Εικόνες σελίδας
PDF
Ηλεκτρ. έκδοση
[ocr errors]

Stay, illusion!
If thou hast any sound, or use of voice,” &c.

Act i. sc. I. With a still higher degree of anxiety, curiosity, and terror, does Hamlet, as might naturally be expected, invoke the spirit of his father; his address being wrought up to the highest tone of amazement and emotion, and clothed with the most vigorous expression of poetry :

Angels and ministers of grace defend us !

Be thou a spirit of health, or goblin damn'd,” &c. Act i. sc. 4. The doubts and queries of this most impressive speech are similar to those which are allowed to be entertained, and directed to be put, by contemporary writers on the subject of apparitions. Thus the English Lavaterus enjoins the person so visited to charge the spirit to “ declare and open what he is—who he is, why he is come, and what he desireth;" saying, “Thou Spirite, we beseech thee by Christ Jesus, tell us what thou art;" and he then orders him to enquire,

What man's soul he is? for what cause he is come, and what he doth desire ? Whether he require any ayde by prayers and suffrages? Whether by massing or almes-giving he may be released ?" etc., etc.

In pursuance of the same judicious plan of adopting the popular conceptions, and giving them dignity and effect, by that philosophy of the supernatural which has been remarked as so peculiarly the gift of Shakspeare,+ we find him employing, in these scenes of super-human interference, the traditional notions of his age, relative to the influence of approaching light on departed spirits, as intimated by the crowing of the cock, and the fading lustre of the glow-worm. One of the passages which have so admirably immortalized these superstitions, contains also another not less striking, concerning the supposed sanctity and protecting power of the nights immediately previous to Christmas-Day. On the sudden departure of the Spirit, Bernardo remarks,

" It was about to speak, when the cock crew.

llor. And then it started like a guilty thing
Upon a fearful summons. I have heard," &c. Act i. sc. I.

Fare thee well at once!"

exclaims the apparition on retiring from the presence of his son,

“ The glow-worm shows the matins to be near,
And gins to pale his unellectual fire."

Act i. sc. 5. This idea of spirits flying the approach of morning, appears from the hymn of * Prudentius,” quoted by Bourne, to have been entertained by the Christian world as early as the commencement of the fourth century;# but a passage still more closely allied to the lines in Shahspeare, has been adduced by Mr. Douce, from a hymn composed by Saint Ambrose, and formerly used in the Salisbury service." It so much resembles," he observes, lloratio's speech, that one might almost suppose Shakspeare had seen them :

Preco diei jam sonat,
Noctis profundæ pervigil ;
Nocturna lux viantibus,
A nocte noctem segregans.

them.

.." of ghostes and spirites walking by nyght,” Parte the Seconde, p. 106, 107. 4to. B. L. 1572. From the chapter entitled, “ The Papistes doctrine touching the soules of dead men, and the appearing of

+ Madame De Stael observes, " there is always something philosophical in the supernatural employed by Shakspeare.” The Lutiuence of Literature on Society, vol. 1. p. 297.

Antiquitates Vulgares apud Brand, p. 68.-It has been observed by Mr. Steevens, that “this is a very trent superstition. Philostratus, giving an account of the apparition of Achilles' shade to Apollonius Iancus, says that it vanished with a little glimmer as soon as the cock crowed.” Vit. Apol. iv. 16.

Hoc excitatus Lucifer,
Solvit polum caligine;
Hoc omnis errorum chorus
Viam nocendi deserit.

Gallo canente spes redit, &c." * “ The epithets extravagant and erring," he adds, “are highly poetical and appropriate, and seem to prove that Shakspeare was not altogether ignorant of the Latin language.”

