Heath v. Sanson, 2 B. & Ad. 291 (1831), questioned in Smith v. Braine, 16 Q. B. 244 (1851). Herdman v. Wheeler, [1902] 1 K. B. 36, questioned in Lloyds Bank v. Cooke, [1907] 1 K. B. 361. Hindhaugh v. Blakey, 3 C. P. D. 136 (1878), overruled by Steele v. McKinlay, 5 App. Cas. 785 (1880). See s. 36. Howland v. Jennings, 11 U. C. C. P. 272 (1861), overruled by St. John Rykert, 10 S. C. Can. 278 (1884). Ianson v. Paxton, 23 U. C. C. P. 439 (1874)), overruled by Macdonald v. Whitfield, 8 App. Cas. 733 (1883). Ingham v. Primrose, 7 C. B. N. S. 82 (1859), dissented from in Baxendale v. Bennett, 3 Q. B. D. 532 (1878). Jenks v. Doran, 5 Ont. A. R. 558 (1880). Contra, s. 40 (2). Jones v. Broadhurst, 9 C. B. 173 (1850), qualified in Cook v. Lister, 13 C. B. N. S. 543 (1863); discussed in Thornton v. Maynard, L. R. 10 C. P. 698 (1875); questioned in Solomon v. Davis, 1 C. & E. 83 (1883). Jones v. Goudie, 2 Rev. de Lég, 334 (1820). Contra, s. 36 (a). Jones v. Hart, 2 Rev. de Lég. 58 (1819), overruled. See p. 50. Jones v. Lane, 3 Y. & C. 281 (1839), overruled by Deuters v. Townsend, 5 B. & S. 613 (1864). Jones v. Whitty, 6 L. C. R. 191 (1859). Contra, s. 22 (1). Keates v. Whieldon, 8 B. & C. 7 (1828), overruled by Cheetham v. Butler, 5 B. & Ad. 837 (1833). Keene v. Beard, 8 C. B. N. S. 372 (1860), qualified in Hopkinson v. Forster, L. R. 19 Eq. 76 (1874). King v. Kemp, 8 L. T. 255 (1863), overruled by Moulis v. Owen, [1907] 1 K. B. 746. Kirk v. Blurton, 9 M. & W. 284 (1841), questioned in Forbes v. Marshall, 11 Ex. at p. 180 (1855); distinguished in Odell v. Cormack, 19 Q. B. D. 223 (1887). Kirkwood v. Smith, [1896] 1 Q. B. 582, overruled by Kirkwood v. Carroll, [1903] 1 K. B. 531. Lagueux v. Cassault, 2 Rev. de Lég. 28 (1813), overruled. See p. 50. Lagueux v. Everett, 1 Rev. de Lég. 510 (1817). Contra, s. 36 (a). Lambert, Ex parte, 13 Ves. 179 (1794), overruled in Ex parte Swan, L. R. 6 Eq. 358 (1868). Latour v. Gauthier, 2 L. C. L. J. 109 (1866). Contra, s. 131. Lebel v. Tucker, L. R. 3 Q. B. 77 (1867), questioned in Alcock v. Smith, [1892] 1 Ch. at p. 257. Lewis v. Clay, 67 L. J. Q. B. 224 (1897), questioned in Herdman v. Wheeler, [1902] 1 K. B. at p. 371. Lloyd v. Chune, 2 Giffard, 441 (1860), criticized in Re Whitaker 42 Ch. D. 125 (1889). McCorkill v. Barrabé, M. L. R. 1 S. C. 319 (1885). Contra, s. 22 (1). McDonell v. Holgate, 2 Rev. de Lég. 29 (1818). See p. 52. McPhee v. McPhee, 19 O. R. 603 (1890), overruled by Robertson v. Lonsdale, 21 O. R. 600 (1892). Marler v. Molsons Bank, 23 L. C. J. 293 (1879). Contra, s. 127. Merchants' Bank v. Spinney, 13 N. S. (1 R. & G.) 87 (1879). Contra, s. 122 and Schedule. Merchants' Benk v. Stirling, 13 N. S. (1 R. & G.) 439 (1880). Contra, s. 146. Merritt v. Maxwell, 14 U. C. Q. B. 50 (1886). Contra, s. 5. Montgomery v. Boucher, 14 U. C. C. P. 45 (1864), overruled by St. John v. Rykert, 10 S. C. Can. 278 (1884). Musgrave v. Drake, 5 Q. B. 185 (1843), dissented from in Hogg v. Skeen, 18 C. B. N. S. 426 (1865). Napier v. Schneider, 12 East, 420 (1810), held overruled in Re Narbonne v. Tetreau, 9 L. C. J. 80 (1863). Contra, s. 131. Owen v. Van Uster, 10 C. B. 318 (1850), distinguished in Re Palmer v. Fahenstock, 9 U. C. C. P. 172 (1859). Contra, s. 28 (d). Pariseau v. Ouellet, M. C. R. 69 (1850). Contra, s. 131. Parry v. Nicholson, 13 M. & W. 778 (1845), doubted in Hirschmann v. Budd, L. R. 8 Ex. 172 (1873). Partridge v. Bank of England, 9 Q. B. 396 (1846), criticized in Goodwin v. Robarts, L. R. 10 Ex. 354 (1875). Paterson v. Hardacre, 4 Taunt. 114 (1811), overruled by Bailey v. Bidwell, 13 M. & W. 73 (1844). Paterson v. Pain, 1 L. C. R. 210 (1851). Contra, s. 131. Piers v. Hall, 18 N. B. (2 P. & B.) 34 (1878). Contra, s. 131. Pike v. Street, Moo. & M. 226 (1828), dissented from in Smith v. Squires, 13 Man. 360 (1901). Powell v. Ford, 2 Stark, 164 (1817), disapproved of in Lewis v. Sapio, M. & M. 39 (1827). Pratt v. Macdougall, 12 L. C. J. 243 (1868). Contra, s. 131. Rea v. Meggott, Cas. temp. Hardw. 77 (1730), overruled by Lumley v. Palmer, 2 Str. 1000 (1734); Windle v. Andrews, 2 B. & A. at pp. 699, 701 (1819). Regina v. Hawkes, 2 Moody, C. C. 60 (1840), overruled by Peto v. Reynolds, 9 Ex. 415 (1854). Richards, Re, Shenstone v. Brock, 36 Ch. D. 541 (1887), criticized in Re Whitaker, 42 Ch. D. at p. 125 (1889). Richardson v. Daniels, 5 U. C. O. S. 671 (1838). Contra, 75 (2). Rivet v. Leonard, 1 L. C. J. 172 (1848). Contra, Badeau v. Brault, 1 L. C. J. 171 (1857); Danziger v. Ritchie, 8 L. C. J. 103 (1864). Robarts v. Tucker, 16 Q. B. 560 (1851), distinguished in Bank of England v. Vagliano, [1891] A. C. at p. 117. Robertson v. Kensington, 4 Taunt. 30 (1811). Contra, s. 75 (2). Rothschild v. Corney, 9 B. & C. 388 (1829), distinguished in Lon don and County Bank v. Groome, 8 Q. B. D. 288 (1881). Rothschild v. Currie, 1 Q. B. 43 (1841), questioned in Allen v. Kemble, 6 Moore P. C. 323 (1848); explained and qualified in Horne v. Rouquette, 3 Q. B. D. 521, 523 (1878). Contra, 1 & 2 Geo. IV. c. Rowe v. Young, 2 B. & B. 165 (1820). 78 (Imp.) and s. 38 (4). Savage v. Aldren, 2 Stark. 