cago, 172 Ill. 263, 50 N. E. 181), for the reason the ordinance did not prescribe the height of the curb. The cause was remanded, and this is an appeal from a decision adverse to the city rendered upon a rehearing of the cause. The record and the matters assigned therein as for error are in all respects the same as were presented by the record in City of Chicago v. Sherman, 192 Ill. 576, 61 N. E. 850. What was there said as to the alleged errors upon the second hearing in that case is applicable to every contention advanced in this record. Upon the authority of the conclusion there announced, the judgment herein must be, and is, affirmed. Judgment affirmed.

KINGMAN v. PEOPLE ex rel. GANNAWAY, County Collector. (Supreme Court of Illinois. April 16, 1902.) Error to circuit court, Coles county; John P. Harrah, Judge. Application by the people, on the relation of D. C. Gannaway, county collector of Coles county, for judgment against the lots of Carrie Kingman for a special tax for a street improvement. From an order overruling her objections to the application, and from a judg ment for the sale of the lots, she brings error. Reversed. James W. & Edward C. Craig, for plaintiff in error.

PER CURIAM. This case is in all respects like that of Craig v. People, 193 Ill. 199, 61 N. E. 1072, and it is stipulated by the parties that it should be submitted on the same briefs and arguments filed in that case. The result must be the same, and for the reasons stated in the opinion in that case the judgment of the county court will be reversed, and the cause remanded. Reversed and remanded.

STATE v. CLEVELAND, C., C. & ST. L. RY. CO. (Supreme Court of Indiana. April 9, 1902.) Appeal from circuit court, Fountain county; Joseph M. Rabb, Judge. Action by the state of Indiana against the Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Company. From a judgment in favor of defendant, plaintiff appeals. Affirmed. Transferred from appellate court under Acts 1901, p. 590 (Burns' Rev. St. 1901, § 1337u). W. L Taylor, Atty. Gen., Merrill Moores, C. C. Hadley, J. W. Brissey, and Lucas Nebeker, for the State. John T. Dye and Leonard J. Hackney, for appellee.

GILLETT, J. The questions involved in this appeal are the same as in State v. Cleveland, C., C. & St. L. Ry. Co. (decided by this court, Oct. 23, 1901) 61 N. E. 669. On the authority of that case the judgment is affirmed.

SPURGEON CENTRAL IRON & STEEL CO. et al. (Appellate Court of Indiana, Division No. 2. April 11, 1902.) Appeal from circuit court, Clay county; S. M. McGregor, Judge. Action by Lydia Spurgeon against the Central Iron & Steel Company and others. From a judgment for defendants, plaintiff appeals. Reversed. E. S. Holliday, and Frank A. Horner, for appellant. George A. Knight, for appellee.

WILEY, J. Appellant was plaintiff below, and her complaint is a duplicate to the complaint in the case of O'Brien v. Steel Co. (decided by the supreme court, March 18, 1902) 63 N. Ě. 302, except as to descriptions of real estate. A demurrer to her complaint was sustained, and, refusing to plead further, judgment was rendered against her for costs. Upon the authority of the O'Brien Case, supra, it must be held that the complaint states a cause of action and that the court erred in sustaining the demurrer to it. The judgment is reversed, and the court below is directed to overrule the demurrer to the complaint.

'Rehearing denied.

UNION MUT. BUILDING & LOAN ASS'N v. COULTER et al.1 (Appellate Court of Indiana, Division No. 1. March 18, 1902.) Appeal from circuit court, Clinton county. Action by the Union Mutual Building & Loan Association against David A. Coulter and others. From a judgment sustaining a demurrer to the complaint, and overruling a demurrer to the cross complaint, plaintiff appeals. Reversed. J. E. Franklin, Claybaugh & Claybaugh, and MeBride & Denny, for appellant. Brumbaugh & Combs, for appellee.

