Εικόνες σελίδας
PDF
Ηλεκτρ. έκδοση

loss that the country daily sustains from the existing state of uncertainty. It directly and powerfully tends to unsettle and paralyze business, to weaken public and private credit, and to create apprehensions in the minds of the people that disturb the peaceful tenor of their ways and mar their happiness. It does far more: it tends to bring republican institutions into discredit, and to create doubts of the success of our form of government, and of the perpetuity of the Republic. All considerations of interest, of patriotism, and of justice unite in demanding of the law-making power a measure that will bring peace and prosperity to the country, and show that our republican institutions are equal to any emergency. And in this connection we cannot refrain from the expression of our satisfaction that your committees, composed of equal numbers of opposing parties, have fortunately been able to do what has been attempted in vain heretofore, almost unanimously agree upon a plan considered by them all to be just, wise, and efficient. We accordingly recommend the proposed act to the patriotic and just judgment of Congress.

beginning with the letter A; and said tellers, having then read the same in the presence and hearing of the two houses, shall make a list of the votes as they shall appear from the said certificates; and the votes having been ascertained and counted as in this act provided, the result of the same shall be delivered to the President of the Senate, who shall thereupon announce the state of the vote, and the names of the persons, if any, elected, which announcement shall be deemed a sufficient declaration of the persons elected President and Vice President of the United States, and, together with a list of the votes, be entered on the Journals of the two houses. Upon such reading of any such certificates or paper when there shall be only one return from a State, the President of the Senate shall call for objections, if any. Every objection shall be made in writing, and shall state clearly and concisely, and without argument, the ground thereof, and shall be signed by at least one Senator and one Member of the House of Representatives before the same shall be received. When all objections so made to any vote or paper from a State shall have been received and read, the Senate shall thereupon withdraw, and such objections shall be submitted to the Senate for its decision; and the Speaker of the House of Representatives shall, in like manner, submit such objections to the House of Representatives Senate Committee. for its decision; and no electoral vote or

GEO. F. EDMUNDS,

FRED'K T. FRELINGHUYSEN,
ROSCOE CONKLING,
A. G. THURMAN,

T. F. BAYARD,

M. W. RANSOM,

H. B. PAYNE,

EPPA HUNTON,

ABRAM S. HEWITT,

WILLIAM M. SPRINGER,
GEO. W. MCCRARY,
GEO. F. HOAR,
GEORGE WILLARD,

House Committee.

THE BILL TO PROVIDE FOR AND REGU

LATE THE COUNTING OF THE VOTES.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the Senate and House of Representatives shall meet in the hall of the House of Representatives at the hour of one o'clock P. M. on the first Thursday in February, A. D. 1877; and the President of the Senate shall be their presiding officer. Two tellers shall be previously appointed on the part of the Senate and two on the part of the House of Representatives, to whom shall be handed, as they are opened by the President of the Senate, all the certificates and papers purporting to be certificates of the electoral votes, which certificates and papers shall be opened, presented, and acted upon in the alphabetical order of the States,

votes from any State from which but one return has been received shall be rejected except by the affirmative vote of the two houses. When the two houses have voted, they shall immediately again meet, and the presiding officer shall then announce the decision of the question submitted.

SEC. 2. That if more than one return or paper purporting to be a return from a State shall have been received by the President of the Senate, purporting to be the certificates of electoral votes given at the last preceding election for President and Vice President in such State, (unless they shall be duplicates of the same return,) all such returns and papers shall be opened by him in the presence of the two houses when met as aforesaid and read by the tellers, and all such returns and papers shall thereupon be submitted to the judgment and decision, as to which is the true and lawful electoral vote of such State, of a commission constituted as follows, namely:

During the session of each house on the Tuesday next preceding the first Thursday in February, 1877, each house shall, by viva voce vote, appoint five of its members, who, with the five Associate Judges of the Supreme Court of the United States, to be

ascertained as hereinafter provided, shall constitute a commission for the decision of all questions upon or in respect of such double returns named in this section.

