Εικόνες σελίδας
Ηλεκτρ. έκδοση

But it is not only in aggravated cases of tuberculous disease of the lungs that Sir Charles has succeeded. Even when there has been Empyema existing at the same time, he has met with the most gratifying results. Case XX. is one in point, provided indeed the reader is satisfied that there was any purulent effusion into the chest at all ; for certainly the most characteristic symptoms of this very serious complication were not present, if we may judge from the report. The reader may determine for himself from the following narrative of the symptoms : there was an open abscess, we should remark, between the 5th and 6th ribs on the left side.

“The fifth, sixth and seventh ribs were elevated, giving to the side a very swollen appearance. The orifice of the abscess had its edges quite inverted, There was a slight purulent discharge; and it was remarkable that this alternated with the expectoration : when the one was free, the other was very slight. Of this fact I was several times an eye-witness. By auscultation and percussion, the following evidence was afforded : considerable resonance in the upper part of the right lung, and still more remarkable in the right axilla. Imperfect respiration in the upper part of the left lung; and below also it was imperfect and more indistinct.

“ Sound duller than natural on the right side ; dull at the inferior part of the left, especially when the patient was in the erect position; and becoming clearer when he lay on the opposite side. I drew the inference that there were tubercles in the upper part of each lung, but particularly the right; that there was effusion into the cavity of the left pleura ; that nature has performed the operation for empyema in producing the external abscess; and that, internally, a communication had been formed, by ulceration, between the bronchi and pleura.” P. 169.

In this case, too, the inhalation of iodine and conium, in conjunction with a generous diet and the use of sarsaparilla and other alteratives, effected the most satisfactory amendment: “ indeed, it much exceeded all expectation.” This patient too, like the preceding one, after having made Buch wonderful progress under Sir Charles' treatment, very imprudently exposed himself to wet and cold, which brought on a recurrence of all the bad symptoms and proved fatal. Unfortunately, there seems never to have been any examination after death of the state of the thoracic viscera; 80 that we are left in doubt as to the correctness of the diagnosis that had been formed.

What tends very greatly to diminish our confidence in the full accuracy of our author's statements in reference to the surprising cures which he has effected, is the circumstance of his, every now and then, seeking to disarm incredulity by protestations of his candour and love of truth. For example, in one passage he says,—" I can conscientiously declare that I have not been guilty of the least exaggeration in any part of my narrative of cases.” Such language sounds to us very much like that of one who deprecates the charge of being a story-teller. Why should any man, assured of the perfect truthfulness of his statements, exhibit such a timorous cringing spirit ? Truth is ever bold, nor seeks to win favour by assuming an air of obsequious humility. Besides, we like not such remarks as these :-" If I had made my own credit and reputation a selfish consideration in the class of cases to be treated by iodine inhalation, I should have rejected all such as were evidently in their nature so confirmed and desperate as to preclude all chance of recovery; but as inhalation has the property of mitigating symptoms, where it cannot accomplish more, I have always felt 1847] Great Increase of the Animal Heat.

355 it my duty to employ it in phthisis, if requested by the patient, even under most unfavourable circumstances of the disease ;” and again—" If I had been governed by a rigid solicitude for the credit of inhalation, I might have declined the application of the treatment to such a case as this, at the first view so evidently hopeless.” Who ever suspects an honest physician of any other motive save the simple one of seeking to relieve distress and sufferings of his patient ? Away then with all such silly, and worse than silly, talk about his credit and fame. Neither do we understand what our author means when he tells us that "no one is more fully aware than himself of the doubtful balance in which a physician places his feelings and his reputation, who engages in the treatment of consumption.” The balance need never be doubtful either one way or the other, provided, all the while, he knows that nought save the dictates of holy truth and humanity has been the actuating principle of his conduct.

In another respect, the language employed by Sir Charles is not very likely to conciliate the approbation of the profession. The following passages will best serve to illustrate what we allude to.

I adopt the opinion that tubercular phthisis is a specific blood disease, that there exists a tuberculous condition of the blood, and which, in the strongly marked examples of hereditary phthisis, is born with the individual as a germ. P. 55.

“ The tubercular virus may exist in different degrees of intensity in different persons; in one individual, leading to slight indications of consumption, what is called a tendency to it; in a second subject, to the disease well-marked, in the chronic form; in a third, the acute disease, running a most rapid course." P. 57.

“ In conclusion, although the method of practice which I have advocated in these pages is the most useful and the most likely to succeed in tubercular phthisis of any with which I am acquainted, it falls short of that which, for the good of humanity, I desire. The desideratum, as I conceive, is a medicine which shall be found to exert a successful specific agency against the tuberculous poison; to neutralise it, and effect a radical cure !" P. 216.

One can scarcely believe that any person, who talks of a specific for the tuberculous poison, can have very accurate notions of pulmonary consumption. It may be as well to mention here that Sir Charles seems to attribute the therapeutic agency of his remedy rather to its alterative effects upon the system in general, than upon its local operation upon the diseased tissue to which it is applied. The only evidence, however, adduced in favour of this idea is contained in the following paragraph.