With what awful and mysterious grandeur has he invested the Popish doctrine of purgatory! a doctrine certainly well calculated for poetical purposes, and of which the particulars must have been familiar to him, through the writings of his contemporaries. Thus the English Lavaterus, detailing the opinions of the Rom inan Catholics on this subject, tells us, that

“ Purgatorie is also under the carth as Hell is. Some say that Hell and Purgatorie are both one place, albeit the paines be divers according to the deserls of soules. Furthermore they say, that under the earth there are more places of punishment in which the soules of the dead may be purged. For they say, that this or that soule hath ben seene in this or that mountaine, floud, ar valley, where it hath commilled the offence : that there are particuler Purgatories assigned ubu them for some special cause, before the day of Judgement, after which lime all maner of Purgatories, as well general as particuler shal cease. Some of them say, that the paine of Purgalorie is al one with the punishment of Hell, and that they differ only in this, that the one bath an ende, the other no ende : and that it is far more easie lo endure all the paynes of this worlde, which al men since Adam's time have susteined, even unto the day of the last Judgement, than to bear One dayes space the least of those two punishments. Further they holde that our lire, if it be compared with the fire of Purgatorie, doth resemble only a painted fire.”+

From this temporary place of torment, he informs us, that,

· By Gods licence and dispensation, cerlaive, yea before the day of Judgement, are permitted to come out, and that not for ever, but only for a season, for the instructing and terrifying of the lyving:”—and again :-" Many times in the nyght season, there have beene certaine spirits hearde softely going ---who being asked what they were, have made aunswere that tbey were the soules of this or that man, and that they nowe endure extreame tormentes. If by chaudre any man did aske of them, by what meanes they might be delivered out of those lortures, they have answered, that in case a certaine numbre of Masses were sung for them, or Pilgrimages vowed to some Saintes, or some other such like deedes doone for their sake, that then surely they shoulde be delivered,"

Never was the art of the poet more discoverable, than in the use which has been made of this doctrine in the play before us, and more particularly in the filJowing narrative, which instantly seizes on the mind, and fills it with that indefinite kind of terror that leads to the most horrid imaginings :

Ghost.

My hour is almost come,
When I to sulphurous and tormenting tlames,
Must render up myself." &c.

Act i. sc. 5. In this hazardous experiment, of placing before our eyes a spirit from the world of departed souls, no one has approached, by many degrees, the excellence of our poct. The shade of Darius, in the Persians of Æschylus, has been satisfactorily shown, by a critic of great ability, to be far inferior;S nor can the ghosts of Ossan, who is justly admired for delineations of this kind, be brought into competition with the Danish spectre; neither the Grecian, nor the Celtic mythology, inderd, allording materials equal, in point of impression, to those which existed for the English bard. We may also venture to affirm, that the management of Shalspeare, in the disposition of his materials, from the first shock which the sentinel receive, to that which Hamlet sustains in the closet of his mother, is perfectly

“See Expositio lymporium secundum usum Sarum, pr. by R. Pynson, n. d., 4to. Cl. vij. 5. * + Of ghostes and spirites walking by myght,” 1572.

' The seconde parte, chap ii. p. 103. | The seconde parte, chap. i1. p. 104 ; and The first parte, chap. X. p. 72.

See Montagu on the Preternatural Beings of Shakspeare, in her Essay.

unrivalled, and, more than any other, calculated to excite the highest degree of interest, pity, and terror.

It is likewise no small proof of judgment in our poet, that he bas only once attempted to unveil, in this direct manner, the awful destiny of the dead, and to embody, as it were, at full length, a missionary from the grave; for the ghost of Banquo, and the spectral appearances in Julius Cæsar and Richard the Third, are slight and powerless sketches, when compared with the tremendous visitation in Hamlet, beyond which no human imagination can ever hope to pass.

CHAPTER XI.

Cbservations on King John ; on All's Well that Ends Well; on King Henry the Fifth ; on Much

Ado about Nothing; on As You Like It; on Merry Wives of Windsor; on Troilus and Cressida ; on Henry the Eighth; on Timon of Athens ; on Measure for Measure ; on King Lear ; on Cymbeline ; on Macbeth- Dissertation on the Popular Belief in Witchcraft during the Age of Shakspeare, and on his Management of this Superstition in the Tragedy of Macbeth.

