Interstate Commerce Commission Reports: Reports and Decisions of the Interstate Commerce Commission

Εξώφυλλο
U.S. Government Printing Office, 1935
 

Περιεχόμενα

South Carolina Asparagus G Assn v Southern Ry Co 64
42
Dallas Paper Co v Arkansas L M Ry Co 148 I C C 787 564
43
Memphis Freight Bureau for Binswanger Co v Louisiana
45
Building Materials Road from Snow Flake W Va 103
51
Arizona Grocery Co v Atchison T S F Ry Co 284 U
53
DimmittCaudleSmith Live Stock Commission Co v Chicago
55
Michael Comella v Delaware L W R Co 197 I C C 39 529
57
HaleyNeeley Co v Ann Arbor R Co 186 I C C 299 198
58
Sawbrook Steel Castings Co v Chicago B Q R Co 261
61
Shippers Assn of Carolina Inc v Atlantic Coast Line R Co
65
Armour Co v El Paso S W Co 52 I C C 240_____ 374
67
Ore Traffic Pooling in Wisconsin and Michigan 13
71
Albers Bros Milling Co v Oregon S L R Co 156 I C C 695
72
Shreveport Chamber of Commerce on behalf ofHamilton
73
Morrell Co v New York Central R Co 104 I C C 104___
76
Penick Ford v Director General 80 I C C 152
77
Eastern Bituminous Coal Investigation 140 I C C 3 446
80
City of Marshall Ill v Pennsylvania R Co 465
84
Land and Phospho Plaster in the South 192 I C C 151__
87
Mead Johnson Co v Atlantic Coast Line R Co 171 I C C 5
88
Washington Building Lime Co v Atlantic City R Co et al 467
106
Eastern Lime Mfrs Traffic Bureau v Akron B B R Co
107
Standard Paint Co v Director General 112 I C C 589 142
112
Paper Newsprint from Jonquierre Quebec 686
115
Eastern Ohio Coal Operators Assn v Ashland C I Ry Co
126
Cash Feed Co v Atlantic Coast Line R Co 152 I C C 247
129
Muscle Shoals Traffic Bureau v Abilene S Ry Co
140
Celotex Co v Ahnapee W Ry Co 140 I C C 274
151
Eastern Shore of Virginia Prod Exc v New York P N
156
Alexandria Refining Co v Missouri Pac R Co 112 I C C 613_
159
Emsco Steel Products Co v Atchison T S F Ry Co
163
Pocahontas Tanning Co v Chesapeake O Ry Co
167
Simonins Sons Inc v Cincinnati I W R Co 393
175
Leonard Crosset Riley v Akron C Y Ry Co 176
189
East Tennessee Sand Gravel Co v Southern Ry Co
192
South Chicago Coal Dock Co v Belt Ry Co 185 I C C
194
Bush Terminal R Co Bedford Pulp Paper Co v
195
United States v American Ry Exp Co 265 U S 425 758
202
Clicquot Club Co v New York N H H R Co
203
Allen Mfg Co v Louisville N R Co 192 I C C 170
208
Wells Trustee v Alton R Co
209
Ashland Fire Brick Co v Southern Ry Co 22 I C C 115
213
Lone Star Cement Co Ala v Atchison T S F Ry Co
225
Lorenz Co v Great Northern Ry Co___
243
Agricultural Limestone to Lower Michigan 739
248
Wertheimer Bag Co v Southern Ry Co 629
249
El Dorado Chamber of Commerce v Chicago R I P
251
Cadillac Malleable Iron Co v Ann Arbor R Co___
263
MinehartTraylor Co v Atchison T S F Ry Co 393
269
Y Ry Co Arkansas Cotton Seed Crushers
273
Limestone Products Co v Chicago N W Ry Co 200 I C C
274
Penn Veneer Co v Pennsylvania R Co 768
275
National Brick Co v Atchison T S F Ry Co 171 I C C
276
Porter Oil Co v Atchison T S F Ry Co 172 I C C 407
295
Alliance Motor Co v Chicago B Q R Co 196 I C C 408
296
Coal from Illinois Indiana and Kentucky
305
Rates from to and between Points in Southern Territory
309
Brick and Related Articles 188 I C C 147 34
310
Coal Producers Assn of Pittsburgh v Ashland C I Ry Co 456
314
Cement in TrunkLine Territory 174 I C C 224
316
Assigned Cars for Bituminous Coal Mines 80 I C C 520
372
Meats and PackingHouse Products 136 I C C 651 78
374
Pennsylvania Sand Gravel Prod Assn v Baltimore O
385
Coltexo Corp v Atchison T S F Ry Co 227
387
R Co
390
Alabama N W R Co National Cottonseed Products
393
Linseed Oil from Edgewater to C F A Points 74 I C C 153____
400
Vegetable Oils from TrunkLine Points 100 I C C 736
401
Proportional Rates to Ohio River Crossings 43 I C C 458 47
404
