Wallbridge v. Becket, 192. Walter v. Molsons Bank, 231, 3. Walters v. Neary, 25, 204. Walton v. Mascall, 261, 269, 293. Walwyn v. St. Quintin, xliii. Wante v. Robinson, 380. Ward v. Evans, 333. Ward v. National Bank of N. Z., 363. Ward v. Royal Canadians Ins. Co., 57. Warrington v. Early, 366, 370. Warwick v. Rogers, 344, 365. Washington Bank v. Krum, 178. Waterous Engine Co. v. McLean, 368. Watkin v. Lamb, 102. Watkins v. Maule, 204. Watson v. Evans, 62. Watson v. Harvey, 320. Watson v. Porter, 352. Watson v. Russell, 182, 196. Watson v. Tarpley, 246. Watters v. Lordley, 260. Waters v. Reiffenstein, 251, Webb v. Alexandria Water Co., 463. Webb v. Herne Bay Com'rs, 460. Wells v. McCarthy, 320. Wells v. Whitehead, 382. Wesleyan Seminary v. Fisher, 171. West v. Bown, 67, 78, 321. West v. MacInnes, 222. Westaway v. Stewart, 265, 266. Westfall v. Braley, 334. Westfield Bank v. Cornen, 153. West London Bank v. Kitson, 139, 159, White v. sabiston, 338. White v. Smith, 93. White v. Stoddard, 272, 287. White v. Tyndall, 442. White v. Wells, 326. Whitehead v. Walker, 222, 246, 268, 351. Whitley v. Pinkerton, 266. Wiffen v. Roberts, 125, 250. Wiesinger v. First Nat. Bank, 265. Wiggins v. Bellve, 291. Wilcocks v. Tinning, 321. Wilcox v. Wilcox, 8. Wilder v. Wolf, 420. Wilders v. Stevens, 210, 226, 321. Wiley v. Ledyard, 439. Wilkes v. Skinner, 190. Wilkins v. Jadis, 240, 251. Winkinson v. Johnson, 213, 365. Wilkinson v. Lutwidge, 109. Wilkinson v. Unwin, 226, 321. Willans v. Ayers, 87, 332. Willett v. Court, 210. Williams, Re, 195. Williams v. Bayley, 189. Williams v. Cady, 463. Williams v. Galt, 24. Williams v. Germaine, 289, 374. Williams v. James, 229. Williams v. Noxon, 77. Williams v. Shadbolt, 215, 216. Williams v. Williams, lii. Willis v. Bank of England, 183. Willis v. Green, 252, 273. Wilson v. Aitkin, 117. Wilson v. Banque Ville Marie, 410. Wilson v. Demers, 349. Wilson v. Gates, 437. Wilson v. Holmes, 215. Wilson v. McQueen, 215. Wilson v. Pringle, 271, 284. Wilson v. Swabey, 281. Wiltshire v. Surrey, 460. Windham Bank v. Norton, 257, 258, 287. Wirth v. Austin, 259. Wise v. Charlton, 438. Wiseman v. Easton, 325. Withall v. Ruston, 195. Wiitherow v. Slayback, 96. Witte v. Derby Fishing Co., 162. Witte v. Williams, 61. Wolke v. Kuhne, 454. Wolverhampton Co., Ex parte, 189. Wood v. Connop. 229. Wood v. Higginbotham, 59. Wood v. Ross, 175, 222, 343. Wood v. Shaw, 58, 154, 168, 185. Wood v. Stephenson, 402, 408. Woodbridge v. Brigham, 450. Woodbridge v. Spooner, 47. Woodcock v. Houldsworth, 286. Woodland v. Fear. 334, 419. Woods v. Dean, 290. Woodthrope v. Lawes, 272. Woodward v. Pell, 226. Woodworth v. Bank of America, 452. Wordsworth v. McDougall, 210, 321. Y. Yates, Ex parte, 205. Yglesias v. River Plate Bank, 364. Yorkshire Banking Co. v. Beatson, 326. Young v. Austen, 47, 48. Young v. Fluke, 95, 330. Young v. Glover, 26, 110, 205. Z. Zampino v. Blanchieri, 437. CASES OVERRULED, QUESTIONED