Τι λένε οι χρήστες - Σύνταξη κριτικής
Δεν εντοπίσαμε κριτικές στις συνήθεις τοποθεσίες.
Άλλες εκδόσεις - Προβολή όλων
14 South action ex Adol agent arise assault assumpsit authority Bank Barb Boston breach carrier cause of action Chicago City Clark committed common carrier common law complained conduct Conn consent consequences contract contributory negligence Cooley courts defendant defendant's duty ex contractu ex delicto Exch exemption exercise fraud harm held liable husband independent contractor injury Iowa joint tort feasors judgment judicial jurisdiction jury law of torts Law Rev malicious master and servant Minn municipal corporation N. J. Law N. Y. Supp negligence nuisance officer Ohio St owner P. R. Co party Pennsylvania Pennsylvania Co plaintiff Post principle Q. B. Div Railroad Co railroad company Railway reason recover recovery remedy responsible resulting rule Smith statute statutory Tenn third persons Thomp tion trespass vide violation Wend wife wrongdoer
Σελίδα 573 - ... where one by his words or conduct wilfully causes another to* believe in the existence of a certain state of things, and induces him to act on that belief, so as to alter his own previous position, the former is concluded from averring against the latter a different state of things as existing at the same time.
Σελίδα 113 - The principle to be deduced from all these cases is that, as a consequence of the absolute independence of every sovereign authority, and of the international comity which induces every sovereign State to respect the independence and dignity of every other sovereign State, each and every one declines to exercise by means of its courts any of its territorial jurisdiction over the person of any sovereign or ambassador of any other State, or over the public property of any State which is destined to...
Σελίδα 41 - But where, besides the crime, property is acquired which benefits the testator, there an action for the value of the property shall survive against the executor. As, for instance, the executor shall not be chargeable for the injury done by his testator in cutting down another man's trees, but for the benefit arising to his testator for the value or sale of the trees he shall.
Σελίδα 374 - The question always Is: Was there an unbroken connection between the wrongful act and the inJury — a continuous operation? Did the facts constitute a continuous succession of events so linked together as to make a natural whole, or was there some new and independent cause Intervening between the wrong and the injury?
Σελίδα 322 - And the said records and exemplifications, authenticated as aforesaid, shall have such faith and credit given to them in every court and office within the United States, as they have by law or usage in the courts or offices of the state from whence the same are or shall be taken.
Σελίδα 98 - So, in every case, where a statute enacts, or prohibits a thing for the benefit of a person, he shall have a remedy upon the same statute for the thing enacted for his advantage, or for the recompense of a wrong done to him contrary to the said law.
Σελίδα 563 - I conceive, that, if a man, having no knowledge whatever on the subject, takes upon himself to represent a certain state of facts to exist, he does so at his peril; and, if it be done either with a view to secure some benefit to himself, or to deceive a third person, he is in law guilty of a fraud, for, he takes upon himself to warrant his own belief of the truth of that which he so asserts.
Σελίδα 567 - I think the third is but an instance of the second, for one who makes a statement under such circumstances can have no real belief in the truth of what he states. To prevent a false statement being fraudulent there must, I think, always be an honest belief in its truth.
Σελίδα 41 - If it is a sort of injury by which the offender acquires no gain to himself at the expense of the sufferer, as beating or imprisoning a man, etc., there, the person injured has only a reparation for the delictum in damages to be assessed by a jury. But where, besides the crime, property is acquired which benefits the testator, there an action for the value of the property shall survive against the executor.