PER CURIAM. Upon the authority of Association v. Plank, 152 Ind. 197, 52 N. E. 991, the complaint in this cause is held sufficient, and upon the authority of Association v. Aichele (Ind. App.) 61 N. E. 11, the cross complaint is held insufficient. The judgment is therefore reversed, with instructions to the trial court to overrule the demurrer to the complaint, and sustain the demurrer to the cross complaint.

ABERT v. REECE. (No. 6,638.) (Supreme Court of Ohio. Jan. 14, 1902.) Error to circuit court, Hamilton county. Follett & Kelley and Harmon, Colston, Goldsmith & Hoadly, for plaintiff in error. Thomas McDougal and Patterson A. Reece, for defendant in error.

PER CURIAM. Judgment affirmed. WILLIAMS, BURKET, DAVIS, and SHAUCK, JJ., concur.

ANISFIELD v. KLEIN. (No. 6,589.) (Supreme Court of Ohio. Dec. 10, 1901.) Error to circuit court, Hamilton county. Sidney G. Stricker, for plaintiff in error. Frank Seinsheimer and J. R. Sayler, for defendant in er

ror.

PER CURIAM. Judgment affirmed. WILLIAMS, SPEAR, and SHAUCK, JJ,

concur.

BANK. CITY OF CINCINNATI et al. (No. 7,320.) (Supreme Court of Ohio. Oct. 1, 1901.) Error to circuit court, Hamilton county. Harmon, Colston, Goldsmith & Hoadly and Burch & Johnson, for plaintiff in error. Frank F. Dinsmore, Gorman & Thompson, Bromwell & Bruce, Charles J. Hunt, Â. J. Cunningham, and Lloyd P. Bean, for defendants in error.

PER CURIAM. Judgment affirmed.

WILLIAMS, BURKET, SPEAR, DAVIS, and SHAUCK, JJ., concur.

BANK v. STANDARD WAGON CO. et al. (No. 7,087.) (Supreme Court of Ohio. Oct. 1, 1901.) Error to superior court of Cincinnati Herron, Gatch & Herron, for plaintiff in error. Lawrence Maxwell, Jr., Edward Ritchie, and Thornton M. Hinkle, for defendants in er

ror.

PER CURIAM. Judgment affirmed. WILLIAMS, BURKET, DAVIS, and SHAUCK, JJ., concur.

CITY OF CINCINNATI et al. v. FENNER. (No. 7,798.) (Supreme Court of Ohio. Feb. 7, 1902.) Error to superior court of Cincinnati. Charles J. Hunt and Wade H. Ellis, Corp. Counsel, for plaintiffs in error. George P. Stimson and L. D. Oliver, for defendant in

error.

PER CURIAM. Judgment affirmed. WILLIAMS, BURKET, DAVIS, and SHAUCK, JJ., concur.

CITY OF DAYTON v. RAILWAY CO. Dec. (No. 7,147.) (Supreme Court of Ohio. 10, 1901.) Error to circuit court, Montgomery county. Edwin P. Matthews, City Sol., for plaintiff in error. John T. Dye and E. M. Nevin, for defendant in error.

PER CURIAM. Judgment affirmed. MINSHALL, C. J., and BURKET and DAVIS, JJ., concur.

CITY OF TOLEDO v. BUECHELE et al. (No. 7,440.) (Supreme Court of Ohio. Jan. 14, 1902.) Error to circuit court, Lucas county. Moses R. Brailey and Charles K. Friedman, for plaintiff in error. J. S. Wertman and E. P. Raymond, for defendants in error. PER CURIAM. Judgment affirmed. WILLIAMS, BURKET, SPEAR, DAVIS, and SHAUCK, JJ., concur.

CITY OF TOLEDO v. LEWIS. (No. 7,420.) (Supreme Court of Ohio. Jan. 14, 1902.) Error to circuit court. Lucas county. Moses R. Brailey and Charles K. Friedman, for plaintiff in error. W. T. S. O'Hara, for defendant in error.

