S. 97, the Children's Internet Protection Act: Hearing Before the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, United States Senate, One Hundred Sixth Congress, First Session, March 4, 1999U.S. Government Printing Office, 2000 - 99 σελίδες |
Άλλες εκδόσεις - Προβολή όλων
Συχνά εμφανιζόμενοι όροι και φράσεις
acceptable use policies ACLU adults Amendment American American Library Association bill brary Center CHAIRMAN chil child pornography children's Internet choice choose committee Communications Decency Act computers concerns Congress constitutional County Library criteria decision developed dren E-rate educational filtering technology Fort Vancouver funding Ginsberg going harmful to minors important inappropriate Internet access Internet filtering software issue JOHN MCCAIN kids law enforcement LAYDEN legislation librarians libraries and schools library board library computers library's Loudoun County Markkula ment MINCBERG Morgan National Net Nanny obscene parents patrons Pico porn PREPARED STATEMENT problem protect children online public forum public library recognized restrictions RuleSpace Russell-Falla Santa Clara County school board school libraries school or library schools and libraries Sekulow Senator SNOWE Solace House solace.com solution speech Supreme Court talk teachers Thank thing tion users Vancouver Regional Library viewpoint
Δημοφιλή αποσπάσματα
Σελίδα 70 - The State, no less than a private owner of property, has power to preserve the property under its control for the use to which it is lawfully dedicated.
Σελίδα 52 - ... the power of the state to control the conduct of children reaches beyond the scope of its authority over adults...
Σελίδα 74 - ... interactive computer service to display in a manner available to a person under 18 years of age, any comment, request, suggestion, proposal, image, or other communication that, in context, depicts or describes, in terms patently offensive as measured by contemporary community standards, sexual or excretory activities or organs...
Σελίδα 51 - Psychiatrists . . . made a distinction between the reading of pornography, as unlikely to be per se harmful, and the permitting of the reading of pornography, which was conceived as potentially destructive. The child is protected in the reading of pornography by the knowledge that it is pornographic, ie, disapproved.
Σελίδα 76 - The Government can, without violating the Constitution, selectively fund a program to encourage certain activities it believes to be in the public interest, without at the same time funding an alternate program which seeks to deal with the problem in another way.
Σελίδα 51 - It is in the period of growth [of youth] when these patterns of behavior are laid down, when environmental stimuli of all sorts must be integrated into a workable sense of self, when sensuality is being defined and fears elaborated, when pleasure confronts security and impulse encounters control — it is in this period, undramatically and with time, that legalized pornography may conceivably be damaging.
Σελίδα 68 - Other forms of offensive expression may be withheld from the young without restricting the expression at its source.
Σελίδα 70 - Wherever the title of streets and parks may rest they have immemorially been held in trust for the use of the public and time out of mind, have been used for the purposes of assembly, communicating thoughts between citizens, and discussing public questions.
Σελίδα 67 - The legislative judgment, as well as the judgment found in the relevant literature, is that the use of children as subjects of pornographic materials is harmful to the physiological, emotional, and mental health of the child.
Σελίδα 76 - For better or worse, editing is what editors are for ; and editing is selection and choice of material. That editors — newspaper or broadcast — can and do abuse this power is beyond doubt, but that is no reason to deny the discretion Congress provided. Calculated risks of abuse are taken in order to preserve higher values.