Entered according to the Act of Congress, in the year 1882, In the Office of the Librarian of Congress, at Washington, D. C. PRINTED AND BOUND BY CARLON & HOLLENBECK, INDIANAPOLIS. ELECTROTYPED BY KETCHUM & WANAMAKER, INDIANAPOLIS. TABLE OF THE CASES REPORTED IN THIS VOLUME. V......... .... ..166 Bunnell, State v.......... ..159 ..315 .433 .128 Acklemire et al., Easter v...........163 | Bryan v. Moore et al................. 9 .239 24 Ballard, Adm'r, v. Franklin Life 1. ..512 Butt v. Jennings School Town- Carr et al. v. State, ex rel. Attor 69 ney General...............................................................342 Holmes et al..... ..582 ..371 75 62 .469 ....125 ..480 Board Comm'rs of Fulton Co., Cottrell et al. v. Cottrell. 87 ...... .542 Bitters v... ..125 Board of Comm'rs of Madison Co., Dale, McElhoes v... ...186 .297 .176 Board of Comm'rs of Marion Co. ux. V........ .554 67 ....183 Davis v. Nicholson, Trustee .520 .489 .271 .540 92 Early, Sheriff, et al., State, ex .510 Bower, Bertelson v........ 512 .455 Fields Evans et al. v. Feeny et al.........532 Evans et al., Hudson v........................................ ..596 ..399 Ex Parte Mitchell................ ...249 Farmers Bank of Frankfort, Heavilon et al. v................... .....186 Fay v. .433 | Johnson, Dubois v.. 520 Burditt Hackler et al. v. State, ex rel. .547 .430 486 Hagenbuck et al. v. McClaskey..577 Hamilton et al. v. Plaut et al....417 Harness et al. v. Harness et al...160 Harrison et al., Lewis et al. v....278 Hathaway, Ex'r, v. Roll...........567 Hawkins et al., State, ex rel. Heavilon et al. v. Farmers Bank Helgemeier et al., Mugge et al. v.120 Hendrickson, St. John et al. v...350 Lafayette, City of, v. Allen.......166 Langohr v. Smith et al.............495 Leary et al. v. Smith et al...... Lewis et al. v. Harrison et al.....278 Losey et ux.v. Bond,Trustee, et a.1510 Louisville and Nashville R. R. Louisville, New Albany and Chi- cago R. R. Co. v. Wunderlich..105 McAllister v. State, ex rel. Heath, McClaskey, Hagenbuck et al. v..577 McFadden et al. v. Hopkins et al..459 Megee et al., Waddle v........... Monk, Highfill v.....................203 Morrison et al. v. Bank of Com- Mugge et al. v. Helgemeier et al.120 Nebeker et al., Cronkhite v.......319 Nelson et al. v. Bronnenburg.....193 Nelson et al., Collins v............. 75 Newberger, Bole et al. v......................... .600 | Pearson, Nickless v.................................................... Jennings School Township, Butt v. 69 | Pickett, Boesker et al. v............554 Plaut et al., Hamilton et al. v...417 | State, ex rel. Fleming, Goodwine Pollard, McGlothlin et al. v......228 Porter et al. v. Reid.......... ....569 State, ex rel. Hazlerigg et al., v. State, ex rel. Heath et al., McAl- St. John et al. v. Hendrickson....350 Stoeber, Rotan et al. v......... .145 Stutsman et al., Short v............. Tachau et al. v. Fiedeldey et al... 54 Terre Haute and Indianapolis R. .382 92 Timmons et al., Swan et al. v......243 Tippecanoe Township, Yeager v.. 46 Toler et al. v. Keiher....... .383 Towell et al. v. Hollweg et al.....154 Tumey, State v........ .............559 Smith v. King.. Smith et al. v. Bissell, Trustee...188 Smith et al., Langohr v... .495 Smith et al., Leary et al. v........ 90 .315 Waddle v. Megee et al..............247 State v. Tumey. State v. Winninger State, Burk v............................... State, ex rel. Collings, v. Beck et al.500 Yeager v. Tippecanoe Township.. 46 TABLE OF THE CASES CITED IN THIS VOLUME. Abbott v. Edgerton, 53 Ind. 196..339 | Baynes v. Chastain, 68 Ind. 376..412 Alford v. Baker, 53 Ind. 279......241 Beauchamp v. State, 6 Blackf. Beineke v. Wurgler, 77 Ind. 468. 91 Bender v. Stewart, 75 Ind. 88.....182 Atherton v. Sugar Creek, etc., T. Atwater v. Schenck, 9 Wis. 160..148 Aurora F. Ins. Co. v. Johnson, 46 Aurora, etc., T. P. Co. v. Holt- Ayer v. Bartlett, 6 Pick. 71........451 ..100 .148 384 Benton v. Shreeve, 4 Ind. 66..............196 Berkshire v. Young, 45 Ind. 461. 62 Betson v. State, 47 Ind. 54.........148 Billings v. Kankakee Coal Co., 67 Billington v. Welsh, 5 Binney, Binford v. Willson, 65 Ind. 70...589 Bird v. Lanius, 7 Ind. 615.........389 Bittinger v. Baker, 29 Pa. St. 66.253 Black v. Duncan, 60 Ind. 522....594 Blackman v. State, 12 Ind. 556... 52 Blair v. Davis, 9 Ind. 236..... ..157 Board, etc., v. Day, 19 Ind. 450..187 Board, etc., v. Elston, 32 Ind. 27.586 Board, etc., v. Gregory, 42 Ind. 32. 73 Board, etc., v. Shipley, 77 Ind. Boaz v. Tate, 43 Ind. 60............ 53 ..407 Bouton v. Lord, 10 Ohio St. 453.341 |
