Εικόνες σελίδας
PDF
Ηλεκτρ. έκδοση

Cases not Otherwise Reported.

April 29, 1895. Docketed and dismissed on motion of Mr.
Solicitor General for the defendant in error.
No one oppos-
ing.

No. 22. WASHBURN AND MOEN MANUFACTURING COMPANY v. FREEMAN WIRE COMPANY. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Missouri. October 12, 1894. Dismissed, with costs, on motion of Mr. John R. Bennett for the appellant. Mr. Henry Hitchcock, Mr. G. A. Finkelnburg, and Mr. John R. Bennett for the appellant. No appearance for appellees.

No. 302.

WHEELER V. MALLON. Error to the City Court of Brooklyn, in the State of New York. April 15, 1895. Dismissed, with costs, pursuant to the tenth rule. Mr. W. E. Osborne for the plaintiffs in error.

the defendant in error.

No. 72. WHEELER V. TERREL. Court of the State of New York. missed, with costs, pursuant to the Stikeman for the plaintiff in error. defendant in error.

No. 71.

Mr. Louis W. Frost for

Error to the Supreme November 9, 1894. Distenth rule. Mr. James No appearance for the

v. WHEELER V. WHITE. Error to the Supreme Court of the State of New York. November 8, 1894. Dismissed, with costs, pursuant to the tenth rule. Mr. James Stikeman for the plaintiff in error. No appearance for the defendant

in error.

No. 900. WHITNEY v. UNITED STATES. Appeal from the Court of Private Land Claims. February 4, 1895. Docketed and dismissed on motion of Mr. Assistant Attorney General Conrad for the appellee. No opposition.

No. 1046. WIGGS v. SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States.

Cases not Otherwise Reported.

for the Northern District of California.

June 3, 1895.

Docketed and dismissed, with costs, on motion of Mr. J. Hubley Ashton for the appellee. No one opposing.

No. 242. WILLIAMS . PASSUMPSIC SAVINGS BANK. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of Florida. March 27, 1895. Dismissed, with costs, pursuant to the tenth rule. Mr. II. Bisbee for the appellants. No appearance for the appellee.

No. 864. WINEMAN V. STEAMER IRON CHIEF. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the sixth circuit. January 7, 1895. Petition denied. Mr. Harvey D. Goulder for steamer Iron Chief, etc., in support of petition. Mr. II. C. Wisner for Wineman in opposition thereto.

No. 309. WOOD v. BACH. Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of Illinois. April 29, 1895. Judgment affirmed, with costs and interest, by a divided court. Mr. Charles H. Aldrich, Mr. N. C. Sears, and Mr. P. V. Hoffman for the plaintiffs in error. Mr. R. A. Childs for the defendants in error.

No. 6. WORCESTER, NASHUA AND ROCHESTER RAILROAD COMPANY V. JOHN HANCOCK MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY; No. 18. WORCESTER, NASHUA AND ROCHESTER RAILROAD COMPANY . DAY; No. 73. WORCESTER, NASHUA AND ROCHESTER RAILROAD COMPANY . INDIA MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY; No. 74. WORCESTER, NASHUA AND ROCHESTER RAILROAD COMPANY v. SWEET; No. 468. WORCESTER, NASHUA AND ROCHESTER RAILROAD COMPANY V. PEOPLE'S SAVINGS BANK. Error to the Superior Court of the State of Massachusetts. October 8, 1894. Dismissed per stipulation. Mr. Attorney General for the plaintiff in error. Mr. Samuel Wells for the defendant in

Cases not Otherwise Reported.

error in No. 6. Mr. W. A. Monroe and Mr. George O. Shattuck for the defendants in error in Nos. 18, 73, and 74, and Mr. W. S. B. Hopkins for the defendant in error in No. 468.

No. 106. WORSWICK MANUFACTURING COMPANY v. KANSAS CITY. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Western District of Missouri. December 7, 1894. Dismissed, with costs, pursuant to the tenth rule. Mr. M. D. Leggett, Mr. L. L. Leggett, and Mr. Albert E. Lynch for the appellants. Mr. F. F. Rozzelle and Mr. J. R. Edson for the appellees.

No. 493. WRIGHT V. ROLLINS. Error to the Supreme Court of the State of California. October 15, 1894. Dismissed per stipulation, on motion of Mr. Calderon Carlisle for the plaintiff in error. Mr. Calderon Carlisle for the plaintiff in error. Mr. Thomas D. Riordan for the defendant in error.

No. 838. UEBERWEG v. COMPAGNIE GÉNÉRALE TRANSATLANTIQUE. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the second circuit. November 12, 1894. Petition denied. Mr. Robert D. Benedict and Mr. Edward K. Jones for Compagnie Générale Transatlantique in support of petition. Mr. Henry G. Ward for Ueberweg in opposition thereto.

No. 551.

UNITED STATES v. CONVERSE. Appeal from the Court of Claims. January 21, 1895. Dismissed on motion of Mr. Solicitor General Maxwell for the appellant. Mr. Attor ney General for the appellant. Mr. W. W. Dudley, Mr. L. T. Michener, and Mr. R. R. McMahon for the appellee.

No. 515. UNITED STATES v. DAVENPORT. Appeal from the Court of Claims. January 28, 1895. Judgment affirmed by

Cases not Otherwise Reported.

a divided court. Mr. Attorney General, Mr. Assistant AttorGeneral Dodge, and Mr. Felix Brannigan for the appellant. Mr. Richard R. McMahon for the appellee.

ney

No. 827. UNITED STATES v. HUNING. Appeal from the Court of Private Land Claims. March 4, 1895. Dismissed on motion of Mr. Solicitor General for the appellant. Mr. Attorney General for the appellant. Mr. Frank W. Clancy for the appellee.

No. 1032.

UNITED STATES v. MERCK. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the second circuit. June 3, 1895. Petition denied. Mr. Attorney General and Mr. Solicitor General for United States in support of the petition. No one opposing.

No. 407. UNITED STATES ex rel. MERRICK v. FOSTER. Error to the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia. January 24, 1895. Dismissed, with costs, on motion of Mr. J. M. Wilson for the plaintiffs in error. Mr. J. M. Wilson for the plaintiffs in error. Mr. Attorney General for the defendant in

error.

No. 134. YOUNG v. FOERSTER. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. December 17, 1894. Dismissed, with costs, pursuant to the tenth rule. Mr. Edwin II. Brown for the appellants. Mr. Arthur v. Briesen for the appellee.

No. 68. YOUNG v. Fox. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Tennessee. November 7, 1894. Dismissed, with costs, pursuant to the tenth rule. Mr. William Henry De Witt for the appellants. Mr. Jefferson Chandler for the appellees.

II.

OCTOBER TERM, 1895.

VOL. CLIX-18

« ΠροηγούμενηΣυνέχεια »