And kill the innocent gazer with thy fight; In life but double death now Glo'fter's dead. Q. Mar. Why do you rate my Lord of Suffolk thus Although the Duke was enemy to him, Yet he, moft Chriftian-like, laments his death. Might liquid tears, or heart-offending groans, I would be blind with weeping, fick with groans, What know I, how the world may deem of me? It may So fhall my name with flander's tongue be wounded, To be a Queen, and crown'd with infamy. K. Henry. Ah, woe is me for Glofter, wretched man! Q. Mar. 4 Be woe for me, more wretched than he is, What, art thou like the adder waxen deaf? • Be woe for me.] That is, let not woe be to thee for Gloucefter, but for me. Nor fet no footing on this unkind shore. What did I then? but curft the gentle gufts, Yet Eolus would not be a murderer; The pretty vaulting fea refus'd to drown me, As far as I could ken the chalky cliffs, A heart it was, bound in with diamonds, And threw it tow'rds thy Land; the fea receiv'd it, 5 The Splitting rocks cow'r'd in their ragged fides.] Sinking fands and Splitting rocks are the two destroyers of fhips, but they are not otherwife allied to one another, and act their mischief by very different powers. I believe here is a tranfpofition, and fhould read, The finking fands, the splitting rocks cow'r'd in. Our poet mentions them toge ther, as in Othello, The gutter'd rocks and congre“ gated fands. But finding no commodious al- The Splitting rocks cow'r'din, For For lofing ken of Albion's wifhed Coaft. 6 To fit and witch me, as Afcanius did, When he to madding Dido would unfold His father's acts, commenc'd in burning Troy? Am I not witcht like her? or thou not falfe like him? Ah me, I can no more: die, Margaret! For Henry weeps, that thou doft live fo long. Noife within. Enter Warwick, Salisbury, and many Commons. War. It is reported, mighty Sovereign, K. Henry. That he is dead, good Warwick, 'tis too true; • To fit and watch me, as Afca nius did, When be to madding Dido would unfold His Father's Acts, commenc'd in burning Troy The Poet bere is unquestionably alluding to Virgil, Anzid. 1.) but he frangely blends Fact with Fiction. In the firft Place, it was Cupid, in the Semblance of Ajcanius, who fat in Dido's Lap, and was fondled by her. but then it was not Cupid, who related to her the Procefs of Troy's deftruction, but it was Eneas himfelf who related this Hif * tory: Again, how did the fuppoled Afcanius fit and watch her? Cupid was ordered, while Dido mistakenly careffed him, to bewitch and infect her with Love. To this Circumftance the Poet certainly alludes; and, unless he had wrote, as I have reftored to the Text; To fit and witch me,→ Why should the Queen immedi.» ately draw this Inference. Am I not witch'd like her? THEOBALD. *Not Henry.] The poet commonly ufes Henry as a word of three fyllables. War. War. That I fhall do, my Liege.-Stay, Salisbury, With the rude multitude, till I return. [Warwick goes in. K. Henry. O thou, that judgeft all things, ftay my thoughts, My thoughts, that labour to perfuade my foul, 4 [Bed with Glo’ster's body put forth. And to furvey his dead and earthly image, What were it, but to make my forrow greater? War. Come hither, gracious Sovereign, view this body. K. Henry. That is to fee how deep my grave is made, For, with his foul fled all my worldly folace ; 7 For feeing him, bfee my life in death. War. As furely as my foul intends to live I do believe, that violent hands were laid Suf. A dreadful oath, fworn with a folemn tongue! What inftance gives Lord Warwick for his vow? War. See, how the blood is fettled in his face. * Oft have I seen a timely-parted ghost, Of afhy femblance, meager, pale, and bloodless But fee, his face is black and full of blood; Suf. Why, Warwick, who fhould do the Duke to death? Myfelf and Beauford had him in protection; And we, I hope, Sirs, are no murderers. War. But both of you have vow'd Duke Humphry's death, And you, forfooth, had the good Duke to keep. 8 Oft have I feen a timely parted ghost, Of afby femblance, meager, pale, and bloodless.] All that is true of the body of a dead man is here faid by Warwick of the foul. I would read, Oft have I feen a timely-parted coarfe, But of two common words how or why was one changed for the other? I believe the tranfcriber thought that the epithet, timely parted could not be used of the body, but that, as in Hamlet there is mention of peace-parted fouls, fo here timely parted must have the fame fubftantive. He removed one imaginary difficulty and made many real. If the foul is parted from the body, the body is likewife parted from the soul. I cannot but ftop a moment to obferve that this horrible defeription is fcarcely the work of any pen but Shakespeare's.. Julty son's 'Tis |