...indirect measures were resorted to for the purpose of prejudicing the jury against the defendants. 4. Because the verdict of the jury was against the weight of the evidence, and against the charge of the Court. 5. Because the plaintiff fraudulently and corruptly joined with...

...the motion alleged: (a) Because the verdict of the jury was contrary to the evidence in the case, (b) Because the verdict of the jury was against the weight of the evidence in the case, (c) Because the verdict was contrary to the law. The trial judge was of the opinion that...

...of the principal reasons alleged on the part of the defendants for a new trial in this case is that the verdict of the jury was against the weight of the evidence. In the opinion of the court, that was true." It is urged here with great persistence and apparent feeling...

...all the weight to contestants' evidence that it is entitled to receive, we are of the opinion that the verdict of the jury was against the weight of the evidence and should have been set aside by the trial judge on that ground upon the motion made by proponent....

...second, that instructions offered on behalf of appellants were improperly refused; and third, that the verdict of the jury was against the weight of the evidence. In support of the first contention made, appellants assert that under a stipulation which had been...

...what principle that court could have granted a new trial. It could not have done so on the ground that the verdict of the jury was against the weight of the evidence as to the carelessuess or negligence of the decedent. There was no material conflict in the evidence...

...presented by the defendant, and to withdraw the jury's consideration from the true issue in the case. 5. Because the verdict of the jury was against the weight of the evidence. COUET OF COMMON PLEAS, JUDGE BEEWSTER. After disposing of the usual business relating to the Orphans'...

...final result of the trials proves him to have been justly and legally entitled to ; and, secondly, that the verdict of the jury was against the weight of the evidence, and inconsistent with the principles on which his associates have been acquitted. The facts connected...

...the part of the Commonwealth in attempting to influence one of the jurors. It is not pretended that the verdict of the jury was against the weight of the evidence or the charge of the Court, certainly not by the counsel for Matthew H. M'Ewen. •"•n looking to...

...testimony of the witness. Motion for new trial. . The reasons filed for the motion were as follows: Because the verdict of the jury was against the weight of the evidence. Because the damages allowed by the jury were excessive and were not supported by the weight of the...