AMERICAN

LAW REPORTS

ANNOTATED

VOL. 39

Contempt, § 16

A. KNEISEL et al.

V.

URSUS MOTOR COMPANY.

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS

V.

LESLIE A. GILMORE, Plff. in Err.

Illinois Supreme Court - February 17, 1925.

(316 Ill. 336, 147 N. E. 243.)

instituting action without leave of court.

1. The act of one claiming property in possession of a receiver and of his attorney, in instituting a suit to recover possession of the property without leave of court, is a direct contempt.

[See note on this question beginning on page 6.]

Appeal, § 476 from order adjudg

which a receiver has been appointed cannot intervene in the suit except by leave of court.

Receiver right to claim assets.