232 (1817). Contra, s. 75 (2). (d). Contra, s. 28 Scholey v. Walsby, Peake N. P. C. 34 (1797), doubted in Phillips v. Warren, 14 M. & W. 380 (1845). Seymour v. Wright, 3 L. C. R. 454 (1852), overruled by Mitchell v. Browne, 9 L. C. J. 168 (1865). Shellard, Ex parte, L. R. 17 Eq. 109 (1873), disapproved of in Buck v. Robson, 3 Q. B. D. 689 (1878). Shepherd v. Harrison, L. R. 5 H. L. 116 (1871), distinguished in Ex parte Banner, 2 Ch. D. 278 (1875). Sibree v. Tripp, 15 M. & W. 23 (1846), distinguished in Foakes v. v. Beer, 9 App. Cas. at p. 613 (1884). Singer v. Elliott, 4 T. L. R. 524 (1888), disapproved of in Robinson v. Mann, 31 S. C. Can. 484 (1901). Solarte v. Palmer, 1 Bing. N. C. 194 (1834), criticized in Everard v. Watson, 1 E. & B. 804 (1853); qualified in Paul v. Joel, 3 H. & N. at p. 459 (1858). Steele v. McKinlay, 5 App. Cas. 754 (1880), distinguished in Wilkinson v. Unwin, 7 Q. B. D. 636 (1881); in Holmes v. Durkee, 1 C. & E. 25 (1883); and in Macdonald v. Whitfield, 8 App. Cas. 733 (1888). Stoessiger v. South Eastern Railway, 3 E. & B. 549 (1854), distinguished in Reg. v. Bowerman, [1891] 1 Q. B. 112, 115. Strange v. Price, 10 A. & E. 125 (1839), overruled by Paul v. Joel, 3 H. & N. 459 (1858). Strathy v. Nicholls, 1 U. C. Q. B. 32 (1844), overruled by Muir v. Cameron, 10 ibid. 356 (1852). Strong v. Foster, 17 C. B. 201 (1855), dissented from in Ewin v. Lancaster, 6 B. & S. at p. 576 (1865). Swinyard v. Bowles, 5 M. & S. 62 (1816), distinguished in Camidge v. Allenby, 6 B. & C. 383 (1827). Tindal v. Brown, 1 T. R. 167 (1786), overruled in Chapman v. Keane, 3 A. & E. 197 (1835). Tinson v. Francis, 1 Camp. 19 (1807), dissented from in Ex parte Swan, L. R. 6 Eq. 358 (1868). Trimbey v. Vignier, 1 Bing. N. C. 151 (1834), not followed in Bradlaugh v. De Rin, L. R. 5 C. P. 473 (1870). Trimingham v. Maud, L. R. 7 Eq. 201 (1868), disapproved in Ex parte Gomez, L. R. 10 Ch. at p. 647 (1875). Walker v. Barnes, 5 Taunt. 240 (1813), dissented from in Siggers v. Lewis, 1 Cr. M. & R. 370 (1834). Walwyn v. St. Quintin, 1 B. & P. 652 (1797), overruled in Cory v. - Scott, 3 B. & Ald. 622 (1820). Warrington v. Furbor, 8 East, 242 (1807), distinguished in Camidge v. Allenby, 6 B. & C. 373 (1827). West v. Bown, 3 U. C. Q. B. 290 (1846). Wood v. Young, 14 U. C. C. P. 250 (1864). Contra, s. 22 (1). Contra, s. 142. Contra, s. 28 (d). Woolsey v. Crawford, 2 Camp. 445 (1810), held overruled in Re General South American Co., 7 Ch. D. 644 (1877). Young v. Grote, 4 Bing. 253 (1827), questioned in Baxendale v. Bennett, 3 Q. B. D. at p. 534 (1878); overruled by Scholfield v. Londesborough, [1896] A. C. 514, and Imperial Bank v. Bank of Hamilton, [1903] A. C. 49. See Halsbury's Laws of England, vol. 3, p. 556, note (n). |