On the Tuesday next preceding the first Thursday in February, A. D. 1877, or as soon thereafter as may be, the Associate Justices of the Supreme Court of the United States now assigned to the first, third, eighth and ninth circuits shall select, in such manner as a majority of them shall deem fit, another of the Associate Justices of said court, which five persons shall be members of said commission; and the person longest in commission of said five justices shall be the president of said commission. The members of said commission shall respectively take and subscribe the following oath:

"I,

do solemnly swear (or affirm, as the case may be) that I will impartially examine and consider all questions submitted to the commission of which I am a member, and a true judgment give thereon, agreeably to the Constitution and the laws; so help me God;" which oath shall be filed with the Secretary of the Senate.

When the commission shall have been thus organized, it shall not be in the power of either house to dissolve the same or to withdraw any of its members; but if any such Senator or Member shall die or become physically unable to perform the duties required by this act, the fact of such death or physical inability shall be by said commission, before it shall proceed further, communicated to the Senate or House of Representatives, as the case may be, which body shall immediately and without debate proceed by viva voce vote to fill the place so vacated, and the person so appointed shall take and subscribe the oath hereinbefore prescribed, and become a member of said commission; and, in like manner, if any of said justices of the Supreme Court shall die or become physically incapable of performing the duties required by this act, the other of said justices, members of the said commission, shall immediately appoint another justice of said court a member of said commission; and, in such appointments, regard shall be had to the impartiality and freedom from bias sought by the original appointments to said commission, who shall thereupon immediately take and subscribe the oath hereinbefore prescribed, and become a member of said commission to fill the vacancy so occasioned.

All the certificates and papers purporting to be certificates of the electoral votes of each State shall be opened, in the alphabetical order of the States, as provided in section 1 of this act; and when there shall be no more than one such certificate or

|

paper, as the certificates and papers from such State shall so be opened, (excepting duplicates of the same return,) they shall be read by the tellers, and thereupon the President of the Senate shall call for objections, if any. Every objection shall be made in writing, and shall state clearly and concisely, and without argument, the ground thereof, and shall be signed by at least one Senator and one member of the House of Representatives before the same shall be received. When all such objections so made to any certificate, vote, or paper from a State shall have been received and read, all such certificates, votes, and papers so objected to, and all papers accompanying the same, together with such objections, shall be forthwith submitted to said commission, which shall proceed to consider the same, with the same powers, if any, now possessed for that purpose by the two houses acting separately or together, and, by a majority of votes, decide whether any and what votes from such State are the votes provided for by the Constitution of the United States, and how many and what persons were duly appointed electors in such State, and may therein take into view such petitions, depositions, and other papers, if any, and shall, by the Constitution and now existing law, be competent and pertinent in such consideration; which decision shall be made in writing, stating briefly the ground thereof, and signed by the members of said commission agreeing therein; whereupon the two houses shall again meet, and such decision shall be read and entered in the Journal of each house, and the counting of the votes shall proceed in conformity therewith, unless, upon objection made thereto in writing by at least five Senators and five members of the House of Representatives, the two houses shall separately concur in ordering otherwise; in which case such concurrent order shall govern. No votes or papers from any other State shall be acted upon until the objections previously made to the votes or papers from any State shall have been finally disposed of.

SEC. 3. That while the two houses shall be in meeting, as provided in this act, no debate shall be allowed and no question shall be put by the presiding officer, except to either house on a motion to withdraw; and he shall have power to preserve order.

SEC. 4. That when the two houses separate to decide upon an objection that may have been made to the counting of an electoral vote or votes from any State, or upon objection to a report of said commission, or other question arising under this act, each Senator and Representative may speak to such objection or question ten

minutes, and not oftener than once; but after such debate shall have lasted two hours. it shall be the duty of each house to put the main question without further; debate.