PER CURIAM. Judgment affirmed. WILLIAMS, BURKET, SPEAR, DAVIS, and SHAUCK, JJ., concur.

CITY OF TOLEDO v. MATHEWS. (No. 7.365.) (Supreme Court of Ohio. Oct. 1, 1901.) Error to circuit court, Lucas county. Moses R. Brailey and Charles K. Friedman, for plaintiff in error. Southard & Love and Marshall & Fraser, for defendant in error.

PER CURIAM. The judgment of the circuit court, reversing the common pleas, is affirmed on the first ground stated in the record, on the authority of Schweinfurth v. Railway Co., 60 Ohio St. 215, 54 N. E. 89.

WILLIAMS, BURKET, and SPEAR, JJ., concur. WILLIAMS and SPEAR, JJ., are of opinion that the judgment should also be affirmed on the second ground.

CITY OF YOUNGSTOWN et al. v. BONNELL et al. (No. 7,332.) (Supreme Court of Ohio. Nov. 12, 1901.) Error to circuit court, Mahoning county. S. S. Conroy, for plaintiffs in error. Hine & Kennedy, for defendants in

error.

PER CURIAM. Judgment affirmed, on the authority of Cincinnati, L. & N. Ry. Co. v. City of Cincinnati, 62 Ohio St. 465, 57 N. E. 229, 49 L. R. A. 566.

MINSHALL, C. J., and WILLIAMS, BURKET, SPEAR, DAVIS, and SHAUCK, JJ.,

concur.

error. C. M. Vandenbark and S. M. Winn, for defendant in error.

PER CURIAM. Judgment affirmed. WILLIAMS, SPEAR, and SHAUCK, JJ.,

concur.

CLEVELAND CITY R. CO. v. CRONINBERGER. (No. 7,141.) (Supreme Court of Ohio. Dec. 17, 1901.) Error to circuit court, Cuyahoga county. Squire, Sanders & Dempsey, for plaintiff in error. Noble, Pinney & Willard, for defendant in error.

PER CURIAM. Judgment of the circuit court and that of the common pleas reversed, and petition for new trial dismissed.

MINSHALL, C. J., and WILLIAMS, BURKET, SPEAR, DAVIS, and SHAUCK, JJ.,

CITY OF ZANESVILLE v. MARTIN. (No. 6,466.) (Supreme Court of Ohio. Nov. 26, 1901.) Error to circuit court, Muskingum county. Charles G. Grifiths, City Sol., C. A. Maxwell, and A. J. Andrews, for plaintiff in

DONOHUE et al. v. BLAIR BRICK CO. et al. (No. 6,587.) (Supreme Court of Ohio. Dec. 3, 1901.) Error to circuit court, Hamilton county. E. R. Donohue and C. Hammond Av

DUHME et al. v. MEHNER et al. (No. 6,624.) (Supreme Court of Ohio. Dec. 10, 1901.) Error to circuit court, Hamilton county. John J. Glidden and John C. Healy, for plaintiffs in error. Follett, Kelley & Follett, Stephens & Lincoln, and Chris. Von Seggern, for defendants in error.

PER CURIAM. Judgment affirmed on the ground that the suit is barred by the statute of limitations, the evidence showing that all the parties, including the minor son, knew of the alleged fraud in the settlement for more than four years before the suit was brought, and for more than four years after the minor son became of age, and, furthermore, the equities seem to be with the defendants.

MINSHALL, C. J., and BURKET and DAVIS, JJ., concur.

ELDER et al. v. KINNANE. (No. 6,541.) (Supreme Court of Ohio. Dec. 17, 1901.) Error to circuit court, Clark county. Bowman & Bowman, for plaintiffs in error. James Johnson, Jr., for defendant in error.

PER CURIAM. Judgment affirmed. MINSHALL, C. J., and WILLIAMS and SPEAR, JJ., concur.

