Εικόνες σελίδας
PDF
Ηλεκτρ. έκδοση

sily find as many logarithms as we please, or may speedily examine any logarithm in the table.*

DESCRIPTION AND USE OF THE TABLE of LOGARITHMS.

Integral numbers are supposed to form a geometrical series, increasing from unity toward the left; but decimals are supposed to form a like series, decreasing from unity toward the right, and the indices of their logarithms are negative. Thus, +1 is the logarithm of 10, but I is the logarithm of, or 1; and 2 is the logarithm of 100, but 2 is the logarithm of, or or; and so on.

Hence it appears in general, that all numbers, which consist of the same figures, whether they be integral, or fractional, or mixed, will have the decimal parts of their logarithms the same, differing only in the index, which will be more or less, and positive or negative, according to the place of the first figure of the number. Thus, the logarithm of 2651 being 3*4234097, the logarithm of for to, or too, &c. part of it, will be as follows:

100

[blocks in formation]

10

[blocks in formation]

* Many other ingenious methods of finding the logarithms of numbers, and peculiar artifices for constructing an entire table of them, may be seen in Dr. HUTTON's Introduction to his Tables, and Baron MASERES' Scriptores Logarithmici.

Hence it appears, that the index, or characteristic, of any logarithm is always less by 1 than the number of integer figures, which the natural number consists of; or it is equal to the distance of the first or left hand figure from the place of units, or first place of integers, whether on the left, or on the right of it: and this index is constantly to be placed on the left of the decimal part of the logarithm.

When there are integers in the given number, the index is always affirmative; but when there are no integers, the index is negative, and is to be marked by a short line drawn before, or above, it. Thus, a number having 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, &c. integer places, the index of its logarithm is O, 1, 2, 3, 4, &c. or less than the number of those places.

[ocr errors]

-

And a decimal fraction, having its first figure in the 1st, 2d, 3d, 4th, &c. place of decimals, has always I, -2, -3,-4, &c. for the index of its logarithm.

It may also be observed, that though the indices of fractional quantities be negative, yet the decimal parts of their logarithms are always affirmative.

I,

To FIND, IN THE TABLE, THE LOGARITHM TO ANY
NUMBER.*

1. If the number do not exceed 100000, the decimal part of the logarithm is found, by inspection in the table, standing against the given number, in this manner, viz. in most tables, the first four figures of the given number

are

* The Tables, considered as the best, are those of GARDINER in 4to. first published in the year 1742; of Dr. HUTTON, in 8vo. first printed in 1785; of TAYLOR, in large 4to. published in 1792; and in France, those of CALLET, the second edition published in 1795.

are in the first column of the page, and the fifth figure in the uppermost line of it; then in the angle of meeting are the last four figures of the logarithm, and the first three figures of the same at the beginning of the same line; to which is to be prefixed the proper index.、

So the logarithm of 34'092 is 1°5326525, that is, the decimal 5326525, found in `the table, with the index 1 prefixed, because the given number contains two integers.

2. But if the given number contain more than five figures, take out the logarithm of the first five figures by inspec tion in the table as before, as also the next greater logarithm, subtracting one logarithm from the other, and also one of their corresponding numbers from the other, Then say,

As the difference between the two numbers
Is to the difference of their logarithms,

So is the remaining part of the given number
To the proportional part of the logarithm.

Which part being added to the less logarithm, before taken out, the whole logarithm sought is obtained very nearly.

EXAMPLE.

To find the logarithm of the number 34:09264.
The log. of 3409200, as before, is

[blocks in formation]

5326525,

5326652,

127

Then, as 100: 127:: 64: 81, the proportional part, 5326525, the first logarithm,

This added to

gives, with the index, 15326606 for the logarithm of 34'09264.

Or, in the best tables, the proportional part may often be taken out by inspection, by means of the small tables of proportional parts, placed in the margin.

If

If the number consist both of integers and fractions, or be entirely fractional, find the decimal part of the logarithm, as if all its figures were integral; then this, the proper characteristic being prefixed, will give the logarithm required. ...

And if the given number be a proper fraction, subtract the logarithm of the denominator from the logarithm of the numerator, and the remainder will be the logarithm sought; which, being that of a decimal fraction, must always have a negative index.

But if it be a mixed number, reduce it to an improper fraction, and find the difference of the logarithms of the numerator and denominator, in the same manner as before.

[blocks in formation]

II. TO FIND, IN THE TABLE, THE NATURAL NUMBER TO ANY LOGARITHM.

This is to be found by the reverse method to the former, namely, by searching for the proposed logarithm among those in the table, and taking out the corresponding num

ber

ber by inspection, in which the proper number of integers is to be pointed off, viz. 1 more than the units of the affirmative index. For, in finding the number answering to any given logarithm, the index always shews how far the first figure must be removed from the place of units, to the left or in integers, when the index is affirmative; but to the right or in decimals, when it is negative.

EXAMPLES.

So, the number to the logarithm 1'5326525 is 34°092. And the number of the logarithm 15326525 is 34092.

But if the logarithm cannot be exactly found in the table, take out the next greater and the next less, subtracting one of these logarithms from the other, and also one of their natural numbers from the other, and the less logarithm from the logarithm proposed. Then say,

As the first difference, or that of the tabular logarithms, Is to the difference of their natural numbers,

So is the difference of the given logarithm and the last tabular logarithm

To their corresponding numeral difference.

Which being annexed to the least natural number above taken, the natural number corresponding to the proposed logarithm is obtained.

EXAMPLE.

Find the natural number answering to the given logarithm 1.5326606.

Here the next greater and next less tabular logarithms, with their corresponding numbers, &c. are as below:

Next greater 5326652 its num. 3409300; giv. log. 5326606 Next less 5326525 its num. 3409200; next less 5326525

Differences

127

100

81

Then,

« ΠροηγούμενηΣυνέχεια »