“ That the introduction of iodine into the system through the medium of the lungs is effected, I have had the proof occasionally by witnessing some of those inconvenient effects on the constitution which its use as an internal medicine, or as rubbed in the form of ointment on the thyroid gland, now and then produce. But I am happy to add, that such instances are so very rare, as not to form any objection to its employment. I am convinced that it does not happen so much as once in fifty times. The disagreement in question is a peculiar nervousness, a tremor, and a timidity ; but no disorder of the stomach or bowels; as is liable to happen from the ordinary taking of iodine.” P. 211.

Before taking leave of Sir Charles, we wish to call the attention of the reader for a few minutes to some observations he has made, in the early part of his volume, on the question of the great increase of the animal heat in cases of Consumption.

“ It is a curious pathological fact, as I have found in a very extensive examination to be verified without a single exception, that in every case of tubercular phthisis the animal heat is more or less raised beyond the healthy standard. This may be stated as a mean at 96-5. It is always found highest in the morning at the time of rising from bed, with all persons. In the course of the day it is influenced by certain circumstances, and is raised by exercise ; particularly in the fresh air of the country. In phthisis, I have found it range from 990 to 105°. I consider that the examination of the animal heat assists our diagnosis as to the existence of tubercles. In a doubtful case, I am pleased to find the animal heat not higher than 98o.

“ It would be foreign to my present purpose to enter into the interesting, beautiful, yet difficult subject of animal heat; or attempt the consideration how far this function is to be referred to chemical action taking place in the lungs, how far to vital influence, and how far to the nervous system; but I believe it is on all hands agreed that the most immediate and influential cause of the production of animal heat is the combustion of carbon, brought in the venous blood to the ramifying capillaries, in order to receive aeration and the all-important influence of oxygen introduced by the air-passages,

“ In this chemical view of the subject, and to which I now confine myself, it appears, I think, surprising, when we consider how much of tuberculated lungs is excluded from the aerating process, either from the compression of the aircells by the tubercles, or their actual occupation by these foreigu bodies, that the animal heat, instead of being lower, as we might imagine, as a consequence of the surface for aeration of the blood being greatly lessened, is actually found to be higher than in the natural healthy state of the lungs." P. 30.

After relating some experinents which go to shew that the quantity of carbonic acid evolved during respiration is greater in a phthisical patient than in a healthy person, our autior remarks :

“ It appears to me that, in the relation of these experiments, I have offered strong evidence that in tubercular phthisis, notwithstanding the organic limitation of the function of the lungs, from the obstruction of the air-cells by tubercles, the important process of the decarbonisation of the blood, the combustion of carbon, and increased animal heat beyond the healthy standard, go on with more rapidity than in sound lungs. An increase of the animal heat does not ensue from merely quickened respiration, as is shown in the examples of running up to the top of a lofty building; nor even more than a degree in the paroxysm of spasmodic asthma. I consider, indeed, that in some cases of this kind, where almost asphyxia takes place, the reverse would happen, and the animal heat be found below the natural standard.

“ There is in tuberculated lungs an increased activity of function; and hence the hectic fever, so urgent in acute phthisis, and the hectic irritation, although often hardly amounting to evident fever, in the chronic form of the disease. The actions of the animal economy, when unnaturally hurried, are not so healthily performed. We may suppose that the oxidation of the blood being effected in so rapid a manner, cannot be so favourably accomplished; and also a morbid excitement prevails in the whole system. The nervous system is morbidly sensitive. Although the appetite may be good, and abundance of food be taken, yet nutrition is imperfect, and the body wastes--a consequence much to be referred to the imperfect and unhealthy performance of assimilation and sanguification; at the same time that the absorbents generally are probably thrown into a state of morbid activity.” P. 33.

The general result of Sir Charles' observations and experiments is, that, “ when the lungs, or mucous membrane of the air-passages, are in a state of irritation from discase, the animal heat is always more or less raised 1847] Increase of the Carbonic Acid during Respiration. 357 beyond the natural standard.” There can be no doubt but that a persistent increase of the animal heat, and (as always happens at the same time) of the pulse, is an almost infallible indication of an inward irritation ; and that inward irritation is, in the majority of instances, dependent upon some pulmonic lesion,

The work of Dr. Deshon-who, we observe, lives at Budleigh Salterton in Devonshire- is altogether a most discreditable production, and one utterly unworthy of any educated and honourable member of our profession. We strongly suspected its character from its very title, and the suspicion was confirmed by the circumstance of our learning that no copy had been sent to the medical journals for review. But this attempt at latency will not preserve the author.from exposure.

The first two chapters profess to give an anatomical and physiological description of the thorax and its viscera. We must find room for one or two morceaux of the silly stuff of which they consist. For example, we are told that

“ The lungs and heart, conjointly, may not inaptly be regarded as a distillatory apparatus; whereof the lungs resemble the furnace, to which the blood, exposed in a convenient retort, the branches of the pulmonary artery, and purified of its grosser parts by due combustion, is returned by the pulmonary veins or worm, to the heart or receiving vessel, to be from thence conveyed by the principal artery of the body, or main pipe, and by its innumerable branches for universal distribution.” P. 5.

