...Holmes' conclusion in the Schenck Case, 249 US 47, 52, 39 Sup. Ct. 247, 249 (63 L. Ed. 470) : "The question In .every case is whether the words used are used in such circumstances and are of such a nature as to create a clear and present danger that they will bring aliout the substantive...

...Schenck v. United States, 249 US 47, 39 Sup. Ct. 247, 63 L. Ed. (March 3, 1919), the court said : "The question In every case is whether the words used are used In such circumstances and are of such a nature as to create a clear and present dan-' ger that they will bring about the substantive...

...Law, and concern' ing a prosecution under that act the Supreme Court of the united States said: "The question in every case is whether the words used are used in snch circumstances and are of such a nature as to create a clear and present danger that they will...

...10212a-10212h) for preventing recruiting by named illegal acts, the Supreme Court, by Justice Holmes, said: "The question in every case is whether the words used are...bring about the substantive evils that Congress has a right to prevent." Schenck v. US, 249 US 47, (H6 A.) Publications Inciting or encouraging revolution...

...speech would not protect a man in falsely shouting 'Fire !' in a theater and causing a panic. * * » The question in every case is whether the words used are used in such circumstances and are of such nature ая to create a clear and present danger that they will bring about the substantive...

...constitutional rights. But the character of every act depends upon the circumstances in which it is done The question in every case is whether the words used are used in such circumstance* and are of such a nature as to create a clear and present danger that they will '" (1919)...

...rights. But the character of every act depends upon the circumstances in which it is done. . . . The question in every case is whether the words used are...bring about the substantive evils that Congress has a right to prevent." / That is the Debs decision. That is the method in which the Supreme Court handled...

...words that may have all the effect of force. Gompers v. Bucks Stove & Range Co., 221 US 418, 439. (The question in every case is whether the words used are...bring /about the substantive evils that Congress has a right to 1 prevent. It is a question of proximity and degree. When a nation is at war many things that...

...no matter where they conie from, to be loyal to this country," etc. Testing the record by the rule that "the question in every case is whether the words...bring about the substantive evils that Congress has a right to prevent" (Schenck v. United States [March 3, 1919] 249 US 47, 39 Sup. Ct. 247, 63 L. Ed. 470)...

...principle laid down by him with the backing of a unanimous court in Schenck v. United States.61 "The question in every case is whether the words used are...bring about the substantive evils that Congress has a right to prevent." Since that case is reaffirmed by Justice Clarke this principle still remains law,...