, 59 L. Ed. 127; Hiawassee River Power Co. v. Carolina-Tennessee Power Co., 252 U. S. 341, 344, 40 S. Ct. 330, 64 L. Ed. 601.

[blocks in formation]

No. 203. Matthew LOWE, plaintiff in error, v. Benjamin E. DYSON, U. S. Marshal; and No. 204. William P. McCARTHY, plaintiff in error, v. Benjamin E. DYSON, U. S. Marshal. Jan. 26, 1925. In error to the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of Florida. Mr. Merwin S. Bobst, of Miami, Fla., for plaintiffs in error.

PER CURIAM. Affirmed, upon the authority of Riddle v. Dyche, 262 U. S. 333, 335, 43 S. Ct. 555, 67 L. Ed. 1009; Goto v. Lane, 265 U. S. 393, 401, 44 S. Ct. 525, 68 L. Ed. 1070.

10

(267 U. S. 573) OF No. 213. BOARD OF DIRECTORS MILLER LEVEE DISTRICT NO. 2, appellant, v. PRAIRIE PIPE LINE COMPANY. Jan. 26, 1925. In error to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. For opinion below, see 292 F. 474. Mr. Henry Moore, Jr., of Texarkana, Ark., for appellants. Mr. W. H. Arnold, of Texarkana, Ark., for appellees. Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Shulthis v. McDougal, 225 U. S. 561, 569, 32 S. Ct. 704, 56 L. Ed. 1205; Southern Pacific Co. v. Stewart, 245 U. S. 359, 362, 38 S. Ct. 130, 62 L. Ed. 345; Barnett v. Kunkel, 264 U. S. 16, 21, 44 S. Ct. 254, 68 L. Ed. 539.

(267 U. S. 574)

No. 221. John CLAY et al., Copartners, etc., plaintiffs in error, v. The DISTRICT COURT OF THE TWELFTH DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF COLORADO, etc. Jan. 26, 1925.

(45 S.Ct.)

In error to the Supreme Court of the State | Messrs. George Donworth and Elmer E. Todd, of Colorado. For opinion below, see 74 Colo. both of Seattle, Wash., for appellant. Mandate 40, 218 P. 745. Mr. William V. Hodges, of granted, on motion of Mr. Robert Ash in that Denver, Colo., for plaintiffs in error. Mr. behalf. La Fayette Twitchell, of Denver, Colo., for defendants in error.

PER CURIAM. Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction upon the authority of section 237 of the Judicial Code, as amended by the act of September 6, 1916, c. 448, § 2, 39 Stat. 726 (Comp. St. § 1214); Jett Bros. Distilling Co. v. Carrollton, 252 U. S. 1, 5, 6, 40 S. Ct. 255, 64 L. Ed. 421.

(267 U. S. 574)

No. 228. Ben C. DAVISSON, plaintiff in error, v. The STATE OF NEW MEXICO. Jan. 26, 1925. In error to the Supreme Court of the State of New Mexico. For opinion below, see 217 P. 240. Mr. Clarence J. Roberts, of Santa Fé, N. M., for plaintiff in error.

PER CURIAM. Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) Farrell v. O'Brien, 199 U. S. 89, 100, 25 S. Ct. 727, 50 L. Ed. 101; Toop v. Ulysses Land Co., 237 U. S. 580, 583, 35 S. Ct. 739, 59 L. Ed. 1127; (2) Hurtado v. California, 110 U. S. 516, 4 S. Ct. 111, 28 L. Ed. 232.

[blocks in formation]

No. 253. SEABOARD AIR LINE RAILWAY COMPANY, plaintiff in error, v. O. T. BELSHE. Jan. 26, 1925. In error to the Supreme Court of the State of North Carolina. For opinion below, see 186 N. C. 246, 119 S. E. 492. Mr. Murray Allen, of Raleigh, N. C., for plaintiff in error. Messrs. Clyde A. Douglass, William C. Douglass, and Robert N. Simms, all of Raleigh, N. C., for defendant in error. Dismissed with costs, on motion of counsel for the plaintiff in error.