EMERINE v. ALCOTT HARDWARE CO. (No. 6,909.) (Supreme Court of Ohio. Dec. 10,

1901.) Error to circuit court, Seneca county. G. E. Seney and McCauley & Weller, for plaintiff in error. Dore & Dore, for defendant in

error.

PER CURIAM. Judgment affirmed. MINSHALL, C. J., and BURKET and DAVIS, JJ., concur.

ESMANN et al. v. ESMANN et al. (No. 6.594.) (Supreme Court of Ohio. Dec. 10, 1901.) Error to circuit court, Hamilton county. Denis F. Cash, for plaintiffs in error. John D. Dewitt and Foraker, Outcalt, Granger & Prior, for defendants in error.

PER CURIAM. Judgment affirmed. WILLIAMS, SPEAR, and SHAUCK, JJ.,

concur.

EVERETT v. CITY OF NEWARK. (No. 6,847.) (Supreme Court of Ohio. Feb. 4, 1902.) Error to circuit court, Licking county. Samuel M. Hunter, for plaintiff in error. T. B. Fulton, City Sol., for defendant in error.

PER CURIAM. Judgment affirmed. MINSHALL, C. J., and BURKET and DAVIS, JJ., concur.

EWING COAL & SALT CO. v. STATE ex rel. SHEETS, Atty. Gen. (No. 7,355.) (Supreme Court of Ohio. Dec. 17, 1901.) Er ror to circuit court, Franklin county. M. A. Daugherty, C. D. Martin, and George Ewing, for plaintiff in error. J. M. Sheets, Atty. Gen., T. J. Keating, and Gilbert H. Stewart, for defendant in error.

PER CURIAM. Judgment affirmed.

MINSHALL, C. J., and WILLIAMS, SPEAR, DAVIS, and SHAUCK, JJ., concur.

FALOON et al. v. SNYDER. (No. 7,282.) (Supreme Court of Ohio. Oct. 1, 1901.) Error to circuit court, Ottawa county. Charles E. Buroker and Hunt & De Ran, for plaintiffs in error. George A. True and Andrews Bros., for defendant in error.

PER CURIAM. Judgment affirmed. WILLIAMS, BURKET, SPEAR, DAVIS, and SHAUCK, JJ., concur.

FALOON et al. v. SNYDER et al. (No. 7,283.) (Supreme Court of Ohio. Oct. 1, 1901.) Error to circuit court, Ottawa county. Charles E. Buroker and Hunt & De Ran, for plaintiffs in error. George A. True and Andrews Bros., for defendants in error.

PER CURIAM. Judgment affirmed. WILLIAMS, BURKET, SPEAR, DAVIS, and SHAUCK, JJ., concur.

FARGO GASLIGHT & COKE CO. v. GREER. (No. 6,683.) (Supreme Court of Ohio. Jan. 14, 1902.) Error to circuit_court, Lucas county. James M. & Walter F. Brown, for plaintiff in error. W. S. Thurstin and Brown & Geddes, for defendant in error.

PER CURIAM. Judgment affirmed. WILLIAMS, BURKET, SPEAR, DAVIS, and SHAUCK, JJ., concur.

FELCH v. HODGMAN MFG. CO. et al. (No. 6,778.) (Supreme Court of Ohio. Jan. 28, 1902.) Error to circuit court, Erie county. King & Guerin and Charles L. Hubbard, for

plaintiff in error. H. L. Peeke and George E. Reiter, for defendants in error.

PER CURIAM. Judgment affirmed. MINSHALL, C. J., and BURKET and DAVIS, JJ., concur.

FENNER V. CITY OF CINCINNATI. (No. 7,473.) (Supreme Court of Ohio. Oct. 15, 1901.) Error to superior court, Cincinnati. Ellis G. Kinkead, H. K. Rogers, and Challen B. Ellis, for plaintiff in error. Charles J. Hunt, Charles W. Scott, and Frank F. Dinsmore, for defendant in error.

