Wanner v. Snyder distinguished from Hahn v. Hutchinson 234 Statement of Pennsylvania law.. 233 133 133 235 134 Clause does not protect estate in the hands of the cestui que trust. . . . . . 284 167 Extent of protection as to previously incurred obligations.. 285 167 Effect on accumulated income due cestui que trust at time of death...... 287 169 Effect on accrued income. 288 170 Effect of the clause as between trustee and cestui que trust 289 170 Origin of the notion that the clause prohibiting involuntary alienation is valid Mr. Gray s reasons for the origin of the notion... 291 171 Dictum in Fisher v. Taylor... 292 172 Vaux v. Parke..... 293 173 Author's conclusion as to origin of the notion in Pennsyl law as to the validity of prohibition of voluntary aliena Mr. Gray's statement of the rule against perpetuities... The author's statement of the rule against perpetuities.... 329 188 330 189 326 187 327 187 328 188 Cases where the limitations did not violate the rule. Law in Pennsylvania as to application of rule to con Where the interest cannot take effect apart from the rule.... 379 221 Rule applies to the future interest and not to the power.... 386 227 Power exercisable only within the period... Pennsylvania cases on special powers of appointment 394 232 Summary of law as to the application of the rule to limitations under special powers of appointment.... 399 238 |