Εικόνες σελίδας
PDF
Ηλεκτρ. έκδοση
[blocks in formation]

General Perlman, Assistant Attorney General Quinn, Robert S. Erdahl and Joseph M. Howard for respondent. Reported below: 166 F. 2d 731.

No. 476, Misc. DIXON v. ILLINOIS. Supreme Court of Illinois. Certiorari denied.

No. 485, Misc. GRAY ET AL. v. BRACEY ET AL. Supreme Court of California. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 31 Cal. 2d 426, 189 P. 2d 3.

No. 487, Misc. WATSON v. UNITED STATES. C. C. A. 5th. Certiorari denied. Bart. A. Riley for petitioner. Solicitor General Perlman, Assistant Attorney General Quinn, Robert S. Erdahl and Philip R. Monahan for the United States. Reported below: 166 F. 2d 1018.

No. 492, Misc. SHOCKLEY V. UNITED STATES. C. C. A. 9th. Certiorari denied. Joseph L. Alioto for petitioner. Solicitor General Perlman, Assistant Attorney General Quinn, Robert S. Erdahl and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States. Reported below: 166 F. 2d 704.

No. 495, Misc. THOMPSON V. UNITED STATES. C. C. A. 9th. Certiorari denied. Melvin M. Belli for petitioner. Solicitor General Perlman, Assistant Attorney General Quinn, Robert S. Erdahl and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.

No. 498, Misc. FAZIO ET AL. v. NEW YORK. County Court of Kings County, New York. Certiorari denied.

No. 499, Misc. THOMPSON V. NIERSTHEIMER, WARDEN. C. C. A. 7th. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 166 F.2d 87.

[blocks in formation]

No. 500, Misc. COLE ET AL. v. NEW JERSEY. Court of Errors and Appeals of New Jersey. Certiorari denied. David W. Louisell, Carl McGowan, A. Warren Littman and Henry F. Schenk for petitioners. Duane E. Minard for respondent. Reported below: 136 N. J. L. 606, 56 A. 2d 898.

No. 510, Misc. ODELL v. HUDSPETH, WARDEN. Supreme Court of Kansas. Certiorari denied.

No. 513, Misc. CALDERBANK V. PENNSYLVANIA. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Certiorari denied.

No. 514, Misc. HOWELL v. JONES, WARDEN. Supreme Court of Nebraska. Certiorari denied.

No. 515, Misc. JOHNSON v. STEWART, WARDEN. Supreme Court of Missouri. Certiorari denied.

No. 518, Misc. ASBELL v. STEWART, WARDEN. Supreme Court of Missouri. Certiorari denied.

No. 520, Misc. KALAN V. KALAN. Court of Appeals of New York. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 297 N. Y.-.

No. 521, Misc. REED V. RAGEN, WARDEN. Criminal Court of Cook County, Illinois. Certiorari denied.

No. 522, Misc. ROBINSON V. RAGEN, WARDEN. Circuit Court of Will County, Illinois. Certiorari denied.

No. 523, Misc. ELLIOTT v. HUDSPETH, WARDEN. Supreme Court of Kansas. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 164 Kan. 598, 191 P. 2d 900.

June 14, 1948.

No. 530, Misc.

334 U.S.

MCELLIGOTT v. BURKE, WARDEN. Su

preme Court of Pennsylvania. Certiorari denied.

No. 531, Misc.

BEASON v. STEWART, WARDEN. Su

preme Court of Missouri. Certiorari denied.

No. 532, Misc. LYLE V. STEWART, WARDEN. Supreme Certiorari denied.

Court of Missouri.

v. RAGEN,

WARDEN.

No. 533, Misc. WASHINGTON Circuit Court of Will County, Illinois. Certiorari denied.

No. 534, Misc. STORY V. OKLAHOMA. Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 184 P. 2d 983.

No. 535, Misc. MEYERS v. RAGEN, WARDEN. Circuit Court of Will County, Illinois. Certiorari denied.

No. 536, Misc. HOLLOWAY V. UNITED STATES. United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia. Certiorari denied. Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Perlman, Assistant Attorney General Quinn, Robert S. Erdahl and Philip R. Monahan for the United States. Reported below: 80 U. S. App. D. C. 3, 148 F. 2d 665.

No. 537, Misc. JONES v. RAGEN, WARDEN. Criminal Court of Cook County, Illinois. Certiorari denied.

No. 539, Misc. BROWN V. MISSOURI. C. C. A. 8th. Certiorari denied.

No. 540, Misc.

LUCAS v. TEXAS. Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 211 S. W. 2d 222.

[blocks in formation]

No. 542, Misc. FARNSWORTH v. MARYLAND. Supreme Bench of Baltimore City, Maryland. Certiorari denied.

No. 546, Misc. TURNER V. MISSOURI. Supreme Court of Missouri. Certiorari denied.

No. 547, Misc. HAWLEY V. ILLINOIS. Supreme Court of Illinois. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 399 Ill. 300, 77 N. E. 2d 701.

No. 549, Misc. SHAFFER V. ILLINOIS. Supreme Court of Illinois. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 400 Ill. 332, 79 N. E. 2d 477.

No. 550, Misc. HAUGHEY V. SMYTH, SUPERINTENDENT. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia. William Alfred Hall, Jr. for petitioner. Reported below: 187 Va. 320, 46 S. E. 2d 419.

No. 551, Misc. FARRELL V. LANAGAN, WARDEN. C. C. A. 1st. Certiorari denied. Alfred A. Albert for petitioner. Reported below: 166 F. 2d 845.

No. 553, Misc. HALL υ. UNITED STATES. United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia. Certiorari denied. Henry Lincoln Johnson, Jr. for petitioner. Reported below: 83 U. S. App. D. C. —, 168 F. 2d 161.

No. 554, Misc. GRAY υ. UNITED STATES. United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia. Certiorari denied for the reason that application therefor was not made within the time provided by law. Rule 37 (b) (2) of the Rules of Criminal Procedure. James T. Wright and Wesley S. Williams for petitioner. Reported below: 83 U.S. App. D. C., 168 F. 2d 161.

334 U.S.

June 14, 21, 1948.

No. 320, Misc. HILLIARD v. UNITED STATES. C. C. A. 5th. Certiorari denied. Motions for other relief also denied.

Rehearing Denied.

No. 690. MILLER V. UNITED States et al., ante, p. 820. Rehearing denied.

No. 754. REDDING v. LOS ANGELES ET AL., ante, p. 825. Rehearing denied.

No. 306, Misc. McGOUGH v. UNITED STATES, ante, p. 829. Rehearing denied.

JUNE 21, 1948.

Per Curiam Decisions.

No. 775. EUBANKS V. THOMPSON, RECEIVER. RECEIVER. On petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Arkansas. Per Curiam: The petition for writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment of the Supreme Court of Arkansas is reversed. See Myers v. Reading Co., 331 U. S. 477 (1947) and Ellis v. Union Pacific R. Co., 329 U. S. 649 (1947). Walter M. Bastian and A. K. Shipe for petitioner. Reported below: See 212 Ark. 652, 207 S. W. 2d 610; 208 S. W. 2d 161.

No. 808. NATIONAL MARITIME UNION OF AMERICA ET AL. v. HERZOG ET AL. Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the District of Columbia. Per Curiam: The decision of the statutory three-judge court is affirmed to the extent that it passes upon the validity of § 9 (f) and § 9 (g) of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended by the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947 (61 Stat. 136, 143; 29 U. S. C. §§ 141, 159 (f) 159 (g), Supp. 1947). We do not find it necessary to

« ΠροηγούμενηΣυνέχεια »