PER CURIAM. On consideration whereof, this court being of opinion that the act of April 26, 1898, entitled "An act supplementary to section 2293 of the Revised Statutes of Ohio" (93 Ohio Laws, p. 374), is unconstitutional, and that the superior court at general term erred in reversing the judgment of that court in special term, it is ordered and adjudged that on the ground above stated the judgment of said superior court at general term be, and the same is hereby, reversed; and, proceeding to render the judgment which said court at general term should have rendered, it is ordered and adjudged that the said judgment of said court at special term be, and the same is hereby, in all things affirmed.

BURKET, SPEAR, DAVIS, and SHAUCK, JJ., concur. MINSHALL, C. J., and WILLIAMS, J., dissent.

28, 1902.) Error to circuit court, Huron_coun ty. C. L. Kennan and C. P. & L. W. Wickham, for plaintiffs in error. Harmon, Colston, Goldsmith & Hoadly, J. H. Collins, and W. Severance, for defendants in error.

PER CURIAM. Judgment affirmed. BURKET, DAVIS, and SHAUCK, JJ., con

cur.

GOODRICH et al. v. MASON. (No. 6,469.) (Supreme Court of Ohio. Nov. 26, 1901.) Error to circuit court, Lorain county. W. B. Bedortha and E. G. Johnson, for plaintiffs in error. N. L. Johnson, for defendant in error. PER CURIAM. Judgment affirmed. WILLIAMS, SPEAR, and SHAUCK, JJ.,

concur.

GORDAN v. PONTIUS. (No. 7.065.) (Supreme Court of Ohio. June 25, 1901.) Error to circuit court, Wyandot county. L. K. Powell, J. W. Barry, H. H. Newell, and W. R. Hare, for plaintiff in error. D. D. Clayton, for defendant in error.

PER CURIAM. Judgment affirmed.

MINSHALL, C. J., and WILLIAMS, BURKET, SPEAR, DAVIS, and SHAUCK, JJ.,

concur.

GUTHRIE v. GUTHRIE. (No. 7,352.) (Supreme Court of Ohio. Oct. 29, 1901.) Error to circuit court, Tuscarawas county. M. V. Ream, for plaintiff in error. P. S. Olmstead, for defendant in error.

PER CURIAM. Judgment affirmed.

MINSHALL, C. J., and BURKET and DAVIS, JJ., concur.

HALLETT v. CURTIS et al. (No. 7,179.) (Supreme Court of Ohio. Dec. 17, 1901.) Error to circuit court, Fulton county. Handy & Unverferth and Fuller & Handy, for plaintiff in error. Frank B. Geer, Files & Emerling, and Ham, Ham & Ham, for defendants in er

ror.

PER CURIAM. Judgment affirmed. MINSHALL, C. J., and WILLIAMS, BURKET, SPEAR, and SHAUCK, JJ., concur.

H. B. CLAFLIN CO. v. FRIEND et al. (No. 6,509.) (Supreme Court of Ohio. Nov. 26, 1901.) Error to circuit court, Seneca county. McCauley & Weller, for plaintiff in error. Jessee Stephens, A. J. Stackhouse, Charles A. Strauch, J. M. Bever, J. C. Royer, and John Bender, for defendants in error.

PER CURIAM. Judgment affirmed. MINSHALL, C. J., and BURKET and DAVIS, JJ., concur.

HILL V. STATE. (No. 7,389.) (Supreme Court of Ohio. June 25, 1901.) Error to circuit court. Wyandot county. Finley & Gallinger and Wright & Leuthold, for plaintiff in error. Benjamin Meck, Pros. Atty., for the State.

PER CURIAM. Judgment affirmed. MINSHALL, C. J., and WILLIAMS and BURKET, JJ., concur.

HOOD et al. v. THOMSON et al. (No. 7.135.) (Supreme Court of Ohio. Dec. 3, 1901.) Error to circuit court, Hardin county. Johnson & Johnson and S. T. Armstrong, for