[blocks in formation]

6

(267 U. S. 588) No. 771. James C. DAVIS, Agent, etc., petitioner. v. Abraham WEISS, Administrator, etc. Jan. 26, 1925. For opinion below, see 144 N. E. 765. Mr. Arthur W. Blackman, of Boston, Mass., for petitioner. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the Municipal Court of the City of Boston, State of Massachusetts, granted.

[blocks in formation]
[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small]

No. 814. Thomas V. KING, petitioner, v. The UNITED STATES of America. Jan. 26, 1925. For opinion below, see 2 F. (2d) 524. Messrs. Thomas P. White and Harry A. Chamberlain, both of Los Angeles, Cal., for petitioner. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

[blocks in formation]

opinion below, see 1 F. (2d) 761. Mr. Frank A. Whiteley, of Minneapolis, Minn., for petitioner. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia denied.

upon the authority of section 338 of the Criminal Code (Comp. St. § 10512); United States v. Pridgeon, 153 U. S. 48, 63, 14 S. Ct. 746, 38 L. Ed. 631. Application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied.

(267 U. S. 593)

[blocks in formation]

No. 835. CENTRAL LEATHER COM

[blocks in formation]

No. 242. Forrest P. TAYLOE, appellant, v. The UNITED STATES. Feb. 2, 1925. Appeal from the Court of Claims. For opinion below, see 58 Ct. Cl. 470. Mr. Harry Peyton, of Washington, D. C., for appellant.

PER CURIAM. Affirmed upon the authority of Brawley v. United States, 96 U. S. 168, 173, 24 L. Ed. 622; Willard Co. v. United States, 262 U. S. 489, 494, 43 S. Ct. 592, 67 L. Ed. 1086.

[blocks in formation]

No. 244. The UNITED STATES of Amer

ica, plaintiff in error, v. DeWitt T. LAW. Feb. 2, 1925. In error to the District Court of the United States for the District of Montana. Mr. James M. Beck, Sol. Gen., of Washington, D. C., for the United States. Dismissed, on motion of Mr. Solicitor General

9

PANY, petitioner, v. THE Steamship GOY- Beck for the plaintiff in error.
AZ, Her Engines, etc., et al. Jan. 26, 1925.
For opinion below, see 3 F. (2d) 553. Messrs.
Bigham, Englar & Jones, of New York City (D.
Roger Englar and Oscar R. Houston, both of
New York City, of counsel), for petitioner.
Mr. William A. Purrington, of New York City
(Frank J. McConnell, of New York City, of
counsel), for respondents. Petition for a writ
of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court
of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

[blocks in formation]

No. 836. SCHMOLL FILS & COMPANY, petitioner, v. THE Steamship GOYAZ, Her Engines, etc., et al. Jan. 26, 1925. For opinion below, see 3 F. (2d) 553. Messrs. Bigham, Englar & Jones, of New York City (D. Roger Englar and Oscar R. Houston, both of New York City, of counsel), for petitioner. Mr. William A. Purrington, of New York City (Frank J. McConnell, of New York City, of counsel), for respondent. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

[blocks in formation]

(267 U. S. 575)

No. 247. Joseph O'MARA, plaintiff in error, v. Harry C. CRAMPTON. Feb. 2, 1925. In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Indiana. For opinion below, see 139 N. E. 360. Mr. Henry W. Moore, of Terre Haute, Ind., for plaintiff in error.

PER CURIAM. Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Missouri & Kansas Interurban Ry. Co. v. Olathe, 222 U. S. 185, 186, 32 S. Ct. 46, 56 L. Ed. 156; Haseltine v. Bank, 183 U. S. 130, 131, 22 S. Ct. 49, 46 L. Ed. 117; Schlosser v. Hemphill, 198 U. S. 173, 175, 25 S. Ct. 654, 49 L. Ed. 1000.

[blocks in formation]

No. 250. YADKIN RAILROAD COMPANY et al., petitioners, v. Ada SIGMON, Administratrix, etc. Feb. 2, 1925. On writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of the State of North Carolina. For opinion below, see 186 N. C. 519, 120 S. E. 56. Messrs. H. O'B. Cooper and S. R. Prince, both of Washington, D. C., B. S. Womble, of Winston-Salem, N. C., and L. E. Jeffries, of Washington, D. C., for petitioners. Mr. T. D. Maness, of Concord, N. C., for respondent.

for further proceedings, upon the authority of
Davis v. Kennedy, 266 U. S. 147, 45 S. Ct. 33,
decided Nov. 17, 1924; Frese
69 L. Ed.
v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy R. R. Co.,
203 U. S. 1, 3, 44 S. Ct. 1, 68 L. Ed. 131.

