Εικόνες σελίδας
PDF
Ηλεκτρ. έκδοση

Entered according to the Act of Congress, in the year 1886,

BY JOHN W. KERN,

In the Office of the Librarian of Congress, at Washington, D. C.

Rec

3. July 27, 1886.

PRINTED AND BOUND BY CARLON & HOLLENBECK,

INDIANAPOLIS.

ELECTROTYPED BY

INDIANAPOLIS ELECTROTYPE

FOUNDRY.

[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]

Holderman v. Thompson..........112 | Perciful, Trout v....
Hollerbach, Louisville and Nash-

[blocks in formation]

.........532

Pittsburgh, Cincinnati and St.

......513

[blocks in formation]

Louis R. W. Co. v. Adams......151
Powell, Waymire v........
Pressley v. Lamb.......
Price v. Jones........
Puett, Beard v.............
Pugh v. Pugh.......

.328

..171

..543

68

...552

.243

....374

..101

Holman v. State, ex rel. Gibson..569
House v. Alexander.......
Hunt v. Dederick...
Huntington, City of, Hasty v.....540

Indiana, Bloomington and West-
ern R. W. Co. v. Koons..........507
Indianapolis and Cumberland G.
R. Co. v. State, ex rel. Flack... 37
Indianapolis and Vincennes R.
R. Co., Welty v......

Ralston v. Moore....
Ratcliffe, Cox V..................
Ray, Ryan v.......
Reamer, Davis v..
Rinehart, Vail v..
Ross, Sannes v......
Roszell v. Roszell.

..318

6

..558

55

77

[blocks in formation]
[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small]

Thompson, Holderman v...........112 | Wartena v. State

Trout v. Perciful......................
..532

United States Encaustic Tile Co.,
First Nat'l Bank of Mauch
Chunk v..........
Unruh v. State, ex rel. Baum......117

Vail v. Rinehart......

Wallace v. Brooker......
Wallace v. Long..
Walter v. State.......

.........227

...............445

..600

Waymire v. Board of Comm'rs of
Jasper Co..............
Waymire v. Powell
Webb v. Simpson..

..........

...328 ....327

55

Welty v. Indianapolis and Vincennes R. R. Co.....

Willey v. State, ex rel. Brown....453 6 Williams v. Thames Loan and Trust Co..........

.598 Willis v. Bayles...... .522 Wines, Heberd v ....................... ..589 Wright v. Jones......

.420

.363

.237

17

TABLE OF THE CASES

CITED IN THIS VOLUME.

Achey v. State, 64 Ind. 56.........476 | Ballard v. Franklin L. Ins. Co.,

[blocks in formation]

.....106

Aiken v. Ising, 94 Ind. 507.......351 Aldrich v. Hawkins, 6 Blackf. 125......... Allegheny Co. v. Watt, 3 Pa. St. 462.....

..314 ...591

Alley v. State, 32 Ind. 476.
Allnutt v. Inglis, 12 East, 527....259
American Rapid Tel. Co. v. Con-
necticut Telephone Co., 44 Am.
Rep. 237....

..258

Anderson v. Ackerman, 88 Ind. 481....... 12 Anderson v. Baker, 98 Ind. 587... 41 Anderson v. Hubble, 93 Ind. 570.357 Anderson v. State, 104 Ind. 467..302, 481 Applegate v. Conner, 93 Ind. 185.360 Arbintrode v. State, 67 Ind. 267..591 Archer v. Ross, 2 Scam. 303.......130 Archey v. Knight, 61 Ind. 311.... 6 Arnold v. Stephenson, 79 Ind. 126.526 Atchison, etc., R. R. Co. v. Wagner, 33 Kan. 660...... ..163 Atkinson v. Jackson, 8 Ind. 31...526 Atlas Engine Works v. Randall, 100 Ind. 293....... .........35, 163 Attorney General v. Railroad Companies, 35 Wis. 425....259 Ayers v. Burns, 87 Ind. 245........110

Badger v. Gilmore, 37 N. H. 457.210 Badger v. Hatch, 71 Maine, 562.. 95 Baldwin v. Cole, 6 Mod. 212...... 86 Baldwin v. Shuter, 82 Ind. 560...350 Ball v. Cox, 7 Ind. 453....

[ocr errors]

Bank of North America v. McCall, 4 Binney, 371.......... 134 Barickman v. Kuykendall, 6

Blackf. 21. 526 Barker v. Dinsmore, 72 Pa. St. 427..... 86 Barker v. State, 48 Ind. 163.. .....323 Barnes v. Jones, 91 Ind. 161......189 Barnett v. Juday, 38 Ind. 86......567 Barnett v. State, 100 Ind. 171.....136 Bartemeyer v. Iowa, 18 Wall. 129.259 Barton v. Anderson, 104 Ind. 578. 74 Barton v. State, 67 Ga. 653. ...300 Bash v. Bash, 9 Pa. St. 260........530 Bates v. Spooner, 45 Ind. 489......511 Batten v. State, 80 Ind. 394.......129, 198, 475

.....་

Baumgartner v. Hasty, 100 Ind.

[blocks in formation]

Bell v. Hewitt, 24 Ind. 280........25, 525 Bell v. Longworth, 6 Ind. 273..... 6 Beloit v. Morgan, 7 Wall. 619 ...512 Bender v. Bender, 37 Pa. St. 419..526 Ballard v. Bond, 32 Vt. 355......................526 Bennett v. Meehan,83 Ind.566.472,498

.323

« ΠροηγούμενηΣυνέχεια »