[ocr errors]

member of the committee who did not agree to this bill. I have thought it proper that I should make a brief statement of the grounds on which I did not concur with my colleagues; but I am not well this SEC. 5. That at such joint meeting of morning and am unable to speak as I the two houses seats shall be provided as, should desire. Still, as the bill is about to follows: For the President of the Senate, come to a vote apparently, I will very the Speaker's chair; for the Speaker, im- | briefly state the reasons why I could not mediately upon his left; the Senators in give my assent to its being reported. the body of the hall upon the right of the presiding officer; for the Representatives, in the body of the hall not provided for the Senators; for the tellers, Secretary of the Senate, and Clerk of the House of Representatives, at the Clerk's desk; for¦ the other officers of the two houses, in front of the Clerk's desk and upon each | side of the Speaker's platform. Such joint ineetings shall not be dissolved until the count of electoral votes shall be completed and the result declared; and no recess shall be taken unless a question shall have arisen in regard to counting any such votes, or otherwise under this act; in which case it shall be competent for either house, acting separately, in the manner hereinbefore provided, to direct a recess of such house not beyond the next day, Sunday excepted, at the hour of ten o'clock in the forenoon. And while any question is being considered by said commission, either house may proceed with its legislative or other business.

SEC. 6. That nothing in this act shall be held to impair or affect any right now existing under the Constitution and laws to question, by proceeding in the judicial Courts of the United States, the right or title of the person who shall be declared elected, or who shall claim to be President or Vice President of the United States, if any such right exists.

This bill is presented for the considera-
tion of Congress under very peculiar cir-
cumstances. The Congress of the United
States is scarcely left free for its considera-
tion. We are aware that there is great un-
easiness in the public mind throughout the
country; apprehensions are entertained of
violence, of revolutionary action on the
part of the House of Representatives, of
some course being taken that may result iu
disturbing the peace of the country. A
member of Congress has said in a speech
in this city that 100,000 men would be here
on the 14th of February to witness the
counting of the votes. That may be re-
garded as an extravagant utterance, but it
is one of very many of the kind that come
up to us from different parts of the country,
so that the business interests of the coun-
try have become alarmed, and there is a
disposition to take almost any measure
that may be proposed that will give assur-
ance of peace without very much regard
to the character of the measure.
THE BILL A PRODUCT OF THE MISSIS-
SIPPI PLAN.

when I say that this bill is a literal product of I do not think I am at all out of the way of intimidation has entered this cham'the Mississippi plan;" that the shadow ber, and that in proposing this bill, and in the consideration of it, members of the SEC. 7. The said commission shall make Senate and of the House are acting under its own rules, keep a record of its proceed-revolutionary act that will threaten the the apprehension of violence, of some great ings, and shall have power to employ such persons as may be necessary for the transaction of its own business and the execution of its powers.

safety and continuance of our institutions.
I do not myself believe in the reality of
this danger. I believe that this sort of talk
is intended for a purpose, and I very much
fear that it will accomplish that purpose.

SENATOR MORTON'S SPEECH ON The real danger that we are in results from

THE BILL.

U. S. SENATE, January 22d. The PRESIDENT pro tempore. The morning hour has expired. The unfinished business is the bill (S. No. 1153) to provide for and regulate the counting of votes for President and Vice President, and the decision of questions arising thereon, for the term commencing March 4, A. D. 1877, which is before the Senate as in Committee of the Whole.

weakness, results from timidity, results
from not daring to stand up to do our whole
duty as we understand it.

