The Critical Response to Arthur Miller
Presenting roughly sixty year's worth of Miller scholarship, Centola and Cirulli offer a wide range of interpretations and critical responses to the playwright's work. Incorporating insights from several disciplines including, but not limited to, philosophy, psychology, and sociology, this work also contains discussions of his work in light of new understandings discovered through considerations of cultural contexts, performance issues, feminist concerns, as well as deconstructionist and postmodernist redefinitions of the textuality of Miller's writing. Bearing witness to the enduring value of Miller's work and the relevance of his artistic vision, this body of critical essays reveals why the writer's influence has been so widespread. Adept at dramatic experimentation, Miller succeeded in inspiring the work not only of American playwrights but also that of dramatists around the world. |
Αναζήτηση στο βιβλίο
Αποτελέσματα 1 - 3 από τα 64.
... William R. Brashear , in “ The Empty Bench : Morality , Tragedy and Arthur Miller , ” Michigan Quarterly Review 5 ( Fall 1966 ) : 270-78 , argues that Miller's emphasis on morality limits his ability to create tragedies .
Talk can create something , Miller says , but he does so not by insisting but by putting the creation on stage , by doing the job dramatically . The relationship between Victor and Solomon , whatever it is ( at the end of the play ...
John Peter also talks of Lyman's “ lethal duality : he is the maker who wants to create and belong but also the cynic who needs to undermine and rebel ” and one can view the play as having this same ambivalence .
Τι λένε οι χρήστες - Σύνταξη κριτικής
Περιεχόμενα
Early Response to 1959 | 25 |
Criticism 19601969 | 45 |
Arthur Miller and the Tradition of Tragedy | 51 |
Πνευματικά δικαιώματα | |
26 άλλες ενότητες δεν εμφανίζονται