(45 S.Ct.) MEMORANDUM DECISIONS DISPOSED OF AT OCTOBER TERM, 1924 (267 U. S. 611) No. 38. IVORY NOVELTIES TRADING COMPANY, petitioner, v. Francois Joseph de Spoturno COTY. April 13, 1925. On writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. For opinion below, see Coty v. Weisbart, 289 F. 1020. See, also, 262 U. S. 159, 43 S. Ct. 531, 67 L. Ed. 922. Messrs. Charles H. Tuttle, of New York City, and Wm. J. Hughes, of Washington, D. C., for petitioner. Messrs. F. D. McKenney, of Washington, D. C., and Hugo Mock, and Asher Blum, both of New York City, for respondent. Dismissed, per stipulation. No. 393. The UNITED STATES of America, plaintiff in error, v. A. E. BAUCH et al.; No. 394. The UNITED STATES of America, plaintiff in error, v. C. F, WATERMAN et al.; and No. 395. The UNITED STATES of America, plaintiff in error, v. A. E. BAUCH. April 13, 1925. In error to the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Washington. Mr. James M. Beck, Sol. Gen., of Washington, D. C., for the United States. Dismissed, on motion of Mr. Solicitor General Beck for the plaintiff in error. For opinion below, see 126 A. 453. See, also, 97 N. J. Law, 278, 116 A. 781, 123 A. 882. Mr. John W. Townsend, of Washington, D. C., for petitioner. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the Court of Errors and Appeals of the State of New Jersey denied. No. 672. SOUTHERN PACIFIC COMPA-ERN RAILWAY COMPANY. April 13, 1925. NY, plaintiff in error, v. CHEVROLET MOTOR COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA. April 13, 1925. In error to the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of California. Mr. Henley C. Booth, of San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiff in error. Dismissed with costs, on motion of counsel for the plaintiff in error. (267 U. S. 606) No. 996. CAMDEN FIRE INSURANCE ASSOCIATION, petitioner, V. UNITED STATES MANUFACTURERS EXPORT ASSOCIATION. Ap 13, 1925. For opinion below, see 5 F. (2d) 1013. Messrs. Dix W. Noel and Arthur W. Clement, both of New York City, for petitioner. Mr. John A. McManus. of New York City, for respondent. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied. No. 328. Peter SAIN et al., plaintiffs in error, v. CYPRESS CREEK DRAINAGE DISTRICT. April 20, 1925. In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Arkansas. For opinions below, see 161 Ark. 529, 257 S. W. 49, 258 S. W. 637. See, also, 265 U. S. 589, 44 S. Ct. 634, 68 L. Ed. 1194. Mr. Lamar Williamson, of Monticello, Ark., for plaintiff in error. Mr. Charles T. Coleman, of Little Rock, Ark., for defendant in error. PER CURIAM. Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of California Power Works v. Davis, 151 U. S. 389, 393, 14 S. Ct. 350, 38 L. Ed. 206; Morrison v. Watson, 154 U. S. 111, 115, 14 S. Ct. 995, 38 L. Ed. 927; Harding v. Illinois, 196 U. S. 78, 86. 25 S. Ct. 176, 49 L. Ed. 394; Chesapeake & Ohio Ry. Co. v. McDonald, 214 U. S. 191, 192, 29 S. Ct. 546, 53 L. Ed. 963; Cleveland & Pittsburgh R. R. Co. v. Cleveland, 235 U. S. 50, 53, 35 S. Ct. 21, 59 L. Ed. 127. 9 (268 U. S. 689) No. 979. Mahlon D. THATCHER, Trustee under the last WILL of Franklin A. LUCE, deceased, et al., etc., petitioners, v. The CHICAGO RAILWAYS COMPANY et al. April 20, 1925. For opinion below, see 4 F. (2d) 63. Mr. Henry S. Robbins, of Chicago, Ill., for petitioners. Messrs. Horace Kent Tenney, Roger Sherman, James M. Sheean and Charles S. Babcock, all of Chicago, Ill., for respondents. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied. ing business as E. Salz & Son. April 20, 1925. Į spondent. Petition for a writ of certiorari to For opinion below, see 3 F. (2d) 759. Mr. H. the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for H. Sanborn, of San Francisco, Cal., for peti- the Second Circuit denied. tioner. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit granted. (268 U. S. 690) Nos. 1012 and 1013. J. H. MOSELY, petitioner, v. The UNITED STATES of America. April 20, 1925. For opinion below, see 4 F. (2d) 381. Mr. John E. Garner, of Springfield, Tenn., for petitioner. Petition for writs of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied. (268 U. S. 690) No. 1014. No. 7 Grace Edna LAYNE v. The UNITED STATES. April 27, 1925. See, also, 3 F. (2d) 431. Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis in this case denied, on the ground that there is obviously no merit in the appeal. No. 13, Original. STATE OF OKLAHOMA, Complainant, v. STATE OF TEXAS, Defendant, The United States, Intervener. April 27, 1925. See, also, 267 U. S. 452, 45 S. Ct. 361, 2 69 L. Ed. 707. S. P. Freeling, of Oklahoma City, Okl., for the State of Oklahoma. C. W. SCHWEYER ELECTRIC & MANUFACTURING COMPANY et al., peti-Taylor, of Corsicanna, Tex., and Orville Bultioners, v. REGAN SAFETY DEVICES COM-lington and A. H. Carrigan, both of Wichita PANY et al. April 20, 1925. For opinion below, see 4 F. (2d) 970. Mr. Irving M. Obrieght, of New York City, for petitioners. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied. Falls, Tex., for the State of Texas. The motion of the State of Texas for leave to file a reply to the replications of the State of Oklahoma and the United States to the amended counterclaim of the State of Texas relating to the interstate boundary along the 100th meridian is granted, and the reply tendered with such motion is ordered filed. The joint motion of the State of Oklahoma, the State of Texas and the United States respecting the making up and printing of the record on such counterclaim and the submission and hearing of the issues pertaining thereto is granted; the Clerk is directed to make up and print the record as requested in the motion; and the hearing on the counterclaim is fixed for Monday, November 2, next, after the cases heretofore assigned for that day. No. 154. CREW LEVICK COMPANY, plaintiff in error, v. The CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, to the use of J. Joseph McHugh. April 27, 1925. In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Pennsylvania. For opinion below, see 278 Pa. 218, 122 A. 300. Mr. David Wallerstein, of Philadelphia, Pa., for plaintiff in error. Mr. G. C. Mead, of Philadelphia, Pa., for defendant in error. PER CURIAM. Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction upon the authority of section 237 of the Judicial Code, as amended by the act of September 6, 1916, c. 448, § 2, 39 Stat. 726 (Comp. St. 1918, Comp. St. Ann. Supp. 1919, § 1214); Jett Bros. Distilling Co. v. Carrollton, 252 U. S. 1, 5-6, 40 S. Ct. 255, 64 L. Ed. 421. (268 U. S. 676) (45 S.Ct.) No. 220. FORT SMITH LIGHT & TRACTION COMPANY, plaintiff in error, v. Fagan BOURLAND et al. April 27, 1925. For former opinion, see 267 U. S. 330, 45 S. Ct. 249, 69 L. Ed. 631. Messrs. Joseph M. Hill and Henry L. Fitzhugh, both of Fort Smith, Ark., for plaintiff in error. Mr. George W. Dodd, of Fort Smith, Ark., for defendants in error. It is ordered by this court that the opinion heretofore filed be amended by inserting after the words "franchise" in the last sentence of the opinion the words "or indeterminate permit." Petition for rehearing denied. 2 8 No. 643. Walker D. HINES, late Director (268 U. S. 693) General of Railroads, petitioner, v. WESTING- No. 1042. TOYO KISEN KABUSHIKI HOUSE, CHURCH, KERR & COMPANY | KAISHA, petitioner, v. William D. OELBER(Inc.) April 27, 1925. See, also, 266 U. S. MANN et al., Copartners, etc. April 27, 1925. 598, 45 S. Ct. 98, 69 L. Ed. -; 138 Va. 647, For opinion below, see 3 F. (2d) 5. Messrs. 123 S. E. 352. Mr. David H. Leake, of Rich- Samuel Knight, Joseph K. Hutchinson and mond, Va., for petitioner. Motion to substitute Knight, Boland, Hutchinson & Christin, all of James C. Davis, present Director General of San Francisco, Cal., for petitioner. Messrs. S. Railroads, in the place of Walker D. Hines, late Hasket Derby and Carroll Single, both of San Director General, as the party petitioner here- Francisco, Cal., for respondents. Petition for in, granted. a writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied for failure to file within the time prescribed by the statute. (268 U. S. 691) 3 No. 918. PORTO RICO RAILWAY, LIGHT & POWER COMPANY, petitioner, v. Eugenie COGNET et al. April 27, 1925. For opinion below, see 3 F. (2d) 21. Mr. Carroll G. Walter, of New York City, for petitioner. Mr. Charles V. Imlay, of Washington, D. C.. for respondents. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied. 9 (268 U. S. 692) No. 1043. Frank MILLER, petitioner, v. The UNITED STATES of America. April 27, 1925. For opinion below, see 4 F. (2d) 228. Messrs. Joseph B. Fleming and Robert N. Golding, both of New York City, for petitioner. Mr. James M. Beck, Sol. Gen., of Washington, D. C., and Mrs. Mabel Walker Willebrandt, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the United States. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied. No. 1061. J. S. HUGHES, petitioner, v. The UNITED STATES of America. April 27, 1925. For opinion below, see 4 F. (2d) 387. Mr. A. M. Beets, of Oklahoma City, Okl., for petitioner. Mr. James M. Beck, Sol. Gen., of Washington, D. C., William J. Donovan, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Harry S. Ridgely, of Washington, D. C., for the United States. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied. (268 U. S. 692) No. 1062. HERCULES POWDER COMPANY, petitioner, v. J. F. RICH. April 27, 1925. For opinion below, see 3 F. (2d) 12. Messrs. Gould G. Rheuby, of Wilmington, Del., and E. Howard Morphy, John M. Bradford and Carl W. Cummins, all of St. Paul, Minn., and William R. Robertson, of Joplin, Mo., for petitioner. Messrs. Heartsell H. Ragon, and Patterson & Ragon, all of Clarksville, Ark., R. W. Robins, of Conway, Ark., and J. H. Thompson, of Little Rock, Ark., for respondent. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States |