Plate Glass from to and between Points in Southern Territory
421
Merchants Mfrs Traffic Bureau v Arkansas L M
431
Penn Veneer Co v Western Maryland Ry Co 176 I C C 499
499
TriState Traffic Co v Illinois Central R Co 179 I C C 181 43
501
Strawberries from Florida 195 I C C 357
505
Chelsea Refining Co v Missouri Pac Ry Co 38 I C C 28 455
511
Sulphuric Acid from Southwest 167 I C C 459____ 150
512
Classification Exceptions on Linseed Oil 74 I C C 155 400
518
Sun Oil Co v MissouriK T R Co of Texas 123 I C C 17 159
519
Burch Inc v Railway Exp Agency Inc 190 I C C 520
520
Northern Hemlock Hardwood Mfrs Assn v Ann Arbor
521
Alabama G S R Co Chamber of Commerce Selma Ala v 7
523
Livestock Southern Territory Rates 171 I C C 721 524 634
524
Estimated Weights on Horses and Mules 91 I C C 215
527
Combination Rule on Sand Gravel and Stone 112 I C C 231 82
529
Quintal Lynch v Florida East Coast Ry Co 57 I C C 289
532
Hammond Standish Co v Atchison T S F Ry Co 183
535
Petroleum Coke to Oklahoma City Okla 200 I C C 423
542
Loading and Unloading Carload Freight 101 I C C 394___
549
Los Angeles Chamber of Commerce v Atchison T S F
562
Handling Charges at Louisiana Ports 61 I C C 379
571
In the Matter of Application of Union Belt of Detroit et al
577
Tap Line Cases 234 U S 1
582
Southeastern Vegetable Case 200 I C C 273 44 63 69
592
Walton Co v Baltimore O R Co 171 I C C 187
594
Concho Livestock Co v Atchison T S F Ry Co 178
596
Iron and Steel fromC F A to Western TrunkLine Points 751
605
Allison Co v Norfolk S R Co 191 I C C 457 236
609
Railroad Commission of Louisiana v Aransas H Term
610
Cotton Wastes from to and between Points in the South
617
Calliari Bros v Ann Arbor R Co 198 I C C 388
618
Fargo N Dak Chamber of Commerce v Akron C Y
625
Farm Seed Assn of North America v Atchison T S F
626
Hansen Packing Co v Baltimore O R Co 196 I C C 722 75
631
Fernandez Co v Southern Pac R Co 104 I C C 193 532
634
American Sand Gravel Co v Chicago N W Ry Co
637
Consolidated Classification Case 54 I C C 1 36
639
Atlantic Coast Line R Co and Atlanta B C R Co
645
Atlanta B A R Co Valuation 75 I C C 645_ 646 670
646
Anderson 225 U S 436___
668
Fredonia Linseed Oil Works Co v Alabama V Ry Co 146
679
Iron City Produce Co Inc v Atlantic Coast Line R Co 235
683
New Orleans T M Ry Co Southern Rice Sales Co Inc v 113
686
Blackmer Post Pipe Co v Wabash Ry Co 161 I C C 74
697
Canadian National Ry Co Application for Approval of
699
John F Casey Co v Georgia Railroad Banking Co 279
703
Cars Refrigerator Use of Privately Owned 323
715
Cement fromLimedale Mitchell and Speeds Ind
724
Steel and Iron fromCentral Freight Association to Western
751
Central R Co of New Jersey Best Foods Inc v 393
761
I C C 5
764
Hay between Points in Tex La and Ark 126 I C C 524___
782
Kansas City Mo Builders Assn Inc v Atchison T
785
Rate Structure InvestigationPart 3 Cotton 165 I C C 595 620
798
Consolidated Stone Cases 200 I C C 65 282
799
Table of commodities__
801
Table of localities_
809
Index digest
825
Lumberfrom Fayette Ala 197 I C C 418 462
829
Central West Coal Co v Baltimore O R Co 271
834
Crushers and Ginners Assn of CaliforniaArizona v Apache
836
Kansas City Structural Steel Co v Alabama V Ry Co 21
838
Freight Handling Charges at St Louis Stations_ 543
839
Blue Ridge Glass Corp v Akron B B R Co 176 I C C
840
Albuquerque Oil Gasoline Co Inc v Atchison T S
851
New York Butchers Dressed Meat Co v Akron C Y
852
Kimball Colwell Co v Baltimore O R Co 390
867
Bags Used to Memphis Tenn 307
876
Mitchelhill Seed Co v Atchison T S F Ry Co 192 I C C
Fruits and Vegetables Switching at Baltimore Md 689
Lebanon Steel Foundry v Pennsylvania R Co 257
Globe Grain Milling Co v Southern Pac Co 186 I C C
Baltimore E R Co Washington Building Lime Co v 467