We are well aware, that, to many of our readers, the chronological discussion iprident to a new arrangement, will be lamented as tedious and uninteresting; the more so, as nothing absolutely certain can be expected as the result. That this part of our subject, therefore, may be as compressed as possible, we shall, in future, be very brief in offering a determination between the decisions of the two previous chronologers, reserving a somewhat larger space for the few instances in which it may be thought necessary to deviate from both.

Of the plays enumerated by Meres, in September, 1598, only two remain to be noticed in this portion of our work, namely, King John and Love's Labour's Wonde:

16. King Johx: 1598. Mr. Chalmers having detected some allusions in this play to the events of 1597, in addition to those which Mr. Malone had accurately referred to the preceding year, it becomes necessary, with the former of these gentlemen, to assign its production to the spring of 1598.

If King John, as a whole, be not entitled to class among the very first rate compositions of our author, it can yet exhibit some scenes of superlative beauty and effect, and two characters supported with unfailing energy and consistency.

The bastard Faulconbridge, though not perhaps a very amiable personage, being somewhat too interested and wordly-minded in bis conduct to excite much of our teem, has, notwithstanding, so large a portion of the very spirit of Plantagenet in him, so much heroism, gaiety, and fire in his constitution, and, in spite of his vowed accommodation to the times, such an open and undaunted turn of mind, that we cannot resuse him our admiration, nor, on account of his fidelity to John, however ill-deserved, our occasional sympathy and attachment. The alacrity and intrepidity of his daring spirit are nobly supported to the very last, where we und him exerting every nerve to rouse and animate the conscience-stricken soul of the tyrant.

In the person of Lady Constance, Maternal Grief, the most interesting passion of the play, is developed in all its strength; the picture penetrates to the inmost beart, and seared must those feelings be, which can withstand so powerful an appeal; for all the emotions of the fondest affection, and the wildest despair, all the rapid transitions of anguish, and approximating phrenzy, are wronght up into the scene with a truth of conception which rivals that of nature herself.

* It has been asserted by Gildon, but upon what foundation does not appear, that Shakspeare wrote the scene of the Ghost in Ilamlet, in the church-yard bordering on his house at Stratford.

[ocr errors]

The innocent and beauteous Arthur, rendered doubly attractive by the sweetness of his disposition and the severity of his fate, is thus described by his doating mother:

“ But thou art fair, and at thy birth, dear boy!

Nature and fortune join'd to make thee great;
of Nature's gifts thou inay'st with lilies boast,
And with the hall-blown rose

Act iii. sc. 1. When he is captured, therefore, and imprisoned by John, and consequently, scaled for destruction, who but Shakspeare could have done justice to the agonising sorrows of the parents? Her invocation to death, and her address to Pandulph, paint maternal despair with a force which no imagination can augment, and of which the tenderness and pathos have never been exceeded :

“ Death, death:-0 amiable lovely death!
Come, grin on me; and I will think thou smil'st-

Misery's love,
0, come to me!” &c.

Act iii. sc. 4. Independent of the scenes which unfold the striking characters of Constance and Faulconbridge, there are two others in this play which may vie with any thing that Shakspeare has produced; namely, the scene between John and Hubert, a and that between Hubert and Arthur. The former, where the usurper obscurely intimates to Hubert bis bloody wishes, is conducted in so masterly a manner, that we behold the dark and turbulent soul of John lying naked before us in all its deformity, and shrinking with fear even from the enunciation of its own vik purpose; “it is one of the scenes," as Mr. Steevens has well observed, **o which may be promised a lasting commendation. Art could add little to its fersection ; and time itself can take nothing from its beauties.”

The scene with Hubert and the executioners, where the hapless Arthur surplicates for mercy, almost lacerates the heart itself; and is only rendered supportable by the tender and alleviating impression which the sweet innocence and artless eloquence of the poor child fix with indelible influence on the mind. Will may it be said, in the language of our poet, that he who can behold this scebi without the gushing tribute of a tear,

“ Is fit for treasons, stratagems, and spoils;

Let no such man be trusted." As for the character of John, which, from its meanness and imbecility, seems not well calculated for dramatic representation, Shakspeare has contrived, towards the close of the drama, to excite in his behalf some degree of interest and commiseration; especially in the dying scene, where the fallen monarch, in answer to the enquiry of his son as to the state of his feelings, mournfully exclaims,

