The Critical Response to Arthur Miller
Presenting roughly sixty year's worth of Miller scholarship, Centola and Cirulli offer a wide range of interpretations and critical responses to the playwright's work. Incorporating insights from several disciplines including, but not limited to, philosophy, psychology, and sociology, this work also contains discussions of his work in light of new understandings discovered through considerations of cultural contexts, performance issues, feminist concerns, as well as deconstructionist and postmodernist redefinitions of the textuality of Miller's writing. Bearing witness to the enduring value of Miller's work and the relevance of his artistic vision, this body of critical essays reveals why the writer's influence has been so widespread. Adept at dramatic experimentation, Miller succeeded in inspiring the work not only of American playwrights but also that of dramatists around the world. |
Αναζήτηση στο βιβλίο
Αποτελέσματα 1 - 3 από τα 57.
Birgitta Steen describes the play as badly adapted Strindberg : “ Arthur Miller's After the Fall : A Strindbergian Failure , ” Moderna Sprak 58.4 ( 1964 ) : 446-52 ; in contrast , Philip Bottman sees the play as reflecting a shift from ...
... and she cites his lack of trust , describing him as a man who cannot “ bear to work along with other human beings ... and describes her husband as a truly isolated figure with no community to which he can naturally belong and from ...
Kelly describes the whole play as " a balancing act between hope and despair " ( 41 ) . Once the need for that balance has been understood , it becomes a little easier to cope with the tribulations of life . Howard Kissel sees something ...
Τι λένε οι χρήστες - Σύνταξη κριτικής
Περιεχόμενα
Early Response to 1959 | 25 |
Criticism 19601969 | 45 |
Arthur Miller and the Tradition of Tragedy | 51 |
Πνευματικά δικαιώματα | |
26 άλλες ενότητες δεν εμφανίζονται