“ As a general rule, it may be said that in aquatic animals, the lungs are prolonged from within outwardly to meet the air with which the water is saturated ; but in terrestrial beings, on the contrary, the lungs are contained in a cavity into which the air enters to meet the blood. The utility of this arrangement is obvious, namely, to present to the gill of the former, by constant change and motion, the largest possible amount of air ; which, on the other hand, being exhibited to the latter in a more pure and undiluted state, every end is accomplished by a smailer quantity entering the pulmonic sac, or receiver. Again, it is absolutely vecessary to respiration that it should be performed by means of a watery vehicle; the fish when brought on land becomes asphyxiated, not for want of air, but for want of water. Since the air is presented to it in a state, under which it cannot elaborate, and the evaporative effects of which it is unable to withstand. Its gill therefore quickly desiccates, and the animal perishes. The gill being in fact an unprotected lung, but the lung a protected gill; protected against, because exposed to evaporation, by a contrivance, which at the same time, by its mucous surfaces and secreting glands, ministers to its aqueous condition, for the terrestrial, like the aquatic, animal must be asphyxiated under a condition which deprives it of these means of extracting moisture.

“ But how avails this digression, which I can fancy some pronouncing most irrelevant to the purpose. Man, say they, is not a fish, and what can the physiology of its respiration have to do with the subject under consideration ? Perhaps more than at first imagined, if, either for prevention or cure, the phthisical must advance a step towards the aqueous condition under which the fish respires. For hereby, is understood a fact which has been brought to light by the experience of later years, that moisture is not prejudicial to the consumptive, as was at first supposed. Without going to the extent of saying, with some physicians of the present day, that ague, the abundant offspring of moisture, is antagonistic to phthisis, it may readily be conceived that a damp atmosphere, by presenting aspirable air to the lungs under a form more analogous to the fluid about to receive it, facilitates the changes which occur during respiration, changes-upon the due execution of which-depend the health of the individual.

“ There is a very intimate connection between the vital energy of the creature and the activity of this function. Birds, some of which are destined for rapid and extraordinary exertions, possess, in comparison with other animals, large vesicular lungs, to which the bones, being hollow and containing air, are likewise auxiliary. How bold and energetic the movements of the hawk! how slow and indolent those of the turtle ! On a smaller scale is witnessed in man a remarkable concord between the vigorous performance of this function and the robust health of the individual.” P. 18.

Equally rational is the description given of the digestive function. Will our readers believe that any man, who has honestly received a professional diploma, could pen such nonsense as this ?

“ If indeed digestion, more correctly termed assimilation, be allied to fermentation, which some believe to be the case, the extrication of carbonic acid and other gases is an accompaniment of that process, which would then seem to be absorbed by the walls of that viscus. Carbon is necessary, but in different quantities, for the elaboration of the tissues of both plants and animals.” P. 22.

The “ viscus" here alluded to, we suppose to be the stomach.

With such specimens of our author's anatomical and physiological knowledge, no one can be surprised at the stupid blunders which he perpetrates, when he proceeds to treat of matters more immediately appertaining to practice. "When describing the signs afforded by auscultation, we are told that Avenbrugger pointed out the applicability of percussion to the elucidation of chest diseases, towards the latter part of the seventeenth century ! But this is a very minor blemish. In the very next page, we learn from the author himself the true why and wherefore of his appearing in print:

“ It is not the object of this brief treatise to enter at any length into an exposition of the signs afforded by percussion and auscultation, because such details are only befitting a work intended solely for the professional eye, and also because the self-application to the detection of disease is impossible; and even were it possible, would be absurd and dangerous. Be it my endeavour to attempt a reasonable explanation of their phenomena, and so to recommend their general adoption, as a great step towards improvement in the treatment of this disease.” P. 49.

Yet this is a work dedicated by permission to George J. Guthrie, Esq. F.R.S., F.L.S., late President of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, &c. &c. Doubtless Mr. Guthrie was utterly unaware of the character of the publication to which he has lent the sanction of his respectable name; and our only reason for alluding to this subject is to shew the necessity of men of repute in our profession not accepting every trumpery dedication that is offered to, or thrust upon, them. If sufficient evidence has not already been adduced to shew the nature of Dr. Deshon's production, what thinks the reader of the following ?

“ Need I tell you what happens every day? Hundreds of young females evidencing all the several symptoms of incipient phthisis, but which may merely denote mal-nutrition, and a proclivity to it, (for I defy any man to decide between them without the assistance of auscultation and percussion) are actually hurried into its confirmed phases by injudicious treatment—by purging, sweating, and cooling medicines; with cupping, leeches, and blistering ; 'for look !' says the symptomatic physician, 'there is cough, difficult breathing, local pain, and bloody

« ΠροηγούμενηΣυνέχεια »