Reports of Cases Determined in the Supreme Court of the State of California, Τόμος 178Bancroft-Whitney, 1919 |
Περιεχόμενα
| 92 | |
| 100 | |
| 120 | |
| 127 | |
| 132 | |
| 137 | |
| 141 | |
| 150 | |
| 204 | |
| 213 | |
| 222 | |
| 234 | |
| 237 | |
| 257 | |
| 289 | |
| 318 | |
| 320 | |
| 363 | |
| 371 | |
| 403 | |
| 535 | |
| 542 | |
| 548 | |
| 552 | |
| 558 | |
| 566 | |
| 573 | |
| 594 | |
| 627 | |
| 652 | |
| 663 | |
| 677 | |
| 698 | |
| 712 | |
| 748 | |
| 758 | |
| 792 | |
| 830 | |
| 885 | |
| 904 | |
Άλλες εκδόσεις - Προβολή όλων
Συχνά εμφανιζόμενοι όροι και φράσεις
affidavit affirmed agreement alleged amended amount Angeles County appellant application attorney averments award bonds California cause of action Civil Code Civil Procedure claim Code of Civil commission Company complaint concurred constitution contention contract contributory negligence corporation cross-complaint damages deceased decedent declared decree deed defendant defendant's district employee entitled error evidence executed facts favor fendant filed finding furnished granted ground homestead injury instruction issue Judge judgment jurisdiction jury land Llata Los Angeles County matter Melvin ment mortgage motion negligence nonsuit notice opinion order denying owner paid parties payment person petitioner plaintiff pleadings proceeding Public Utilities Act purchase question reason record Respondent rule Shaw sinking fund Sloss statute street sufficient Superior Court surety testimony thereof thousand dollars tiff tion trial court trust verdict Victor E wife Wilbur witness
Δημοφιλή αποσπάσματα
Σελίδα 24 - Ed. 518] ), and that the true test of employment in such commerce in the sense intended is, was the employee at the time of the injury engaged in interstate transportation or in work so closely related to it as to be practically a part of it.
Σελίδα vi - Justice of the Court when so convened. The concurrence of four Justices present at the argument shall be necessary to pronounce a judgment in bank; but if four Justices, so present, do not concur in a judgment, then all the Justices qualified to sit in the cause shall hear the argument; but to render a judgment a concurrence of four Judges shall be necessary. In the determination of causes, all decisions of the Court in bank or in departments shall be given in writing, and the grounds of the decision...
Σελίδα 48 - When such consent is obtained and filed, notice of the intended removal or change must be published at least once a week for three successive weeks in some newspaper published in the county...
Σελίδα 214 - The right of trial by jury shall be secured to all, and remain inviolate; but in civil actions three fourths of the jury may render a verdict.
Σελίδα 215 - No person shall, on account of sex, be disqualified from entering upon or pursuing any lawful business, vocation, or profession.
Σελίδα 285 - The Legislature may by appropriate legislation create and enforce a liability on the part of all employers to compensate their employees for any injury incurred by the said employees in the course of their employment irrespective of the fault of either party.
Σελίδα v - No judgment by a department shall become final until the expiration of the period of thirty days aforesaid, unless approved by the chief justice, in writing, with the concurrence of two associate justices. The chief justice may convene the Court in Bank at any time, and shall be the presiding justice of the court when so (v) convened.
Σελίδα 83 - Extortion is the obtaining of property from another with his consent, induced by a wrongful use of force, or fear, or under color of official right.
Σελίδα 92 - The ruling of the court in denying defendant's motion for a change of venue upon the ground that a fair and impartial trial could not be had in the county is fully supported by what is said in People v.
Σελίδα 241 - Would the owner of the property, in an action of ejectment brought by the adverse party, founded upon the deed, be required to offer evidence to defeat a recovery. If such proof would be necessary, the cloud would exist; if the proof would be unnecessary, no shade would be cast by the presence of the deed.