It is said by geologists that there was a period in the history of the earth's crust when there were skull-less vertebrates; and it would seem now that we have come to that period when there are vertebrateless skulls. The thing to do is to do what is right, and to do it fearlessly. For one, I am not afraid that, if this vote shall be counted as it was for the first seventy-two Mr. MORTON. Mr. President, as the years in the history of our Government,

1

there will be any revolution; I believe that any one who attempts it will be utterly destroyed.

provided that the two houses should not go behind the returns so far as to count the votes for electors. I am not an advocate for State sovereignty; I never have been; but I have been a consistent advocate of State rights as I am now. The Constitution of the United States confers upon the State the power to appoint electors in such a way as the Legislatures of the States may prescribe. This is the absolute right of each State. The mode of appointment is left to the Legislature of the State. The determination as to who have been ap

I regard this bill, Mr. President, as a
compromise. It will take its place along-
side of the compromise of 1820, and the
compromise of 1850. By the compromise
of 1820, all the territory south of 36° 30′
was given over to slavery; and, when the
time came to settle the territory north of
that line, the compromise was destroyed.
By the compromise of 1850 the institution
of slavery got the immediate benefit of the
fugitive-slave law, which gave it such pres-pointed is left entirely to the State.
tige, power, and confidence as made it as-
pire to the complete conquest of the coun-
try.

HAYES ELECTED ACCORDING TO LAW
AND IN THE HEARTS OF THE PEOPLE.

I believe that Rutherford B. Hayes has been elected President of the United States; he has been elected under the forms of law and according to law, and that he is elected in the hearts of the people; and I believe that if he should be counted in, as eighteen Presidents were successively counted in from the beginning of this Government, he would be inaugurated and there would be no violence and no revolution.

Should Congress assume to determine who have been appointed so far as to go behind the action of officers of the State appointed by the laws of the State for that purpose, Congress would absorb to itself the entire power, would become a grand returning board, without limit and without restraint. The very moment we undertake to go behind the determination of the officers of the State as to the result of a State election and to count and determine the result for ourselves, that moment we establish a revolution which ultimately will be the end of Presidential elections. I am not now referring to the certificate of the Governor, which is prescribed not by State laws but prescribed by the act of Congress; but I am referring to that determination of the result of elections as prescribed by the laws of the States. The States have the right to appoint electors; the Legislature has the right to prescribe the method; and the evidence as to the appointment, as to who has been appointed, is left to the States as absolutely and as completely as the appointment itself.

There have been upon this question, a great many loose opinions given from time to time on the first impression, without examination, and perhaps most Senators have indulged in them, so that very few can entirely claim to be consistent. I have in dulged in them myself. But within the last few weeks this question has been presented as a case in hand, not simply as a matter speculative, something to come in I listened to the very able speech of the the future; and there has been a flood of Senator from Vermont [Mr. Edmunds] on light poured upon it such as had never been Saturday last with great interest. If I unbefore; many new things have been discov-derstood him correctly he assumed that ered, many things have been said, and we have the counsel of the best legal minds all over the country.

I brought forward a bill some two years ago, which was afterward reported by the Committee on Privileges and Elections, for the purpose of having a law for the counting of the electoral vote. I did not claim that that bill was perfect. It was not in view of any contingency or case. It, however, was in one respect a safe bill, and that is, leaving out of view who should count the vote, whether the President of the Senate or the two houses, it contained no word by which the two houses could be authorized to go behind the returns of a State, to go behind the decision made by the returning officers of the State appointed by the State for that purpose; and the bill of 1800, if I remember correctly, expressly

there was no provision of the Constitution that executes itself except one, and that is in regard to the recovery of fugitives from labor, fugitive slaves; that the rest of the provisions of the Constitution are not selfexecuting, but require legislation to carry them into operation. He made a distinction, I believe, which is correct, that there are two classes of powers conferred by the Constitution. Where a power is conferred directly upon any department of the Government by the Constitution, that power cannot be taken from that department; that power cannot be delegated; but where the Constitution simply imposes a duty, but does not vest any particular department with the performance of that duty, then Congress may by law determine who shall discharge that duty.