Poison'd,-ill fare;-dead, forsook, cast off.” 17. ALL'S WELL THAT Ends Well: 1598. There does not appear any sufficient reason for altering the date assigned to this play by Mr. Malone, when we have, therefore, followed in preference to Mr. Chalmers, who has fixed on the succeeding year; a decision to which we have been particularly induced, independent of other circumstances, by the apparent notice of this drama by Mores under the title of Love's Labour's Wonne, an appellation which very accurately applies to this, but to no other of our author's productions with any similar dezten of pertinency. We have reason, therefore, to conclude, as nothing has hitherto been brought forward to invaliate the assumption, that Meres's title was the original designation of this comedy, and was intended by the poet as a countertitle to Love's Labour's Lost. What induced him to dismiss the first, and to adunt the present proverbial appellation, cannot positively be ascertained; but the pm bability is, as Mr. Malone has remarked, that the alteration was suggested in consequence of the adage itself being found in the body of the play.

The noblest character in this comedy, which, though sounded on a story somewhat too improbable, abounds both in interest and entertainment, is the good old Countess of Rousillon. Shakspeare seems to have drawn this portrait con amore, and we figure to ourselves for this amiable woman, a countenance beaming with dignity, sweetness, and sensibility, emanations from a heart which had ever responded to the impulses of love and charity. In short, her maternal atlection for the gentle Helen, her piety, sound sense, and candour, call for our warmest reverence and esteem, which accompany her to the close of the representation, and follow her departure with regret.

Helen, the romantic, the love-dejected Helen, must excite in every feeling bosom a high degree of sympathy; patient suffering in the female sex, especially when resulting from ill-requited attachment, and united with modesty and beauty, cannot but be an object of interest and commiseration, and in the instance before us, these are admirably blended in

.“ a maid too virtuous For the contempt of empire,

but who, unfortunately, has to struggle against the prejudices of birth, rank, and un feeling pride, in the very man who is the object of her idolatry, and who, even after the most sacred of bonds should have cemented their destiny, lies with scorn from her embraces.

Il in the infancy of her passion the error of indiscretion be attributable to llelen, how is it atoned for by the most engaging humility, by the most bewitching tenderness of heart: “Be not oflended," she tells her noble patroness,

“ Be not offended; for it hurts not him,

That he is lov'd of me: I follow him not
By any token of presumptuous suit;
Nor would I have him, till I do deserve bim ;
Yet never know how that desert should be

thus, ludian-like,
Religious in mine error, I adore
The sun, that looks upon his worshipper,
But knows of himn no more.”

Act i. sc. 3. But when the wife of Bertram, with a resignation and self-devotedness worthy of the highest praise, she deserts the house of her mother-in-law, knowing that whilst she is sheltered there her husband will not return, how does she, becoming thus an unprotected wanderer, a pilgrim tare-foot plodding the cold ground for him who has contemned her, rise to the tone of exalted truth and heroism !

“Poor lord ! is't I
That chase thee from thy country, and expose
T'hose tender limbs of thine to the event
Or the none-sparing war?” &c.

Act iii. sc. 2. It was necessary, in order to place the character of Helen in its most interesting point of view, that Bertram should be represented as arrogant, profligate, and unfeeling; a coxcomb who to family-consequence hesitates not to sacrilice allthat is manly, just, and honourable. The picture is but too true to nalure, and, since the poet found such a delineation essential to the construction of his story, he has very properly taken care, though Bertram, out of tenderness to the Countess and Helena, meets not the punishment he merits, that nothing in mitigation of his folly should be produced.

To the comic portion of this drama too much praise can scarcely be given; it is singularly rich in all that characterises the wit, the drollery, and the humour of Shakspeare. The Clown is the rival of Touchstone in As You Like It; and

• «of all the characters of Shakspeare," remarks Mr. Felton, "none more resemble his best female advocate Mrs. Montagu) than the Countess of Rousillon,” Imperfect Hints, parti. p. 65.

« ΠροηγούμενηΣυνέχεια »