Cases not Otherwise Reported. No. 320. RICE v. RICE. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Delaware. May 31, 1894. Dismissed pursuant to the twenty-eighth rule. Mr. George H. Bates and Mr. Edward G. Bradford for the appellant. Mr. Anthony Higgins for the appellees. No. 823. RICHARDSON v. GREEN. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the ninth circuit. October 22, 1894. Petition denied. Mr. Lewis L. McArthur for Green et al. in support of petition. Mr. William A. Maury and Mr. J. N. Dolph for Richardson et al. in opposition thereto. No. 315. RITCHIE . MERRILL. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. April 23, 1895. Dismissed, with costs, pursuant to the tenth rule. Mr. Charles A. Peabody and Mr. Charles H. Drew for the appellant. No appearance for the appellees. No. 672. ROYAL CLAY MANUFACTURING COMPANY V. CHICAGO SEWER PIPE AND COAL COMPANY. Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of Illinois. May 20, 1895. Dismissed, with costs, on authority of counsel for plaintiff in error. Mr. S. S. Gregory, Mr. Wm. M. Booth, and Mr. James S. Harlan for the plaintiff in error. No appearance for the defendant in error. No. 213. ROYER V. SHULTZ BELTING COMPANY. Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Missouri. January 29, 1895. Dismissed, with costs, pursuant to the tenth rule. Mr. J. O. Broadhead for the plaintiff in error. Mr. Chester H. Krum for the defendant in error. Cases not Otherwise Reported. No. 881. SAYWARD U. NUNAN. Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Washington. January 7, 1895. Docketed and dismissed, with costs, on motion of Mr. Edward B. Whitney for the defendants in error. Mr. Edward B. Whitney for the defendants in error in support of the motion. No opposition. No. 80. SCHEELE v. LORDAN. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Texas. November 12, 1894. Dismissed, with costs, pursuant to the tenth rule. Mr. J. M. Burroughs for the appellant. Νο appearance for the appellee. No. 210. SCHREINER V. SMITH. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of Illinois. January 16, 1895. Dismissed, with costs, on authority of counsel for the appellant. Mr. I. C. Sloan and Mr. A. R. Bushnell for the appellant. Mr. James L. High for the appellees. No. 252. SELLERS v. MILLER. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of Texas. November 6, 1894. Dismissed, with costs, on motion of counsel for appellant. Mr. F. Charles Hume and Mr. E. II. Graham for the appellant. No appearance for the appellees. No. 246. SEXTON v. JONES. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Oregon. March 28, 1895. Dismissed, with costs, pursuant to the tenth rule. Mr. Frank V. Drake for the appellants. No appearance for appellees. No. 42. SMITH v. PITTSBURGH GAS COMPANY. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Western District of Pennsylvania. October 12, 1894. Dismissed, with costs, pursuant to the tenth rule. Mr. D. F. Patterson for the appellants. Mr. W. Bakewell for the appellee. Cases not Otherwise Reported. No. 116. SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPAny v. GraHAM. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of California. March 7, 1895. Dismissed, with costs, on motion of Mr. J. Hubley Ashton for the appellant. Mr. J. Hubley Ashton for the appellant. Mr. W. B. Wallace and Mr. J. H. Call for the appellees. No. 115. SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY 2. MCCUTCHEON. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of California. March 7, 1895. Dismissed, with costs, on motion of Mr. J. Hubley Ashton for the appellant. Mr. J. Hubley Ashton for the appellant. Mr. W. B. Wallace, Mr. George W. Merrill, and Mr. J. II. Call for the appellee. No. 35. SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of California. October 8, 1894. Dismissed on motion of Mr. J. Hubley Ashton for the appellant. Mr. Henry Beard, Mr. Charles H. Tweed, and Mr. J. Ilubley Ashton for the appellant. Mr. Attorney General for the appellee. No. 335. STANTON V. UNION TRUST COMPANY et al. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Kansas. April 30, 1895. Dismissed, with costs, pursuant to the tenth rule. Mr. Lucien Birdseye for the appellants. No appearance for the appellees. No. 185. STEAMBOAT CITY OF WORCESTER V. SCOTT. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District. of Connecticut. September 6, 1894. Dismissed pursuant to the twenty-eighth rule. Mr. Harrington Putnam for the appellant. Mr. Walter C. Noyes for the appellee. Cases not Otherwise Reported. No. 722. ST. LOUIS, IRON MOUNTAIN AND SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY v. LEEP. Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Arkansas. December 10, 1894. Dismissed, with costs, on motion of Mr. John F. Dillon for the plaintiff in error. Mr. John F. Dillon and Mr. Winslow S. Pierce for the plaintiff in error. No appearance for the defendant in error. No. 93. TENNANT V. DUDLEY. Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of Texas. March 4, 1895. Dismissed, with costs, per stipulation. Mr. E. H. Graham for the plaintiffs in error. Mr. Eugene Williams for the defendants in error. No. 108. TEXAS AND PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY V. GEIGER. Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Texas. December 11, 1894. Dismissed, with costs, on motion of Mr. John F. Dillon for the plaintiff in error. Mr. John F. Dillon for the plaintiff in error. Mr. T. P. Young for the defendant in error. No. 110. TEXAS AND PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY v. McELROY. Error to the Court of Appeals of the State of Texas. March 18, 1895. Dismissed, with costs, on motion of Mr. D. D. Duncan in behalf of counsel for the plaintiffs in error. Mr. John F. Dillon and Mr. Winslow S. Pierce for the plaintiffs in error. No appearance for the defendant in error. No. 111. TEXAS AND PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY v. WILSON. Error to the Court of Appeals of the State of Texas. March 18, 1895. Dismissed, with costs, on motion of Mr. D. D. Duncan in behalf of counsel for the plaintiffs in error. Mr. John F. Dillon and Mr. Winslow S. Pierce for the plaintiffs in No appearance for the defendant in error. error. Cases not Otherwise Reported. No. 814. THOM v. PITTARD. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the fourth circuit. November 12, 1895. Petition denied. Mr. Robert M. Hughes for Pittard et al. in support of petition. No appearance for Thom, receiver, etc. No. 317. THOMPSON v. UNITED STATES. Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. April 24, 1895. Dismissed pursuant to the tenth rule. Mr. Adolph L. Sanger for the plaintiff in error. No appearance for the defendant in error. No. 13. THOMSON v. SMITH & GRIGGS MANUFACTURING COMPANY. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Connecticut. October 10, 1894. Dismissed, with costs, pursuant to the nineteenth rule. Mr. George W. Hey for the appellants. Mr. C. E. Mitchell for the appellees. No. 318. TOPLITZ v. MERRITT. Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. April 22, 1895. Dismissed, with costs, on authority of counsel for the plaintiffs in error, on motion of Mr. Solicitor General Conrad for the defendant in error. Mr. Stephen G. Clarke for the plaintiffs in error. Mr. Attorney General for the defendant in error. No. 286. TREDWAY 2. RILEY. Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Nebraska. April 8, 1895. Dismissed, with costs, pursuant to the tenth rule. Mr. O. C. Tredway and Mr. William E. Gantt for the plaintiff in error. Mr. W. L. Joy for the defendant in error. Error to the District No. 998. TUCKER v. UNITED STATES. Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Texas. |