OR DISTINGUISHED. Where a case is in whole or in part in conflict with a provision of the Bills of Exchange Act, the section of the Act alone is given, even when the case may have been previously overruled or overridden by legislation prior to the Act. Agricultural Assn. v. Federal Bank, 6 Ont. A. R. 192 (1881), overruled in part by Bank of England v. Vagliano [1891], A. C. 107. Allen v. Kemble, 6 Moore P. C. 314 (1848), qualified in Rouquette v. Overmann, L. R. 10 Q. B. 540 (1875). Armstrong v. Hemstreet, 22 O. R. 336 (1892), overruled by Davidson v. Fraser, 28 S. C. Can. 272 (1897). Arthur v. Clarkson, 35 Beav. 458 (1865), disapproved in Re Whitaker, 42 Ch. D. at p. 125 (1889). Bacon v. Searles, 1 H. Bl. 88 (1788), overruled by Jones v. Broadhurst, 9 C. B. at p. 185 (1850). Balloch v. Binney, 5 N. B. (3 Kerr) 440 (1847). Contra, s. 104. Banbury v. Lisset, 2 Stra. 1211 (1774), overruled by Griffin v. Weatherby, L. R. 3 Q. B. at p. 759 (1868). Bank of Bengal v. Fagan, 5 Moore Ind. App. 40 (1849), distinguished in Jonmenjoy v. Watson, 9 App. Cas. at p. 568 (1884). Bank of Bengal v. McLeod, 7 Moore P. C. 35 (1849), distinguished in Jonmenjoy v. Watson, 9 App. Cas. at p. 567 (1884). Bank of Michigan v. Gray, 1 U. C. Q. B. 422 (1841). Contra, s. 97 (d). Bank of Montreal v. Langlois, 3 Rev. de Lég. 88 (1847). Contra, s. 62. Bank of U. C. v. Parsons, 3 U. C. Q. B. 383 (1846). Contra, s. 88 (a). Banque du Peuple v. Ethier, 1 R. L. 47 (1869). Contra, s. 22 (1). Bartrum v. Caddy, 9 A. & E. 275 (1838), distinguished in Glasscock v. Balls, 24 Q. B. D. 13 (1889). Baxter v. Bruneau, 17 R. L. 359 (1889). Contra, s. 57. Bell v. Moffat, 20 N. B. (4 P. & B.) 121 (1880). Contra, s. 131. Berton v. Central Bank, 10 N. B. (5 Allen) 493 (1863). Contra, s. 36. Bettis v. Weller, 30 U. C. Q. B. 23 (1870), overruled by Third Nat. Bank v. Cosby, 40 U. C. Q. B. 69 (1878). Bickerdike v. Bollman, 1 T. R. 405 (1786), criticized in Carter v. Flower, 16 M. & W. at p. 748 (1847). Boulton v. Welsh, 3 Bing. N. C. 688 (1837), overruled by Lewis v. Gompertz, 6 M. & W. at p. 403 (1840). Boutin, In re, Q. B. 12 S. C. 186 (1897), overruled by Denenberg v. Mendelssohn, Q. R. 23 S. C. 128 (1903). Brook v. Hook, L. R. 6 Ex. 89 (1871), said to be overruled in part by McKenzie v. British Linen Co., 6 App. Cas. 82 (1881), per Strong, C.J., in Scott v. Bank of N. B., 23 S. C. Can. at p. 283. Brown v. Davies, 3 T. R. 80 (1789), overruled by Ex parte Swan, L. R. 6 Eq. 358 (1868). Brown v. Nat. Bank of India, 18 T. L. R. 669 (1902), criticized in Capital & Counties Bank v. Gordon [1903] A. C. 240. Brown v. Philpot, 2 M. & Rob. 285 (1840), overruled by Smith v. Braine, 16 Q. B. at p. 254 (1851). Brunet v. Lalonde, 16 L. C. R. 347 (1866). Contra, Aurèle v. Durocher, 5 R. L. 165 (1873). Callaghan v. Aylett, 2 Camp. 549 (1810), overruled by Fenton v. Goundry, 13 East, 459 (1811). Camidge v. Allenby, 6 B. & C. 373 (1827), distinguished in Leeds