PER CURIAM. Reversed, and remanded

(267 U. S. 577)

6

No. —, original. Ex parte BARKER. Feb. 2, 1925.

PER CURIAM. Application for leave to file petition for a writ of habeas corpus denied,

(267 U. S. 575)

No. 251. G. L. CENTER, plaintiff in error, v. The UNITED STATES of America. Feb. 2, 1925. In error to the District Court of the United States for the Western District of

(45 S.Ct.)

South Carolina. Mr. Richard A. Ford, of, Ct. 739, 59 L. Ed. 1127; Piedmont Power & Washington, D. C., for plaintiff in error. PER CURIAM. Affirmed, upon the authority of Burdeau v. McDowell, 256 U. S. 465, 475, 41 S. Ct. 574, 65 L. Ed. 1048, 13 A. L. R. 1159.

(267 U. S. 576)

For

No. 271. Anthony COLORA, plaintiff in error, v. The STATE OF NEW JERSEY. Feb. 2, 1925. In error to the Court of Errors and Appeals of the State of New Jersey. opinion below, see 97 N. J. Law, 316, 117 A. 702, which affirmed 96 N. J. Law, 59, 114 A. 241. Mr. Edmund A. Hayes, of New Brunswick, N. J., for plaintiff in error. Mr. Joseph E. Stricker, of Newark, N. J., for defendant in error.

PER CURIAM. Affirmed, upon the authority of Viglotti v. Pennsylvania, 258 U. S. 403, 42 S. Ct. 330, 66 L. Ed. 686; Molinari v. Maryland, 263 U. S. 685, 44 S. Ct. 179, 68 L. Ed. 506.

[blocks in formation]

No. 275. Dennis B. CHAPIN, appellant, v. D. A. WALKER, United States Marshal for the Western District of Texas. Feb. 2, 1925. Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Western District of Texas. Mr. C. M. Chambers, of San Antonio, Tex., for appellant.

PER CURIAM. Cause transferred to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, upon the authority of the act of September 14, 1922, c. 305, 42 Stat. 837 (Comp. St. Ann. Supp. 1923, § 1215a); Heitler v. United States, 260 U. S. 438, 43 S. Ct. 185, 67 L. Ed. 338.

Light Co. v. Graham, 253 U. S. 193, 195, 40
S. Ct. 453, 64 L. Ed. 855; (2) Texas Co. v.
Brown, 258 U. S. 466, 477, 478, 42 S. Ct.
375, 66 L. Ed. 721.

[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]

No. 288. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF MOBILE, ALABAMA, appellant, V. The UNITED STATES of America. Feb. 2, 1925. Appeal from the District Court of The United States for the Southern District of Alabama. For opinion below, see 295 F. 142. Mr. Gregory L. Smith, of Mobile, Ala., for appellant.

PER CURIAM. Affirmed, upon the authority of Essgee v. United States, 262 U. S. 151, 155, 43 S. Ct. 514, 67 L. Ed. 917; Hale v. Henkel, 201 U. S. 43, 69, 26 S. Ct. 370, 50 L. Ed. 652; Wilson v. United States, 221 U. S. 361, 382, 31 S. Ct. 538. 55 L. Ed. 771, Ann. Cas. 1912D, 558; Wheeler v. United States, 226 U. S. 478, 490, 38 S. Ct. 158, 57 L. Ed.

309.

[blocks in formation]

No. 760. INDIAN REFINING COMPANY, plaintiff in error, v. John C. TAYLOR. Feb. 2, 1925. In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Indiana. For opinion below, see 143 N. E. 682. See, also, 266 U. S. 632, 45 S. Ct. 197, 69 L. Ed. Mr. James W. Noel, of Indianapolis, Ind., for plaintiff in error. PER CURIAM. Dismissed for want of jurisdiction, upon the authority of (1) Toop v. Ulysses Land Co., 237 U. S. 580, 583, 35 S.

[blocks in formation]
« ΠροηγούμενηΣυνέχεια »