If I understood the Senator aright, he

took the ground that the counting of the votes was a duty imposed by the Constitution, but that the Constitution had not located it, had not said who should do it. He denied that the duty was imposed upon the President of the Senate. He said the President of the Senate was directed to open all the certificates, but he was not directed to count them. He was directed to open them "and the votes shall then be counted. The power and duty to count were not located in the two houses; the Constitution did not say that any more than it said the President of the Senate should count them. It said the votes should then be counted. Assuming, for the sake of the argument, his position to be true that there is nothing in the Constitution, any part of it, that indicates that the President of the Senate shall count the votes as well as open them; assuming it to be true that the Constitution simply imposes a duty to count the votes, but does not say by whom the duty shall be performed, and therefore that Congress is left free to impose the performance of that duty upon a commission and upon any person it sees proper to put in that situation, his position would be tenable. The Senator in applying that to this case made use of the following language :

"But, as I have said, I only intended on this occasion to explain in as brief a way as I could exactly what the bill is and in a general way the grounds upon which it rests. The illustrations that might be still further made to show that this deciding power of which I am speaking does not rest with you, and as I think to show equally that it does not rest with either house of Congress until Congress provides a law that allows it to lest there, are so numerous that the whole day might be spent upon them."

The position of the Senator is that the Constitution created the duty to count the votes, but did not locate the power or duty anywhere, and that Congress, under the general power to pass all laws necessary and proper to carry into execution the powers given to any department or to the Government of the United States, may by law devolve that duty upon a commission or upon any person. If I do not state his position correctly, I hope he will correct

me.

Mr. EDMUNDS. Mr. President, if the Senator wishes me to correct him now, he states a part of my position correctly, but he only states half of it; but I will take the opportunity to correct him, so as not to disturb him afterward.

Mr. MORTON. Well, Mr. President, I am stating the Senator's position correctly and fully as I understand it, and I understand this position of his to be necessary to another part of his argument, because if the power to count the votes, which I believe he expressly disclaims, is lodged in

|

the two houses by the Constitution and is not a general power to be executed by law, then this power must be exercised by the two houses only and cannot be delegated; whereas if it is simply a duty imposed to count the vote then Congress may locate that duty wherever it sees proper by law. The position of the Senator is that neither the President of the Senate is vested with this power nor are the two houses of Congress, that neither can exercise it in the absence of a law passed for that purpose.

IMPORTANT PRECEDENTS CITED.

And this brings us then to a very great fact, which is that for eighty-four years Presidents were counted in and inaugurated without any authority in point of law by any person. The President of the Senate had no power to do it because there was no law authorizing him to do it. The two houses had no power to do it because there was no law authorizing them to do it. It was a part of the Constitution which had not been carried into operation by legislation. Now, sir, is it true that for eightyfour years Presidents were counted in and inaugurated without authority of law? That would be a very great discovery if it were true. It would show that the men who made the Constitution, did not understand it. I believe that they thought the first President and all succeeding Presidents were counted in and inaugurated according to law. They may have been mistaken. Their opportunities for knowing what the Constitution is were not so good as ours, I suppose. They undoubtedly believed that the votes were properly counted for George Washington, John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, and so on.

I believe that this power is vested somewhere, located somewhere, that if it does not belong to the President of the Senate it belongs to the two houses. It is in one place or the other. But whatever may be the location, in theory, that the two houses cannot exercise this power without legislation I think is correct. I think the Senator from Vermont occupies a sound position in that respect; and whatever we may say about the power of Congress to legislate, and conceding that, as I have done heretofore and have presented bills to this chamber upon that hypothesis heretofore, yet that in the absence of legislation the President of the Senate must count the votes, that this results not from any theory but results from necessity to prevent a deadlock, to prevent the Government from coming to a stand-still, that until legislation has been had under which the vote can be counted by the two houses or providing some tribunal for it the President of the Senate must count the vote, and the vote

[merged small][ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors]
« ΠροηγούμενηΣυνέχεια »