TICKETS AND FARES-Continued. | TRESPASSERS-Continued.
for sole purpose of accumulat-
ing penalties for overcharges,
does not preclude recovery. St.
Louis & S. F. R. Co. v. Gill
(Ark.), 462.
Ticket punched by mistake; ex-
pulsion of passenger for. Mis-
conduct of conductor. Johnson
v. Northern Pac, R. Co. (C. C.),
634 1.
Ticket "via direct line." Author-
ity of ticket agent. Meaning-
less condition. Dancey v. Grand
Trunk R. Co. (Ont.), 482 n.
TRESPASS. See EMINENT DOMAIN.
Unlawful entry.
Damages. Market value of land
for any purpose for which it
was sold for the highest price.
Chicago, K. & W. R. Co. v.
Willets, (Kan.), 317.
for making excavations on
adjoining land. Measure of
damages is difference in mar-
ket values. Chicago, K. & W.
R. Co. v. Willets (Kan.), 317.
Injunction to prevent continuing
trespass, where remedy at law
is not plain and adequate.
Payne z. Kansas & A. V. R. Co.
(C. C.), 228.
Personal examination of premises
by jury. Instructions authoriz-
ing jury to use knowledge thus
acquired, held not error. Chi-
cago, K. & W. R. Co. (Kan.),
317.
Wrongful entry on land, action
for. Declaration sounding in
trespass. Wood v. Michigan
A. L. R. Co. (Mich.), 248 n.
TRESPASSERS.
Expulsion. Negligence or wan-
tonness in expelling passenger,
is a question for jury. South-
ern Kan. R. Co. v. Sanford
(Kan.), 615.
of trespasser from moving
train, held to render company
liable. Gulf C. & F. S. R. Co.
v. Kirkbride (Tex.), 620 n.
Freight train; person entering,
clandestinely to beat his way,
becomes a trespasser. Duty of
company to him. Hendrix v.
Kansas City, F. S. & G. R. Co.
(Kan.), 635 n.
Leaving train. Expulsion of
trespasser from train moving
slowly, not negligence per se.
Southern Kan. R. Co. v. Sanford
(Kan), 615.
Licensee on car. Instruction
that deceased was a mere tres-
passer held harmless error.
McCauley v. Tennessee C., I. &
R. Co. (Ála.), 581.
TRIAL.
Argument of counsel.
Improper
remarks necessitated by like
remarks on other side, cannot
be complained of. Alabama G.
S. R. Co. v. Hill (Ala.), 501.
Personal injuries. Courts have
no power to order injured per-
son to submit to surgical exam-
ination. Union P. R. Co. v.
Botsford (U. S.), 406.
Estoppel to set up defense,
368 n.
Lease. Lessee cannot plead that
contract was ultra vires in an-
swer for bill for accounting and
return of property.
Manches.
ter & L. R. Co. v. Concord R.
Co. (N. H.), 359.
of trackage rights held not
ultra vires of lessor, possession
not interfering with its use.
Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co. v.
United Pac. R. Co. (Neb.), 340.
Neither party to transaction ultra
vires simply will be heard to
allege its invalidity while re-
taining its fruits. Manchester
& L. R. Co. v. Concord R. Co.
(N. H.), 359.
UNION DEPOTS. See EMINENT DO-