The Critical Response to Arthur Miller
Presenting roughly sixty year's worth of Miller scholarship, Centola and Cirulli offer a wide range of interpretations and critical responses to the playwright's work. Incorporating insights from several disciplines including, but not limited to, philosophy, psychology, and sociology, this work also contains discussions of his work in light of new understandings discovered through considerations of cultural contexts, performance issues, feminist concerns, as well as deconstructionist and postmodernist redefinitions of the textuality of Miller's writing.
Bearing witness to the enduring value of Miller's work and the relevance of his artistic vision, this body of critical essays reveals why the writer's influence has been so widespread. Adept at dramatic experimentation, Miller succeeded in inspiring the work not only of American playwrights but also that of dramatists around the world.
Αναζήτηση στο βιβλίο
Αποτελέσματα 1 - 3 από τα 88.
( “ Language ” 94 ) This “ split vision ” provides a key to every Miller play from All My Sons through Broken Glass . It's a vision , moreover , that defines the private condition of the individual while simultaneously outlining the ...
However , few studies explore how the poetic language of the play supports Miller's social and political concerns . In The Crucible , Arthur Miller uses figurative language — images , symbols , metaphors — indigenous to the society of ...
John Prudhoe in “ Arthur Miller and the Tradition of Tragedy " notes how the characters use Biblical imagery in their language because “ a large context of traditional beliefs gives meaning to their words . ” However , Stephen Fender in ...
Τι λένε οι χρήστες - Σύνταξη κριτικής
Early Response to 1959
Arthur Miller and the Tradition of Tragedy
26 άλλες ενότητες δεν εμφανίζονται