Hast, by thy frantic sacrilege, drawn on thec Rie. Ay, there's the sting, That I, an insect of to-day, outsoar The reverend worm, nobility! Wouldst shame me Of him who kept a sordid hostelry In the Jew's quarter; my good mother cleansed Rie. Add, that my boasted school-craft Was gained from such base toil;-gained with such pain, That the nice nurture of the mind was oft Stolen at the body's cost. I have gone dinnerless The roots delve deepest. Yes, I've trod thy halls, I have borne this-and I have borne the death, I seemed I was a base ignoble slave. What am I?-peace, I say!—what am I now? Head of this great republic, chief of Rome- Ang. In an evil hour Rie. Darest thou Say that? An evil hour for thee, my Claudia! Thou shouldst have been an emperor's bride, my fairest. In an evil hour thy woman's heart was caught, The gallant bearing, the feigned tale of love- Ang. But that I loved her, but that I do love her, With a deep tenderness, softer and fonder Than thy ambition-hardened heart e'er dreamed of, Rie. Go to, Lord Angelo; Thou lov'st her not.-Men taunt not, nor defy The bosom's idol !—I have loved!—she loves thee; Keep that brave for thy comrades. I'll not fight thee. Ang. Come back, Rienzi! Thus I throw [Going. A brave defiance in thy teeth. (Throws down his glove.) Rie. Once more, Beware! Ang. Take up the glove! Rie. This time, for her- (Takes up the glove.) For her dear sake-Come to thy bride! home! home! Ang. Dost fear me, tribune of the people? Rie. Fear! [Exit, Do I fear thee?-Tempt me no more. This once Home to thy bride! Ang. Now, Ursini, I come Fit partner of thy vengeance! HER EYES ARE WILD. WILLIAM WORDSWORTH, [William Wordsworth, some time poet-laureate, was born at Cockermouth, in Cumberland, April 7, 1770. He received the rudiments of his education at Hawkshead School, and entered St. John's College, Cambridge, 1787. After taking his degree he made the tour of France and Switzerland, at a time when the French revolution had attained its crisis. His first work, "Descriptive Sketches," was published in 1793. For a quarter of a century Wordsworth wrote and waited to be acknowledged. He was one of those whose light was thoroughly paled by the glare of Byron; but his time came-a sentimental age that had more compassion for a housebreaker than it had pity for the honest poor, recognised in Wordsworth a congenial, because a harmless, poet. He has many admirers still, but very few readers; he enjoys a sort of halfway-house fame, between the respectably moral and the strictly religious; he is respected for his philosophy and his virtuous tenets, but his works are not used as Cowper's are, as aids to religion. He was not like Robert Montgomery, a mere ranter in rhyme and the pet of a fanatical sect, but a thoughtful writer; consequently his writings will be more enduring, but with the million he will never be popular; he never mixed with them, he passed his time in Westmoreland, among the lakes, in the enjoyment of a moderate competence. He walked about, boated, went to church, and wrote. It has been said of him that he never read Shakspeare. We can well imagine it; he was wrapped up in self, and if ever he quoted a poem it was one of his own; indeed, we are told that he was very fond of quoting his own poems to any one who would listen to them—any of those stray visitors who occasionally obtained an introduction to him. One of these has said, "it would be nothing strange in him to leave the knife inserted in the wing of a chicken while he recited a stanza from 'Yarrow Revisited;' " and Walter Savage Landor asserted that, in examining as a grammarian the grammar of Wordsworth, he found in it but one personal pronoun, "I." It is undoubtedly a good thing to believe in oneself, and with Wordsworth poetry had its own reward, sweetened no doubt by the distributorship of stamps in addition to the 3001. a-year that he enjoyed as laureate. Wordsworth attempted to set up a new theory in regard to poetical composition, viz., that it should be expressed in the ordinary language of familiar conversation; but it was laughed down; indeed, except in a few instances, he was too much of a poet himself not to fall unconsciously into the elegancies of poetical diction. A large amount of criticism has been written to prove and disprove Wordsworth's claim to be considered a great poet-to have been called by one recognised critic "the greatest poet since Milton," and by another "no poet at all," goes to prove how difficult it is to say what true poetry is; and yet, after all, it cannot be a mere matter of taste. For our own part, we cannot help thinking that the admirers of Wordsworth, in forming the great and just estimate they do of him as a philosopher, overlook his want of facility as a constructor of poetry,-with them this is a minor consideration; if this be so, would it not have been better that he had worked out his theories in prose, to which much of his poetry bears so close a resemblance? But we hazard these opinions very reservedly when we find such names as Wilson, Coleridge, Henry Taylor, and Archbishop Trench among his most ardent admirers. Anyhow, Wordsworth does not deserve the neglect into which his works appear again to be falling. He died 1850.] HER eyes are wild, her head is bare, And she came far from over the main. Or else she were alone: And underneath the hay-stack warm, And on the greenwood stone, She talked and sung the woods among, "Sweet babe! they say that I am mad, To thee I know, too much I owe; A fire was once within my brain; Suck, little babe, oh suck again! Oh! love me, love me, little boy! Then do not fear, my boy! for thee |