Bank v. Walker, 11 Q. B. D. at p. 88 (1883). Canadian Investment Co. v. Brown, 19 R. L. 364 (1890). Contra, s. 146. Castrique v. Buttigieg, 10 Moore P. C. 94 (1855), explained in Abrey v. Crux, L. R. 5 C. P. 42 (1869). Catton v. Simpson, 8 A. & E. 136 (1838), overruled in Aldous v. Cornwell, L. R. 3 Q. B. at p. 578 (1868). Cazet v. Kirk, 9 N. B. (4 Allen) 543 (1860). Contra, s. 28 (d). Coles v. Bank of England, 10 A. & E. 437 (1839), questioned in Baxendale v. Bennett, 3 Q. B. D. at p. 534 (1878). Commercial Bank v. Johnston, 2 U. C. Q. B. 126 (1845). Contra, s. 88 (a). Coutu v. Rafferty, M. L. R. 7 S. C. 146 (1891). Contra, s. 131. London & County Bank v. River Plate Bank, 20 Q. B. D. DeBerdt v. Atkinson, 2 H. Bl. 336 (1794), overruled by Maltass v. Siddle, 6 C. B. N. S. 494 (1859). Dechantal v. Pominville, 6 L. C. J. 88 (1860), overruled. See Cleroux v. Pigeon, 32 L. C. J. 236 (1888). Delaney v. Hall, 3 N. S. (2 Thom.) 401 (1858). Contra, s. 98. Dingwall v. Dunster, 1 Dougl. 247 (1779). Contra, s.142. Down v. Halling, 4 B. & C. 330 (1825), dissented from in Bank of Bengal v. Macleod, 5 Moore, Indian Appeals, 1 (1849); distinguished in London & County Bank v. Groome, 8 Q. B. D. 288 (1881). Dupuis v. Marsan, 17 L. C. J. 42 (1872). Contra, s. 61. Exchange Bank v. Quebec Bank, M. L. R. 6 S. C. 10 (1890). Contra, s. 69. Fahnestock v. Palmer, 20 U. C. Q. B. 307 (1860). Contra, s. 28 (d). Fisken v. Meehan, 40 U. C. Q. B. 146 (1876), overruled by Macdonald v.. Whitfield, 8 App. Cas. 733 (1883). Foster v. Dawber, 6 Ex. 839 (1851). Contra, s. 142. Frith v. Forbes, 4 De G. F. & J. 409 (1863), overruled in Brown v. Kough, 29 Ch. D. 848 (1885). Fyfe v. Boyce, 21 R. L. 4 (1891). Contra, s. 131. Gill v. Cubitt, 3 B. & C. 466 (1824), dissented from in Bank of Bengal v. Macleod, 5 Moore, Ind. App. 1 (1849); held overruled in London and County Bank v. Groome, 8 Q. B. D. 288 (1881). Girvin v. Burke, 19 O. R. 204 (1890). Contra, s. 14. Goodwin v. Robarts, 10 Ex. 337 (1875), and 1 App. Cas. 476 (1876), distinguished in London and County Bank v. River Plate Bank, 20 Q. B. D. 241 (1887); criticized in Easton v. London Joint Stock Bank, 34 Ch. D. 95 (1886); discussed in Sheffield v. London Joint Stock Bank, 13 App. Cas. at p. 342 (1888). Graham, Ex parte, 5 De G. M. & G. 356 (1856), overruled by Oriental Corporation v. Overend, L. R. 7 Ch. at p. 152 (1871). Grant v. Young, 23 U. C. Q. B. 307 (1860). Contra, s. 28 (d). Hall v. Smith, 1 B. & C. 407 (1823), overruled by Ex parte Buckley, 14 M. & W. 469 (1845). Hansard v. Robinson, 7 B. & C. 90 (1827), not followed in Wright v. Lord Maidstone, 1 K. & J. 701 (1855). Harris v. Benson, 2 Str. 910 (1713), overruled by Lumley v. Palmer, 2 Str. 1000 (1734); Windle v. Andrews, 2 B. & A. 699, 700 (1819). Harvey v. Bank of Hamilton, 16 S. C. Can. 714 (1888). Contra, s. 22 (1). Harvey v. Cane, 34 L. T. N. S. 64 (1876), questioned in Hogarth v. Latham, 3 Q. B. D. 651 (1878). |