Άλλες εκδόσεις - Προβολή όλων

Συχνά εμφανιζόμενοι όροι και φράσεις

Δημοφιλή αποσπάσματα

Σελίδα 513 - ... than it charges, demands, collects or receives from any other person or persons for doing for him or them a like and contemporaneous service in the transportation of a like kind of traffic under substantially similar circumstances and conditions, such common carrier shall be deemed guilty of unjust discrimination, which is hereby prohibited and declared to be unlawful.
Σελίδα 282 - If the owner of property transported under this Act directly or indirectly renders any service connected with such transportation, or furnishes any instrumentality used therein, the charge and allowance therefor shall be no more than is just and reasonable, and the Commission may, after hearing on a complaint...
Σελίδα 332 - While the statements of the law thus relied upon are satisfactory in the connection in which they were used, they have been plainly and repeatedly held not applicable where stock ownership has been resorted to, not for the purpose of participating in the affairs of a corporation in the normal and usual manner, but for the purpose, as in this case, of controlling a subsidiary company so that it may be used as a mere agency or instrumentality of the owning company or companies.
Σελίδα 332 - In such a case the courts will not permit themselves to be blinded or deceived by mere forms or law but, regardless of fictions, will deal with the substance of the transaction involved as if the corporate agency did not exist and as the justice of the case may require.
Σελίδα 282 - ... therein, the charge and allowance therefor shall be no more than is just and reasonable, and the commission may, after hearing on a complaint or on its own initiative, determine what is a reasonable charge as the maximum to be paid by the carrier or carriers for the services so rendered or for the use of the instrumentality so furnished, and fix the same by appropriate order, which order shall have the same force and effect and be enforced in like manner as the orders above provided for under...
Σελίδα 386 - For neither through billing, uninterrupted movement, continuous possession by the carrier, nor unbroken bulk, is an essential of a through interstate shipment. These are common incidents of a through shipment; and when the intention with which a shipment was made is in issue, the presence, or absence, of one or all of these incidents may be important evidence bearing upon that question.
Σελίδα 565 - It is the right of the public to use the road's facilities and to demand service of it rather than the extent of its business which is the real criterion determinative of its character.
Σελίδα 442 - Provided, however, that authority to issue said stock is granted upon the express condition, that. for the purposes of the accounting, as provided in the classification of investment in road and equipment in the text of account 41,
Σελίδα 332 - Interstate commerce the products of such mining company, yet where such ownership of stock is resorted to, not for the purpose of participating In the affairs of the corporation in which it is held in a manner normal and usual with stockholders, but for the purpose of making It a mere agent, or instrumentality or department of another company...
Σελίδα 472 - The cause of action in respect of a shipment of property shall, for the purposes of this section, be deemed to accrue upon delivery or tender of delivery thereof by the carrier, and not after.

Πληροφορίες βιβλιογραφίας