examples will show their application to a variety of such equa Adding the square of p to both members, we have, By Rule II, 4x2” +4px” + p2=4q +p2. b √ x + 7. Given Vx+a+b√x+a⇒ 262, to find x. (77.) Divide 34 into two such parts, that their product shall be 225. Let x one of the parts; then will the other be 34 and taking their product, we have, or, x(34-x)=225, - or by changing the signs, - Ꮖ ; therefore, x=17825, or 9. In this case, the two values of x give the two parts into which the given number is to be divided, for, 25 x9= 225. 2. There are two numbers whose difference is 7, and half their product plus 30, is equal to the square of the lesser number. What are the numbers? Let x be the less; then x+7 will be the greater; and by the conditions of the question. x(x+7) +30= x2. 2 Completing the square by Rule II. 4x2-28x+49=240 +49=289; extracting the root, 2x-7=17; 12 is therefore the less, and 12+7=19, the greater; or, if we take the other value of x, which is -5, we shall have for the greater, −5+7=2. Either of these values will satisfy the conditions of the equation, for 19 × 12 +30= 144, and -5x2 +30=25. 3. Divide the number 30 into two such parts, that their product shall be equal to eight times their difference. Let the lesser part; then 30-≈ will be the greater, and their difference will be (30-x)-x=30—2x. Then, by the conditions of the problem, or, x(30-x)=8(30 — 2x); 30x x2 240 16x. Transposing and changing the signs, x2 46x —— 240. Completing the square by Rule I. x2 46x+529- · 240 +529= extracting the root, x-23=17; whence, x = 23 ± 17 = 6, or 40. 289; Of these values of x, it is evident, that only one will satisfy the conditions of the question, for 40 cannot be the lesser part, nor any part of 30; 6 is therefore the value of x, and we have for the greater part, 30-6, or 24, which answers the conditions of the question, for 6 × 24=144 = (30-6)-6)8, or 18 x8-144. 4. A person bought a number of sheep for $120. If there had been 8 more, each sheep would have cost him half a dollar less. What was the cost of a sheep? 120 the number of sheep, then is the price of one Let x= sheep; but if he had bought 8 more for the same money, the price of each sheep would have been 120 x+8 and by the con ditions, the difference between these two prices is half a dollar; x2+8x+161920+16=1936. Extracting the root, x+4= ±44; The value found for a, by making 44 positive, answers the required conditions; and the other value, — 48, would be the answer to another problem, which is thus enunciated :A person bought a number of sheep for $120. If there had been 8 less, each sheep would have cost him half a dollar more. NOTE. It may sometimes occur, that after completing the square, the second member of the equation is negative, in which case, the root cannot be extracted (63). Such a result is generally an indication of some impossibility in the conditions from which the equation is derived, or an error in forming the equation. If we have the equation 2-2x —— 13, by completing the square, and reducing, we shall have x= = 1 ± √ — 12, in which the value of a contains an imaginary expression. For another example, let it be required to divide 20 into two such parts, that their product shall be 125. Let a one part, then 20- x will be the other, and x(20x)=123, |